select * from apigoogleposts where googleid = '114605547533973731226' order by toprating desc limit 0,100
Zephyr López Cervilla2013-04-04 07:18:41
-flickr.com - Minor Protest Title: 267_6766 "Non-therapeutic Circumcision"
By DB King. October 11, 2005 (Washington D.C.)
Source: flickr.com/photos/bootbearwdc/51682205 (license terms below)
Minor protest in front of Washington Convention Center in connection with the American Association of Pediatricians annual meeting

Edit:  I've expanded the post with further quotes.

Excerpts from Wikipedia:
<<Circumcision is probably the world's most widely performed procedure. Approximately one-third of males worldwide are circumcised, most often for reasons other than medical indication. The WHO estimated in 2007 that 664,500,000 males aged 15 and over are circumcised (30% global prevalence), almost 70% of whom are Muslim. Circumcision is most prevalent in the Muslim world, Israel, South Korea, the United States and parts of Southeast Asia and Africa. It is relatively rare in Europe, Latin America, parts of Southern Africa and Oceania and most of Asia. Prevalence is near-universal in the Middle East and Central Asia. Non-religious circumcision in Asia, outside of the Republic of Korea and the Philippines, is rare, and prevalence is generally low across Europe. Estimates for individual countries include Spain and Colombia less than 2%; Brazil 7%; Taiwan 9%; Thailand 13%; and Australia 58.7%. Prevalence in the United States and Canada is estimated at 75% and 30% respectively. Prevalence in Africa varies from less than 20% in some southern African countries to near universal in North and West Africa.>>
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision#Prevalence 
See also: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prevalence_of_circumcision 

<<Circumcision is the world's oldest planned surgical procedure, suggested by anatomist and hyperdiffusionist historian Grafton Elliot Smith to be over 15,000 years old, pre-dating recorded history. There is no firm consensus as to how it came to be practiced worldwide. One theory is that it began in one geographic area and spread from there; another is that several different cultural groups began its practice independently. In his 1891 work History of Circumcision, physician Peter Charles Remondino suggested that it began as a less severe form of emasculating a captured enemy: penectomy or castration would likely have been fatal, while some form of circumcision would permanently mark the defeated yet leave him alive to serve as a slave.>>
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision#History 

<<Alexander the Great conquered the Middle East in the 4th century BCE, and in the following centuries ancient Greek cultures and values came to the Middle East. The Greeks abhorred circumcision, making life for circumcised Jews living among the Greeks (and later the Romans) very difficult. Antiochus Epiphanes outlawed circumcision, as did Hadrian, which helped cause the Bar Kokhba revolt. During this period in history, Jewish circumcision called for the removal of only a part of the prepuce, and some Hellenized Jews attempted to look uncircumcised by stretching the extant parts of their foreskins. This was considered by the Jewish leaders to be a serious problem, and during the 2nd century CE they changed the requirements of Jewish circumcision to call for the complete removal of the foreskin, emphasizing the Jewish view of circumcision as intended to be not just the fulfillment of a Biblical commandment but also an essential and permanent mark of membership in a people.>>
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision#Middle_East.2C_Africa_and_Europe 

<<Circumcision has only been thought of as a common medical procedure since late Victorian times. In 1870, the influential orthopedic surgeon Lewis Sayre, a founder of the American Medical Association, began using circumcision as a purported cure for several cases of young boys presenting with paralysis or significant gross motor problems. He thought the procedure ameliorated such problems based on a "reflex neurosis" theory of disease, with the understanding that a tight foreskin inflamed the nerves and caused systemic problems. The use of circumcision to promote good health also fit in with the germ theory of disease, which saw validation during the same time period: the foreskin was seen as harboring infection-causing smegma (a mixture of shed skin cells and oils). Sayre published works on the subject and promoted it energetically in speeches. Contemporary physicians picked up on Sayre's new treatment, which they believed could prevent or cure a wide-ranging array of medical problems and social ills, including masturbation (considered by the Victorians to be a serious problem), syphilis, epilepsy, hernia, headache, clubfoot, alcoholism and gout. Its popularity spread with publications such as Peter Charles Remondino's History of Circumcision. By the turn of the century, in both America and Great Britain, infant circumcision was nearly universally recommended.

After the end of World War II, Britain moved to a nationalized health care system, and so looked to ensure that each medical procedure covered by the new system was cost-effective. Douglas Gairdner's 1949 article "The Fate of the Foreskin" argued persuasively that the evidence available at that time showed that the risks outweighed the known benefits. The procedure was not covered by the national health care system, and circumcision rates dropped in Britain and in the rest of Europe. In the 1970s, national medical associations in Australia and Canada issued recommendations against routine infant circumcision, leading to drops in the rates of both of those countries. In the United States, the American Academy of Pediatrics has, over the decades, issued a series of policy statements regarding circumcision, sometimes positive and sometimes negative.

An association between circumcision and reduced heterosexual HIV infection rates was suggested in 1986. Experimental evidence was needed to establish a causal relationship, so three randomized controlled trials were commissioned as a means to reduce the effect of any confounding factors. Trials took place in South Africa, Kenya and Uganda.[10] All three trials were stopped early by their monitoring boards on ethical grounds, because those in the circumcised group had a lower rate of HIV contraction than the control group. Subsequently, the World Health Organization promoted circumcision in high-risk populations as part of an overall program to reduce the spread of HIV, although some have challenged the validity of the African randomized controlled trials, prompting a number of researchers to question the effectiveness of circumcision as an HIV prevention strategy.[68][69][70][71]>>
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision#Modern_times 

<<In some cultures, males must be circumcised shortly after birth, during childhood or around puberty as part of a rite of passage. Circumcision is commonly practiced in the Jewish and Islamic faiths.

Judaism
Circumcision is very important to Judaism, with over 90% of adherents having the procedure performed as a religious obligation. The basis for its observance is found in the Torah of the Hebrew Bible, in Genesis chapter 17, in which a covenant of circumcision is made with Abraham and his descendants. Jewish circumcision is part of the brit milah ritual, to be performed by a specialist ritual circumciser (a mohel) on the eighth day of a newborn son's life (with certain exceptions for poor health). Jewish law requires that the circumcision leave the glans bare when the penis is flaccid. Converts to Judaism must also be circumcised; those who are already circumcised undergo a symbolic circumcision ritual. Circumcision is not required by Judaism for one to be considered Jewish, but adherents foresee serious negative spiritual consequences if it is neglected.

Islam
Although there is debate within Islam over whether it is a religious requirement, circumcision (called khitan) is practiced nearly universally by Muslim males. Islam bases its practice of circumcision on the Genesis 17 narrative, the same Biblical chapter referred to by Jews. The procedure is not mentioned in the Quran, but rather adherents believe it is a tradition established by Islam's prophet Muhammad directly (following Abraham), and so its practice is considered a sunnah (prophet's tradition). For Muslims, circumcision is a matter of cleanliness, purification and control over one's baser self (nafs). There is no agreement across the many Islamic communities about the age at which circumcision should be performed. It may be done from soon after birth up to about age 15, with it most often performed at around six to seven years of age. The timing can correspond with the boy's completion of his recitation of the whole Quran, with a coming-of-age event such as taking on the responsibility of daily prayer or betrothal. Circumcision may be celebrated with an associated family or community event. Circumcision is recommended for, but is not required of, converts to Islam.>>
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision#Cultures_and_religions 

<<The origination of male circumcision is not known with certainty. It has been variously proposed that it began as a religious sacrifice, as a rite of passage marking a boy's entrance into adulthood, as a form of sympathetic magic to ensure virility or fertility>>
<<as a means of humiliating enemies and slaves by symbolic castration, as a means of differentiating a circumcising group from their non-circumcising neighbors, as a means of discouraging masturbation or other socially proscribed sexual behaviors, as a means of removing "excess" pleasure, as a means of increasing a man's attractiveness to women, as a demonstration of one's ability to endure pain, or as a male counterpart to menstruation or the breaking of the hymen, or to copy the rare natural occurrence of a missing foreskin of an important leader, and as a display of disgust of the smegma produced by the foreskin. It has been suggested that the custom of circumcision gave advantages to tribes that practiced it and thus led to its spread. Darby describes these theories as "conflicting", and states that "the only point of agreement among proponents of the various theories is that promoting good health had nothing to do with it." Immerman et al. suggest that circumcision causes lowered sexual arousal of pubescent males, and hypothesize that this was a competitive advantage to tribes practising circumcision, leading to its spread. Wilson suggests that circumcision reduces insemination efficiency, reducing a man's capacity for extra-pair fertilizations by impairing sperm competition. Thus, men who display this signal of sexual obedience, may gain social benefits, if married men are selected to offer social trust and investment preferentially to peers who are less threatening to their paternity. It is possible that circumcision arose independently in different cultures for different reasons.>>
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_male_circumcision 

<<According to Hodges, ancient Greek aesthetics of the human form considered circumcision a mutilation of a previously perfectly shaped organ. Greek artwork of the period portrayed penises as covered by the foreskin (sometimes in exquisite detail), except in the portrayal of satyrs, lechers, and barbarians. This dislike of the appearance of the circumcised penis led to a decline in the incidence of circumcision among many peoples that had previously practiced it throughout Hellenistic times. In Egypt, only the priestly caste retained circumcision, and by the 2nd century, the only circumcising groups in the Roman Empire were Jews, Jewish Christians, Egyptian priests, and the Nabatean Arabs. Circumcision was sufficiently rare among non-Jews that being circumcised was considered conclusive evidence of Judaism (or Early Christianity and others derogatorily called Judaizers) in Roman courts—Suetonius in Domitian 12.2 described a court proceeding in which a ninety-year-old man was stripped naked before the court to determine whether he was evading the head tax placed on Jews and Judaizers.>>
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_male_circumcision#Male_circumcision_in_the_Greco-Roman_world 

<<Europeans, with the exception of the Jews, did not practice male circumcision. A rare exception occurred in Visigothic Spain, where during the armed campaign king Wamba ordered to circumcise everyone who committed atrocities against civilian population.>>
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_male_circumcision#Male_circumcision_in_the_Middle_Ages 

<<Historically, neonatal circumcision was promoted during late Victorian times in the English-speaking parts of Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the United States and the United Kingdom and was widely practiced during the first part of the 20th century in these countries. However, the practice declined sharply in the United Kingdom after the Second World War, and somewhat later in Canada, Australia and New Zealand. It has been argued (e.g., Goldman 1997) that the practice did not spread to other European countries because others considered the arguments for it fallacious. In South Korea, circumcision was largely unknown before the establishment of the United States trusteeship in 1945. More than 90% of South Korean high school boys are now circumcised, but the average age of circumcision is 12 years, which makes South Korea a unique case.

Infant circumcision has been abandoned in New Zealand and Britain, and is now much less common in Australia and in Canada (see table 1). The decline in circumcision in the United Kingdom followed the decision by the National Health Service (NHS) in 1948 not to cover the procedure following an influential article by Douglas Gairdner which claimed that circumcision resulted in the deaths of about 16 children under 5 each year in the United Kingdom.>>
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_male_circumcision#Male_circumcision_in_the_19th_century_and_beyond 

<<
Male circumcision to prevent masturbation
Non-religious circumcision in English-speaking countries arose in a climate of negative attitudes towards sex, especially concerning masturbation. In her 1978 article The Ritual of Circumcision, Karen Erickson Paige writes: "In the United States, the current medical rationale for circumcision developed after the operation was in wide practice. The original reason for the surgical removal of the foreskin, or prepuce, was to control 'masturbatory insanity' – the range of mental disorders that people believed were caused by the 'polluting' practice of 'self-abuse.'"

"Self-abuse" was a term commonly used to describe masturbation in the 19th century. According to Paige, "treatments ranged from diet, moral exhortations, hydrotherapy, and marriage, to such drastic measures as surgery, physical restraints, frights, and punishment. Some doctors recommended covering the penis with plaster of Paris, leather, or rubber; cauterization; making boys wear chastity belts or spiked rings; and in extreme cases, castration." Paige details how circumcision became popular as a masturbation remedy:

"In the 1890s, it became a popular technique to prevent, or cure, masturbatory insanity. In 1891 the president of the Royal College of Surgeons of England published On Circumcision as Preventive of Masturbation, and two years later another British doctor wrote Circumcision: Its Advantages and How to Perform It, which listed the reasons for removing the 'vestigial' prepuce. Evidently the foreskin could cause 'nocturnal incontinence,' hysteria, epilepsy, and irritation that might 'give rise to erotic stimulation and, consequently, masturbation.' Another physician, P.C. Remondino, added that 'circumcision is like a substantial and well-secured life annuity...it insures better health, greater capacity for labor, longer life, less nervousness, sickness, loss of time, and less doctor bills.' No wonder it became a popular remedy."

At the same time circumcisions were advocated on men, clitoridectomies (removal of the clitoris) were also performed for the same reason (to treat female masturbators). The US "Orificial Surgery Society" for female "circumcision" operated until 1925, and clitoridectomies and infibulations would continue to be advocated by some through the 1930s. As late as 1936, L. E. Holt, an author of pediatric textbooks, advocated male and female circumcision as a treatment for masturbation.

One of the leading advocates of circumcision was John Harvey Kellogg. He advocated the consumption of Kellogg's corn flakes to prevent masturbation, and he believed that circumcision would be an effective way to eliminate masturbation in males.

"Covering the organs with a cage has been practiced with entire success. A remedy which is almost always successful in small boys is circumcision, especially when there is any degree of phimosis. The operation should be performed by a surgeon without administering an anesthetic, as the brief pain attending the operation will have a salutary effect upon the mind, especially if it be connected with the idea of punishment, as it may well be in some cases. The soreness which continues for several weeks interrupts the practice, and if it had not previously become too firmly fixed, it may be forgotten and not resumed. If any attempt is made to watch the child, he should be so carefully surrounded by vigilance that he cannot possibly transgress without detection. If he is only partially watched, he soon learns to elude observation, and thus the effect is only to make him cunning in his vice."

Robert Darby, writing in the Australian Medical Journal, noted that some 19th-century circumcision advocates—and their opponents—believed that the foreskin was sexually sensitive:

In the 19th century the role of the foreskin in erotic sensation was well understood by physicians who wanted to cut it off precisely because they considered it the major factor leading boys to masturbation. The Victorian physician and venereologist William Acton (1814–1875) damned it as "a source of serious mischief", and most of his contemporaries concurred.

Both opponents and supporters of circumcision agreed that the significant role the foreskin played in sexual response was the main reason why it should be either left in place or removed. William Hammond, a Professor of Mind in New York in the late 19th century, commented that "circumcision, when performed in early life, generally lessens the voluptuous sensations of sexual intercourse", and both he and Acton considered the foreskin necessary for optimal sexual function, especially in old age. Jonathan Hutchinson, English surgeon and pathologist (1828–1913), and many others, thought this was the main reason why it should be excised.>>
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_male_circumcision#Male_circumcision_to_prevent_masturbation 

In United States
<<A study in 1987 found that the prominent reasons for parents choosing circumcision were "concerns about the attitudes of peers and their sons' self concept in the future," rather than medical concerns.[51] A 1999 study reported that reasons for circumcision included "ease of hygiene (67 percent), ease of infant circumcision compared with adult circumcision (63 percent), medical benefit (41 percent), and father circumcised (37 percent)." The authors commented that "Medical benefits were cited more frequently in this study than in past studies, although medical issues remain secondary to hygiene and convenience."[52] A 2001 study reported that "The most important reason to circumcise or not circumcise the child was health reasons."[53] A 2005 study speculated that increased recognition of the potential benefits may be responsible for an observed increase in the rate of neonatal circumcision in the USA between 1988 and 2000.[54] In a 2001 survey, 86.6% of parents felt respected by their medical provider, and parents who did not circumcise "felt less respected by their medical provider".[53]>>
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_male_circumcision#Circumcision_since_1950 
_________________ 


Excerpt from
The non-therapeutic circumcision of male minors. KNMG (May 2010)

ABSTRACT

"The official viewpoint or KNMG and other related medical / scientific organisaties Is that non-therapeutic circumcision of male minors is a violation of children's rights to autonomy and physical integrity. Contrary to popular belief, circumcision can cause complications - bleeding, infection, urethral stricture and panic attacks are particularly common. KNMG is powerful Therefore urging a strong policy of deterrence. KNMG is calling upon doctors to Actively and insistently inform parents who are considering the procedure of the absence of medical benefits and the danger of complications."

PREAMBULE

POSITION OF THE KNMG WITH REGARD TO NON-THERAPEUTIC CIRCUMCISION OF MALE MINORS
 . . . 
<<The reason for our adoption of an official viewpoint regarding this matter is the increasing emphasis on children’s rights. It is particularly relevant for doctors that children must not be subjected to medical proceedings that have no therapeutic or preventative value. In addition to this, there is growing concern regarding complications, both minor and serious, which can occur as a result of circumcising a child. A third reason for this viewpoint is the growing sentiment that there is a discrepancy between the KNMG’s firm stance with regard to female genital mutilation and the lack of a stance with regard to the non-therapeutic circumcision of male minors, as the two have a number of similarities.

The initial objective of this viewpoint is to initiate public discussion of this issue. The ultimate aim is to minimise non-therapeutic circumcision of male minors.>>
 . . . 
— Prof. Dr. Arie Nieuwenhuijzen Kruseman (Chairman of KNMG)
 . . . 

BACKGROUND STUDY FOR KNMG VIEWPOINT

NON-THERAPEUTIC CIRCUMCISION OF MALE MINORS

INTRODUCTION
 . . . 
<<Until a few years ago, the attitude towards circumcision was fairly permissive, and circumcision was legitimised by appealing to freedom of religion and supposed medical benefits. In recent years, the attitude towards circumcision appears to have been changing. This is probably partly the result of the debate about female genital mutilation (FGM). With the global condemnation of this practice, including in its non-mutilating, symbolic form, the question regularly arises why circumcision should be judged differently than FGM. These days, more critical articles are being published about circumcision.[1] These articles point to the rights of children, the absence of medical benefits and the fact that this is a mutilating intervention that regularly leads to complications and can cause medical and psychological problems, both at a young and a later age.>>
 . . . 
<<
MEDICAL/PREVENTATIVE
In the past, circumcision was performed as a preventative and treatment for a large number of complaints, such as gout, syphilis, epilepsy, headaches, arthrosis, alcoholism, groin hernias, asthma, poor digestion, eczema and excessive masturbation.[10] Due to the large number of medical benefits which were wrongly ascribed to circumcision, it is frequently asserted that circumcision is ‘a procedure in need of a justification’.[11] In recent decades, evidence has been published which apparently shows that circumcision reduces the risk of HIV/AIDS[12], but this evidence is contradicted by other studies.[13]>>

<<Further, there is apparent evidence that circumcision offers protection against complaints such as HPV infection, urinary tract infections and penis cancer. However, these studies, too, are controversial.[16] Moreover, urinary tract infections can be successfully treated with modern healthcare. Children with inborn abnormalities to the urinary tract can generally be successfully helped by a foreskin-widening operation, which makes the foreskin easier to clean.

In response to the possible medical benefits, a large number of complications resulting from circumcision are described: infections, bleeding, sepsis, necrosis, fibrosis of the skin, urinary tract infections, meningitis, herpes infections, meatisis, meatal stenosis, necrosis and necrotising complications, all of which have led to the complete amputation of the penis.[17] Deaths have also been reported.[18] The AAFP estimates the number of deaths as 1 in 500,000.[19] That would mean that in the United States, two children die each year as a result of the intervention.

Alongside these direct medical complications, psychological problems[20] and complications in the area of sexuality have also been reported,[21] as have extreme pain experiences in newborns causing behavioural changes which are still apparent years later.[22] [23] Similarly, the high social costs of circumcision as a result of complications have been cited.[24]

Even if there were slight medical benefits connected with circumcision for medical-preventative reasons, it is questionable whether these possible medical benefits would compensate for the risk of complications. Certainly when it comes to children, who cannot make this assessment themselves, the possible medical benefits should be significant and the risk of complications small for the intervention to be justifiable.

It is a generally accepted moral principle that children may only be exposed to medical treatments if illness or abnormalities are present, or if it can be demonstrated that the medical intervention is in the interest of the child, as is the case for vaccinations, for example. In the case of preventative medical interventions, there needs to be a clear individual or public health benefit which cannot be achieved in another, less intrusive way.

Thus circumcision as a preventative against urinary tract infections or HIV/AIDS would need to be weighed against other, less intrusive forms of prevention (such as antibiotics, condom use, sex education or behavioural changes) and a scientific cost/benefit analysis made. Only if the results of this cost/benefit analysis were positive should the intervention be offered to all parents of small boys on public health grounds.

In addition, it would need to be demonstrated that it was essential that the circumcision be performed during childhood or infancy, rather than waiting until the boy had reached an age at which the risk was relevant (such as in HIV infection) and he could make a decision about the intervention for himself. After all, in many cases, such as in HPV or HIV prevention, it will be possible to put off circumcision until the boy reaches an age at which he can elect to have the intervention himself or instead choose alternatives such as using condoms, HPV vaccination or abstinence.


DOCTORS' ORGANISATIONS ABROAD

A large number of doctors’ organisations have pronounced on the supposed medical benefits of circumcision for medical/preventative reasons, set against the risk of complications.

In 2003, the British Medical Association stated: ‘The medical benefits previously claimed have not been convincingly proven. (...) The British Medical Association considers that the evidence concerning health benefits from non-therapeutic circumcision is insufficient for this alone to be a justification for doing it.’[25]

The American Academy of Pediatrics stated in 1999: ‘Existing scientific evidence ... [is] not sufficient to recommend routine neonatal circumcision.’[26] The American Medical Association endorsed this position in December 1999 and now rejects circumcision for medical/preventative reasons. The AMA further states: ‘parental preference alone is not sufficient justification for performing a surgical procedure on a child’.[27]

Other doctors’ organisations in Australia and Canada have taken similar positions.[28] For example, the Royal Australasian College of Physicians asserts: ‘Review of the literature in relation to risks and benefits shows there is no evidence of benefit outweighing harm for circumcision as a routine procedure in the neonate.’[29]

In its viewpoint, the Australasian Association of Paediatric Surgeons states: ‘the AAPS does not support the routine circumcision of male neonates, infants or children in Australia. It is considered to be inappropriate and unnecessary as a routine to remove the prepuce, based on the current evidence available’.

The Canadian Paediatric Society states: ‘The overall evidence of the benefits and dangers of circumcision is so evenly balanced that it does not support recommending circumcision as a routine procedure for newborns’.[30]

The American Academy of Family Physicians believes that the medical benefits of circumcision are ‘conflicting or inconclusive’. The decision should therefore be left to parents: ‘The American Academy of Family Physicians recommends physicians discuss the potential harms and benefits of circumcision with all parents or legal guardians considering this procedure for their newborn son’.[31]

In Sweden, a law was introduced in 2001 after a child died after NTC as a result of an incorrect dose of the painkiller Ketogan. A first version of the law implied a total prohibition of circumcision for non-therapeutic reasons up to the age of 18. Under pressure from Jewish organisations, and out of fear that the practice would be driven underground, the law was later watered down. The law now states that non-therapeutic circumcision may only be performed in the first two months after birth and only under local or general anaesthetic. This anaesthetic may only be administered by a doctor or a qualified nurse. The circumcision itself may only be performed by a doctor or a mohel specially trained for the procedure, who has followed a course and has a licence from the Ministry of Health.

The prevailing consensus in the medical world is that there may be some medical benefits associated with circumcision but that these benefits, weighed against alternatives and the risk of complications from circumcision, are insufficiently great to be able to recommend routine circumcision for medical/preventative reasons. There is currently not a single medical association that recommends routine circumcision for medical/preventative reasons.

Given the above, the rest of this memo uses the term non-therapeutic circumcision (NTC). This refers to circumcision in boys and men for reasons other than medical/ therapeutic reasons.>>
 . . . 

<<
FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION VS. NTC

[NTC: Non-therapeutic Circumcision]

The practice of FGM has been prohibited by law in the Netherlands since 1993 in both adult and minor women and girls. In various viewpoints, the KNMG and NVOG have rejected all forms of FGM, including the most mild form, in adult women, as well as reinfibulation[38] following childbirth. The form which most closely resembles NTC, circumcision, is also unanimously rejected in virtually all the literature.[39] [40] In spite of this, the practice of FGM still occurs regularly, particularly among girls from North Africa. This led the internist Jannes Mulder to call in Medisch Contact for the mildest form of FGM, ‘sunna light’, to be tolerated.[41] This intervention proposed by Mulder consists of a small prick in the foreskin of the clitoris, causing a drop of blood to be released.

No tissue is removed, and the girl suffers no damage to her body, and there is no effect on sexual function. According to Mulder, the practice of FGM could in this way eventually be redirected into innocent, symbolic forms.
His proposal attracted purely negative reactions, generally based on the principled position that any form of FGM, including a symbolic one, must be treated as child abuse. “When it comes to the integrity of the girl’s body, no single compromise must be made”, states Pharos, knowledge centre for the prevention and tackling of female circumcision. The Netherlands Municipal Health Services (GGD) stated: “A girl is fine as she is.” Even so, this ‘sunna light’ is far less intrusive than NTC, in which part of the erotogenic tissue of the penis is removed.

In a response to the criticism of his article, Jannes Mulder points to the difference in how NTC and FGM are judged: ‘No one says a word about the Jewish practice of circumcising boys. This traditional ‘abuse’ involves more than my single drop of blood. Some see the circumcision of Muslim boys as a hygienic intervention. That argument conceals a deeper motive. After all, there is no culture that preventatively deals with dirty ears by cutting them off.’[42]

In an article in Medisch Contact, Karim and Hage (former board members of the Netherlands Association for Plastic Surgery, NVPC) similarly point to what they see as the discriminating fact that circumcision in girls is categorically rejected (even in its non-mutilating form) but that it is permitted in boys.[43] However, in the authors’ view, there are no reasons why FGM and NTC should be judged differently in moral or legal terms.

The Partij voor de Vrijheid (Freedom Party) responded to the article by Karim and Hage through the person of Ms Agema with questions in the Dutch Lower House calling on the State Secretary not to prohibit the circumcision of boys. ‘Can we be assured that the Dutch government will not bow to this discrimination argument and that circumcision of boys will remain permitted?[44]

FGM and NTC are generally seen as two separate practices, which need to be evaluated differently. For example, doctors’ organisations often devote different statements to the two practices.

In the literature, little attention is given to legitimating the different treatment given to the two practices: apparently the difference is regarded as self-evident.[45] FGM is generally viewed as a serious violation of the rights of the child, while NTC is seen as something which parents may decide on for themselves. In the literature that exists, a number of arguments are made which are intended to justify a different evaluation of FGM and NTC.

SEXUAL FUNCTION
One of the most frequently used arguments for treating the two interventions differently is that FGM leads to the impairment of sexual function in the woman; supposedly, NTC has no such impact on the man.

However, FGM takes many forms. There is the most severe form, infibulation, in which the inner and outer labia are stitched together and the clitoris is removed. However, there are also much milder forms of FGM, in which only the foreskin of the clitoris is removed. However, sunna light, as proposed by Mulder and previously proposed by Bartels[46], in which no tissue is removed, is also universally rejected. The WHO also rejects all forms of FGM: ‘Female genital mutilation of any type has been recognized as a harmful practice and a violation of the human rights of girls and women’.[47] The WHO explicitly includes in this the mild forms of FGM, in which no tissue is removed. So the argument for rejecting FGM is not that FGM interferes with female sexuality, but that it is a violation of the rights of the woman.

‘The guiding principles for considering genital practices as female genital mutilation should be those of human rights, including the right to health, the rights of children and the right to non-discrimination on the basis of sex’.[48]
Another part of this argument says that NTC does not affect male sexuality. The foreskin is regarded as a part of the body that has no function at all in male sexuality. Many sexologists contradict this idea: in their view, the foreskin is a complex, erotogenic structure that plays an important role ‘in the mechanical function of the penis during sexual acts, such as penetrative intercourse and masturbation’.[49] The many attempts by men to restore their foreskins by mechanical or surgical means also contradict the idea that the foreskin is a useless part of the body.[50]

NTC is sometimes compared to interventions such as tattoos and piercings.[51] On this view, Jews and Muslims see NTC not as an infringement of physical integrity, but as an innocent perfectioning of the body, comparable to tattoos and piercings. However, an important legal distinction between NTC in children and piercings and tattoos is that it is prohibited to tattoo or pierce children under the age of 16.[52] In other words, tattoos and piercings can only be done if a child is old enough to ask for them itself.

NO THEORY OF OPPRESSION
A second much-used argument to separate FGM from NTC is that FGM comes from a theory of female oppression, of which FGM is an expression. Since there is no such theory of oppression at play in NTC, this would make FGM morally more reprehensible than NTC.

This argument can be refuted in two ways. Firstly, the historical background of NTC is extremely complex, and is in any case rooted in the desire to control male sexuality. Thus NTC was deployed in the past to combat excessive onanism, and it was also used to ‘brand’ slaves.[53] So the background to NTC is not as unambiguous as is often thought.

There is another reason why the argument does not hold. The reason why FGM is condemned is not because it comes forth from a theory of female oppression but because it is harmful to them and represents a violation of their physical integrity. FGM would also be condemned if it were done out of aesthetic considerations or as a way of ‘venerating’ women. Even if women were to want FGM themselves at a later age, doctors would probably not be permitted to meet their request.

The right to physical integrity is an inalienable human right, like the right to life and the right to personal freedom. These are inalienable rights, which is to say that the patient’s permission does not offer sufficient justification to be allowed to perform the intervention. Besides permission, there must also always be an additional reason, such as a medical interest. From this it follows that even if women did not regret the intervention, doctors would not be permitted to commit serious infringements of the integrity of the body, such as FGM.

EMBEDDED IN CULTURE
A third argument often made for drawing a distinction between FGM and NTC is that NTC is a much older practice than FGM, and that NTC is far more embedded in existing religious groups such as Islam and Judaism. However, this is open to question: both NTC and FGM have been practised for centuries by many different peoples and for many different reasons. And FGM also has an important ritual, religious and identifying significance for many peoples. So it cannot be said with certainty that NTC is older than FGM. Even if it were, it is still questionable whether this argument is morally relevant. It is not the history of a practice which is of decisive importance, but whether a particular practice is a violation of the rights of the child.

RELIGIOUS FREEDOM VS. PHYSICAL INTEGRITY

NTC in minors is regarded by many authors as a violation of physical integrity.[54] However, they subsequently often conclude that NTC falls under the right to religious freedom, and that parents may therefore decide for themselves whether they wish to have this intervention carried out.
The right to religious freedom means that parents are free to raise their children in a religion or philosophy of their own choosing. However, the right to religious freedom does not apply only to parents, but also to children. The right to religious freedom of the child implies that the child must at a later age have the right to choose a religion or philosophy of life for itself, or to reject the one in which it was raised.>>
 . . . 

<<
CONCLUSION

- There is no convincing evidence that circumcision is useful or necessary in terms of prevention or hygiene. Partly in the light of the complications which can arise during or after circumcision, circumcision is not justifiable except on medical/ therapeutic grounds. Insofar as there are medical benefits, such as a possibly reduced risk of HIV infection, it is reasonable to put off circumcision until the age at which such a risk is relevant and the boy himself can decide about the intervention, or can opt for any available alternatives.

- Contrary to what is often thought, circumcision entails the risk of medical and psychological complications. The most common complications are bleeding, infections, meatus stenosis (narrowing of the urethra) and panic attacks. Partial or complete penis amputations as a result of complications following circumcisions have also been reported, as have psychological problems as a result of the circumcision.

- Non-therapeutic circumcision of male minors is contrary to the rule that minors may only be exposed to medical treatments if illness or abnormalities are present, or if it can be convincingly demonstrated that the medical intervention is in the interest of the child, as in the case of vaccinations.

- Non-therapeutic circumcision of male minors conflicts with the child’s right to autonomy and physical integrity.

- The KNMG calls on (referring) doctors to explicitly inform parents/carers who are considering non-therapeutic circumcision for male minors of the risk of complications and the lack of convincing medical benefits. The fact that this is a medically non-essential intervention with a real risk of complications makes the quality of this advice particularly important. The doctor must then record the informed consent in the medical file.

- The KNMG respects the deep religious, symbolic and cultural feelings that surround the practice of non-therapeutic circumcision. The KNMG calls for a dialogue between doctors’ organisations, experts and the religious groups concerned in order to put the issue of non-therapeutic circumcision of male minors on the agenda and ultimately restrict it as much as possible.

- There are good reasons for a legal prohibition of non-therapeutic circumcision of male minors, as exists for female genital mutilation. However, the KNMG fears that a legal prohibition would result in the intervention being performed by non-medically qualified individuals in circumstances in which the quality of the intervention could not be sufficiently guaranteed. This could lead to more serious complications than is currently the case.>>


The non-therapeutic circumcision of male minors is a publication setting out the Position of the Koninklijke Nederlandsche Maatschappij tot bevordering der Geneeskunst (KNMG), adopted by the Board of the Federation and effective as from 27 May 2010.

The KNMG physicians’ federation represents over 53,000 physicians and medical students. KNMG member organisations include the Koepel Artsen Maatschappij en Gezondheid (Umbrella organisation for physicians and health – KAMG), the Landelijke vereniging van Artsen in Dienstverband (National society of employee physicians – LAD), the Landelijke Huisartsen Vereniging (National society of general practitioners – LHV), the Netherlands Society of Occupational Medicine (NVAB), the Nederlandse Vereniging voor Verzekeringsgeneeskunde (Netherlands society of insurance medicine – NVVG), the Orde van Medisch Specialisten (Order of medical specialists – OMS) and the Dutch Association of Elderly Care Physicians and Social Geriatricians (Verenso).


— KNMG. Non-therapeutic circumcision of male minors. KNMG Viewpoint (2010)
URL: http://knmg.artsennet.nl/Publicaties/KNMGpublicatie/Nontherapeutic-circumcision-of-male-minors-2010.htm 
PDF: http://knmg.artsennet.nl/web/file?uuid=579e836d-ea83-410f-9889-feb7eda87cd5&owner=a8a9ce0e-f42b-47a5-960e-be08025b7b04&contentid=77976 
_______________ 

URL related G+ posts:
plus.google.com/114605547533973731226/posts/hVYmaN4v38P 
plus.google.com/114605547533973731226/posts/RawvufH5Q86 
plus.google.com/118135535337532829792/posts/HhdEseNQrFn 
_______________ 

DB King (David): dbkingsdc.blogspot.com 
License terms: Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic (CC BY 2.0) 
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/deed.en 
_______________ 
  • 9 plusses - 40 comments - 0 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-12-20 04:25:09
    RESHARE:
    SOCIALISM
    ‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾ 
    Where you can purge fellow comrades,
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Purge 
     . . . 
    Deport political dissidents or send them to gulags,
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulag 
     . . . 
    Starve people to death,
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holodomor 
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_famine_of_1932–1933 
     . . . 
    Blow up nuclear plants and produce radioactive rain,
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chernobyl_disaster 
     . . . 
    And be praised for your heroic feats in service to the Soviet state and society,
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hero_of_the_Soviet_Union 
     . . . 
    For having 6, 7, 8, 9 or 10 children,
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Awards_and_decorations_of_the_Soviet_Union 

    Or for having reported your father to the political police (sentenced to 10 years in a labour camp for forging documents, and later executed.)
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pavlik_Morozov 
    __________ 

    URL via G+ post: 
    plus.google.com/114167164349903533897/posts/Vn51zrfbbNY 
    __________ 

    Reshared text:
  • 3 plusses - 35 comments - 0 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-11-12 05:58:58
    RESHARE:
    facebook.com/ILIWIWUITMABOIP - German Solar Power Plants Produced a World Record 22 GW of electricity
    By I love it when I wake up in the morning and Barack Obama is President. November 11, 2012
    facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=477159532318469 

    Quiz: Can you spot the basic MISTAKE in the text of this meme?

    <<German solar power plants produced a world record 22 gigawatts of electricity per hour, equal to 20 nuclear power stations at full capacity.
    Solar power in the United States has been demonized as a "Left Wing conspiracy".>> [ sic ]

    Shame on you, N. Allnoch, E. Kirschbaum and/or Reuters!

    uk.reuters.com - Germany sets new solar power record, institute says
    By Erik Kirschbaum BERLIN | Sat May 26, 2012
    uk.reuters.com/article/2012/05/26/us-climate-germany-solar-idUKBRE84P0FI20120526 

    (Reuters) - German solar power plants produced a world record 22 gigawatts of electricity per hour - equal to 20 nuclear power stations at full capacity - through the midday hours on Friday and Saturday, the head of a renewable energy think tank said.
    ________________________ 

    Excerpt from G+ post comments:

    Skane Canyon Nov 11, 2012 6:47 AM+5
    Germany is blowing everyone else away at solar power production. And they are even farther north than we are. We could be doing a lot better here in the U.S. if it weren't for all the years of suppression, but that said, we are not at the bottom of the list either. I feel as though we are reaching a turning point. I'm seeing more and more solar panels on houses where I live. Maybe a sort of grass roots movement is taking place that will tell politicians and big energy that we demand it.
    _________________ 

    Curtis Edenfield Nov 11, 2012 7:17 AM
    An yet three major solar companies were approved for loans by Obama. Two have gone out of business because of the bureaucracy from the loans. In other words they couldn't use the money loaned to them to build a panel better an cheaper than the Chinese.
    _________________ 

    Eric Muller Nov 11, 2012 7:22 AM +3
    I'm curious why the thermal concentration style isn't more common for large scale installation instead of PV. It's quite a bit more efficient, and if I remember right there was one in Spain that had enough stored energy to keep juice flowing in the event that the sun failed to rise for a week. 
    Since it shares a lot of components it could be backed up by a more conventional natural gas generator or something (in case it's night time for more than a week...) 
    _________________ 

    Curtis Edenfield Nov 11, 2012 7:30 AM +1
    Because they raise the overall temperature in the area. Change weather patterns a promote desertification! I believe there are only three in the US, two in California an one in the Mid West. None produce enough electricity to power much.
    _________________ 

    Duncan Margetts Nov 11, 2012 7:34 AM +3
    +Curtis Edenfield Cant work out if you're serious or being satirical? How can a solar thermal concentration plant raise temperatures in the area they are located in? That would require a net ingress of energy to the area.. in fact, its clear that energy is being taken OUT of the area in which its being generated... please elaborate.
    _________________ 

    Thoughts on Religion Nov 11, 2012 8:21 AM +1
    +Curtis Edenfield 
    Same thoughts as Duncan. I cannot figure out of your joking around or a total nut!
    _________________ 

    Eric Muller Nov 11, 2012 8:24 AM +2
    It could be due to storage of molten salt? 
    I'm curious about the desertification. In North America that might be due to covering entire industrial properties in a thick layer of gravel. 
    I'm baffled by the local zoning for a couple PV parks here. They took farm land, covered it in gravel and solar panels. Which isn't great, but there is hundreds of acres of abandoned industrial land here that hasn't been touched in 40 years. 
    _________________ 

    Timothy Chase Nov 11, 2012 8:43 AM +3
    +Curtis Edenfield wrote, "An yet three major solar companies were approved for loans by Obama. Two have gone out of business because of the bureaucracy from the loans."

    Do you have a source for that?

    I understand that the default rate is actually quite low:

    "The default rate on the U.S. clean- energy loan program that funded Solyndra LLC is a fraction of what the government budgeted for losses.

    "The BGOV Barometer shows the default rate on the $16.1 billion Energy Department loan portfolio is less than 3.6 percent. The White House planned for defaults of as much as 12.85 percent for loans to solar, wind and bio-energy projects, according to the Office of Management and Budget."

    Solyndra Losses a Fraction of Default Budget: BGOV Barometer
    By Jim Efstathiou Jr. - Nov 9, 2011 9:00 PM PT
    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-11-10/solyndra-losses-a-fraction-of-default-budget-bgov-barometer.html
    _________________ 

    Zephyr López Cervilla Nov 11, 2012 8:53 AM (edited)
    In my opinion it can only be due to one of the two following processes (or a combination of the two):
    1. they cause a reduction in annual or seasonal precipitation;
    2. they indirectly increase plant evapotranspiration by rising local temperatures during the central hours of the day (solar plants contribute to decrease the albedo by absorbing radiant energy or converting it into heat). Also, higher temperatures would increase the direct evaporation from the terrain before it's absorbed from the soil by the vegetation.
    _________________ 

    Curtis Edenfield Nov 11, 2012 8:48 AM
    The oldest site of concentration reactor is in the California desert. The area around the reactor has had a heat index rise of a half a degree. Plants as well as animals no longer habitat the area surrounding the site. This reactor was built in the 70's an has been in operation since. It has killed the living Sonoran desert around it.

    About four years ago, several engineers got together to speculate on how to use solar energy to supply the entire planet. They designed a solar collection array over a 100 miles square in the Sahara. In fifty years time after completion of such a project. The Sahara would grow over 100 times faster. In other words it would cover greater that 7/10's of Africa at that point. This is because it raises the overall temperature of the area! In in simple terms it raise the ambient temperature of the area around it!
    _________________ 

    Eric Muller Nov 11, 2012 8:49 AM +3
    Solyndra was doing something fairly different. Their failure doesn't have much to do with the technology they were working on or solar power in general 
    _________________ 

    Ivan Raszl Nov 11, 2012 8:53 AM +2
    A typical nuclear plant produces 4GW, which means 22GW is only 5.5 plants. ;)

    Also, this was only a peak production record not a sustained or reliable amount of energy produced. Within hours the production went down to zero. :D

    Germany shuts down its own nuclear plants and buying electricity from the Czech Republic which is incidentally produced by nuclear. It's all politics and BS.
    _________________ 

    Curtis Edenfield Nov 11, 2012 8:58 AM
    It was my understanding because of the loan, there were not to compete directly with the Chinese on similar designs. I can't back the up, because it was considered hearsay rom disgruntled employees.
    _________________ 

    Thoughts on Religion Nov 11, 2012 9:00 AM +1
    +Curtis Edenfield 
    You are a nut!!

    +Ivan Raszl 
    It is politics and panic. Even when you take out climate change, nuclear is still better overall than other energy sources. How many die every year from pollution and other problems from coal etc. power plants? 

    People expect nuclear to have a perfect safety record but let other types of plants generate all kinds of pollution etc. that affect our health.

    Still, for a long term solution, alternative energy sources are the way to go. They need time and investment to make them really work. A combination of sources is needed with both nuke and solar playing a part. 
    _________________ 

    Zephyr López Cervilla Nov 11, 2012 9:07 AM (edited) +1
    +Ivan Raszl, that's the key point. Their peak production was achieved during the central hours of a quite unusual day that was sunny in all Germany, just some weeks before the summer solstitium. Their sustained production (the annual production) is way lower. Germany is an awful place to instal solar plants. I guess their intention is using their plants to convince other countries to instal solar plants and sell them the panels (or mirrors) that they produce, some sort of demonstration plants.
    _________________ 

    Eric Muller Nov 11, 2012 9:07 AM +1
    +Curtis Edenfield solar one is in the Mojave, it was sited in an area where it would have minimal impact on wildlife. As far as I can determine there isn't anything suggesting mass destruction of flora and fauna. Including pretty pictures of wildlife amongst the array from the National Park Service. 
    I couldn't find any concentrator in the sonoran desert, I assume you mixed them up. 
    If a change of 0.5 degrees is enough to cause massive desertification global warming should be much more alarming. 
    I did see some reports of isreal considering solar concentration towers to combat desertification. I'm not sure where your information is coming from but it's not on the first few pages of google 
    _________________ 

    Curtis Edenfield Nov 11, 2012 9:08 AM
    +Thoughts on Religion Yes a very well informed an educated nut! Yet I see no rebuttal disputing what I've said from you. 
    _________________ 

    Thoughts on Religion Nov 11, 2012 9:13 AM
    +Curtis Edenfield You just seem to out there for me to bother with and I am not even sure of your point. Besides, solar panels are most certainly taking energy out of a system to use elsewhere. Looks like Eric Muller did a nice job of it though.
    _________________ 

    Curtis Edenfield Nov 11, 2012 9:19 AM
    I have a National Geo article about Solar One, I'll see if it's on line! It talked about heat in the atmosphere around the plant increasing enough to cause environmental impact.
    _________________ 

    Zephyr López Cervilla Nov 11, 2012 9:21 AM (edited)
    +Thoughts on Religion: "solar panels are most certainly taking energy out of a system to use elsewhere"
    - What system? Have you ever heard of the albedo? You need first to define your system properly.
    _________________ 

    Eric Muller Nov 11, 2012 9:21 AM
    +Thoughts on Religion it could create a localized hot spot, probably less than most industrial processes, but it's not out of the question. 
    Though it is capturing the heat and putting it elsewhere. 
    Usually they are located in arid areas with high insolation. Vegetation moderates the temperature quite a bit. On the other hand the array would create cool spots of shade over quite a wide area. 
    What he's saying isn't crazy enough that I didn't have to look it up. I can follow it. Based on a quick look though, it seems incorrect. 
    _________________ 

    Curtis Edenfield Nov 11, 2012 9:26 AM
    From Wikipedia

    Photovoltaics are best known as a method for generating electric power by using solar cells to convert energy from the sun into a flow of electrons. The photovoltaic effect refers to photons of light exciting electrons into a higher state of energy, allowing them to act as charge carriers for an electric current. The photovoltaic effect was first observed by Alexandre-Edmond Becquerel in 1839.[6][7] The term photovoltaic denotes the unbiased operating mode of a photodiode in which current through the device is entirely due to the transduced light energy. Virtually all photovoltaic devices are some type of photodiode.

    Curtis Edenfield Nov 11, 2012 9:26 AM
    From Wikipedia

    Professor Giovanni Francia (1911–1980) designed and built the first concentrated-solar plant. which entered into operation in Sant'Ilario, near Genoa, Italy in 1968. This plant had the architecture of today's concentrated-solar plants with a solar receiver in the center of a field of solar collectors. The plant was able to produce 1 MW with superheated steam at 100 bar and 500 degrees Celsius.[8] The 10 MW Solar One power tower was developed in Southern California in 1981, but the parabolic-trough technology of the nearby Solar Energy Generating Systems (SEGS), begun in 1984, was more workable. The 354 MW SEGS is still the largest solar power plant in the world.
    _________________ 

    Thoughts on Religion Nov 11, 2012 9:29 AM
    +Zephyr López Cervilla No, I have not heard of it!
    What I want to say is this. If you are collecting energy with solar panels, then it is being used elsewhere. What is being absorbed by the solar panels is not available to heat the ground etc. So, I cannot see how it could be causing an area to heat up, unlike burning something which clearly is. 

    Anyway, my point is this. Something needs to be done about climate change etc. I favor a approach that uses solar, nuke etc. ANything to move away from fossil fuel!
    _________________ 

    Curtis Edenfield Nov 11, 2012 9:30 AM (edited)
    Now can any of you truly say not all that reflective energy is not going just to were it's focused to? Part of that energy is reflected back into the atmosphere surrounding the site. What is part of that energy heat.
    _________________ 

    Zephyr López Cervilla Nov 11, 2012 9:35 AM (edited)
    +Eric Muller, you do consider the fact that a significant part of the sunlight that hits the Earth surface is reflected back to upper layers of the atmosphere and the outer space, right? That is, unless you deflect that light with a mirror to heat something or you use that energy to generate electricity or to ionize molecules.
    _________________ 

    Curtis Edenfield Nov 11, 2012 9:33 AM
    The ones in Spain are the only sites that have plants around it. Most are being built in the Middle East desert or Western US desert.
    _________________ 

    Eric Muller Nov 11, 2012 9:37 AM
    +Curtis Edenfield I'm not sure what you were trying to show with the wiki paste.
    The goal would be to have all the panels directing energy back to the collection point. Any leakage lowers the efficiency so it will be avoided. Even if there is some it would be significantly less than what was being captured and turned into steam, molten salt, or whatever. 

    Eric Muller* Nov 11, 2012 9:39 AM
    If you had all the mirrors just point off into the atmosphere and not at anything, it shouldn't heat the area any more than usual. 

    Eric Muller* Nov 11, 2012 9:44 AM
    +Zephyr López Cervilla I'm not sure what point you're trying to make, was this the albedo thing?
    +Curtis Edenfield yeah there is a few others, but as it turns out deserts have high insolation. They also have large open spaces.
    _________________ 

    Curtis Edenfield Nov 11, 2012 9:47 AM
    Yes I know this, they aim these mirror with a precision of + or - .00000003 of an inch. The majority of the energy is going to the collector, but there is always a factor of heat loss to the atmosphere, what the consider acceptable amounts. This energy increases the temp in the area creating something similar to heat island effect like in urban settings

    Curtis Edenfield Nov 11, 2012 9:50 AM
    Here's something simple look at the grass in the pic of the Spain site. Is the temp there the same as say a couple hundred yards of site? 

    Curtis Edenfield Nov 11, 2012 9:55 AM
    +Eric Muller Have you ever been near a glass high rise i a city? Even in the winter time it creates a huge amount of reflective energy, changing temps through out the area of reflection.
    _________________ 

    Zephyr López Cervilla Nov 11, 2012 10:01 AM (edited)
    +Eric Muller: "I'm not sure what point you're trying to make, was this the albedo thing?"

    - That solar plants contribue to decrease the albedo in a greater extent than the efficiency of the plant using sunlight to produce electricity. In the case of photovoltaic panels no more than 21%: 

    <<Currently the best achieved sunlight conversion rate (solar panel efficiency) is around 21% in commercial products>>
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_panel#Efficiencies 

    As for the solar thermal collectors, I haven't yet found their net efficiency converting all the light that they collect into useful energy (at least not here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_thermal_collector), but I doubt it will be much greater but rather probably lower, the main advantage of these plants is their cost efficiency, not their energetic efficiency.
    _________________ 

    Eric Muller Nov 11, 2012 10:01 AM+1
    http://www.greenworldinvestor.com/2011/07/07/advantages-and-disadvantages-of-solar-thermal-energy-power-towersparabolic-troughs/
    I found this, there might be something to the desertification if it uses water, particularly from a local source from an already arid area. It also hints at wildlife problems but isn't too specific. 
    Since it's an industrial process I imagine it heats the local area some. I don't think it's related to albedo (more reflectivity should lower the temperature). I also don't think it's much like the heat island effect. 
    Other industrial power generation would show a much more dramatic local temperature increase, plus contribute to greenhouse gas emissions (with the exception of nuclear) 
    _________________ 

    Eric Muller Nov 11, 2012 10:25 AM
    +Zephyr López Cervilla photovoltaic panels are around 35 percent efficient for the expensive high performance stuff. Solar thermal is quite a bit more efficient. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concentrated_solar_power#section_4
    Most large scale power generation uses super heated steam. It gets more efficient as temperatures rise, so using molten salt is expensive but the best way to go for efficiency. The salt is at around 700C so you then use that to generate steam with a heat exchanger. 

    That's why I was saying earlier, I wonder why you don't see more. They outperform PV easily. 
    _________________ 

    Curtis Edenfield Nov 11, 2012 10:47 AM (edited)
    Ok here's something else pretty simple to chew on. All that sunlight hits the surface of the water on the planet, as well as the snow caps. Lets increase that by 1/10 now 8/10 or 4/5 of the earth is covered by a reflective surface. What do you think would happen to atmospheric conditions then? That energy won't go back into space. Look at what happened in history when the sun was block from reflecting. 
    _________________ 

    Zephyr López Cervilla Nov 11, 2012 11:14 AM (edited)
    +Eric Muller: "I don't think it's related to albedo (more reflectivity should lower the temperature). I also don't think it's much like the heat island effect."

    - But they don't probably have a total greater reflectivity but a lower one even though the light is deflected by mirrors, since it isn't reflected back to the space but to a thermal collector. So the efficiency must be measured there rather than on the mirrors. How much of the light that hits the thermal collector is converted into electricity and what percentage it is dissipated as heat? Is this amount of electric energy greater than the light that would have been reflected back to space (or just high above the surface, away from the ground and the vegetation) in case the mirrors weren't there?

    Additionally, the mirrors absorb some light energy that will be later dissipated as heat.

    +Eric Muller: "photovoltaic panels are around 35 percent efficient for the expensive high performance stuff. Solar thermal is quite a bit more efficient."

    - In any case, probably never more than 50% since the most efficient thermal power station can't attain efficiencies greater than 48%: 

    <<The energy efficiency of a conventional thermal power station, considered as salable energy as a percent of the heating value of the fuel consumed, is typically 33% to 48%. This efficiency is limited as all heat engines are governed by the laws of thermodynamics. The rest of the energy must leave the plant in the form of heat. This waste heat can go through a condenser and be disposed of with cooling water or in cooling towers.>>

    <<The Carnot efficiency dictates that higher efficiencies can be attained by increasing the temperature of the steam. Sub-critical fossil fuel power plants can achieve 36–40% efficiency. Super critical designs have efficiencies in the low to mid 40% range, with new "ultra critical" designs using pressures of 4400 psi (30.3 MPa) and multiple stage reheat reaching about 48% efficiency. Above the critical point for water of 705 °F (374 °C) and 3212 psi (22.06 MPa), there is no phase transition from water to steam, but only a gradual decrease in density.>>
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_power#Efficiency 
    _________________ 

    Eric Muller Nov 11, 2012 10:55 AM
    It cools. Snow and clouds reflect a lot of solar energy back into space. That's another reason why the large scale polar ice melt is a concern.
    The use of black asphalt and black roofing contributes to the heat island effect (not the sole cause) it absorbs the Suns energy instead of reflecting it. 

    Eric Muller Nov 11, 2012 10:57 AM
    On the other hand if you aimed those reflective surfaces at something that would absorb the heat, then it wouldn't go into space. You would be able to do something with it. 

    Eric Muller Nov 11, 2012 11:04 AM
    http://www.zenithsolar.com/product.aspx?id=287 It's probably marketing, and it's combined concentrated PV and thermal but that's saying it gets 72 percent or better 

    Eric Muller Nov 11, 2012 11:16 AM
    http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivanpah_Solar_Power_Facility#section_5
    That talks a bit more specifically about the impact on wildlife. It also talks about what's being done to reduce water consumption. _________________ 

    Zephyr López Cervilla Nov 12, 2012 9:32 AM (edited)
    In the page about albedo there some examples of different surfaces (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albedo). The albedo of crops is between 25% and 15%, the albedo of meadows between 10 and 20% and forests roughly between 6% and 14%. Assuming a 15%, part of the remaining 85% is used in the photosynthesis: 

    <<Plants usually convert light into chemical energy with a photosynthetic efficiency of 3–6%.>>
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photosynthesis#Efficiency 

    Say a 5% during the central hours. 
    However, there's still another energy output from the system. Part of the energy captured by the vegetation is used to pump water, driven by the change of phase that takes place in the stomata, when the water passes to water vapor by absorbing heat.

    So we need to know how much energy is required to transpire all the water that the vegetation is draining from the soil and the water that is directly evaporated from the ground (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evapotranspiration), since all that energy absorbed won't contribute to heat the surroundings.

    <<Given the Earth's surface area, that means the globally averaged annual precipitation is 990 millimetres (39 in).>>
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rain#Global_climatology

    Assuming most of the rain water is evapotranspirated, say 500 L/m^2 per year,  which are 33,333 mol H2O/m^2. The standard enthalpy of vaporization at 298.15 K (25ºC) is 44 kJ/mol H2O. Thus the total energy required to vaporize 27,778 mol of H2O at 25ºC and 1 bar is 1,222 MJ per m^2 and year, that is 38.73 W/m^2
    (1 year = 31557600 seconds) 

    Annual Global Mean Energy Budget of Solar Radiation
    <<The energy budget of solar radiation can be derived by combining observations and modeling studies, which show the combined effects of atmospheric gases, aerosols, clouds, and surfaces. Under the annual global mean condition, the incident solar radiation at the top of the atmosphere is 342 W/m^2. Of this incident solar radiation, 67 W/m^2 is absorbed during passage through the atmosphere. A total of 107 W/m^2 is reflected back to space: 30W/m^2 from the surface and 77 W m^2 from clouds and aerosols and atmosphere. The remaining 168W/m^2 is absorbed at the Earth’s surface. It is noted that while the incoming and reflected solar irradiances at the top of the atmosphere are constrained by satellite observations, uncertainties may exist for the partitioning of the absorbed solar radiation between the atmosphere and the surface on the global scale.>>
    curry.eas.gatech.edu/Courses/6140/ency/Chapter3/Ency_Atmos/Radiation_Solar.pdf 

    Incident solar radiation at Earth surface: 
    30 W/m^2 + 168 W/m^2 = 198 W/m^2 
    15% of 198 W/m^2 is 30 W/m^2 (flux radiation reflected from surface back to space)
    5% of 168 W/m^2 is 8.4 W/m^2 spent in photosynthesis.

    Flux of energy dissipated as heat by terrain and vegetation: 
    168 W/m^2 - 38.73 W/m^2 - 8.4 W/m^2 = 121 W/m^2

    Thermal collector plant:

    <<Telescopes and other precision instruments use front silvered or first surface mirrors, where the reflecting surface is placed on the front (or first) surface of the glass (this eliminates reflection from glass surface ordinary back mirrors have). Some of them use silver, but most are aluminium, which is more reflective at short wavelengths than silver. All of these coatings are easily damaged and require special handling. They reflect 90% to 95% of the incident light when new.>>
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mirror#Instruments 

    Absorbed by the mirrors: 10% of 198 W/m^2 ≈ 19.5 W/m^2 (dissipated as heat from mirrors)

    Flux light incident on thermal collector: 90% of 198 W/m^2 ≈ 178.2 W/m^2 

    <<Of all of these technologies the solar dish/Stirling engine has the highest energy efficiency. A single solar dish-Stirling engine installed at Sandia National Laboratories National Solar Thermal Test Facility (NSTTF) produces as much as 25 kW of electricity, with a conversion efficiency of 31.25%. >>
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_thermal_energy#Conversion_rates_from_solar_energy_to_electrical_energy 

    On the other hand, 

    <<The PS10 is located 20 km west of Seville (which receives at least nine hours of sunshine 320 days per year, with 15 hours per day in mid summer). The solar receiver at the top of the tower produces saturated steam at 275 °C. The energy conversion efficiency is approximately 17%.>>
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PS10_Solar_Power_Plant 

    Flux of electric energy (a great overestimation):
    31.25% of 198 W/m^2 is 61.875 W/m^2

    Flux energy dissipated from thermal collector and mirrors as heat: 136.125 W/m^2

    Flux of energy dissipated from thermal collector: 
    136.125 W/m^2 (thermal collector) - 19.5 W/m^2 (mirrors) = 116.625 W/m^2

    Efficiency thermal collector: 
    (178.2 W/m^2 - 116.625 W/m^2) / 178.2 W/m^2 = 34.55% 

    Conclusion:
    under conditions of significant evapotranspiration mainly driven by local vegetation (e.g., 500 L/m^2 per year), the average flux of heat dissipated by the vegetation and the terrain (121 W/m^2) is significantly lower than the average flux of heat dissipated by the thermal collector station (136 W/m^2).

    Note: the direct evaporation from the terrain under the thermal collector station hasn't been considered. THis value may vary greatly depending on the porosity and permeability of the terrain, but in any case, it'll be usually much less significant than in a terrain covered with vegetation, since plants are very efficient transpiration systems capable to pump large amounts of water from the soil, water that otherwise would percolate to the phreatic zone. 
    Also, I haven't taken into account the light reflected by the thermal collector or absorbed by the air (by gas molecules and aerosols) before it reaches the collector.
    _________________ 

    Further reading:
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PS10_Solar_Power_Plant 
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PS20 
    nrel.gov/csp/solarpaces/project_detail.cfm/projectID=38 
    nrel.gov/csp/solarpaces/project_detail.cfm/projectID=39 

    scientificamerican.com/slideshow.cfm?id=10-largest-renewable-energy-projects 

    URL source G+ post: 
    plus.google.com/111635150542674847021/posts/97mdARxzGRc 
    _________________ 

    Reshared text:
  • 7 plusses - 3 comments - 8 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2013-04-04 11:08:30
    -flickr.com - Minor Protest Title: 267_6766 "Non-therapeutic Circumcision"
    By DB King. October 11, 2005 (Washington D.C.)
    Source: flickr.com/photos/bootbearwdc/51682205 (license terms below)
    Minor protest in front of Washington Convention Center in connection with the American Association of Pediatricians annual meeting

    Excerpts from Wikipedia:
    <<Circumcision is probably the world's most widely performed procedure. Approximately one-third of males worldwide are circumcised, most often for reasons other than medical indication. The WHO estimated in 2007 that 664,500,000 males aged 15 and over are circumcised (30% global prevalence), almost 70% of whom are Muslim. Circumcision is most prevalent in the Muslim world, Israel, South Korea, the United States and parts of Southeast Asia and Africa. It is relatively rare in Europe, Latin America, parts of Southern Africa and Oceania and most of Asia. Prevalence is near-universal in the Middle East and Central Asia. Non-religious circumcision in Asia, outside of the Republic of Korea and the Philippines, is rare, and prevalence is generally low across Europe. Estimates for individual countries include Spain and Colombia less than 2%; Brazil 7%; Taiwan 9%; Thailand 13%; and Australia 58.7%. Prevalence in the United States and Canada is estimated at 75% and 30% respectively. Prevalence in Africa varies from less than 20% in some southern African countries to near universal in North and West Africa.>>
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision#Prevalence 
    See also: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prevalence_of_circumcision 

    <<Circumcision is the world's oldest planned surgical procedure, suggested by anatomist and hyperdiffusionist historian Grafton Elliot Smith to be over 15,000 years old, pre-dating recorded history. There is no firm consensus as to how it came to be practiced worldwide. One theory is that it began in one geographic area and spread from there; another is that several different cultural groups began its practice independently. In his 1891 work History of Circumcision, physician Peter Charles Remondino suggested that it began as a less severe form of emasculating a captured enemy: penectomy or castration would likely have been fatal, while some form of circumcision would permanently mark the defeated yet leave him alive to serve as a slave.>>
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision#History 

    <<Alexander the Great conquered the Middle East in the 4th century BCE, and in the following centuries ancient Greek cultures and values came to the Middle East. The Greeks abhorred circumcision, making life for circumcised Jews living among the Greeks (and later the Romans) very difficult. Antiochus Epiphanes outlawed circumcision, as did Hadrian, which helped cause the Bar Kokhba revolt. During this period in history, Jewish circumcision called for the removal of only a part of the prepuce, and some Hellenized Jews attempted to look uncircumcised by stretching the extant parts of their foreskins. This was considered by the Jewish leaders to be a serious problem, and during the 2nd century CE they changed the requirements of Jewish circumcision to call for the complete removal of the foreskin, emphasizing the Jewish view of circumcision as intended to be not just the fulfillment of a Biblical commandment but also an essential and permanent mark of membership in a people.>>
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision#Middle_East.2C_Africa_and_Europe 

    <<Circumcision has only been thought of as a common medical procedure since late Victorian times. In 1870, the influential orthopedic surgeon Lewis Sayre, a founder of the American Medical Association, began using circumcision as a purported cure for several cases of young boys presenting with paralysis or significant gross motor problems. He thought the procedure ameliorated such problems based on a "reflex neurosis" theory of disease, with the understanding that a tight foreskin inflamed the nerves and caused systemic problems. The use of circumcision to promote good health also fit in with the germ theory of disease, which saw validation during the same time period: the foreskin was seen as harboring infection-causing smegma (a mixture of shed skin cells and oils). Sayre published works on the subject and promoted it energetically in speeches. Contemporary physicians picked up on Sayre's new treatment, which they believed could prevent or cure a wide-ranging array of medical problems and social ills, including masturbation (considered by the Victorians to be a serious problem), syphilis, epilepsy, hernia, headache, clubfoot, alcoholism and gout. Its popularity spread with publications such as Peter Charles Remondino's History of Circumcision. By the turn of the century, in both America and Great Britain, infant circumcision was nearly universally recommended.

    After the end of World War II, Britain moved to a nationalized health care system, and so looked to ensure that each medical procedure covered by the new system was cost-effective. Douglas Gairdner's 1949 article "The Fate of the Foreskin" argued persuasively that the evidence available at that time showed that the risks outweighed the known benefits. The procedure was not covered by the national health care system, and circumcision rates dropped in Britain and in the rest of Europe. In the 1970s, national medical associations in Australia and Canada issued recommendations against routine infant circumcision, leading to drops in the rates of both of those countries. In the United States, the American Academy of Pediatrics has, over the decades, issued a series of policy statements regarding circumcision, sometimes positive and sometimes negative.

    An association between circumcision and reduced heterosexual HIV infection rates was suggested in 1986. Experimental evidence was needed to establish a causal relationship, so three randomized controlled trials were commissioned as a means to reduce the effect of any confounding factors. Trials took place in South Africa, Kenya and Uganda.[10] All three trials were stopped early by their monitoring boards on ethical grounds, because those in the circumcised group had a lower rate of HIV contraction than the control group. Subsequently, the World Health Organization promoted circumcision in high-risk populations as part of an overall program to reduce the spread of HIV, although some have challenged the validity of the African randomized controlled trials, prompting a number of researchers to question the effectiveness of circumcision as an HIV prevention strategy.[68][69][70][71]>>
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision#Modern_times 

    <<In some cultures, males must be circumcised shortly after birth, during childhood or around puberty as part of a rite of passage. Circumcision is commonly practiced in the Jewish and Islamic faiths.

    Judaism
    Circumcision is very important to Judaism, with over 90% of adherents having the procedure performed as a religious obligation. The basis for its observance is found in the Torah of the Hebrew Bible, in Genesis chapter 17, in which a covenant of circumcision is made with Abraham and his descendants. Jewish circumcision is part of the brit milah ritual, to be performed by a specialist ritual circumciser (a mohel) on the eighth day of a newborn son's life (with certain exceptions for poor health). Jewish law requires that the circumcision leave the glans bare when the penis is flaccid. Converts to Judaism must also be circumcised; those who are already circumcised undergo a symbolic circumcision ritual. Circumcision is not required by Judaism for one to be considered Jewish, but adherents foresee serious negative spiritual consequences if it is neglected.

    Islam
    Although there is debate within Islam over whether it is a religious requirement, circumcision (called khitan) is practiced nearly universally by Muslim males. Islam bases its practice of circumcision on the Genesis 17 narrative, the same Biblical chapter referred to by Jews. The procedure is not mentioned in the Quran, but rather adherents believe it is a tradition established by Islam's prophet Muhammad directly (following Abraham), and so its practice is considered a sunnah (prophet's tradition). For Muslims, circumcision is a matter of cleanliness, purification and control over one's baser self (nafs). There is no agreement across the many Islamic communities about the age at which circumcision should be performed. It may be done from soon after birth up to about age 15, with it most often performed at around six to seven years of age. The timing can correspond with the boy's completion of his recitation of the whole Quran, with a coming-of-age event such as taking on the responsibility of daily prayer or betrothal. Circumcision may be celebrated with an associated family or community event. Circumcision is recommended for, but is not required of, converts to Islam.>>
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision#Cultures_and_religions 

    <<The origination of male circumcision is not known with certainty. It has been variously proposed that it began as a religious sacrifice, as a rite of passage marking a boy's entrance into adulthood, as a form of sympathetic magic to ensure virility or fertility>>
    <<as a means of humiliating enemies and slaves by symbolic castration, as a means of differentiating a circumcising group from their non-circumcising neighbors, as a means of discouraging masturbation or other socially proscribed sexual behaviors, as a means of removing "excess" pleasure, as a means of increasing a man's attractiveness to women, as a demonstration of one's ability to endure pain, or as a male counterpart to menstruation or the breaking of the hymen, or to copy the rare natural occurrence of a missing foreskin of an important leader, and as a display of disgust of the smegma produced by the foreskin. It has been suggested that the custom of circumcision gave advantages to tribes that practiced it and thus led to its spread. Darby describes these theories as "conflicting", and states that "the only point of agreement among proponents of the various theories is that promoting good health had nothing to do with it." Immerman et al. suggest that circumcision causes lowered sexual arousal of pubescent males, and hypothesize that this was a competitive advantage to tribes practising circumcision, leading to its spread. Wilson suggests that circumcision reduces insemination efficiency, reducing a man's capacity for extra-pair fertilizations by impairing sperm competition. Thus, men who display this signal of sexual obedience, may gain social benefits, if married men are selected to offer social trust and investment preferentially to peers who are less threatening to their paternity. It is possible that circumcision arose independently in different cultures for different reasons.>>
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_male_circumcision 

    <<According to Hodges, ancient Greek aesthetics of the human form considered circumcision a mutilation of a previously perfectly shaped organ. Greek artwork of the period portrayed penises as covered by the foreskin (sometimes in exquisite detail), except in the portrayal of satyrs, lechers, and barbarians. This dislike of the appearance of the circumcised penis led to a decline in the incidence of circumcision among many peoples that had previously practiced it throughout Hellenistic times. In Egypt, only the priestly caste retained circumcision, and by the 2nd century, the only circumcising groups in the Roman Empire were Jews, Jewish Christians, Egyptian priests, and the Nabatean Arabs. Circumcision was sufficiently rare among non-Jews that being circumcised was considered conclusive evidence of Judaism (or Early Christianity and others derogatorily called Judaizers) in Roman courts—Suetonius in Domitian 12.2 described a court proceeding in which a ninety-year-old man was stripped naked before the court to determine whether he was evading the head tax placed on Jews and Judaizers.>>
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_male_circumcision#Male_circumcision_in_the_Greco-Roman_world 

    <<Europeans, with the exception of the Jews, did not practice male circumcision. A rare exception occurred in Visigothic Spain, where during the armed campaign king Wamba ordered to circumcise everyone who committed atrocities against civilian population.>>
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_male_circumcision#Male_circumcision_in_the_Middle_Ages 

    <<Historically, neonatal circumcision was promoted during late Victorian times in the English-speaking parts of Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the United States and the United Kingdom and was widely practiced during the first part of the 20th century in these countries. However, the practice declined sharply in the United Kingdom after the Second World War, and somewhat later in Canada, Australia and New Zealand. It has been argued (e.g., Goldman 1997) that the practice did not spread to other European countries because others considered the arguments for it fallacious. In South Korea, circumcision was largely unknown before the establishment of the United States trusteeship in 1945. More than 90% of South Korean high school boys are now circumcised, but the average age of circumcision is 12 years, which makes South Korea a unique case.

    Infant circumcision has been abandoned in New Zealand and Britain, and is now much less common in Australia and in Canada (see table 1). The decline in circumcision in the United Kingdom followed the decision by the National Health Service (NHS) in 1948 not to cover the procedure following an influential article by Douglas Gairdner which claimed that circumcision resulted in the deaths of about 16 children under 5 each year in the United Kingdom.>>
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_male_circumcision#Male_circumcision_in_the_19th_century_and_beyond 

    <<
    Male circumcision to prevent masturbation
    Non-religious circumcision in English-speaking countries arose in a climate of negative attitudes towards sex, especially concerning masturbation. In her 1978 article The Ritual of Circumcision, Karen Erickson Paige writes: "In the United States, the current medical rationale for circumcision developed after the operation was in wide practice. The original reason for the surgical removal of the foreskin, or prepuce, was to control 'masturbatory insanity' – the range of mental disorders that people believed were caused by the 'polluting' practice of 'self-abuse.'"

    "Self-abuse" was a term commonly used to describe masturbation in the 19th century. According to Paige, "treatments ranged from diet, moral exhortations, hydrotherapy, and marriage, to such drastic measures as surgery, physical restraints, frights, and punishment. Some doctors recommended covering the penis with plaster of Paris, leather, or rubber; cauterization; making boys wear chastity belts or spiked rings; and in extreme cases, castration." Paige details how circumcision became popular as a masturbation remedy:

    "In the 1890s, it became a popular technique to prevent, or cure, masturbatory insanity. In 1891 the president of the Royal College of Surgeons of England published On Circumcision as Preventive of Masturbation, and two years later another British doctor wrote Circumcision: Its Advantages and How to Perform It, which listed the reasons for removing the 'vestigial' prepuce. Evidently the foreskin could cause 'nocturnal incontinence,' hysteria, epilepsy, and irritation that might 'give rise to erotic stimulation and, consequently, masturbation.' Another physician, P.C. Remondino, added that 'circumcision is like a substantial and well-secured life annuity...it insures better health, greater capacity for labor, longer life, less nervousness, sickness, loss of time, and less doctor bills.' No wonder it became a popular remedy."

    At the same time circumcisions were advocated on men, clitoridectomies (removal of the clitoris) were also performed for the same reason (to treat female masturbators). The US "Orificial Surgery Society" for female "circumcision" operated until 1925, and clitoridectomies and infibulations would continue to be advocated by some through the 1930s. As late as 1936, L. E. Holt, an author of pediatric textbooks, advocated male and female circumcision as a treatment for masturbation.

    One of the leading advocates of circumcision was John Harvey Kellogg. He advocated the consumption of Kellogg's corn flakes to prevent masturbation, and he believed that circumcision would be an effective way to eliminate masturbation in males.

    "Covering the organs with a cage has been practiced with entire success. A remedy which is almost always successful in small boys is circumcision, especially when there is any degree of phimosis. The operation should be performed by a surgeon without administering an anesthetic, as the brief pain attending the operation will have a salutary effect upon the mind, especially if it be connected with the idea of punishment, as it may well be in some cases. The soreness which continues for several weeks interrupts the practice, and if it had not previously become too firmly fixed, it may be forgotten and not resumed. If any attempt is made to watch the child, he should be so carefully surrounded by vigilance that he cannot possibly transgress without detection. If he is only partially watched, he soon learns to elude observation, and thus the effect is only to make him cunning in his vice."

    Robert Darby, writing in the Australian Medical Journal, noted that some 19th-century circumcision advocates—and their opponents—believed that the foreskin was sexually sensitive:

    In the 19th century the role of the foreskin in erotic sensation was well understood by physicians who wanted to cut it off precisely because they considered it the major factor leading boys to masturbation. The Victorian physician and venereologist William Acton (1814–1875) damned it as "a source of serious mischief", and most of his contemporaries concurred.

    Both opponents and supporters of circumcision agreed that the significant role the foreskin played in sexual response was the main reason why it should be either left in place or removed. William Hammond, a Professor of Mind in New York in the late 19th century, commented that "circumcision, when performed in early life, generally lessens the voluptuous sensations of sexual intercourse", and both he and Acton considered the foreskin necessary for optimal sexual function, especially in old age. Jonathan Hutchinson, English surgeon and pathologist (1828–1913), and many others, thought this was the main reason why it should be excised.>>
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_male_circumcision#Male_circumcision_to_prevent_masturbation 

    In United States
    <<A study in 1987 found that the prominent reasons for parents choosing circumcision were "concerns about the attitudes of peers and their sons' self concept in the future," rather than medical concerns.[51] A 1999 study reported that reasons for circumcision included "ease of hygiene (67 percent), ease of infant circumcision compared with adult circumcision (63 percent), medical benefit (41 percent), and father circumcised (37 percent)." The authors commented that "Medical benefits were cited more frequently in this study than in past studies, although medical issues remain secondary to hygiene and convenience."[52] A 2001 study reported that "The most important reason to circumcise or not circumcise the child was health reasons."[53] A 2005 study speculated that increased recognition of the potential benefits may be responsible for an observed increase in the rate of neonatal circumcision in the USA between 1988 and 2000.[54] In a 2001 survey, 86.6% of parents felt respected by their medical provider, and parents who did not circumcise "felt less respected by their medical provider".[53]>>
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_male_circumcision#Circumcision_since_1950 
    _________________ 


    Excerpt from
    The non-therapeutic circumcision of male minors. KNMG (May 2010)

    ABSTRACT

    "The official viewpoint or KNMG and other related medical / scientific organisaties Is that non-therapeutic circumcision of male minors is a violation of children's rights to autonomy and physical integrity. Contrary to popular belief, circumcision can cause complications - bleeding, infection, urethral stricture and panic attacks are particularly common. KNMG is powerful Therefore urging a strong policy of deterrence. KNMG is calling upon doctors to Actively and insistently inform parents who are considering the procedure of the absence of medical benefits and the danger of complications."

    PREAMBULE

    POSITION OF THE KNMG WITH REGARD TO NON-THERAPEUTIC CIRCUMCISION OF MALE MINORS
     . . . 
    <<The reason for our adoption of an official viewpoint regarding this matter is the increasing emphasis on children’s rights. It is particularly relevant for doctors that children must not be subjected to medical proceedings that have no therapeutic or preventative value. In addition to this, there is growing concern regarding complications, both minor and serious, which can occur as a result of circumcising a child. A third reason for this viewpoint is the growing sentiment that there is a discrepancy between the KNMG’s firm stance with regard to female genital mutilation and the lack of a stance with regard to the non-therapeutic circumcision of male minors, as the two have a number of similarities.

    The initial objective of this viewpoint is to initiate public discussion of this issue. The ultimate aim is to minimise non-therapeutic circumcision of male minors.>>
     . . . 
    — Prof. Dr. Arie Nieuwenhuijzen Kruseman (Chairman of KNMG)
     . . . 

    BACKGROUND STUDY FOR KNMG VIEWPOINT

    NON-THERAPEUTIC CIRCUMCISION OF MALE MINORS

    INTRODUCTION
     . . . 
    <<Until a few years ago, the attitude towards circumcision was fairly permissive, and circumcision was legitimised by appealing to freedom of religion and supposed medical benefits. In recent years, the attitude towards circumcision appears to have been changing. This is probably partly the result of the debate about female genital mutilation (FGM). With the global condemnation of this practice, including in its non-mutilating, symbolic form, the question regularly arises why circumcision should be judged differently than FGM. These days, more critical articles are being published about circumcision.[1] These articles point to the rights of children, the absence of medical benefits and the fact that this is a mutilating intervention that regularly leads to complications and can cause medical and psychological problems, both at a young and a later age.>>
     . . . 
    <<
    MEDICAL/PREVENTATIVE
    In the past, circumcision was performed as a preventative and treatment for a large number of complaints, such as gout, syphilis, epilepsy, headaches, arthrosis, alcoholism, groin hernias, asthma, poor digestion, eczema and excessive masturbation.[10] Due to the large number of medical benefits which were wrongly ascribed to circumcision, it is frequently asserted that circumcision is ‘a procedure in need of a justification’.[11] In recent decades, evidence has been published which apparently shows that circumcision reduces the risk of HIV/AIDS[12], but this evidence is contradicted by other studies.[13]>>

    <<Further, there is apparent evidence that circumcision offers protection against complaints such as HPV infection, urinary tract infections and penis cancer. However, these studies, too, are controversial.[16] Moreover, urinary tract infections can be successfully treated with modern healthcare. Children with inborn abnormalities to the urinary tract can generally be successfully helped by a foreskin-widening operation, which makes the foreskin easier to clean.

    In response to the possible medical benefits, a large number of complications resulting from circumcision are described: infections, bleeding, sepsis, necrosis, fibrosis of the skin, urinary tract infections, meningitis, herpes infections, meatisis, meatal stenosis, necrosis and necrotising complications, all of which have led to the complete amputation of the penis.[17] Deaths have also been reported.[18] The AAFP estimates the number of deaths as 1 in 500,000.[19] That would mean that in the United States, two children die each year as a result of the intervention.

    Alongside these direct medical complications, psychological problems[20] and complications in the area of sexuality have also been reported,[21] as have extreme pain experiences in newborns causing behavioural changes which are still apparent years later.[22] [23] Similarly, the high social costs of circumcision as a result of complications have been cited.[24]

    Even if there were slight medical benefits connected with circumcision for medical-preventative reasons, it is questionable whether these possible medical benefits would compensate for the risk of complications. Certainly when it comes to children, who cannot make this assessment themselves, the possible medical benefits should be significant and the risk of complications small for the intervention to be justifiable.

    It is a generally accepted moral principle that children may only be exposed to medical treatments if illness or abnormalities are present, or if it can be demonstrated that the medical intervention is in the interest of the child, as is the case for vaccinations, for example. In the case of preventative medical interventions, there needs to be a clear individual or public health benefit which cannot be achieved in another, less intrusive way.

    Thus circumcision as a preventative against urinary tract infections or HIV/AIDS would need to be weighed against other, less intrusive forms of prevention (such as antibiotics, condom use, sex education or behavioural changes) and a scientific cost/benefit analysis made. Only if the results of this cost/benefit analysis were positive should the intervention be offered to all parents of small boys on public health grounds.

    In addition, it would need to be demonstrated that it was essential that the circumcision be performed during childhood or infancy, rather than waiting until the boy had reached an age at which the risk was relevant (such as in HIV infection) and he could make a decision about the intervention for himself. After all, in many cases, such as in HPV or HIV prevention, it will be possible to put off circumcision until the boy reaches an age at which he can elect to have the intervention himself or instead choose alternatives such as using condoms, HPV vaccination or abstinence.


    DOCTORS' ORGANISATIONS ABROAD

    A large number of doctors’ organisations have pronounced on the supposed medical benefits of circumcision for medical/preventative reasons, set against the risk of complications.

    In 2003, the British Medical Association stated: ‘The medical benefits previously claimed have not been convincingly proven. (...) The British Medical Association considers that the evidence concerning health benefits from non-therapeutic circumcision is insufficient for this alone to be a justification for doing it.’[25]

    The American Academy of Pediatrics stated in 1999: ‘Existing scientific evidence ... [is] not sufficient to recommend routine neonatal circumcision.’[26] The American Medical Association endorsed this position in December 1999 and now rejects circumcision for medical/preventative reasons. The AMA further states: ‘parental preference alone is not sufficient justification for performing a surgical procedure on a child’.[27]

    Other doctors’ organisations in Australia and Canada have taken similar positions.[28] For example, the Royal Australasian College of Physicians asserts: ‘Review of the literature in relation to risks and benefits shows there is no evidence of benefit outweighing harm for circumcision as a routine procedure in the neonate.’[29]

    In its viewpoint, the Australasian Association of Paediatric Surgeons states: ‘the AAPS does not support the routine circumcision of male neonates, infants or children in Australia. It is considered to be inappropriate and unnecessary as a routine to remove the prepuce, based on the current evidence available’.

    The Canadian Paediatric Society states: ‘The overall evidence of the benefits and dangers of circumcision is so evenly balanced that it does not support recommending circumcision as a routine procedure for newborns’.[30]

    The American Academy of Family Physicians believes that the medical benefits of circumcision are ‘conflicting or inconclusive’. The decision should therefore be left to parents: ‘The American Academy of Family Physicians recommends physicians discuss the potential harms and benefits of circumcision with all parents or legal guardians considering this procedure for their newborn son’.[31]

    In Sweden, a law was introduced in 2001 after a child died after NTC as a result of an incorrect dose of the painkiller Ketogan. A first version of the law implied a total prohibition of circumcision for non-therapeutic reasons up to the age of 18. Under pressure from Jewish organisations, and out of fear that the practice would be driven underground, the law was later watered down. The law now states that non-therapeutic circumcision may only be performed in the first two months after birth and only under local or general anaesthetic. This anaesthetic may only be administered by a doctor or a qualified nurse. The circumcision itself may only be performed by a doctor or a mohel specially trained for the procedure, who has followed a course and has a licence from the Ministry of Health.

    The prevailing consensus in the medical world is that there may be some medical benefits associated with circumcision but that these benefits, weighed against alternatives and the risk of complications from circumcision, are insufficiently great to be able to recommend routine circumcision for medical/preventative reasons. There is currently not a single medical association that recommends routine circumcision for medical/preventative reasons.

    Given the above, the rest of this memo uses the term non-therapeutic circumcision (NTC). This refers to circumcision in boys and men for reasons other than medical/ therapeutic reasons.>>
     . . . 

    <<
    FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION VS. NTC

    [NTC: Non-therapeutic Circumcision]

    The practice of FGM has been prohibited by law in the Netherlands since 1993 in both adult and minor women and girls. In various viewpoints, the KNMG and NVOG have rejected all forms of FGM, including the most mild form, in adult women, as well as reinfibulation[38] following childbirth. The form which most closely resembles NTC, circumcision, is also unanimously rejected in virtually all the literature.[39] [40] In spite of this, the practice of FGM still occurs regularly, particularly among girls from North Africa. This led the internist Jannes Mulder to call in Medisch Contact for the mildest form of FGM, ‘sunna light’, to be tolerated.[41] This intervention proposed by Mulder consists of a small prick in the foreskin of the clitoris, causing a drop of blood to be released.

    No tissue is removed, and the girl suffers no damage to her body, and there is no effect on sexual function. According to Mulder, the practice of FGM could in this way eventually be redirected into innocent, symbolic forms.
    His proposal attracted purely negative reactions, generally based on the principled position that any form of FGM, including a symbolic one, must be treated as child abuse. “When it comes to the integrity of the girl’s body, no single compromise must be made”, states Pharos, knowledge centre for the prevention and tackling of female circumcision. The Netherlands Municipal Health Services (GGD) stated: “A girl is fine as she is.” Even so, this ‘sunna light’ is far less intrusive than NTC, in which part of the erotogenic tissue of the penis is removed.

    In a response to the criticism of his article, Jannes Mulder points to the difference in how NTC and FGM are judged: ‘No one says a word about the Jewish practice of circumcising boys. This traditional ‘abuse’ involves more than my single drop of blood. Some see the circumcision of Muslim boys as a hygienic intervention. That argument conceals a deeper motive. After all, there is no culture that preventatively deals with dirty ears by cutting them off.’[42]

    In an article in Medisch Contact, Karim and Hage (former board members of the Netherlands Association for Plastic Surgery, NVPC) similarly point to what they see as the discriminating fact that circumcision in girls is categorically rejected (even in its non-mutilating form) but that it is permitted in boys.[43] However, in the authors’ view, there are no reasons why FGM and NTC should be judged differently in moral or legal terms.

    The Partij voor de Vrijheid (Freedom Party) responded to the article by Karim and Hage through the person of Ms Agema with questions in the Dutch Lower House calling on the State Secretary not to prohibit the circumcision of boys. ‘Can we be assured that the Dutch government will not bow to this discrimination argument and that circumcision of boys will remain permitted?[44]

    FGM and NTC are generally seen as two separate practices, which need to be evaluated differently. For example, doctors’ organisations often devote different statements to the two practices.

    In the literature, little attention is given to legitimating the different treatment given to the two practices: apparently the difference is regarded as self-evident.[45] FGM is generally viewed as a serious violation of the rights of the child, while NTC is seen as something which parents may decide on for themselves. In the literature that exists, a number of arguments are made which are intended to justify a different evaluation of FGM and NTC.

    SEXUAL FUNCTION
    One of the most frequently used arguments for treating the two interventions differently is that FGM leads to the impairment of sexual function in the woman; supposedly, NTC has no such impact on the man.

    However, FGM takes many forms. There is the most severe form, infibulation, in which the inner and outer labia are stitched together and the clitoris is removed. However, there are also much milder forms of FGM, in which only the foreskin of the clitoris is removed. However, sunna light, as proposed by Mulder and previously proposed by Bartels[46], in which no tissue is removed, is also universally rejected. The WHO also rejects all forms of FGM: ‘Female genital mutilation of any type has been recognized as a harmful practice and a violation of the human rights of girls and women’.[47] The WHO explicitly includes in this the mild forms of FGM, in which no tissue is removed. So the argument for rejecting FGM is not that FGM interferes with female sexuality, but that it is a violation of the rights of the woman.

    ‘The guiding principles for considering genital practices as female genital mutilation should be those of human rights, including the right to health, the rights of children and the right to non-discrimination on the basis of sex’.[48]
    Another part of this argument says that NTC does not affect male sexuality. The foreskin is regarded as a part of the body that has no function at all in male sexuality. Many sexologists contradict this idea: in their view, the foreskin is a complex, erotogenic structure that plays an important role ‘in the mechanical function of the penis during sexual acts, such as penetrative intercourse and masturbation’.[49] The many attempts by men to restore their foreskins by mechanical or surgical means also contradict the idea that the foreskin is a useless part of the body.[50]

    NTC is sometimes compared to interventions such as tattoos and piercings.[51] On this view, Jews and Muslims see NTC not as an infringement of physical integrity, but as an innocent perfectioning of the body, comparable to tattoos and piercings. However, an important legal distinction between NTC in children and piercings and tattoos is that it is prohibited to tattoo or pierce children under the age of 16.[52] In other words, tattoos and piercings can only be done if a child is old enough to ask for them itself.

    NO THEORY OF OPPRESSION
    A second much-used argument to separate FGM from NTC is that FGM comes from a theory of female oppression, of which FGM is an expression. Since there is no such theory of oppression at play in NTC, this would make FGM morally more reprehensible than NTC.

    This argument can be refuted in two ways. Firstly, the historical background of NTC is extremely complex, and is in any case rooted in the desire to control male sexuality. Thus NTC was deployed in the past to combat excessive onanism, and it was also used to ‘brand’ slaves.[53] So the background to NTC is not as unambiguous as is often thought.

    There is another reason why the argument does not hold. The reason why FGM is condemned is not because it comes forth from a theory of female oppression but because it is harmful to them and represents a violation of their physical integrity. FGM would also be condemned if it were done out of aesthetic considerations or as a way of ‘venerating’ women. Even if women were to want FGM themselves at a later age, doctors would probably not be permitted to meet their request.

    The right to physical integrity is an inalienable human right, like the right to life and the right to personal freedom. These are inalienable rights, which is to say that the patient’s permission does not offer sufficient justification to be allowed to perform the intervention. Besides permission, there must also always be an additional reason, such as a medical interest. From this it follows that even if women did not regret the intervention, doctors would not be permitted to commit serious infringements of the integrity of the body, such as FGM.

    EMBEDDED IN CULTURE
    A third argument often made for drawing a distinction between FGM and NTC is that NTC is a much older practice than FGM, and that NTC is far more embedded in existing religious groups such as Islam and Judaism. However, this is open to question: both NTC and FGM have been practised for centuries by many different peoples and for many different reasons. And FGM also has an important ritual, religious and identifying significance for many peoples. So it cannot be said with certainty that NTC is older than FGM. Even if it were, it is still questionable whether this argument is morally relevant. It is not the history of a practice which is of decisive importance, but whether a particular practice is a violation of the rights of the child.

    RELIGIOUS FREEDOM VS. PHYSICAL INTEGRITY

    NTC in minors is regarded by many authors as a violation of physical integrity.[54] However, they subsequently often conclude that NTC falls under the right to religious freedom, and that parents may therefore decide for themselves whether they wish to have this intervention carried out.
    The right to religious freedom means that parents are free to raise their children in a religion or philosophy of their own choosing. However, the right to religious freedom does not apply only to parents, but also to children. The right to religious freedom of the child implies that the child must at a later age have the right to choose a religion or philosophy of life for itself, or to reject the one in which it was raised.>>
     . . . 

    <<
    CONCLUSION

    - There is no convincing evidence that circumcision is useful or necessary in terms of prevention or hygiene. Partly in the light of the complications which can arise during or after circumcision, circumcision is not justifiable except on medical/ therapeutic grounds. Insofar as there are medical benefits, such as a possibly reduced risk of HIV infection, it is reasonable to put off circumcision until the age at which such a risk is relevant and the boy himself can decide about the intervention, or can opt for any available alternatives.

    - Contrary to what is often thought, circumcision entails the risk of medical and psychological complications. The most common complications are bleeding, infections, meatus stenosis (narrowing of the urethra) and panic attacks. Partial or complete penis amputations as a result of complications following circumcisions have also been reported, as have psychological problems as a result of the circumcision.

    - Non-therapeutic circumcision of male minors is contrary to the rule that minors may only be exposed to medical treatments if illness or abnormalities are present, or if it can be convincingly demonstrated that the medical intervention is in the interest of the child, as in the case of vaccinations.

    - Non-therapeutic circumcision of male minors conflicts with the child’s right to autonomy and physical integrity.

    - The KNMG calls on (referring) doctors to explicitly inform parents/carers who are considering non-therapeutic circumcision for male minors of the risk of complications and the lack of convincing medical benefits. The fact that this is a medically non-essential intervention with a real risk of complications makes the quality of this advice particularly important. The doctor must then record the informed consent in the medical file.

    - The KNMG respects the deep religious, symbolic and cultural feelings that surround the practice of non-therapeutic circumcision. The KNMG calls for a dialogue between doctors’ organisations, experts and the religious groups concerned in order to put the issue of non-therapeutic circumcision of male minors on the agenda and ultimately restrict it as much as possible.

    - There are good reasons for a legal prohibition of non-therapeutic circumcision of male minors, as exists for female genital mutilation. However, the KNMG fears that a legal prohibition would result in the intervention being performed by non-medically qualified individuals in circumstances in which the quality of the intervention could not be sufficiently guaranteed. This could lead to more serious complications than is currently the case.>>


    The non-therapeutic circumcision of male minors is a publication setting out the Position of the Koninklijke Nederlandsche Maatschappij tot bevordering der Geneeskunst (KNMG), adopted by the Board of the Federation and effective as from 27 May 2010.

    The KNMG physicians’ federation represents over 53,000 physicians and medical students. KNMG member organisations include the Koepel Artsen Maatschappij en Gezondheid (Umbrella organisation for physicians and health – KAMG), the Landelijke vereniging van Artsen in Dienstverband (National society of employee physicians – LAD), the Landelijke Huisartsen Vereniging (National society of general practitioners – LHV), the Netherlands Society of Occupational Medicine (NVAB), the Nederlandse Vereniging voor Verzekeringsgeneeskunde (Netherlands society of insurance medicine – NVVG), the Orde van Medisch Specialisten (Order of medical specialists – OMS) and the Dutch Association of Elderly Care Physicians and Social Geriatricians (Verenso).


    — KNMG. Non-therapeutic circumcision of male minors. KNMG Viewpoint (2010)
    URL: http://knmg.artsennet.nl/Publicaties/KNMGpublicatie/Nontherapeutic-circumcision-of-male-minors-2010.htm 
    PDF: http://knmg.artsennet.nl/web/file?uuid=579e836d-ea83-410f-9889-feb7eda87cd5&owner=a8a9ce0e-f42b-47a5-960e-be08025b7b04&contentid=77976 
    _______________ 

    URL related G+ posts:
    plus.google.com/114605547533973731226/posts/hVYmaN4v38P 
    plus.google.com/114605547533973731226/posts/bhv7a23Y6K6 
    plus.google.com/118135535337532829792/posts/HhdEseNQrFn 
    _______________ 

    DB King (David): dbkingsdc.blogspot.com 
    License terms: Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic (CC BY 2.0) 
    creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/deed.en 
    _______________ 
  • 9 plusses - 14 comments - 0 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-08-16 09:16:57
    guardian.co.uk - Fusion power: is it getting any closer?
    By Leo Hickman. August 23, 2011

    For decades, scientists have been predicting that, one day, the same process that powers the sun will give us virtually unlimited cheap, clean electricity. Are they wrong?

    Related links:

    www.efda.org
    www.ccfe.ac.uk/CCFE.aspx
    fusionforenergy.europa.eu
    www-jt60.naka.jaea.go.jp/english/index-e.html

    ITER iter.org 
    JET www.efda.org/jet 
    www.ccfe.ac.uk/JET.aspx 
    JT-60SA jt60sa.org 
    MAST www.ccfe.ac.uk/MAST.aspx

    Further reading:

    A more recent article:

    Fusion: The quest to recreate the Sun’s power on Earth
    By Gaia Vince. August 13, 2012
    bbc.com/future/story/20120810-the-quest-to-recreate-the-sun
    Gaia Vince watches the construction of the world’s biggest fusion energy reactor and wonders whether this ambitious and expensive project will actually work.

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iter

    Magnetic confinement
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_confinement_fusion
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokamak
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spherical_tokamak
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stellarator
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spheromak
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reversed_field_pinch
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Field-reversed_configuration
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levitated_dipole
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Z-pinch
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dense_plasma_focus

    Inertial confinement
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inertial_confinement_fusion
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bubble_fusion
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teller%E2%80%93Ulam_design
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pure_fusion_weapon
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inertial_electrostatic_confinement
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Farnsworth%E2%80%93Hirsch_fusor
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polywell

    Magnetized Inertial Fusion
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetized_Inertial_Fusion
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetized_Liner_Inertial_Fusion
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetized_target_fusion

    Other
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muon-catalyzed_fusion
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyroelectric_fusion
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Migma 
    ________________________ 
  • 3 plusses - 3 comments - 6 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2013-04-04 06:48:43
    -flickr.com - Minor Protest Title: 267_6766 "Non-therapeutic Circumcision"
    By DB King. October 11, 2005 (Washington D.C.)
    Source: flickr.com/photos/bootbearwdc/51682205 (license terms below)

    Minor protest in front of Washington Convention Center in connection with the American Association of Pediatricians annual meeting

    Excerpts from Wikipedia:
    <<Circumcision is probably the world's most widely performed procedure. Approximately one-third of males worldwide are circumcised, most often for reasons other than medical indication. The WHO estimated in 2007 that 664,500,000 males aged 15 and over are circumcised (30% global prevalence), almost 70% of whom are Muslim. Circumcision is most prevalent in the Muslim world, Israel, South Korea, the United States and parts of Southeast Asia and Africa. It is relatively rare in Europe, Latin America, parts of Southern Africa and Oceania and most of Asia. Prevalence is near-universal in the Middle East and Central Asia. Non-religious circumcision in Asia, outside of the Republic of Korea and the Philippines, is rare, and prevalence is generally low across Europe. Estimates for individual countries include Spain and Colombia less than 2%; Brazil 7%; Taiwan 9%; Thailand 13%; and Australia 58.7%. Prevalence in the United States and Canada is estimated at 75% and 30% respectively. Prevalence in Africa varies from less than 20% in some southern African countries to near universal in North and West Africa.>>
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision#Prevalence 
    Also: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prevalence_of_circumcision 

    <<Circumcision is the world's oldest planned surgical procedure, suggested by anatomist and hyperdiffusionist historian Grafton Elliot Smith to be over 15,000 years old, pre-dating recorded history. There is no firm consensus as to how it came to be practiced worldwide. One theory is that it began in one geographic area and spread from there; another is that several different cultural groups began its practice independently. In his 1891 work History of Circumcision, physician Peter Charles Remondino suggested that it began as a less severe form of emasculating a captured enemy: penectomy or castration would likely have been fatal, while some form of circumcision would permanently mark the defeated yet leave him alive to serve as a slave.>>
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision#History 

    <<Alexander the Great conquered the Middle East in the 4th century BCE, and in the following centuries ancient Greek cultures and values came to the Middle East. The Greeks abhorred circumcision, making life for circumcised Jews living among the Greeks (and later the Romans) very difficult. Antiochus Epiphanes outlawed circumcision, as did Hadrian, which helped cause the Bar Kokhba revolt. During this period in history, Jewish circumcision called for the removal of only a part of the prepuce, and some Hellenized Jews attempted to look uncircumcised by stretching the extant parts of their foreskins. This was considered by the Jewish leaders to be a serious problem, and during the 2nd century CE they changed the requirements of Jewish circumcision to call for the complete removal of the foreskin, emphasizing the Jewish view of circumcision as intended to be not just the fulfillment of a Biblical commandment but also an essential and permanent mark of membership in a people.>>
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision#Middle_East.2C_Africa_and_Europe 

    <<Circumcision has only been thought of as a common medical procedure since late Victorian times. In 1870, the influential orthopedic surgeon Lewis Sayre, a founder of the American Medical Association, began using circumcision as a purported cure for several cases of young boys presenting with paralysis or significant gross motor problems. He thought the procedure ameliorated such problems based on a "reflex neurosis" theory of disease, with the understanding that a tight foreskin inflamed the nerves and caused systemic problems. The use of circumcision to promote good health also fit in with the germ theory of disease, which saw validation during the same time period: the foreskin was seen as harboring infection-causing smegma (a mixture of shed skin cells and oils). Sayre published works on the subject and promoted it energetically in speeches. Contemporary physicians picked up on Sayre's new treatment, which they believed could prevent or cure a wide-ranging array of medical problems and social ills, including masturbation (considered by the Victorians to be a serious problem), syphilis, epilepsy, hernia, headache, clubfoot, alcoholism and gout. Its popularity spread with publications such as Peter Charles Remondino's History of Circumcision. By the turn of the century, in both America and Great Britain, infant circumcision was nearly universally recommended.

    After the end of World War II, Britain moved to a nationalized health care system, and so looked to ensure that each medical procedure covered by the new system was cost-effective. Douglas Gairdner's 1949 article "The Fate of the Foreskin" argued persuasively that the evidence available at that time showed that the risks outweighed the known benefits. The procedure was not covered by the national health care system, and circumcision rates dropped in Britain and in the rest of Europe. In the 1970s, national medical associations in Australia and Canada issued recommendations against routine infant circumcision, leading to drops in the rates of both of those countries. In the United States, the American Academy of Pediatrics has, over the decades, issued a series of policy statements regarding circumcision, sometimes positive and sometimes negative.

    An association between circumcision and reduced heterosexual HIV infection rates was suggested in 1986. Experimental evidence was needed to establish a causal relationship, so three randomized controlled trials were commissioned as a means to reduce the effect of any confounding factors. Trials took place in South Africa, Kenya and Uganda.[10] All three trials were stopped early by their monitoring boards on ethical grounds, because those in the circumcised group had a lower rate of HIV contraction than the control group. Subsequently, the World Health Organization promoted circumcision in high-risk populations as part of an overall program to reduce the spread of HIV, although some have challenged the validity of the African randomized controlled trials, prompting a number of researchers to question the effectiveness of circumcision as an HIV prevention strategy.[68][69][70][71]>>
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision#Modern_times 

    <<In some cultures, males must be circumcised shortly after birth, during childhood or around puberty as part of a rite of passage. Circumcision is commonly practiced in the Jewish and Islamic faiths.

    Judaism
    Circumcision is very important to Judaism, with over 90% of adherents having the procedure performed as a religious obligation. The basis for its observance is found in the Torah of the Hebrew Bible, in Genesis chapter 17, in which a covenant of circumcision is made with Abraham and his descendants. Jewish circumcision is part of the brit milah ritual, to be performed by a specialist ritual circumciser (a mohel) on the eighth day of a newborn son's life (with certain exceptions for poor health). Jewish law requires that the circumcision leave the glans bare when the penis is flaccid. Converts to Judaism must also be circumcised; those who are already circumcised undergo a symbolic circumcision ritual. Circumcision is not required by Judaism for one to be considered Jewish, but adherents foresee serious negative spiritual consequences if it is neglected.

    Islam
    Although there is debate within Islam over whether it is a religious requirement, circumcision (called khitan) is practiced nearly universally by Muslim males. Islam bases its practice of circumcision on the Genesis 17 narrative, the same Biblical chapter referred to by Jews. The procedure is not mentioned in the Quran, but rather adherents believe it is a tradition established by Islam's prophet Muhammad directly (following Abraham), and so its practice is considered a sunnah (prophet's tradition). For Muslims, circumcision is a matter of cleanliness, purification and control over one's baser self (nafs). There is no agreement across the many Islamic communities about the age at which circumcision should be performed. It may be done from soon after birth up to about age 15, with it most often performed at around six to seven years of age. The timing can correspond with the boy's completion of his recitation of the whole Quran, with a coming-of-age event such as taking on the responsibility of daily prayer or betrothal. Circumcision may be celebrated with an associated family or community event. Circumcision is recommended for, but is not required of, converts to Islam.>>
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision#Cultures_and_religions 

    <<The origination of male circumcision is not known with certainty. It has been variously proposed that it began as a religious sacrifice, as a rite of passage marking a boy's entrance into adulthood, as a form of sympathetic magic to ensure virility or fertility>>
    <<as a means of humiliating enemies and slaves by symbolic castration, as a means of differentiating a circumcising group from their non-circumcising neighbors, as a means of discouraging masturbation or other socially proscribed sexual behaviors, as a means of removing "excess" pleasure, as a means of increasing a man's attractiveness to women, as a demonstration of one's ability to endure pain, or as a male counterpart to menstruation or the breaking of the hymen, or to copy the rare natural occurrence of a missing foreskin of an important leader, and as a display of disgust of the smegma produced by the foreskin. It has been suggested that the custom of circumcision gave advantages to tribes that practiced it and thus led to its spread. Darby describes these theories as "conflicting", and states that "the only point of agreement among proponents of the various theories is that promoting good health had nothing to do with it." Immerman et al. suggest that circumcision causes lowered sexual arousal of pubescent males, and hypothesize that this was a competitive advantage to tribes practising circumcision, leading to its spread. Wilson suggests that circumcision reduces insemination efficiency, reducing a man's capacity for extra-pair fertilizations by impairing sperm competition. Thus, men who display this signal of sexual obedience, may gain social benefits, if married men are selected to offer social trust and investment preferentially to peers who are less threatening to their paternity. It is possible that circumcision arose independently in different cultures for different reasons.>>
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_male_circumcision 

    <<According to Hodges, ancient Greek aesthetics of the human form considered circumcision a mutilation of a previously perfectly shaped organ. Greek artwork of the period portrayed penises as covered by the foreskin (sometimes in exquisite detail), except in the portrayal of satyrs, lechers, and barbarians. This dislike of the appearance of the circumcised penis led to a decline in the incidence of circumcision among many peoples that had previously practiced it throughout Hellenistic times. In Egypt, only the priestly caste retained circumcision, and by the 2nd century, the only circumcising groups in the Roman Empire were Jews, Jewish Christians, Egyptian priests, and the Nabatean Arabs. Circumcision was sufficiently rare among non-Jews that being circumcised was considered conclusive evidence of Judaism (or Early Christianity and others derogatorily called Judaizers) in Roman courts—Suetonius in Domitian 12.2 described a court proceeding in which a ninety-year-old man was stripped naked before the court to determine whether he was evading the head tax placed on Jews and Judaizers.>>
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_male_circumcision#Male_circumcision_in_the_Greco-Roman_world 

    <<Europeans, with the exception of the Jews, did not practice male circumcision. A rare exception occurred in Visigothic Spain, where during the armed campaign king Wamba ordered to circumcise everyone who committed atrocities against civilian population.>>
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_male_circumcision#Male_circumcision_in_the_Middle_Ages 

    <<Historically, neonatal circumcision was promoted during late Victorian times in the English-speaking parts of Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the United States and the United Kingdom and was widely practiced during the first part of the 20th century in these countries. However, the practice declined sharply in the United Kingdom after the Second World War, and somewhat later in Canada, Australia and New Zealand. It has been argued (e.g., Goldman 1997) that the practice did not spread to other European countries because others considered the arguments for it fallacious. In South Korea, circumcision was largely unknown before the establishment of the United States trusteeship in 1945. More than 90% of South Korean high school boys are now circumcised, but the average age of circumcision is 12 years, which makes South Korea a unique case.

    Infant circumcision has been abandoned in New Zealand and Britain, and is now much less common in Australia and in Canada (see table 1). The decline in circumcision in the United Kingdom followed the decision by the National Health Service (NHS) in 1948 not to cover the procedure following an influential article by Douglas Gairdner which claimed that circumcision resulted in the deaths of about 16 children under 5 each year in the United Kingdom.>>
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_male_circumcision#Male_circumcision_in_the_19th_century_and_beyond 

    Male circumcision to prevent masturbation
    Non-religious circumcision in English-speaking countries arose in a climate of negative attitudes towards sex, especially concerning masturbation. In her 1978 article The Ritual of Circumcision, Karen Erickson Paige writes: "In the United States, the current medical rationale for circumcision developed after the operation was in wide practice. The original reason for the surgical removal of the foreskin, or prepuce, was to control 'masturbatory insanity' – the range of mental disorders that people believed were caused by the 'polluting' practice of 'self-abuse.'"

    "Self-abuse" was a term commonly used to describe masturbation in the 19th century. According to Paige, "treatments ranged from diet, moral exhortations, hydrotherapy, and marriage, to such drastic measures as surgery, physical restraints, frights, and punishment. Some doctors recommended covering the penis with plaster of Paris, leather, or rubber; cauterization; making boys wear chastity belts or spiked rings; and in extreme cases, castration." Paige details how circumcision became popular as a masturbation remedy:

    "In the 1890s, it became a popular technique to prevent, or cure, masturbatory insanity. In 1891 the president of the Royal College of Surgeons of England published On Circumcision as Preventive of Masturbation, and two years later another British doctor wrote Circumcision: Its Advantages and How to Perform It, which listed the reasons for removing the 'vestigial' prepuce. Evidently the foreskin could cause 'nocturnal incontinence,' hysteria, epilepsy, and irritation that might 'give rise to erotic stimulation and, consequently, masturbation.' Another physician, P.C. Remondino, added that 'circumcision is like a substantial and well-secured life annuity...it insures better health, greater capacity for labor, longer life, less nervousness, sickness, loss of time, and less doctor bills.' No wonder it became a popular remedy."

    At the same time circumcisions were advocated on men, clitoridectomies (removal of the clitoris) were also performed for the same reason (to treat female masturbators). The US "Orificial Surgery Society" for female "circumcision" operated until 1925, and clitoridectomies and infibulations would continue to be advocated by some through the 1930s. As late as 1936, L. E. Holt, an author of pediatric textbooks, advocated male and female circumcision as a treatment for masturbation.

    One of the leading advocates of circumcision was John Harvey Kellogg. He advocated the consumption of Kellogg's corn flakes to prevent masturbation, and he believed that circumcision would be an effective way to eliminate masturbation in males.

    "Covering the organs with a cage has been practiced with entire success. A remedy which is almost always successful in small boys is circumcision, especially when there is any degree of phimosis. The operation should be performed by a surgeon without administering an anesthetic, as the brief pain attending the operation will have a salutary effect upon the mind, especially if it be connected with the idea of punishment, as it may well be in some cases. The soreness which continues for several weeks interrupts the practice, and if it had not previously become too firmly fixed, it may be forgotten and not resumed. If any attempt is made to watch the child, he should be so carefully surrounded by vigilance that he cannot possibly transgress without detection. If he is only partially watched, he soon learns to elude observation, and thus the effect is only to make him cunning in his vice."

    Robert Darby, writing in the Australian Medical Journal, noted that some 19th-century circumcision advocates—and their opponents—believed that the foreskin was sexually sensitive:

    In the 19th century the role of the foreskin in erotic sensation was well understood by physicians who wanted to cut it off precisely because they considered it the major factor leading boys to masturbation. The Victorian physician and venereologist William Acton (1814–1875) damned it as "a source of serious mischief", and most of his contemporaries concurred.

    Both opponents and supporters of circumcision agreed that the significant role the foreskin played in sexual response was the main reason why it should be either left in place or removed. William Hammond, a Professor of Mind in New York in the late 19th century, commented that "circumcision, when performed in early life, generally lessens the voluptuous sensations of sexual intercourse", and both he and Acton considered the foreskin necessary for optimal sexual function, especially in old age. Jonathan Hutchinson, English surgeon and pathologist (1828–1913), and many others, thought this was the main reason why it should be excised.>>
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_male_circumcision#Male_circumcision_to_prevent_masturbation 

    In United States
    <<A study in 1987 found that the prominent reasons for parents choosing circumcision were "concerns about the attitudes of peers and their sons' self concept in the future," rather than medical concerns.[51] A 1999 study reported that reasons for circumcision included "ease of hygiene (67 percent), ease of infant circumcision compared with adult circumcision (63 percent), medical benefit (41 percent), and father circumcised (37 percent)." The authors commented that "Medical benefits were cited more frequently in this study than in past studies, although medical issues remain secondary to hygiene and convenience."[52] A 2001 study reported that "The most important reason to circumcise or not circumcise the child was health reasons."[53] A 2005 study speculated that increased recognition of the potential benefits may be responsible for an observed increase in the rate of neonatal circumcision in the USA between 1988 and 2000.[54] In a 2001 survey, 86.6% of parents felt respected by their medical provider, and parents who did not circumcise "felt less respected by their medical provider".[53]>>
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_male_circumcision#Circumcision_since_1950 
    _________________ 


    Excerpt from
    The non-therapeutic circumcision of male minors. KNMG (May 2010)

    ABSTRACT

    "The official viewpoint or KNMG and other related medical / scientific organisaties Is that non-therapeutic circumcision of male minors is a violation of children's rights to autonomy and physical integrity. Contrary to popular belief, circumcision can cause complications - bleeding, infection, urethral stricture and panic attacks are particularly common. KNMG is powerful Therefore urging a strong policy of deterrence. KNMG is calling upon doctors to Actively and insistently inform parents who are considering the procedure of the absence of medical benefits and the danger of complications."

    PREAMBULE

    POSITION OF THE KNMG WITH REGARD TO NON-THERAPEUTIC CIRCUMCISION OF MALE MINORS
     . . . 
    <<The reason for our adoption of an official viewpoint regarding this matter is the increasing emphasis on children’s rights. It is particularly relevant for doctors that children must not be subjected to medical proceedings that have no therapeutic or preventative value. In addition to this, there is growing concern regarding complications, both minor and serious, which can occur as a result of circumcising a child. A third reason for this viewpoint is the growing sentiment that there is a discrepancy between the KNMG’s firm stance with regard to female genital mutilation and the lack of a stance with regard to the non-therapeutic circumcision of male minors, as the two have a number of similarities.

    The initial objective of this viewpoint is to initiate public discussion of this issue. The ultimate aim is to minimise non-therapeutic circumcision of male minors.>>
     . . . 
    — Prof. Dr. Arie Nieuwenhuijzen Kruseman (Chairman of KNMG)
     . . . 

    BACKGROUND STUDY FOR KNMG VIEWPOINT

    NON-THERAPEUTIC CIRCUMCISION OF MALE MINORS

    INTRODUCTION
     . . . 
    <<Until a few years ago, the attitude towards circumcision was fairly permissive, and circumcision was legitimised by appealing to freedom of religion and supposed medical benefits. In recent years, the attitude towards circumcision appears to have been changing. This is probably partly the result of the debate about female genital mutilation (FGM). With the global condemnation of this practice, including in its non-mutilating, symbolic form, the question regularly arises why circumcision should be judged differently than FGM. These days, more critical articles are being published about circumcision.[1] These articles point to the rights of children, the absence of medical benefits and the fact that this is a mutilating intervention that regularly leads to complications and can cause medical and psychological problems, both at a young and a later age.>>
     . . . 
    <<
    MEDICAL/PREVENTATIVE
    In the past, circumcision was performed as a preventative and treatment for a large number of complaints, such as gout, syphilis, epilepsy, headaches, arthrosis, alcoholism, groin hernias, asthma, poor digestion, eczema and excessive masturbation.[10] Due to the large number of medical benefits which were wrongly ascribed to circumcision, it is frequently asserted that circumcision is ‘a procedure in need of a justification’.[11] In recent decades, evidence has been published which apparently shows that circumcision reduces the risk of HIV/AIDS[12], but this evidence is contradicted by other studies.[13]>>

    <<Further, there is apparent evidence that circumcision offers protection against complaints such as HPV infection, urinary tract infections and penis cancer. However, these studies, too, are controversial.[16] Moreover, urinary tract infections can be successfully treated with modern healthcare. Children with inborn abnormalities to the urinary tract can generally be successfully helped by a foreskin-widening operation, which makes the foreskin easier to clean.

    In response to the possible medical benefits, a large number of complications resulting from circumcision are described: infections, bleeding, sepsis, necrosis, fibrosis of the skin, urinary tract infections, meningitis, herpes infections, meatisis, meatal stenosis, necrosis and necrotising complications, all of which have led to the complete amputation of the penis.[17] Deaths have also been reported.[18] The AAFP estimates the number of deaths as 1 in 500,000.[19] That would mean that in the United States, two children die each year as a result of the intervention.

    Alongside these direct medical complications, psychological problems[20] and complications in the area of sexuality have also been reported,[21] as have extreme pain experiences in newborns causing behavioural changes which are still apparent years later.[22] [23] Similarly, the high social costs of circumcision as a result of complications have been cited.[24]

    Even if there were slight medical benefits connected with circumcision for medical-preventative reasons, it is questionable whether these possible medical benefits would compensate for the risk of complications. Certainly when it comes to children, who cannot make this assessment themselves, the possible medical benefits should be significant and the risk of complications small for the intervention to be justifiable.

    It is a generally accepted moral principle that children may only be exposed to medical treatments if illness or abnormalities are present, or if it can be demonstrated that the medical intervention is in the interest of the child, as is the case for vaccinations, for example. In the case of preventative medical interventions, there needs to be a clear individual or public health benefit which cannot be achieved in another, less intrusive way.

    Thus circumcision as a preventative against urinary tract infections or HIV/AIDS would need to be weighed against other, less intrusive forms of prevention (such as antibiotics, condom use, sex education or behavioural changes) and a scientific cost/benefit analysis made. Only if the results of this cost/benefit analysis were positive should the intervention be offered to all parents of small boys on public health grounds.

    In addition, it would need to be demonstrated that it was essential that the circumcision be performed during childhood or infancy, rather than waiting until the boy had reached an age at which the risk was relevant (such as in HIV infection) and he could make a decision about the intervention for himself. After all, in many cases, such as in HPV or HIV prevention, it will be possible to put off circumcision until the boy reaches an age at which he can elect to have the intervention himself or instead choose alternatives such as using condoms, HPV vaccination or abstinence.


    DOCTORS' ORGANISATIONS ABROAD

    A large number of doctors’ organisations have pronounced on the supposed medical benefits of circumcision for medical/preventative reasons, set against the risk of complications.

    In 2003, the British Medical Association stated: ‘The medical benefits previously claimed have not been convincingly proven. (...) The British Medical Association considers that the evidence concerning health benefits from non-therapeutic circumcision is insufficient for this alone to be a justification for doing it.’[25]

    The American Academy of Pediatrics stated in 1999: ‘Existing scientific evidence ... [is] not sufficient to recommend routine neonatal circumcision.’[26] The American Medical Association endorsed this position in December 1999 and now rejects circumcision for medical/preventative reasons. The AMA further states: ‘parental preference alone is not sufficient justification for performing a surgical procedure on a child’.[27]

    Other doctors’ organisations in Australia and Canada have taken similar positions.[28] For example, the Royal Australasian College of Physicians asserts: ‘Review of the literature in relation to risks and benefits shows there is no evidence of benefit outweighing harm for circumcision as a routine procedure in the neonate.’[29]

    In its viewpoint, the Australasian Association of Paediatric Surgeons states: ‘the AAPS does not support the routine circumcision of male neonates, infants or children in Australia. It is considered to be inappropriate and unnecessary as a routine to remove the prepuce, based on the current evidence available’.

    The Canadian Paediatric Society states: ‘The overall evidence of the benefits and dangers of circumcision is so evenly balanced that it does not support recommending circumcision as a routine procedure for newborns’.[30]

    The American Academy of Family Physicians believes that the medical benefits of circumcision are ‘conflicting or inconclusive’. The decision should therefore be left to parents: ‘The American Academy of Family Physicians recommends physicians discuss the potential harms and benefits of circumcision with all parents or legal guardians considering this procedure for their newborn son’.[31]

    In Sweden, a law was introduced in 2001 after a child died after NTC as a result of an incorrect dose of the painkiller Ketogan. A first version of the law implied a total prohibition of circumcision for non-therapeutic reasons up to the age of 18. Under pressure from Jewish organisations, and out of fear that the practice would be driven underground, the law was later watered down. The law now states that non-therapeutic circumcision may only be performed in the first two months after birth and only under local or general anaesthetic. This anaesthetic may only be administered by a doctor or a qualified nurse. The circumcision itself may only be performed by a doctor or a mohel specially trained for the procedure, who has followed a course and has a licence from the Ministry of Health.

    The prevailing consensus in the medical world is that there may be some medical benefits associated with circumcision but that these benefits, weighed against alternatives and the risk of complications from circumcision, are insufficiently great to be able to recommend routine circumcision for medical/preventative reasons. There is currently not a single medical association that recommends routine circumcision for medical/preventative reasons.

    Given the above, the rest of this memo uses the term non-therapeutic circumcision (NTC). This refers to circumcision in boys and men for reasons other than medical/ therapeutic reasons.>>
     . . . 

    <<
    FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION VS. NTC

    [NTC: Non-therapeutic Circumcision]

    The practice of FGM has been prohibited by law in the Netherlands since 1993 in both adult and minor women and girls. In various viewpoints, the KNMG and NVOG have rejected all forms of FGM, including the most mild form, in adult women, as well as reinfibulation[38] following childbirth. The form which most closely resembles NTC, circumcision, is also unanimously rejected in virtually all the literature.[39] [40] In spite of this, the practice of FGM still occurs regularly, particularly among girls from North Africa. This led the internist Jannes Mulder to call in Medisch Contact for the mildest form of FGM, ‘sunna light’, to be tolerated.[41] This intervention proposed by Mulder consists of a small prick in the foreskin of the clitoris, causing a drop of blood to be released.

    No tissue is removed, and the girl suffers no damage to her body, and there is no effect on sexual function. According to Mulder, the practice of FGM could in this way eventually be redirected into innocent, symbolic forms.
    His proposal attracted purely negative reactions, generally based on the principled position that any form of FGM, including a symbolic one, must be treated as child abuse. “When it comes to the integrity of the girl’s body, no single compromise must be made”, states Pharos, knowledge centre for the prevention and tackling of female circumcision. The Netherlands Municipal Health Services (GGD) stated: “A girl is fine as she is.” Even so, this ‘sunna light’ is far less intrusive than NTC, in which part of the erotogenic tissue of the penis is removed.

    In a response to the criticism of his article, Jannes Mulder points to the difference in how NTC and FGM are judged: ‘No one says a word about the Jewish practice of circumcising boys. This traditional ‘abuse’ involves more than my single drop of blood. Some see the circumcision of Muslim boys as a hygienic intervention. That argument conceals a deeper motive. After all, there is no culture that preventatively deals with dirty ears by cutting them off.’[42]

    In an article in Medisch Contact, Karim and Hage (former board members of the Netherlands Association for Plastic Surgery, NVPC) similarly point to what they see as the discriminating fact that circumcision in girls is categorically rejected (even in its non-mutilating form) but that it is permitted in boys.[43] However, in the authors’ view, there are no reasons why FGM and NTC should be judged differently in moral or legal terms.

    The Partij voor de Vrijheid (Freedom Party) responded to the article by Karim and Hage through the person of Ms Agema with questions in the Dutch Lower House calling on the State Secretary not to prohibit the circumcision of boys. ‘Can we be assured that the Dutch government will not bow to this discrimination argument and that circumcision of boys will remain permitted?[44]

    FGM and NTC are generally seen as two separate practices, which need to be evaluated differently. For example, doctors’ organisations often devote different statements to the two practices.

    In the literature, little attention is given to legitimating the different treatment given to the two practices: apparently the difference is regarded as self-evident.[45] FGM is generally viewed as a serious violation of the rights of the child, while NTC is seen as something which parents may decide on for themselves. In the literature that exists, a number of arguments are made which are intended to justify a different evaluation of FGM and NTC.

    SEXUAL FUNCTION
    One of the most frequently used arguments for treating the two interventions differently is that FGM leads to the impairment of sexual function in the woman; supposedly, NTC has no such impact on the man.

    However, FGM takes many forms. There is the most severe form, infibulation, in which the inner and outer labia are stitched together and the clitoris is removed. However, there are also much milder forms of FGM, in which only the foreskin of the clitoris is removed. However, sunna light, as proposed by Mulder and previously proposed by Bartels[46], in which no tissue is removed, is also universally rejected. The WHO also rejects all forms of FGM: ‘Female genital mutilation of any type has been recognized as a harmful practice and a violation of the human rights of girls and women’.[47] The WHO explicitly includes in this the mild forms of FGM, in which no tissue is removed. So the argument for rejecting FGM is not that FGM interferes with female sexuality, but that it is a violation of the rights of the woman.

    ‘The guiding principles for considering genital practices as female genital mutilation should be those of human rights, including the right to health, the rights of children and the right to non-discrimination on the basis of sex’.[48]
    Another part of this argument says that NTC does not affect male sexuality. The foreskin is regarded as a part of the body that has no function at all in male sexuality. Many sexologists contradict this idea: in their view, the foreskin is a complex, erotogenic structure that plays an important role ‘in the mechanical function of the penis during sexual acts, such as penetrative intercourse and masturbation’.[49] The many attempts by men to restore their foreskins by mechanical or surgical means also contradict the idea that the foreskin is a useless part of the body.[50]

    NTC is sometimes compared to interventions such as tattoos and piercings.[51] On this view, Jews and Muslims see NTC not as an infringement of physical integrity, but as an innocent perfectioning of the body, comparable to tattoos and piercings. However, an important legal distinction between NTC in children and piercings and tattoos is that it is prohibited to tattoo or pierce children under the age of 16.[52] In other words, tattoos and piercings can only be done if a child is old enough to ask for them itself.

    NO THEORY OF OPPRESSION
    A second much-used argument to separate FGM from NTC is that FGM comes from a theory of female oppression, of which FGM is an expression. Since there is no such theory of oppression at play in NTC, this would make FGM morally more reprehensible than NTC.

    This argument can be refuted in two ways. Firstly, the historical background of NTC is extremely complex, and is in any case rooted in the desire to control male sexuality. Thus NTC was deployed in the past to combat excessive onanism, and it was also used to ‘brand’ slaves.[53] So the background to NTC is not as unambiguous as is often thought.

    There is another reason why the argument does not hold. The reason why FGM is condemned is not because it comes forth from a theory of female oppression but because it is harmful to them and represents a violation of their physical integrity. FGM would also be condemned if it were done out of aesthetic considerations or as a way of ‘venerating’ women. Even if women were to want FGM themselves at a later age, doctors would probably not be permitted to meet their request.

    The right to physical integrity is an inalienable human right, like the right to life and the right to personal freedom. These are inalienable rights, which is to say that the patient’s permission does not offer sufficient justification to be allowed to perform the intervention. Besides permission, there must also always be an additional reason, such as a medical interest. From this it follows that even if women did not regret the intervention, doctors would not be permitted to commit serious infringements of the integrity of the body, such as FGM.

    EMBEDDED IN CULTURE
    A third argument often made for drawing a distinction between FGM and NTC is that NTC is a much older practice than FGM, and that NTC is far more embedded in existing religious groups such as Islam and Judaism. However, this is open to question: both NTC and FGM have been practised for centuries by many different peoples and for many different reasons. And FGM also has an important ritual, religious and identifying significance for many peoples. So it cannot be said with certainty that NTC is older than FGM. Even if it were, it is still questionable whether this argument is morally relevant. It is not the history of a practice which is of decisive importance, but whether a particular practice is a violation of the rights of the child.

    RELIGIOUS FREEDOM VS. PHYSICAL INTEGRITY

    NTC in minors is regarded by many authors as a violation of physical integrity.[54] However, they subsequently often conclude that NTC falls under the right to religious freedom, and that parents may therefore decide for themselves whether they wish to have this intervention carried out.
    The right to religious freedom means that parents are free to raise their children in a religion or philosophy of their own choosing. However, the right to religious freedom does not apply only to parents, but also to children. The right to religious freedom of the child implies that the child must at a later age have the right to choose a religion or philosophy of life for itself, or to reject the one in which it was raised.>>
     . . . 

    <<
    CONCLUSION

    - There is no convincing evidence that circumcision is useful or necessary in terms of prevention or hygiene. Partly in the light of the complications which can arise during or after circumcision, circumcision is not justifiable except on medical/ therapeutic grounds. Insofar as there are medical benefits, such as a possibly reduced risk of HIV infection, it is reasonable to put off circumcision until the age at which such a risk is relevant and the boy himself can decide about the intervention, or can opt for any available alternatives.

    - Contrary to what is often thought, circumcision entails the risk of medical and psychological complications. The most common complications are bleeding, infections, meatus stenosis (narrowing of the urethra) and panic attacks. Partial or complete penis amputations as a result of complications following circumcisions have also been reported, as have psychological problems as a result of the circumcision.

    - Non-therapeutic circumcision of male minors is contrary to the rule that minors may only be exposed to medical treatments if illness or abnormalities are present, or if it can be convincingly demonstrated that the medical intervention is in the interest of the child, as in the case of vaccinations.

    - Non-therapeutic circumcision of male minors conflicts with the child’s right to autonomy and physical integrity.

    - The KNMG calls on (referring) doctors to explicitly inform parents/carers who are considering non-therapeutic circumcision for male minors of the risk of complications and the lack of convincing medical benefits. The fact that this is a medically non-essential intervention with a real risk of complications makes the quality of this advice particularly important. The doctor must then record the informed consent in the medical file.

    - The KNMG respects the deep religious, symbolic and cultural feelings that surround the practice of non-therapeutic circumcision. The KNMG calls for a dialogue between doctors’ organisations, experts and the religious groups concerned in order to put the issue of non-therapeutic circumcision of male minors on the agenda and ultimately restrict it as much as possible.

    - There are good reasons for a legal prohibition of non-therapeutic circumcision of male minors, as exists for female genital mutilation. However, the KNMG fears that a legal prohibition would result in the intervention being performed by non-medically qualified individuals in circumstances in which the quality of the intervention could not be sufficiently guaranteed. This could lead to more serious complications than is currently the case.>>


    The non-therapeutic circumcision of male minors is a publication setting out the Position of the Koninklijke Nederlandsche Maatschappij tot bevordering der Geneeskunst (KNMG), adopted by the Board of the Federation and effective as from 27 May 2010.

    The KNMG physicians’ federation represents over 53,000 physicians and medical students. KNMG member organisations include the Koepel Artsen Maatschappij en Gezondheid (Umbrella organisation for physicians and health – KAMG), the Landelijke vereniging van Artsen in Dienstverband (National society of employee physicians – LAD), the Landelijke Huisartsen Vereniging (National society of general practitioners – LHV), the Netherlands Society of Occupational Medicine (NVAB), the Nederlandse Vereniging voor Verzekeringsgeneeskunde (Netherlands society of insurance medicine – NVVG), the Orde van Medisch Specialisten (Order of medical specialists – OMS) and the Dutch Association of Elderly Care Physicians and Social Geriatricians (Verenso).


    — KNMG. Non-therapeutic circumcision of male minors. KNMG Viewpoint (2010)
    URL: http://knmg.artsennet.nl/Publicaties/KNMGpublicatie/Nontherapeutic-circumcision-of-male-minors-2010.htm 
    PDF: http://knmg.artsennet.nl/web/file?uuid=579e836d-ea83-410f-9889-feb7eda87cd5&owner=a8a9ce0e-f42b-47a5-960e-be08025b7b04&contentid=77976 
    _______________ 

    URL related G+ posts:
    plus.google.com/114605547533973731226/posts/hVYmaN4v38P 
    plus.google.com/118135535337532829792/posts/HhdEseNQrFn 
    _______________ 

    DB King (David): dbkingsdc.blogspot.com 
    License terms: Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic (CC BY 2.0) 
    creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/deed.en 
    _______________ 
  • 5 plusses - 13 comments - 0 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-06-30 17:14:11
    RESHARE:
    plus.google.com - Can Your Mac Do This?
    Uploaded by Joshua Roy. On June 30, 2012

    Excerpt from comments:
    Chad Olson June 30, 2012 6:24 PM +3
    Did you win at solitaire

    Can your Mac do this?
    I don't think so...
    ________________

    Reshared text:
  • 9 plusses - 2 comments - 2 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-05-13 07:16:48
    Why Mike Elgan is the 'Statist Douchebag of the Year.'
    Self. May 13, 2012

    Excerpt from comments:

    Zephyr López Cervilla May 13, 2012 8:36 AM (edited)
    All his rant is more an apology of Statism than an accurate description of the facts. The states don't own their citizens (unless you're a Cuban, a North Korean or a Chinese "subject").

    Silicon Valley wasn't created by the US government but by private initiative (originated around Shockley Semiconductor Laboratory, founded by a William Shockley, a researcher who had previously worked at Bell Labs, labs owned by a private corporation).

    And those elite universities (many of them privately owned) aren't free, most of their students have to pay onerous fees for their tuition.

    Finally, the claim that America (the US Government?) is the creator of the Internet (as we know it) is ignoring all the development of the WWW that took place in the CERN facilities (primarily carried out by Tim Berners-Lee, a British researcher), that allowed sharing information between different platforms using different software. If something did the US Government was to delay the popularization of Internet with restrictions on the use of the Internet to carry commercial traffic until 1995.

    If there's a douchebag here this is Mike Elgan.
    ----------------------------

    A typical comment by a statist:

    P E Sharpe May 13, 2012 7:26 AM
    If he benefited in any way from the infrastructure of the city in which he lived, he has an obligation to pay taxes to the city. Likewise to the State. Likewise to the country. A company and an individual do not live an autonomous existence, all parental and collegial affirmations to the contrary. If he was a citizen, he benefited. Period.
    ----------------------------

    Zephyr López Cervilla May 13, 2012 9:21 AM (edited)
    He and/or his family have payed more than enough taxes all these years for the use of any of those services and infrastructure.
    On the other hand, the US Government has no say in privately owned companies, specially those that make much of their annual revenue overseas. If any potential entrepeneur was forced to pay high taxes for the rest of their lives you wouldn't see the creation of so many new companies in the States, they would simply move somewhere else.
    ----------------------------
    URL via post: plus.google.com/109667384864782087641/posts/VfWFbGWrU6k
    via +Jonathan Langdale
    ----------------------------

    References:

    <<The ideology of statism espoused by fascism holds that sovereignty is not vested in the people but in the nation state, and that all individuals and associations exist only to enhance the power, prestige and well-being of the state. It repudiates individualism and exalts the nation as an organic body headed by the Supreme Leader and nurtured by unity, force, and discipline. Fascism and some forms of corporatism extol the moral position that the corporate group, usually the state, is greater than the sum of its parts and that individuals have a moral obligation to serve the state.>>
    1. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statism

    2. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_World_Wide_Web
    3. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Internet
    ----------------------------

    Text original post:

    Mike Elgan originally shared this post*:
    Why Eduardo Saverin is the 'Ungrateful Douchebag of the Year.'

    +Farhad Manjoo lays bare the shamelessness and depravity of Eduardo Saverin's decision to renounce his American citizenship to avoid U.S. taxes before the Facebook IPO that will make him billions.

    As Manjoo points out, America saved Saverin's life, educated him; created the Internet without which Facebook could not exist; created the elite university where he could meet someone like Mark Zuckerberg; created Silicon Valley where a company like Facebook could grow; thrive and have a $100 billion IPO; created the U.S. legal system, which protected his investment in Facebook when in many other countries he would have lost it.

    Saverin was happy to be American when it afforded him these many opportunities, and the coming opportunity to gain $5 billion or so for his relatively marginal contribution to the creation of Facebook. And now that it's time to cash in, suddenly he's renouncing his citizenship to avoid contributing back to the country that made him rich beyond imagination.

    So you and I will have to keep on paying taxes to support the US government. But not Saverin. He's just going to take the billions America made possible and give nothing back.

    What a greedy, shameless, ungrateful douchebag.

    http://pandodaily.com/2012/05/12/what-eduardo-saverin-owes-america-hint-nearly-everything/
    ----------------------------
    *: plus.google.com/113117251731252114390/posts/Uz6CaW2qqaM
    ----------------------------

    Comment:
    I must say I'm not surprised by Elgan's statist stance. He had already supported the military intervention of the US Armed Forces in Libya and their participation in the slaughtering of Gaddafi, referring to everyone else who disagreed with his war mongering stance as "Gaddafi apologist,"[1] and blocking others to prevent that they could question his political views.
    1. plus.google.com/113117251731252114390/posts/hVv2MHoqLdP

    Related posts:
    plus.google.com/114605547533973731226/posts/5goNHv8ahG
    plus.google.com/114605547533973731226/posts/fzngz4o8Yr4
    ----------------------------
    #mikeelgan
  • 2 plusses - 16 comments - 0 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-09-28 06:54:34
    RESHARE:
    plus.google.com - This Is Our Plan to Overcome the Debt Crisis
    By Singer. Uploaded September 28, 2012

    Governments: "We'll sell bonds to you so we can bail you out with loans"
    Banks: "We'll borrow money from you so we can buy your bonds"

    URL source G+ post: plus.google.com/115288001414266277268/posts/3QcCQRLVCgj 
    ___________________________ 

    Reshared text:
  • 9 plusses - 1 comments - 2 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-06-07 23:57:00
    informationisbeautiful.net - Snake Oil? Scientific evidence for popular health supplements showing tangible health benefits when taken orally by an adult with healthy diet
    By Davd McCandless and Andy Perkins (code). Research: Miriam Quick. May 2011 

    Others: Pearl Doughty-White, Alexia Wdowski

    Source: PubMed, cochrane.org 
    Large human blind placebo-controlled trials only.
    Click bubble to see key study
    Popularity (Google hits) [bubble size]
    One To Watch (OTW) (few studies but promising results) [orange bubbles]

    "All content Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial David McCandless 2009 (unless otherwise stated)"
    informationisbeautiful.net/play/snake-oil-supplements 
    -------------------------------------- 

    Comment:

    All these are (or aren't), but here you aren't all those that they are.
    Also notice: 
    - "Large human blind placebo-controlled trials only" and also
    - "when taken orally by an adult with healthy diet"

    I've detected several flaws. They have assigned that there's null evidence 
    of reveratrol's anti-carcinogenic capacity, whereas both linked papers consider resveratrol can prevent cancer and be used in anti-cancer treatment: 

    <<numerous preclinical findings suggest resveratrol as a promising nature's arsenal for cancer prevention and treatment.>>  
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18550275 
    <<Our analysis of published data strengthen support that resveratrol displays novel roles in various cellular processes, and help to establish an expanded molecular framework for cancer prevention by resveratrol in vivo.>>  
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20623546 

    Also, the evidence scale in the diagram doesn't totally match the data sheet. In the sheet, 4 is considered as "good" evidence, whereas in the diagram, the products with 4 has been considered only as "promising."
    For some reason, even though the scale goes from 0 to 6, no product has been given 6 (strong evidence), whereas for instance, in the linked papers the evidence that folic acid can prevent certain birth defects i considered as strong:  

    <<Only one study assessed the incidence of NTDs and the effect was not statistically significant (RR 0.08, 95% CI 0.00 to 1.33) although no events were found in the group that received folic acid. Folic acid had a significant protective effect for reoccurrence (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.60).>>  
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20927767 
    <<Any level of use in the first 3 months after conception resulted in a lowered risk as well (OR = 0.60; 95% CI = 0.46-0.79).>>  
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7619926

    I personally find more reliable the compendium of the results of the more relevant studies on different herbs and supplements provided by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NIH) in their MedlinePlus health information service (although the number of products reviewed is more limited). Besides, the scale of possible effectiveness makes more sense: 

    nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/druginfo/herb_All.html
    -------------------------------------- 

    List of products included in the SnakeOil's data sheet arranged according to their evidence on health effectiveness:

    (6) Strong Evidence (none?!)
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

    (5)

    062. garlic - blood pressure ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18554422ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20594781
    059. folic acid - certain birth defects ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20927767ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7619926
    092. melatonin - insomnia in the elderly ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18036082ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21845053
    053. fish oil / omega 3 - heart disease ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19609891ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19106137
    156. vitamin D - general health, all-cause mortality ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18375700ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21415774
    165. zinc - colds ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21328251
    100. niacin (vitamin B3) - heart disease ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20208032ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9915658
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

    (4) Good evidence

    071. green tea - cholesterol ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11897173ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12824094
    041. dark chocolate - blood pressure ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20584271ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19910929
    023. calcium + vitamin D - breast cancer in premenopausal women, cancer ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17533208ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17556697
    052. fish oil /omega 3 - cancer symptoms ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17408522ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12506181
    007. antioxidants - infertility in men ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20378409
    158. vitamin D - bone health ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18689393ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18088161
    051. fish oil / omega 3 - colorectal cancer ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17493949ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17823383
    106. omega 6 - heart health ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19171857
    102. olive leaf extract - blood pressure, cholesterol ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21036583ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18729245
    034. coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) - blood pressure ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17287847
    161. vitamin K2 - heart disease OTW ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20850029ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15514282
    140. tyrosine - alertness, wakefulness, memory ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7794222
    072. hawthorn [ Crataegus curvisepala, C. oxycantha, C. monogyna ] - blood pressure ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16149711
    098. N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) - mental health OTW ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18534556ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18436195
    039. creatine - cognition ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14561278ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19773644
    125. Rhodiola rosea - fatigue ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19016404ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11081987
    112. peppermint oil - Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19008265
    042. devil's claw [ Harpagophytum procumbens ] - arthritis ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14669250ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17212570
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

    WORTH IT LINE
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
    (3.5)

    055. fish oil / omega 3 - depression, mental illness ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15535884ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20925595
    022. calcium - osteoporosis in postmenopausal women ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21289325ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18412990
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

    (3)

    073. honey - cough in children ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20091616ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20618098
    121. probiotics - diarrhea, gastrointestinal and respiratory infections ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20107143ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16148529
    045. Echinacea - colds ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16437427ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17597571
    123. red yeast rice [ Monascus purpureus ] - cholesterol, heart disease OTW ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18549841ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20975018
    151. vitamin B8 (inositol) - Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD), panic disorder, depression OTW ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8780431
    063. ginger - nausea and vomiting ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10793599ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17957907
    162. vitamin K2 - osteoporosis ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10227010springerlink.com/content/v4288732927n2072
    021. calcium - colorectal cancer ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9887161ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11073017
    004. Aloe vera - diabetes ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10885091 Antidiabetic activity of Aloe vera L juice. II. clinical trial in diabetes mellitus patients in combination with glibenclamide
    143. valerian [ Valeriana officinalis ] - insomnia ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17145239ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17517355
    099. nettle [ Urtica dioica ] - prostate-related urinary problems OTW ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16635963ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18038253
    120. probiotics - Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) [ Bifidobacterium infantis 35624 and B. coagulans GBI-30, 6086] ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19277023
    079. krill oil - Premenstrual Syndrome (PMS) ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12777162ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19332970
    090. magnesium - blood pressure ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18390781
    133. St. John's wort [ Hypericum perforatum ] - depression, Premenstrual Syndrome (PMS) nccam.nih.gov/health/stjohnswort/sjw-and-depression.htmncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18843608
    030. cinnamon - type 2 diabetes ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17381386ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14633804
    091. magnesium + vitamin B6 - child Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorders (ADHD) ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16846100ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16579066
    70. green tea - cancer ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19588362  
    031. coconut oil - obesity, cholesterol ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19437058ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14608053
    085. licorice root [ Glycyrrhiza glabra ] - dyspepsia ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11505331
    134. sunlight - kidney cancer in men OTW ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20213683
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

    (2)

    077. iron - chid development (when not anaemic) ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20410098
    095. milk thistle [ Silybum ] - hepatitis ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18458640
    152. vitamin C - colds ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17636648
    103. omega 3 - child Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17435458ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18448859
    050. feverfew ( Tanacetum parthenium ) - migraine ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14973986ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16232154
    038. cranberry juice [ Vaccinium subgen. Oxycoccus ] - urinary tract infections, kidney stones ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18253990efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/943.htm
    132. spirulina [ Spirulina maxima ] - blood pressure, cholesterol ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18039384
    096. methylsulfonylmethane (MSM) - arthritis ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16309928
    074. horse chestnut seed extract [ Aesculus hippocastanum ] - chronic venous insufficiency OTW ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16437450ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19247403
    082. L-lysine - herpes simplex [HSV] OTW ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6435961ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3115841
    037. coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) - migrane ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15728298
    005. Andrographis paniculata - respiratory tract infections OTW ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14748896
    054. fish oil / omega 3 - child intelligence ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20171055ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12509593
    083. lavender ( Lavandula angustifolia ) - depression ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12551734
    020. bromelain (an extract pineapple plant) - arthritis ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15841258
    060. GABA - stress, anxiety ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16971751
    065. ginseng ( Panax ginseng ) - cognitive performance ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15982990
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

    (1.5)

    017. black tea - heart disease, stress nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/druginfo/natural/997.html
    135. taurine - weight loss, cholesterol ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15221507
    081. L-carnitine - diabetes, impotence ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10067662ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12568837
    129. selenium - cancer ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20568891ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12433704
    018. borage seed oil - rheumatism ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8214997
    080. L-arginine - exercise performance_ ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20724562ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21399536
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

    (1) Low Evidence

    046. elderberry [ Sambucus ] - cholesterol OTW ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14749743
    153. vitamin D - cancer OTW ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20164683ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17556697
    137. tryptophan and 5-HTP - depression in women ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16767422ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11869656
    118. probiotics - athletic performance ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17618005
    061. garlic - cancer ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16484572
    056. fish oil / omega 3 - Alzheimer's disease, dementia ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17030655ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18573585
    067. goji berry (wolfberry) [ Lycium ] (lutein and zeaxanthin) - eye health ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15604618ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15705234
    088. lutein - eye health ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11431456
    035. coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) - heart disease ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16190504
    009. astaxanthin - oxidative stress OTW ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19656058
    164. xylitol - teeth ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15153702
    149. vitamin B2 (riboflavin) - migraine ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15257686
    141. ubiquinol - heart disease OTW ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19096107
    114. polyphenols - heart disease ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15640497
    015. black cohosh [ Cimicifuga racemosa ] - menopause ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15969244
    138. turmeric [ Curcuma longa ] (curcumin) - cancer OTW ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20214562
    160. vitamin K2 - prostate cancer OTW ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18400723ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20335553
    058. flaxseed oil - breast cancer ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15897583
    064. Gingko biloba - dementia ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20040554
    087. lingzhi [ Ganoderma lucidum ] + San Miao San (Sān miào wán): 50% Cangzhu (cāng zhú) [ Rhizoma atractylodis, the root of Atractylodes lancea or Atractylodes chinensis ] + 33% Huangbai (huáng bǎi) [ Cotex phellodendri, the bark of Phellodendron chinense or Phellodendron amurense ] + 17% Niuxi (huái niú xī) [ Radix achyranthes Bidentatae, the root of Achyranthes Bidentata ] - arthritis ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17907228ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16873089
    028. chromium - diabetes ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12081828  (ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17519436 ?)
    047. elderberry [ Sambucus ] - flu OTW ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19548290ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15080016
    075. hyaluronic acid - arthritis (only when injected) ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14679274
    139. turmeric [ Curcuma longa ] (curcumin) - peptic ulcer OTW ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20438867ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11485087
    157. vitamin D - depression, mood disorders ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16554952ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19187703
    122. quercetin - athletic performance ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19927026
    104. omega 3: ALA - heart disease ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15890766ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19664246
    044. dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) - memory in young men OTW ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16231168
    016. black tea - cancer nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/druginfo/natural/997.htmlncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21538852
    094. milk thistle [ Silybum ] - diabetes ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9126802
    019. boron - menopause ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3678698
    144. valerian [ Valeriana officinalis ] - anxiety OTW ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17054208
    066. glucosamine - arthritis, joint pain ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20847017ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19903416
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

    (0.5)

    011. B vitamins - Alzheimer's disease ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18854539ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21216507
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

    (0) No Evidence

    159. vitamin E - mortality ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17327526
    154. vitamin D - heart disease ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20816120ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21147944
    105. omega 6 - cancer (no studies in humans) ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16264182ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16705127
    155. vitamin D - diabetes  ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20194237ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20150805
    089. lycopene - prostate cancer ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16434593
    068. grape seed extract - wound healing, swelling ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16546280
    147. vitamin A: retinol - birth defects ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9431575ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16243460
    048. evening primrose oil [ Oenothera ] - Premenstrual Syndrome (PMS) ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8721802ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2201888
    130. silicic acid - Alzheimer's disease OTW ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16988476
    006. antioxidants - mortality ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17327526ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15153272
    146. vitamin A: beta-carotene - cancer ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18689373ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18429004
    012. beta-glucans - cancer OTW ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19515245
    128. saw palmetto [ Serenoa repens or Sabal serrulatum ] - prostate-related urinary problems ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19370565ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16467543
    057. fish oil / omega 3 - Crohn's disease, asthma, diabetes ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19160277ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20564531ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17443620 
    043. dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) - aging ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17050889
    001. açaí palm [ Euterpe oleracea ] - weight loss, diabetes quackwatch.com/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/PhonyAds/acai.htmlabcnews.go.com/Health/Diet/story?id=6434350
    008. aspartic acid
    010. astragalus [ Astragalus onobrychis ] OTW
    013. bitter melon [ Momordica charantia ] - diabetes
    014. bitter orange [ Citrus × aurantium ]
    024. capsaicin - cancer (no human trials)
    025. cat's claw [ Uncaria rhynchophylla ] - cancer, viruses, immune system (no human supplementation trials)
    026. chamomile [ Chamaemelum nobile and Matricaria chamomilla ] - bowel disorders (no evidence) nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/druginfo/natural/752.htmlnccam.nih.gov/health/chamomile/ataglance.htmncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez/19593179nccam.nih.gov/research/results/spotlight/040310.htm
    027. chasteberry [ Vitex agnus-castus ] - (no evidence)
    029. chondroitin - arthritis (no evidence)
    032. collagen
    033. copper
    040. dandelion [ Taraxacum officinale ]
    049. fenugreek [ Trigonella foenum-graecum ] - cancer prevention, diabetes
    069. grapefruit seed extract - antibiotic, antifungal (no human trials)
    078. isoflavones
    084. lavender ( Lavandula angustifolia ) - sleep, relaxation (no studies)
    086. lignans
    093. methionine
    101. noni [ Morinda citrifolia ]
    107. omega 9
    108. palm oil [ Elaeis guineensis ]
    109. pancreatin
    110. papain
    111. pau d'arco [ Tabebuia ]
    113. phenylalanine
    115 potassium - blood pressure
    116. prebiotics - no studies yet
    117. prickly pear [ Opuntia ficus-indica ] - diabetes
    119. probiotics - cholesterol, blood pressure
    126. rose hip [ Rosa ]
    127. royal jelly
    131. slippery elm [ Ulmus rubra ] - sore throat
    136. trypsin
    142. uva ursi (Kinnikinnick or Pinemat manzanita) [ Arctostaphylos uva-ursi ]
    145. vanadium
    148. vitamin B1
    150. vitamin B5 - cholesterol, arthritis (no human studies)
    163. wheatgrass [ Triticum aestivum ]

    124. resveratrol - cancer, diabetes, heart health OTW ????? ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18550275ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20623546

    See Data:
    docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Altk3Tn01ZsWdDRVN19EeENwd1pQY1ZyV1AwTnJCMnc&hl=en#gid=0 
    -------------------------------------- 
  • 7 plusses - 3 comments - 2 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-09-21 06:01:10
    nytimes.com - Foes of Modified Corn Find Support in a Study
    By Andrew Pollack. September 19, 2012

    Reference paper: 

    - Seralini G-E et al. Long term toxicity of a Roundup herbicide and a Roundup-tolerant genetically modified maize. Food and Chemical Toxicology (2012), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2012.08.005
    URL PDF (open access): http://research.sustainablefoodtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Final-Paper.pdf 
    Manuscript source: 
    research.sustainablefoodtrust.org/resources 
    research.sustainablefoodtrust.org 
    sustainablefoodtrust.org 

    Comment:
    I found particularly interesting the following remark:

    "We have to ask whether a diet with this level of maize is normal for rats. Another control with an alternative diet should have been included."
    — Dr Wendy Harwood (senior scientist, John Innes Centre).

    - Various. Press Releases: Expert reaction to GM maize causing tumours in rats Science Media Center. 19 September 2012
    sciencemediacentre.org/pages/press_releases/12-09-19_gm_maize_rats_tumours.htm 

    If a diet with a high level of corn isn't normal and can lead to a increase the incidence of tumors, what may it do on humans? In a number of developing countries maize is the main source of protein, and protein isn't particularly abundant in maize what means that maize is their main and almost exclusive staple.[1]
    ______________________  

    Reference 1:

    Table 1. Importance of maize in the diet of individuals in selected African countries with respect to the percentage of calories and protein in the total diet.

    Country
    Lesotho | Zambia | Malawi | Zimbabwe | Kenya | Tanzania | South Africa | Togo | Cape Verde | Swaziland | Mozambique | Ethiopia | European Union | United States | World
     Maize as:
    % Total Calories
    58% | 57% | 54% | 38% | 36 |% 33% | 33% | 25% | 24% | 23% | 22% | 21% | 1% | 3% | 5%
    % Total Protein
    55% | 60% | 55% | 46% | 34% | 33% | 33% | 29% | 26% | 24% | 31% | 17% | 1% | 2% | 5%

    a Estimates calculated from FAO food balance sheets; FAOSTAT data, 2003.

    - Krivanek AF et al. Breeding and disseminating quality protein maize (QPM) for Africa. African Journal of Biotechnology (2007) vol. 6 (4) pp. 312-324
    http://academicjournals.org/AJB/abstracts/abs2007/19Feb/Krivanek%20et%20al.htm 
    ______________________  

    - Pollack, Andrew. Foes of Modified Corn Find Support in a Study. The New York Times. September 19, 2012
    nytimes.com/2012/09/20/business/energy-environment/disputed-study-links-modified-corn-to-greater-health-risks.html 

    Related webpages: 

    - Grayer, Michael. in which I blow a gasket and get very uppity about this GM-food study which appears to have everyone going nuts at the moment. michaelgrayer's posterous. September 19, 2012
    http://michaelgrayer.posterous.com/in-which-i-blow-a-gasket-and-get-very-uppity 

    - Kniss, Andrew. *Why I think the Seralini GM feeding trial is bogus* _Control Freaks. Wyoming Weed Science in (almost) Real Time. September 19, 2012_
    weedcontrolfreaks.com/2012/09/why-i-think-the-seralini-gm-feeding-trial-is-bogus 

    - Revkin, Adrew C. Single-Study Syndrome and the G.M.O. Food Fight The Opinion Pages: Dot Earth. The New York Times. September 20, 2012
    http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/09/20/the-gmo-food-fight-rats-cancer-and-single-study-syndrome/?smid=tw-share 

    - Carman, Tim. French scientists question safety of GM corn. The Washington Post. September 19, 2012
    washingtonpost.com/blogs/all-we-can-eat/post/french-scientists-question-safety-of-gm-corn/2012/09/19/d2ed52e4-027c-11e2-8102-ebee9c66e190_blog.html 

    - Willingham, Emily. Was it the GMOs or the BPA that did in those rats? Words, words, words. September 23, 2012
    emilywillinghamphd.com/2012/09/was-it-gmos-or-bpa-that-did-in-those.html 

    - Orac. Bad science about GMOs: It reminds me of the antivaccine movement. Science Blogs - Respectful Insolence. September 24, 2012
    scienceblogs.com/insolence/2012/09/24/bad-science-on-gmos-it-reminds-me-of-the-antivaccine-movement 

    - Philpott, Tom. Does GMO Corn Really Cause Tumors in Rats? Mother Jones. September 21, 2012
    motherjones.com/tom-philpott/2012/09/gmo-corn-rat-tumor#comment-657883136 
    __________________________ 
    via +Matt Kuenzel  #GMfeedtrial
    URL source G+ post: plus.google.com/106919440800476787564/posts/NGwRQgiRDoN _______________________________ 
  • 2 plusses - 14 comments - 0 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-04-12 02:44:54
    Chrome Extension - G+ Whitespace Fix (to extend your stream)

    Comment: this is what I was looking for.
    Edit: Another extension named "GExtend" also works in a similar way:
    chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/dgkjhlnnlabicokdgaecdeihkdlkdhjm
    And if you don't need the post stretched but still want the stream in the center of the screen there's another extension maned "Whitespace Remover for Google Plus":
    chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/hjhgeibimkoddhdkkgimnipkdodobgpm
    It's the most similar thing to the previous layout. The only esthetic downside is that the grey band of the left gets widened so the background will be half grey and half white.

    via +Alex Fung
    URL source post: https://plus.google.com/u/0/112366735963271550830/posts/87JKQYPs2FP
  • 2 plusses - 5 comments - 4 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-07-12 06:37:28
    plus.google.com - The fatal misstep of intellectuals
    By Thomas Sowell. 2009

    Comment:
    I'm not fond of posting quotes, that's why I'm posting this quote. It's almost the antithesis of the eye-opening statement attributed to some eminent celeb that periodically appear in my stream. 
    _______________________ 

    “The fatal misstep of intellectuals is assuming that superior ability within a particular realm can be generalized to superior wisdom or morality overall. Chess grand masters, musical prodigies and others who are as remarkable within their respected specialties as intellectuals within theirs, seldom make that mistake.”

    — Thomas Sowell in "Intellectuals and Society".

    Reference:
    - Sowell, Thomas (2009). Intellectuals and Society. Basic Books, New York, NY.  ISBN-13: 978-0465019489

    - Video interview to Thomas Sowell on "Intellectuals and Society":
    Thomas Sowell on Intellectuals and Society (quote: 2:14 - 2:37)
    - Transcript of the interview: media.hoover.org/sites/default/files/documents/Thomas-Sowell-12-11-09.pdf 

    About the book:
    1. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intellectuals_and_Society
    2. nationalreview.com/articles/228901/intellectuals-and-society/thomas-sowell
    3. amazon.com/Intellectuals-Society-Thomas-Sowell/dp/046501948X 
    _______________________ 
  • 3 plusses - 8 comments - 2 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-09-29 23:55:23
    James Besson - The Empirical Evidence on Patents: Do They Work Like Property?
    By Duke University School of Law. February 27, 2006
    The Center for the Study of the Public Domain
    Video: youtu.be/Ih11oGsBRSY 
    Audio: mediastream.law.duke.edu/mp3cast/02272006bessen64.mp3 

    Q: Empirical Evidence on Patents: Do They Work Like Property?
    A: No (or at least no for everyone), dispute costs > incentives.

    Comment:
    The question he's trying to answer is whether patent system is working well as a property system [16:16], rather than whether the patent sytem works better than without patents.
    Don't be fooled, the net positive incentive provided by the patent system in 1987 [22:27] (just before things started to go bad from 1999 [22:51] onwards) doesn't mean that innovation and economic growth is greater with patents than without them, it only means that in an economy in which patents exists, firms are better off by investing in patents because their added value exceeds litigation costs. 

    A suitable analogy to compare the results of economies with and without patent system could be the paving of a road with asphalt or sharp rocks. 
    If you drive on a road covered with sharp rocks, you're better off fitting very thick tires in your automobile (the patents) to prevent punctures (lawsuits) rather than periodically repairing punctures (compensations due to lawsuits against patent infringement); whereas on an asphalted road you can fit thinner, lighter tires because there're little risk of having a flat tire (a lawsuit). 
    Granted, in a road made of sharp rocks, you're better off fitting thick tires, but it's a road made of sharp rocks the fastest road that we can build?

    Another analogy (I'm inspired today). In a world where conflicts can be easily resolved by means of the use of force, nations have a net positive incentive to develop and maintain a strong military (patents). In contrast, in a world in which it is unacceptable that nations try to resolve international conflicts by means of force, most of the resources will be invested on promoting economic development instead of in fighting each other.

    Just imagine a monopolistic economy in which each sector is controled by a single corporation (just a single phone company, a single water supplier, just one power company, one food supplier, a single furniture seller, a single auto maker, just a book publisher, only a computer manufacturer, you get the idea). No fuzzy boundaries between different businesses, so no chance of litigation due to overlapping interests.
    Each corporation would need to invest a great amount of money to buy a monopolistic patent and then pay a tax fixed as a percentage of their profits. Over time the investment would turn profitable, so there would be a net positive incentive provided by this monopolistic patent system. Yet, would it be the most efficient way to develop the economy and improve the services supplied to the general population?
    _____________________ 

    Supplementary material:

    ffii.org - Jim Bessen: Do Patents Work as Property?
    Review of a Lecture at Duke Law School
    http://eupat.ffii.org/10/03/bessen 

    Jim Bessen and colleagues found by statistical analysis that innovators are nowadays, unlike 20 years ago, losing more money by patent litigation than they are gaining from patent royalties. Bessen correlates these findings to changes in patent law which made the boundaries of patents more fuzzy.

    Related publications:

    - Bessen, James and Meurer, Michael J. Patent Failure: How Judges, Bureaucrats, and Lawyers Put Innovators at Risk Princeton University Press. March, 2008
    1. researchoninnovation.org/dopatentswork 
    2. amazon.com/Patent-Failure-Bureaucrats-Lawyers-Innovators/dp/0691143218 
    3. nytimes.com/2007/07/15/business/yourmoney/15proto.html?_r=1 
    patentlyo.com/patent/2007/07/do-patents-disc.html 

    - Bessen J and Hunt RM. An Empirical Look at Software Patents. Working Paper (2004) 03-17/R
    researchoninnovation.org/swpat.pdf 

    - Bessen J and Maskin E. Sequential Innovation, Patents, and Imitation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology - Department of Economics (2000) 11/99
    researchoninnovation.org/patent.pdf 
    _____________________ 

    Related lectures recorded in video:

    harvard.edu - Jim Bessen on “Patent Failure” (Berkman Luncheon Series)
    By Mike Deehan. March 4, 2008
    http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/mediaberkman/2008/03/04/jim-bessen-on-patent-failure 

    Video blurb:
    Jim Bessen, Lecturer of Law at Boston University Law School, was the guest speaker this week at the Berkman Center’s Luncheon Series.

    Bessen’s presentation is titled “Patent Failure”. Bessen analyzes a broad range of evidence on the economic performance of the patent system. He finds that patents provide strong incentives for firms in a few industries, but for most firms today, patents actually discourage innovation because they fail to perform as well-defined property rights. This analysis provides a guide to policy reform.

    Runtime: 56:14, size: 320×240, 165.4MB, .MOV, H.264 codec

    Video: 
    http://wilkins.law.harvard.edu/events/luncheons/2008-03-04_bessen/2008-03-04_bessen320.mov 
    Audio: 
    http://wilkins.law.harvard.edu/events/luncheons/2008-03-04_bessen/2008-03-04_bessen.mp3 
    _____________________ 

    tvworldwide.com - 11:00 a.m. Panel Discussion: Property Rights and Patent Reform (The Progress & Freedom Foundation
    Aspen Summit 2007)
    By Michael Meurer et al. August 20, 2007
    tvworldwide.com/events/pff/070819 

    Video blurb:
    -John F. Duffy, Oswald Symister Colclough Research Professor of Law, George Washington University, and Adjunct Fellow, The Progress & Freedom Foundation (Moderator) 
    -Mark Chandler, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, Cisco Systems, Inc. 
    -Bronwyn H. Hall, Professor of Economics, University of California, Berkeley 
    -F. Scott Kieff, Professor of Law, Washington University School of Law & Research Fellow, Hoover Institution 
    -Michael Meurer, Professor of Law, Michaels Faculty Research Scholar, Boston University School of Law

     Video: 
    tvworldwide.com/events/pff/070819/default.cfm?id=8800&type=wmhigh&test=0 
    _____________________ 

    Empirical Evidence on Software Patents
    By James Bessen.
    Wes Cohen (moderator), Bronwyn Hall (UC Berkeley), Jim Bessen (Boston University/ROI), Mark Webbink (Red Hat)

    researchoninnovation.org/swconf/Empirical_Evidence_Bessen.html 
    Slides: researchoninnovation.org/swconf/bessenslides.pdf 
    _____________________ 

    researchoninnovation.org - Legal Perspectives on Software Patents
    By Mike Meurer.
    Robert Plotkin (moderator), John Duffy (George Washington University), Peter Menell (UC Berkeley), Mike Meurer (Boston University), Jay Dratler (University of Akron)

    researchoninnovation.org/swconf/Legal_Perspectives_Meurer.html 
    Slides: http://www.researchoninnovation.org/swconf/meurerslides.ppt 
    _____________________ 

    James Besson - Empirical Evidence on Patents: Do They Work Like Property? 
    Related G+ post: https://plus.google.com/114605547533973731226/posts/KwRkrNWT8BX 
    _____________________________  
  • 3 plusses - 10 comments - 1 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-08-26 23:45:40
    RESHARE:
    spiegel.de - No Copyright Law. The Real Reason for Germany's Industrial Expansion?
    By Frank Thadeusz. August 18, 2010

    Did Germany experience rapid industrial expansion in the 19th century due to an absence of copyright law? A German historian argues that the massive proliferation of books, and thus knowledge, laid the foundation for the country's industrial might.

    Excerpt:
    <<German authors during this period wrote ceaselessly. Around 14,000 new publications appeared in a single year in 1843. Measured against population numbers at the time, this reaches nearly today's level. And although novels were published as well, the majority of the works were academic papers.

    The situation in England was very different. "For the period of the Enlightenment and bourgeois emancipation, we see deplorable progress in Great Britain," Höffner states.

    Equally Developed Industrial Nation
    Indeed, only 1,000 new works appeared annually in England at that time -- 10 times fewer than in Germany -- and this was not without consequences. Höffner believes it was the chronically weak book market that caused England, the colonial power, to fritter away its head start within the span of a century, while the underdeveloped agrarian state of Germany caught up rapidly, becoming an equally developed industrial nation by 1900.

    Even more startling is the factor Höffner believes caused this development -- in his view, it was none other than copyright law, which was established early in Great Britain, in 1710, that crippled the world of knowledge in the United Kingdom.

    Germany, on the other hand, didn't bother with the concept of copyright for a long time. Prussia, then by far Germany's biggest state, introduced a copyright law in 1837, but Germany's continued division into small states meant that it was hardly possible to enforce the law throughout the empire.>>

    <<Yet a historical comparison, at least, reaches a different conclusion. Publishers in England exploited their monopoly shamelessly. New discoveries were generally published in limited editions of at most 750 copies and sold at a price that often exceeded the weekly salary of an educated worker.

    London's most prominent publishers made very good money with this system, some driving around the city in gilt carriages. Their customers were the wealthy and the nobility, and their books regarded as pure luxury goods. In the few libraries that did exist, the valuable volumes were chained to the shelves to protect them from potential thieves.

    In Germany during the same period, publishers had plagiarizers -- who could reprint each new publication and sell it cheaply without fear of punishment -- breathing down their necks. Successful publishers were the ones who took a sophisticated approach in reaction to these copycats and devised a form of publication still common today, issuing fancy editions for their wealthy customers and low-priced paperbacks for the masses.

    A Multitude of Treatises
    This created a book market very different from the one found in England. Bestsellers and academic works were introduced to the German public in large numbers and at extremely low prices. "So many thousands of people in the most hidden corners of Germany, who could not have thought of buying books due to the expensive prices, have put together, little by little, a small library of reprints," the historian Heinrich Bensen wrote enthusiastically at the time.

    The prospect of a wide readership motivated scientists in particular to publish the results of their research. In Höffner's analysis, "a completely new form of imparting knowledge established itself."

    Essentially the only method for disseminating new knowledge that people of that period had known was verbal instruction from a master or scholar at a university. Now, suddenly, a multitude of high-level treatises circulated throughout the country.

    The "Literature Newspaper" reported in 1826 that "the majority of works concern natural objects of all types and especially the practical application of nature studies in medicine, industry, agriculture, etc." Scholars in Germany churned out tracts and handbooks on topics such as chemistry, mechanics, engineering, optics and the production of steel.>>

    URL source G+ post: plus.google.com/110513304172301520239/posts/3sdMY8WGJLb 
    ______________________ 

    Reshared text:
  • 4 plusses - 4 comments - 3 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-09-02 05:22:54
    RESHARE:
    youtube.com - Clint Eastwood Speech at the Republican Convention
    By PBS News Hour. August 30, 2012

    Excerpt from comments G+ post:

    +Christof Rack-Stefaniak: "http://p.twimg.com/A1mdi6tCIAAuKjP.jpg"

    +Michael Facente: "Rich, white, old dude that likes to shoot minorities endorses Romney!"

    +Cynthia Fusillo: "Jeez clint eastwood got old. For a while there I was like um who is he talking to?"

    +Brandon Trivett: "He's getting a bit senile at his old age. Old folks home for u Mr Eastwood."

    +Olaf Iwankow: "Personification of the party. Old, Cranky and Perplexed"

    +Razo Marco: "wow. the legend forgot how to talk. this is epic fail."

    +mathew murphy: "Angry old white guy argues with imaginary version of Barack Obama."

    +Neil Mcginnis: "Looks like he's slipping into senility.. Another old white man dislikes Obama.."

    Ageism
    <<Ageism, or age discrimination is stereotyping and discriminating against individuals or groups because of their age. It is a set of beliefs, attitudes, norms, and values used to justify age based prejudice, discrimination, and subordination.[1] This may be casual or systematic.[2][3] The term was coined in 1969 by Robert Neil Butler to describe discrimination against seniors, and patterned on sexism and racism.[4] Butler defined Ageism as a combination of three connected elements. Among them were prejudicial attitudes towards older people, old age, and the aging process; discriminatory practices against older people; and institutional practices and policies that perpetuate stereotypes about older people[5] >>
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ageism 

    +Kathy Schneider: "Come on +Alain Lemay, have some compassion, he is elderly.  He did a great job for his age.  There are people his age in homes not able to use a fork. "

    +Alain Lemay: "I do have compassion +Kathy Schneider. I think he was somewhat exploited here. I have a grandmother that i love dearly. She tends to ramble, al lot. The last thing I would do to her is stick her up on a stage and let her embarrass herself for my own gain."
     
    Benevolent prejudice
    <<Age-based prejudice and stereotyping usually involves older or younger people being pitied, marginalized, or patronized. This is described as "benevolent prejudice" because the tendency to pity is linked to seeing older or younger people as "friendly" but "incompetent." This is similar to the prejudice most often directed against women and disabled people. Age Concern’s survey revealed strong evidence of "benevolent prejudice." 48% said that over-70s are viewed as friendly (compared to 27% who said the same about under-30s). Meanwhile, only 26% believe over-70s are viewed as capable (with 41% saying the same about under-30s).[15]>>
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ageism#Benevolent_prejudice 

    URL source comments G+ post: plus.google.com/+GuyKawasaki/posts/6g4RT1imcf3 
    __________________________

    Excerpt from comments on related G+ post:

    Ron Miller Sep 3, 2012 7:52 PM
    +Zephyr López Cervilla I think it is just a light joke.  I don't think most people see it that deeply and most people - my parents who are in their 70s - think it is kind of funny. 

    This is discrimination against just about everyone.  But we treat our elderly pretty well.  Medicare, Social Security and, largely I would argue, overall respect.
    ________________ 

    Zephyr López Cervilla Sep 3, 2012 9:13 PM
    +Ron Miller: "I think it is just a light joke.  I don't think most people see it that deeply and most people - my parents who are in their 70s - think it is kind of funny."

    - There are also racist and sexist jokes, and some of them are even funny, but most people don't dare to post. Somehow it seems that ageism has become socially acceptable and can be used as a valid argument in discussions.
    You wouldn't imagine how frequent the allusion of Eastwood's old age has been used to debunk his speech on the RNC. A few examples:

    +Christof Rack-Stefaniak: http://p.twimg.com/A1mdi6tCIAAuKjP.jpg  
    +Michael Facente: "Rich, white, old dude that likes to shoot minorities endorses Romney!"  
    +Cynthia Fusillo: "Jeez clint eastwood got old. For a while there I was like um who is he talking to?"  
    +Brandon Trivett: "He's getting a bit senile at his old age. Old folks home for u Mr Eastwood."  
    +Olaf Iwankow: "Personification of the party. Old, Cranky and Perplexed"  
    +Razo Marco: "wow. the legend forgot how to talk. this is epic fail."   
    +mathew murphy: "Angry old white guy argues with imaginary version of Barack Obama."  
    +Neil Mcginnis: "Looks like he's slipping into senility.. Another old white man dislikes Obama.."
    +Kathy Schneider: "Come on +Alain Lemay, have some compassion, he is elderly.  He did a great job for his age.  There are people his age in homes not able to use a fork. "
    +Alain Lemay: "I do have compassion +Kathy Schneider. I think he was somewhat exploited here. I have a grandmother that i love dearly. She tends to ramble, al lot. The last thing I would do to her is stick her up on a stage and let her embarrass herself for my own gain."
    plus.google.com/+GuyKawasaki/posts/6g4RT1imcf3 

    +Ron Miller: "we treat our elderly pretty well.  Medicare, Social Security"

    - That is a paternalist attitude. The elderly don't need a treatment different from the rest of the people. Many of them have invested their wealth in a retirement plan and have paid for their medical care. If the public system is broken they aren't more responsible than anyone else, so everyone should contribute to pay the debt of the public system.  

    URL related G+ post: https://plus.google.com/103949261056887216874/posts/ZpzM4uHq9Sw 
    ____________________________ 

    Reshared text:
    (Fri01) Make Mitt's day...

    (Shared using #DoShare )
  • 2 plusses - 11 comments - 1 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-08-10 22:38:57
    RESHARE:
    Jean-Luc Cornec - 'Telephone Sheep' 1989
    Museum für Kommunikation (Museum of Communications), Frankfurt am Main (Deutschland)

    An installation of 32 sheep that at times ring. The starting point for this work was the phone as a closed system whose elements combined in a new way.

    (1989) Eine Installation aus 32 Schafen zeitweilig klingelnden Schafen. Ausgangspunkt für diese Arbeit war das Telefon als geschlossenes System, dessen Elemente ich neu kombiniere.
    http://jeanluc.cornec.de/arbeiten/tribut 
    __________________ 

    The museum:

    amusingplanet.com - Inside Frankfurt Museum of Communication
    By Kaushik. August 1, 2010
    amusingplanet.com/2010/08/inside-frankfurt-museum-of.html

    de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Museum_f%C3%BCr_Kommunikation_Frankfurt 
    __________________ 

    'Telephone Sheep' Gallery:

    whatthecool.com - Sheep Sculptures Made Out of Rotary Phones
    August 18, 2010
    http://whatthecool.com/post/973293104/rotary-phone-sheep-sculptures 

    mag.ceza.me - Jean-Luc Cornec: Des moutons écolochics et recyclés , avec de la laine au bout du fil
    January 25, 2010
    http://mag.ceza.me/art/jean-luc-cornec-des-moutons-ecolochics-et-recycles-avec-de-la-laine-au-bout-du-fil-1888 

    greenupgrader.com - Telephone Sheep Exhibit by Artist Jean Luc Cornec
    By Doug Gunzelmann. July 19, 2008
    http://greenupgrader.com/2492/telephone-sheep-exhibit-by-artist-jean-luc-cornec 

    inhabitat.com - Jean Luc Cornec's Re-purposed Rotary Phone Sheep
    By Moe Beitiks, 23 January, 2010
    http://inhabitat.com/jean-luc-cornecs-re-purposed-rotary-phone-sheep

    Jean-Luc Cornec at work:
    tribuneindia.com/2011/20110703/spectrum/main1.htm 
    __________________ 

    Reshared text:
    Telephone Sheep by Jean-Luc Cornec
     
    Museum for Communications
     
    Frankfurt Main, Germany
  • 9 plusses - 1 comments - 1 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-10-17 09:31:39
    aether.lbl.gov - Alpha Centauri. A Candidate for Terrestrial Planets And Intelligent Life
    By Smoot Group (George Smoot). Last update: October 15, 1997
    aether.lbl.gov/www/classes/p139/speed/Alpha-Centauri.html 

    Excerpt:
    <<For the third test, a system must demonstrate stable conditions. The star's brightness must not vary so much that the star would alternately freeze and fry any life that does manage to develop around it. But because Alpha Centauri A and B form a binary pair there's a further issue. How much does the light received by the planets of one star vary as the other star revolves around it ? During their 80-year orbit, the separation between A and B changes from 11 AU to 35 AU. As viewed from the planets of one star, the brightness of the other increases as the stars approach and decreases as the stars recede. Fortunately, the variation is too small to matter, and Alpha Centauri A and B pass this test. However, Proxima fails this test, too. Like many red dwarfs it is a flare star, prone to outbursts that cause its light to double or triple in just a few minutes.>>
     . . . 
    <<Now to the final question. Do we find at Alpha Centauri warm, rocky planets like Earth, full of liquid water ? Unfortunately, we don't know yet whether Alpha Centauri even has planets or not. What we know is that in a binary system the planets must not be too far away from a particular star, or else their orbits become unstable. If the distance exceeds about one fifth of the closest approach of the two stars then the second member of the binary star fatally disturbes the orbit of the planet. For the binary Alpha Centauri A and B, their closest approach is 11 AU, so the limit for planetary orbits is at about 2 astronomical units. Comparing with our system, we see that both Alpha Centauri A and B might hold four inner planets like we have Mercury (0.4 AU), Venus (0.7 AU), Earth (1 AU) and Mars (1.5 AU). Therefore, both Alpha Centauri A and B might have one or two planets in the life zone where liquid water is possible.

    Terrestrial Life Conditions: | Sun | α Centauri A | α Centauri B | Proxima
    On the main sequence? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes
    Of the right spectral type? | Yes | Yes | Maybe | No
    Constant in brightness? | Yes | Yes | Yes | No
    Old enough? | Yes | Yes | Yes | No?
    Rich in metals? | Yes | Yes | Yes | ?
    Has stable planetary orbits? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes
    Could planets form? | Yes | ? | -?- ((Yes)) | Yes
    Do planets actually exist? | Yes | ? | -?- ((Yes)) | ?
    Small rocky planets possible? | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes?
    Planets in the life zone? | Yes | Maybe | Maybe | No
    >>

    Article of reference:
    - Croswell K and Carroll M. Does Alpha Centauri have intelligent life? Astronomy 19 (1991), No. 4, pgs. 28 - 37
    http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/9105130690/does-alpha-centauri-have-intelligent-life 
    _____________ 

    - James, Andrew. Part 6. Voyage to Alpha Centauri The Imperial Star Alpha Centauri. Last Update: June 1, 2010
    southastrodel.com/PageAlphaCen006.htm 
    _____________ 

    Related discovery 1:

    - Hand, Eric. The exoplanet next door Nature News. October 16, 2012
    nature.com/news/the-exoplanet-next-door-1.11605 
    Earth-sized world discovered in nearby α Centauri star system.

    - ESO. Planet Found in Nearest Star System to Earth eso1241 — Science Release. October 16, 2012
    eso.org/public/news/eso1241 
    ESO’s HARPS instrument finds Earth-mass exoplanet orbiting Alpha Centauri B

    - Plait, Phil. Alpha Centauri Has a Planet! Discover Magazine. Bad Astronomy (Blog). October 16, 2012
    blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/10/16/alpha-centauri-has-a-planet 

    - Mann, Adam. Earth-Sized Planet Discovered Orbiting Around Nearest Star. Wired. October 16, 2012
    wired.com/wiredscience/2012/10/earth-exoplanet-alpha-centauri 

    - Boyle, Alan. How to take a trip to Alpha Centauri NBCNews.com. Cosmic Log. October 17, 2012
    cosmiclog.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/10/17/14516293-how-to-take-a-trip-to-alpha-centauri 
    ____________ 

    Stephane Udry (astronomer, Geneva University in Switzerland): "Most of the low-mass planets are in systems of two, three, up to six or seven planets, so finding in our closest neighbour one Earth-mass planet ... opens a really good prospect for detecting planets in the habitable zone in the system that is very close to us."

    <<The measurement is difficult because of variations in the star's light caused by other phenomenon, such as flares and magnetic storms, similar to sunspots on the sun.>>

    Artie Hatzes (astronomer, Thuringian State Observatory in Tautenburg, Germany): "Trying to extract a signal that you are interested in when it is in the presence of "noise" - in this case the variability of the star -- is difficult. One has to apply special analysis methods and tricks. The real challenge, in this particular case, was in how to analyze the data."
    "I still have my doubts. Even though there is clearly a signal in the data at 3.26 days, the nature of this is still open to debate."

    - Klotz, Irene (Discovery News). Earth-sized world found next door ABC Science. News in Science. October 17, 2012.
    abc.net.au/science/articles/2012/10/17/3612356.htm 
    ____________ 

    Star Positioning:
    ESO. A journey to Alpha Centauri. HD

    Article of reference:
    - Dumusque X et al. An Earth mass planet orbiting Alpha Centauri B. Nature (2012) to be published (eso1241)
    eso.org/public/archives/releases/sciencepapers/eso1241/eso1241a.pdf 
    At Nature website:
    nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nature11572.html 
    Supplementary information:
    nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/extref/nature11572-s1.pdf 
    nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/extref/nature11572-s2.txt 
    _____________________ 

    Related discovery 2:

    Armchair astronomers find planet in quadruple star system. Phys.org. October 15, 2012
    phys.org/news/2012-10-armchair-astronomers-planet-quadruple-star.html 

    - Johnson, Michele *Citizen Scientists Discover Four-Star Planet with NASA Kepler.* NASA Mission News. October 15, 2012
    nasa.gov/mission_pages/kepler/news/kepler-ph1.html 

    Article of reference: 
    - Schwamb ME et al. Planet Hunters: A Transiting Circumbinary Planet in a Quadruple Star System. Astrophysical Journal (2012) draft version
    arxiv.org/abs/1210.3612 PDF: arxiv.org/pdf/1210.3612v1 
    _____________________ 

    - Dole, Stephen H. Habitable Planets for Man. The RAND Corporation (1964) pp. 1-114
    1. rand.org/pubs/commercial_books/CB179-1.html 
    1. PDF: rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/commercial_books/2007/RAND_CB179-1.pdf 
    2. http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA473471 
    2. PDF: dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf&AD=ADA473471 

    Podcast Episode:
    - Woo, Joanna and Brar, Rupinder. Episode 7: Extrasolar Planets with Ryan North The Titanium Physicists Podcast. January 22, 2012
    titaniumphysicists.brachiolopemedia.com/2012/01/22/episode-7-extrasolar-planets-with-ryan-north 
    MP3 file: traffic.libsyn.com/titaniumphysics/Ep_7_Ti_Phy_Extra_Solar_Planets.mp3 (34:32)
    _____________________ 

    Other: 
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alpha_Centauri 
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alpha_Centauri_Bb 
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proxima_Centauri 
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alpha_Centauri_in_fiction 
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tidal_locking 

    Related G+ posts:
    via +Jenny Winder 
    plus.google.com/116017061364727182937/posts/2rcQa8PJoAK 
    plus.google.com/116017061364727182937/posts/J3kLPidTBbg 

    plus.google.com/110978315648533764743/posts/6AFNk5RYahc 
    plus.google.com/106505577291311813232/posts/4tzy9YsP2q4 
    _____________________ 
  • 3 plusses - 9 comments - 1 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-06-04 04:55:06
    RESHARE:
    scientificamerican.com - Ultra Marathons Might Be Ultra Bad for your Heart
    By Katherine Harmon. June 4, 2012

    Excerpt:

    <<The researchers found that many of these athletes had temporarily elevated levels of substances that promote inflammation and cardiac damage. One study found that as many as half of runners in the midst of, or who have just finished, a marathon show these spikes, which can last for days after an event. And over time and with repeated exposure, these compounds can lead to scarring of the heart and its main arteries as well as to enlarged ventricles—all of which can in turn lead to dangerous irregular heart beats (arrhythmia) and possibly sudden cardiac death.>>

    <<Earlier this year ultra runner Micah True, also known as Caballo Blanco, made famous by Christopher McDougall’s book Born to Run (Knopf, 2009) for running with the Tarahumara tribes in Mexico, died at the age of 58 while on a relatively short trail run. The medical report concluded that he had a scarred, enlarged heart and likely died from arrhythmia.>>

    <<Screening for factors to find people who might be at a particular risk so far is unproven and would likely be expensive. So the researchers suggest that athletes dial back intense exercise to about an hour per day (sessions can be longer if exercise is less rigorous) or at least have regular visits with their doctors to check up on their heart health.>>

    <<An analysis published May 30 in PLoS ONE also highlights potential downsides of exercise for some people. Claude Bouchard of the Human Genomics Laboratory at the Pennington Biomedical Research Center in Baton Rouge Louisiana, and his colleagues report that in many exercise studies, moderate to intense exercise elevated one or more indicators of risk for cardiac disease or diabetes in a subset (about 10 percent) of the population in the analysis. The authors did not follow the subjects to see if these people were actually more likely to have poor health outcomes, however. And for the rest of the subjects, most of them saw improvements in these risk factors.

    But the new findings do not negate the benefits of regular exercise for most people. It adds an average of seven extra years of life expectancy, and it also increases the likelihood that people will spend more of those years relatively trim and in good health. “Exercise is one of the most important things you need to do on a daily basis,” O’Keefe said. But, he noted, “extreme exercise is not really conductive to great cardiovascular health. Beyond 30 to 60 minutes per day, you reach a point of diminishing returns.”

    Indeed, a long-term study of 52,000 runners found that those who ran one to 20 miles a week spaced out over two to five days and at an 8.5- to 10-minute mile lived longest.>> 

    URL source post: plus.google.com/u/0/107991184034868817056/posts/i3dsaQ9ZTGP 
    -------------------------------- 

    Reference paper:  

    - Bouchard C, Blair SN, Church TS, Earnest CP, Hagberg JM, et al. (2012) Adverse Metabolic Response to Regular Exercise: Is It a Rare or Common Occurrence? PLoS ONE 7(5): e37887. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0037887 
    plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0037887

    ABSTRACT  

    Background
    Individuals differ in the response to regular exercise. Whether there are people who experience adverse changes in cardiovascular and diabetes risk factors has never been addressed.

    Methodology/Principal Findings
    An adverse response is defined as an exercise-induced change that worsens a risk factor beyond measurement error and expected day-to-day variation. Sixty subjects were measured three times over a period of three weeks, and variation in resting systolic blood pressure (SBP) and in fasting plasma HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides (TG), and insulin (FI) was quantified. The technical error (TE) defined as the within-subject standard deviation derived from these measurements was computed. An adverse response for a given risk factor was defined as a change that was at least two TEs away from no change but in an adverse direction. Thus an adverse response was recorded if an increase reached 10 mm Hg or more for SBP, 0.42 mmol/L or more for TG, or 24 pmol/L or more for FI or if a decrease reached 0.12 mmol/L or more for HDL-C. Completers from six exercise studies were used in the present analysis: Whites (N = 473) and Blacks (N = 250) from the HERITAGE Family Study; Whites and Blacks from DREW (N = 326), from INFLAME (N = 70), and from STRRIDE (N = 303); and Whites from a University of Maryland cohort (N = 160) and from a University of Jyvaskyla study (N = 105), for a total of 1,687 men and women. Using the above definitions, 126 subjects (8.4%) had an adverse change in FI. Numbers of adverse responders reached 12.2% for SBP, 10.4% for TG, and 13.3% for HDL-C. About 7% of participants experienced adverse responses in two or more risk factors.

    Conclusions/Significance
    Adverse responses to regular exercise in cardiovascular and diabetes risk factors occur. Identifying the predictors of such unwarranted responses and how to prevent them will provide the foundation for personalized exercise prescription.

    plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0037887
    -------------------------------- 

    Related articles in Scientific American:

    scientificamerican.com - Study Sheds Light on Hidden Heart Danger for Athletes
    By Sarah Graham. April 22, 2002
    scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=study-sheds-light-on-hidd
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

    scientificamerican.com - Fit Body, Fit Mind? Your Workout Makes You Smarter [Preview]
    By Christopher Hertzog, Arthur F. Kramer, Robert S. Wilson and Ulman Lindenberger. July 1, 2009
    scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=fit-body-fit-mind

    -------------------------------- 
    #ultrarunning   #ultramarathon   #caballoblanco   #christophermcdougal   #borntorun   #endurancesports   #enduranceracing   #enduranceexercises   #endurance  
    -------------------------------- 

    Reshared text:
  • 5 plusses - 6 comments - 1 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-09-29 15:51:36
    theamericanconservative.com - Patent Nonsense
    By Sheldon Richman. January 18, 2012
    theamericanconservative.com/articles/patent-nonsense 

    "Intellectual property enforces a monopoly over the mind."

    Excerpt:

    <<Why should an inventor or author have an exclusive right, whether in perpetuity or for a finite period?>>

    <<there is a distinction between physical objects and ideas that is crucial to the property question. Two or more people cannot use the same pair of socks at the same time and in the same respect, but they can use the same idea—or if not the same idea, ideas with the same content. That tangible objects are scarce and finite accounts for the emergence of property rights in civilization. Considering the nature of human beings and the physical world they inhabit, if individuals are to flourish in society they need rules regarding thine and mine. But “ideal objects” are not bound by the same restrictions. Ideas can be multiplied infinitely and almost costlessly; they can be used nonrivalrously.

    If I articulate an idea in front other people, each now has his own “copy.” Yet I retain mine. However the others use their copies, it is hard to see how they have committed an injustice>>

    <<Contrary to [Ayn] Rand, ideas, while inherent in purposeful human action, have no role in establishing ownership>>

    <<In practical terms, when one acquires a copyright or a patent, what one really acquires is the power to ask the government stop other people from doing harmless things with their own property. IP is thus inconsistent with the right to property.

    An IP advocate might challenge the proposition that two or more people can use the “same” idea at the same time by noting that the originator’s economic return from exploiting the idea will likely be smaller if unauthorized imitators are free to enter the market. That is true, but this confuses property with economic value. In traditional property-rights theory, one owns objects not economic values. If someone’s otherwise unobjectionable activities lower the market value of my property, my rights have not been violated.>>

    <<Property rights arose to grapple with natural scarcity; “intellectual property” rights were invented to create scarcity where it does not naturally exist.>>

    <<Don’t patents encourage innovation and therefore bestow incalculable benefits on all us? This crosses the boundary from justice to utilitarian considerations. The concern here is not with rewards to the innovator but with the good of society.>>

    <<as libertarian legal theorist Stephan Kinsella points out, the implied cost-benefit analysis is a sham. Defenders tout IP’s hypothesized benefits while presuming the costs are virtually zero. Ignored are the costs in innovation never ventured for fear of legal reprisal, in resources consumed during litigation, in talent diverted to protecting IP rather than producing useful goods, and so on.>>

    <<IP proponents are guilty of doing a priori history. Real history undermines the utilitarian case for patents and copyright. In their book, Against Intellectual Monopoly, pro-market economists Michele Boldrin and David K. Levine show that IP impedes innovation. For example, James Watt’s steam engine improved very little while his patents were in effect—he was too busy suing anyone he could for patent infringement. Only once the patents expired in 1800 did improvements in the steam engine accelerate.

    The IP defender might counter that without patents there might not have been a steam engine at all. Boldrin and Levine’s historical analysis shows this to be implausible. People invented things long before patents. Innovators have understood the advantages of being first to market even without the prospect of monopoly privilege. (Shakespeare created without copyright, as did Charles Dickens in the U.S. market.) The first company to put wheels on luggage, Travelpro, had no patent, and the idea was soon copied. But the company is still a player in the industry.>>

    <<Boldrin and Levine devote an entire chapter to the toughest nut, pharmaceuticals, which we supposedly would have to do without but for the protection of intellectual property. The high fixed cost of research, development, and testing, and the low marginal cost of production are said to preclude any significant innovation without the monopoly protection afforded by patents. Who would sink so much money into a product only to face copycat competitors with no development costs? Here IP is thought to be literally a matter of life and death.

    Things are not what they seem. Write Boldrin and Levine:

    Historically, intellectual monopoly in pharmaceuticals has varied enormously over time and space. The summary story: the modern pharmaceutical industry developed faster in those countries where patents were fewer and weaker… .  [I]f patents were a necessary  requirement for pharmaceutical innovation, as claimed by their supporters,  the large historical and cross-country variations in the patent protection  of medical products should have had a dramatic impact on national pharmaceutical industries. In particular, at least between 1850 and 1980, most drugs and medical products should have been invented and produced in the United States and the United Kingdom, and very little if anything produced in continental Europe. Further, countries such as Italy, Switzerland, and, to a lesser extent, Germany, should have been the poor, sick laggards of the pharmaceutical industry until recently. Instead, the opposite was true for longer than a century.>>

    <<Underlying the IP defense is the faulty assumption that imitation produces little value when in fact it is critical to competitive markets and progress, most of which comes through incremental improvements to existing ideas rather than big dramatic breakthroughs.>>
    _____________________________ 

    Excerpt from comments:

    Federal Farmer says:
    January 18, 2012 at 3:55 pm
    <<Thank you for publishing this thoughtful critique of intellectual property. Richman cites Watt and the steam engine as an example of how patent law impedes rather than promotes innovation. There are other, related examples of so-called multiple invention that undermine the claim that patent monopolies are the key to innovation: the telephone, the radio, and the light bulb just to name a few.

    With regard to the pharmaceutical industry, I agree that it is also right to question the value of the IP regime there too. It is true development costs are high, but that is largely because a pharmaceutical manufacturer must perform years of clinical trials to demonstrate a drug is safe and effective to the FDA before it can sell a drug on the market.>>

    <<The federal courts’ willingness to recognize gene patents also inhibits innovation in the pharmaceutical and health care industries. In the Myriad Genetics case that is working its way through the federal courts now, one commercial entity is claiming the right to exclude researchers and competitors to use the BRAC1 and BRAC2 breast cancer genes in diagnostics and other medical practices. The Federal Circuit, which other than the Supreme Court is the highest federal appellate court on patent law matters, recently affirmed that Myriad’s claims are patentable subject matter. The implications are startling and costly.>>
    _____________________ 

    Anonymous says:
    January 18, 2012 at 11:40 pm
    <<I don’t understand why so many IP supporters absolutely shut down their capacity to think when this subject is brought up. Posting here fresh off the heels of reading the comments on a similar article on a more mainstream Conservative news site, it amazes me that people, on what is a genuinely arguable subject, resort to the most mind-numbing points of contention. It must be an emotional response to what people perceive as a threat to what they feel they have the right to, but you’d think they’d at least extend this fervor to material property; they never seem to.
    This article doesn’t have many comments yet. Hopefully TAC’s readership can operate differently.
    _____________________ 

    Joel says:
    January 19, 2012 at 8:30 am
    <<One other aspect you might have been included (especially topical in light of the SOPA debate) is how as ease of copying advances, the protection of intellectual property has become the justification for an ever-increasing police state.>>
    _____________________ 

    jb says:
    January 19, 2012 at 11:15 am
    An IP advocate might challenge the proposition that two or more people can use the “same” idea at the same time by noting that the originator’s economic return from exploiting the idea will likely be smaller if unauthorized imitators are free to enter the market.

    <<It’s true that I can reduce an originator’s economic return on an idea by exploiting that idea myself. But I can also reduce his return by coming up with an original and superior idea, and no one finds that objectionable. So whatever other arguments may be made for or against IP, reducing the economic return on an idea is not in itself a wrong that one is entitled to be protected against.>>
    _____________________ 

    D. Saul Weiner says:
    February 7, 2012 at 4:04 pm
    <<Agree with Federal Farmer that high drug development costs are not necessarily inherent, but to a large extent driven by the FDA regulatory gauntlet.

    Another critical item to note in this regard is how the patent regime has very much skewed the practice of medicine toward pharmaceutical usage and away from natural and non-patentable therapeutics. In a system rife with medical licensing (another form of monopoly), it becomes possible for those who profit from patents to ensure that this mode of medical practice becomes the dominant one>>
    _____________________ 

    Bobby Cathey says:
    May 31, 2012 at 11:56 pm
    <<However, a point that was missing from the article however was the fact that terms of patent in the United States are only a limited period of time. This is actually a big indicator of how suppressive Patents are to innovation. You will never hear a proponent of Patents come out in favor of perpetually held patents. Why only 20 years? Where did this magic number come from? Why not 50 years? 100 years? 1,000 years? If IP proponents truly thought Patents were legitimate, they would advocate for the perpetuity of these “property rights”.>>
    _____________________ 


    Further reading:

    - Explicitly cited in this article:

    - Boldrin, Michele and Levine, David K. Against Intellectual Monopoly. Cambridge University Press, 2008 (print version) 
    PDF final online version (January 2, 2008): 
    http://levine.sscnet.ucla.edu/papers/imbookfinalall.pdf 
    Excerpt: plus.google.com/114605547533973731226/posts/aPA3xZEQpHF 

    - Kinsella,  N. Stephan. How Intellectual Property Hampers the Free Market. The Free Man (thefreemanonline.org), Foundation for Economic Education. June, 2011
    thefreemanonline.org/features/how-intellectual-property-hampers-the-free-market 

    - Other works:

    - Boldrin, Michelle and Levine, David K. The Case Against Patents. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Working Paper Series (2012) 2012-035A
    http://research.stlouisfed.org/wp/2012/2012-035.pdf

    - Kinsella, N Stephan. Against Intellectual Property. Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2008 (print version) 
    Source: http://mises.org/resources/3582/Against-Intellectual-Property
    PDF: http://mises.org/books/against.pdf
    ePub: http://mises.org/books/AgainstIP.epub 
    _____________________ 


    - References and links of several studies on the subject:

    - Torrance, Andrew W and Tomlinson, Bill. Patents and the Regress of Useful Arts. Columbia Science and Technology Law Review (2009) vol. 10 pp. 130-168
    stlr.org/volumes/volume-x-2008-2009/torrance (link PDF broken)
    http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1411328 (PDF available) 

    - Meloso, Debrah et al. Promoting intellectual discovery: patents versus markets. Science (2009) vol. 323 (5919) pp. 1335-9
    sciencemag.org/content/323/5919/1335.full 
    http://arstechnica.com/science/2009/03/study-markets-provide-an-alternative-to-patent-monopolies 

    - Moser, Petra. How Do Patent Laws Influence Innovation? Evidence From Nineteenth-Century World's Fair. American Economic Review, 2005, v95(4,Sep), 1214-1236.
    researchoninnovation.org/tiip/archive/2005_1e.html
    http://papers.nber.org/papers/w9909 

    - Machlup, Fritz. An Economic Review of the Patent System. Study commission by the Subcommitttee on Patents,  Trademarks, and Copyrights of the Committee on the Judiciary, US Senate, 85th Congress, second session. Washington, D.C.: US Government Printing Office, 1958.
    http://mises.org/document/1182 
    http://library.mises.org/books/Fritz%20Machlup/An%20Economic%20Review%20of%20the%20Patent%20System_Vol_3.pdf 
    http://mises.org/etexts/patentsystem.pdf 

    - Bessen, James and Meurer, Michael J. Patent Failure: How Judges, Bureaucrats, and Lawyers Put Innovators at Risk Princeton University Press. March, 2008
    1. researchoninnovation.org/dopatentswork 
    2. amazon.com/Patent-Failure-Bureaucrats-Lawyers-Innovators/dp/0691143218 
    3. nytimes.com/2007/07/15/business/yourmoney/15proto.html?_r=1 
    patentlyo.com/patent/2007/07/do-patents-disc.html 

    - Hensen, Stephen et al. The Effects of Patenting AAAS in the Scientific Community. American Association for the Advancement of Science (2006)
    http://sippi.aaas.org/survey 
    http://sippi.aaas.org/survey/AAAS_IP_Survey_Report.pdf

    - Leveque, François and Meniere, Yann. The Economics of Patents and Copyright. Berkeley Electronic Press (2004)
    bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1001&context=leveque 

    - Landes, William M. and Posner, Richard A. An Economic Analysis of Copyright Law. J. Legal Stud. (June 1989)

    - Bell, Tom W. Prediction Markets for Promoting the Progress of Science and the Useful Arts. George Mason Law Review (2006) vol. 14 (1) pp. 37-92
    http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=925989 

    - Lemley, Mark. Rational ignorance at the patent office. Northwestern University Law Review (2000) vol. 95 (4) pp. 1-34
    http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=261400 

    - Ritter DS. Switzerland’s Patent Law History. Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L.J. (2004) vol. 14 pp. 463-496
    law2.fordham.edu/publications/articles/200flspub6401.pdf

    - Bessen J and Hunt RM. An Empirical Look at Software Patents. Working Paper (2004) 03-17/R
    researchoninnovation.org/swpat.pdf 

    - Bessen J and Maskin E. Sequential Innovation, Patents, and Imitation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology - Department of Economics (2000) 11/99
    researchoninnovation.org/patent.pdf 


    Main source: stephankinsella.com/2009/07/yet-another-study-finds-patents-do-not-encourage-innovation 

    - Bessen, Jim. Do Patents Work as Property?
    Review of a Lecture at Duke Law School
    http://eupat.ffii.org/10/03/bessen
    (James Besson - Empirical Evidence on Patents: Do They Work Like Property?)

    Jim Bessen and colleagues found by statistical analysis that innovators are nowadays, unlike 20 years ago, losing more money by patent litigation than they are gaining from patent royalties. Bessen correlates these findings to changes in patent law which made the boundaries of patents more fuzzy.
    ________________ 

    URL related G+ post:
    plus.google.com/114605547533973731226/posts/DhEwwFH3jq7 
    ______________________________ 
  • 2 plusses - 10 comments - 1 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-08-27 20:36:52
    RESHARE:
    geekologie.com - Pretty Kitty!: Chimera Cat Is Its Own Fraternal Twin
    August 22, 2012
    geekologie.com/2012/08/pretty-kitty-chimera-cat-is-its-own-frat.php

    Excerpt from G+ via post comments:

    Zephyr López Cervilla August 27, 2012 2:19 PM (edited)
    Among marmosets and tamarins (several genera of New World monkeys) chimerism is very frequent. There has been reported even some case in which an individual had two genetic fathers instead of a mother and a father:
     . . . 
    "One breeding female, whose uterine twin was a male, produced offspring that inherited her sibling’s alleles. This documents the possibility that an XY primordial germ cell is capable of maturing and producing viable eggs in a female, a phenomenon that has not been documented for primates. Al- though we are not currently able to document the fate of the Y chromosome during development of the female’s oocytes, our data suggest the intriguing possibility that a female may pass on a Y chromosome to her offspring."

    - Ross CN et al. Germ-line chimerism and paternal care in marmosets ( Callithrix kuhlii ). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2007) vol. 104 (15) pp. 6278-82
    pnas.org/content/104/15/6278.full 
    _______________________  

    Zephyr López Cervilla August 27, 2012 10:04 PM
    +John Baez: "Far out, +Zephyr López Cervilla!  That's amazing. Two questions: 1) Why do you know about this?  2) Why might chimerism be more common among these species?""
     . . . 
    2) According to this same paper, chimerism between DZ twins may be favored to promote paternal care. These species present several traits that make paternal care particularly important, they have small body size, two offspring per pregnancy, the adult/offspring ratio is higher than in other primates, their population live in groups of small size and alloparental care. All these traits make the involvement of the father in the rearing of the offspring particularly advantageous. 

    What does have to do chimerism with all this? According to their suggested theory (supported by statistical correlation), genetic fathers will perceive chimeric offspring as closer relatives. 

    Supposing that they rely on molecular clues to estimate kinship, the individual of the offspring whose cells come from two cells lines derived from two spermatozoids (and two ovules) will express a greater variety of molecules specific of the father (although in lesser amount). 

    It hasn't to be limited to molecular clues, though. Other traits (behavior, physiognomy) could be differently affected as well. 

    For instance, genetic traits of dominant expression are more likely to be shared between the parent and the chimeric offspring if the father is heterozygotic, whereas in the case of homozygotic fathers, chimerism won't cause on average any difference in the expression of that trait in the offspring. 

    Codominant and quantitative traits will also be on average more similar between fathers and chimeric offspring than between fathers and nonchimeric offspring.

    Reference:

    - Ross CN et al. Germ-line chimerism and paternal care in marmosets ( Callithrix kuhlii ). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2007) vol. 104 (15) pp. 6278-82
    pnas.org/content/104/15/6278.full 
    _______________________  

    Some related papers:

    - Watkins DI et al. A primate species with limited major histocompatibility complex class I polymorphism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (1988) vol. 85 (20) pp. 7714-8
    [ Saguinis oedipus (cotton-top tamarin)]
    pnas.org/content/85/20/7714.full.pdf 

    - Antunes SG et al. The common marmoset: a new world primate species with limited Mhc class II variability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (1998) vol. 95 (20) pp. 11745-50
    [ Callithrix jacchus ]
    pnas.org/content/95/20/11745.full 

    - Cadavid LF et al. Evolutionary instability of the major histocompatibility complex class I loci in New World primates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (1997) vol. 94 (26) pp. 14536-41
    pnas.org/content/94/26/14536.full 
    _______________________  

    - Starzl TE. Chimerism and tolerance in transplantation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2004) vol. 101 Suppl 2 pp. 14607-14
    pnas.org/content/101/suppl.2/14607.full 

    - Billingham RE et al. Transplantation Immunity, Immunological Tolerance, and Chicken x Turkey Interspecific Hybrids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (1961) vol. 47 (7) pp. 1039-43
    pnas.org/content/47/7/1039.full.pdf 

    Shizuru JA et al. Purified hematopoietic stem cell grafts induce tolerance to alloantigens and can mediate positive and negative T cell selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2000) vol. 97 (17) pp. 9555-60
    pnas.org/content/97/17/9555.full.pdf 
    _______________________  

    URL source G+ comments G+ post: plus.google.com/117663015413546257905/posts/ZjDkQC9ULvN 
    _______________________  

    Reshared text:
    Venus, the Heterochromatic Chimera Cat

    Venus the Chimera split face, two face, odd eye, 2 diff color eyes... cat gone viral

    Meet Venus, the three year old heterochromatic (http://goo.gl/pYddP) chimera cat :3 Literally, she's her own fraternal twin!

    Chimera cat is one individual organism, but genetically its own fraternal twin. A chimera is typically formed from four parent cells (either two fertilized eggs, or two early embryos that have fused together). When the organism forms, the cells that had already begun to develop in the separate embryos keep their original phenotypes and appearances. This means that the resulting animal is a mixture of tissues and can look like this gorgeous (but bizarre) kitty.

    (Source: http://goo.gl/LsuUO) #caturday #scienceeveryday
  • 6 plusses - 0 comments - 3 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-07-11 20:35:01
    RESHARE:
    plus.google.com - Map of the World: 1. Hobo-Dyer Projection, 2. South Facing Upwards 3. International Date Line Centered
    Uploaded by Farran Lee. July 11, 2012

    Comment:
    I've thought of 2 other ways to map the world:

    1. a disk-shaped representation with the North Pole in the center, similar to the UN flag (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_United_Nations), but mantaining the relative surface areas of the land and ocean masses. 
    The UN emblem corresponds to an azimuthal equidistant projection (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Azimuthal_equidistant_projection) which isn't an equal-area projection (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Azimuthal_projection#Equal-area). In contrast, I suggest a Lambert azimuthal equal area projection centered in the North Pole (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lambert_azimuthal_equal-area_projection), rather than in a point of the equator unlike it has been depicted in Wikipedia. 

    2. projecting the geography of the globe on the surface of a polyhedron (e.g., a truncated icosahedron) and then unfolding the faces on a flat map.

    Picture of an unfolded truncated icosahedron:
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Truncated_icosahedron_flat.png

    This projection slightly alters the relative surface area and distances between the periphery and the center of each face. But since the faces are homogeneously distributed all around the globe, the distorsion wouldn't generate large areas overdimensioned and underdimensioned.
    This representation corresponds to a Snyder’s equal-area polyhedral projection used for geodesic grids (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geodesic_grid) but unfolded.
    ________________ 

    As in the case of the disk-shaped representation, I place the North Pole in the center the projection once the polyhedral projection is unfolded on a flat surface. For several reasons:

    1. Most of the emerged land masses are located around the North Pole.

    2. Most of the world population live around the North Pole.

    3. None of the populated areas in the Northern hemisphere is particularly priviledged over the rest. Even the areas in the Southern hemisphere aren't so marginalized since the relief of the periphery on a disk-shaped representation is easily more distinguishable than the center.

    4. The most distorted area is the Antarctic (specially in the disk-shaped representation) what isn't a big issue since there's no permanent human population in that area.
    ________________ 

    To conclude:

    - 1 is a better representation than 2 to easily pinpoint the relative position of points when there's a long distance between them.

    - 2 is a better representation than 1 at the local level, since the distorsion in the relative distances and surface areas represented in the same face is moderate. 

    - As in the case of the circular projection, there's no distorsion of the relative surface areas between large areas. 

    - In contrast, in both cases there's some distorsion between distances at the large scale, which is more important between the peripheral points in the disk-shaped representation.

    URL source G+ post: plus.google.com/111993317164904084662/posts/CUpPBRCJ4Bf ________________ 

    Related information:
    1. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lambert_azimuthal_equal-area_projection 
    2. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dymaxion_map
    3. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geodesic_grid 
    4. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Azimuthal_projection#Equal-area 
    5. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Azimuthal_equidistant_projection ________________ 

    Reshared text:
    +Ronnie Boadi provided a link to an excellent article about the warped accepted appearance of our World: directionsmag.com/features/a-more-realistic-view-of-our-world/129763 . Our perception of the world is important, and teaching it 'wrongly' to everyone is damaging to people's views on the global society.

    The Hobo-Dyer Projection: This is probably the most realistic rectangular projection of the globe - to maintain equal area of landmass, "the shapes have become progressively flatter [but wider] towards the poles, but shapes between 45° north and south are well preserved." (full view: moyakarta.ucoz.ru/rastr/anti-world-map.jpg)

    The reason this map appears to be upside-down is due to the etymology of the word 'north'. According to en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North "The word north is related to the Old High German nord, both descending from the Proto-Indo-European unit ner-, meaning "down" (or "under")."
    Down, under. Not Up or above.

    Modern society (and generally whoever created the map) has always made the Northern Hemisphere more important over the rest of the world. The previous accepted version, the Mercator Projection, placed the equator 2/3s down the map, elongating the north greatly. Larger landmass creates the illusion of being greater.

    Blergh, I'm bored of typing, but hopefully you get the point I'm trying to make. Perception is an incredibly important thing.
    
  • 4 plusses - 7 comments - 1 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-10-16 00:46:02
    sciencedaily.com - Increase in Allergies Is Not from Being Too Clean, Just Losing Touch With 'Old Friends' October 2, 2012

    EXCERPT:
    Professor Sally Bloomfield: "The underlying idea that microbial exposure is crucial to regulating the immune system is right. But the idea that children who have fewer infections, because of more hygienic homes, are then more likely to develop asthma and other allergies does not hold up."

    Dr Rosalind Stanwell-Smith: "Allergies and chronic inflammatory diseases are serious health issues and it's time we recognised that simplistically talking about home and personal cleanliness as the cause of the problem is ill-advised, because it's diverting attention from finding workable solutions and the true, probably much more complex, causes."

    Professor Graham Rook: "The rise in allergies and inflammatory diseases seems at least partly due to gradually losing contact with the range of microbes our immune systems evolved with, way back in the Stone Age. Only now are we seeing the consequences of this, doubtless also driven by genetic predisposition and a range of factors in our modern lifestyle -- from different diets and pollution to stress and inactivity. It seems that some people now have inadequately regulated immune systems that are less able to cope with these other factors."

    Dr Stanwell Smith: "Since the 1800s, when allergies began to be more noticed, the mix of microbes we've lived with, and eaten, drunk and breathed in has been steadily changing. Some of this has come through measures to combat infectious diseases that used to take such a heavy toll in those days -- in London, 1 in 3 deaths was a child under 5. These changes include clean drinking water, safe food, sanitation and sewers, and maybe overuse of antibiotics. Whilst vital for protecting us from infectious diseases, these will also have inadvertently altered exposure to the 'microbial friends' which inhabit the same environments."

    <<But we've also lost touch with our "old friends" in other ways: our modern homes have a different and less diverse mix of microbes than rural homes of the past. This is nothing to do with cleaning habits: even the cleanest-looking homes still abound with bacteria, viruses, fungi, moulds and dust mites. It's mainly because microbes come in from outside and the microbes in towns and cities are very different from those on farms and in the countryside.>>

    Professor Sally Bloomfield: "The good news is that we aren't faced with a stark choice between running the risk of infectious disease, or suffering allergies and inflammatory diseases. The threat of infectious disease is now rising because of antibiotic resistance, global mobility and an ageing population, so good hygiene is even more vital to all of us."

    Professor Graham Rook: "How we can begin to reverse the trend in allergies and CID isn't yet clear. There are lots of ideas being explored but relaxing hygiene won't reunite us with our Old Friends -- just expose us to new enemies like E. coli O104."

    Professor Sally Bloomfield: "One important thing we can do is to stop talking about 'being too clean' and get people thinking about how we can safely reconnect with the right kind of dirt."
    _____________ 

    Review article of reference (open access):

    - Smith RS et al. The Hygiene Hypothesis and its implications for home hygiene, lifestyle and public health. International Scientific Forum on Home Hygiene (2012) pp. 1-113
    www.ifh-homehygiene.org/IntegratedCRD.nsf/a639aacb2d462a2180257506004d35db/00bf50c9379c013c80257a7f0043aaa2?OpenDocument 
    PDF: www.ifh-homehygiene.org/IntegratedCRD.nsf/a639aacb2d462a2180257506004d35db/00BF50C9379C013C80257A7F0043AAA2/$File/Hygiene%20hypothesis%20review_19092012.pdf 

    Articles and references somehow related:

    - Gitig, Diana. Has our war on microbes left our immune systems prone to dysfunction? Ars Technica (Condé Nast). October 14, 2012
    arstechnica.com/science/2012/10/book-review-an-epidemic-of-absence-takes-on-the-worms-youre-missing 

    - Velasquez-Manoff, Moises. An Epidemic of Absence: A New Way of Understanding Allergies and Autoimmune Diseases (book)

    - Velasquez-Manoff, Moises. An Immune Disorder at the Root of Autism. The New York Times August 25, 2012
    nytimes.com/2012/08/26/opinion/sunday/immune-disorders-and-autism.html?pagewanted=all 

    - Keim, Brandon. Q&A: Parasites, Modern Life and Immune Systems Gone Haywire Wired. September 4, 2012
    wired.com/wiredscience/2012/09/epidemic-of-absence 
    _______________ 

    Criticism of the article (and book) written by Moises Velasquez-Manoff:

    Comment: The hypothesis that he supports in his article, the existence of a link between a dysregulation of the immune system and many of the recently diagnosed cases of autism, has been negatively criticized by some scientists: 

    - Willingham, Emily. Autism, immunity, inflammation, and the New York Times. Words, Words, Words. August 27, 2012
    emilywillinghamphd.com/2012/08/autism-immunity-inflammation-and-new.html 

    - Willingham, Emily. An analysis of the sources supplied for the NYT autism and inflammation op-ed. Words, Words, Words. September 2, 2012
    emilywillinghamphd.com/2012/09/an-analysis-of-sources-supplied-for-nyt.html 

    - Eisen, Jonathan. Velasquez-Manoff opinion piece in the NY Times on autism, parasites & inflammation; nice ideas; not enough caveats. The Tree of Life. August 26, 2012
    phylogenomics.blogspot.com.es/2012/08/velasquez-manoff-opinion-piece-in-ny.html 

    - Koerth-Baker, Maggie. Autism is more than a parasite deficiency. BoingBoing.net. August 27, 2012
    boingboing.net/2012/08/27/autism-is-more-than-a-parasite.html 
    _______________ 

    Comment:
    I often disagree with the predominant stance of the science blogs on different topics. However, my first impression on this issue was coincident with the main content on the above mentioned blogs even before I could read any them. 
    Particularly, their stance on the supposed link between an immune dysregulation caused hypothetically by the absence of certain exogenous stimuli and the autism epidemic that allegedly has spread in the last decades throughout the developed countries (even though the increase in autism incidence is more than dubious). 
    This excerpt summarizes the leitmotif of their content: 

    <<Willingham's basic point: There is an atmosphere of desperation and panic surrounding autism, which has lead some parents to try a range of risky interventions in the hopes of "curing" it. Given that, maybe it's irresponsible to claim that a hypothetical factor in autism is the absolute cause. Especially when the proposed treatment—intentional infection with parasitic whipworms—comes with its own downsides, including growth retardation in children, anemia, and even rectal prolapse.>>
    — Maggie Koerth-Baker
    _______________ 
    sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/10/121003082734.htm 

    URL related G+ post:  plus.google.com/100647702320088380533/posts/WKpwDezKCT9 
    ________________________ 
  • 6 plusses - 2 comments - 2 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-09-11 22:48:12
    RESHARE:
    plus.google.com - Biological Perpetual Motion Machine
    Uploaded by Sean Bonner. February 9, 2012

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perpetual_motion 

    1. Cat always lands on its feet.
    2. Bread with butter always falls buttered side down.
    3. Fasten the bread with butter to cat's back.
    4. Cat will keep rotating and never fall on te ground.
    5. Attach the cat-bread to the generator.
    6. ∞ Infinite energy!
    ______________________ 

    Comment:
    I would have said that it was an cheap and energetically efficient levitation system (you'd only have to feed the cat).
    Actually, it should be the other way around. The belly of the cat should be facing the buttered side of a very large bread slice.

    via +Nicu Zaporojan 
    URL via G+ post: plus.google.com/109435527326101648962/posts/JYBzNtJK37z 
    URL source G+ post: plus.google.com/101629211371073711149/posts/BKpiyYPDPYL 
    ________________________ 

    Reshared text:
    Science!
  • 6 plusses - 2 comments - 2 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-10-14 04:45:13
    RESHARE:
    kurzweilai.net - Dyson sphere hunt using Kepler data
    By Amara D. Angelica. October 12, 2012

    Excerpt:
    <<Technological civilizations may communicate with their space probes located throughout the galaxy by using laser beams, either in visible light or infrared light. Laser light is detectable from other civilizations because the power is concentrated into a narrow beam and the light is all at one specific color or frequency. The lasers outshine the host star at the color of the laser.>>

    Excerpt comments:

    Thomas Mach October 13, 2012 8:41 AM +3
    The probability that a laser is pointing exactly in our direction is very low. It's a waste of money and observation time.
    _____________ 

    Zephyr López Cervilla October 13, 2012 9:11 AM
    +Thomas Mach, laser beams diverge over long distances, such as interstellar distances, even at interplanetary distances.
    _____________ 

    John Baez October 13, 2012 6:06 PM +3
    There's a low chance that a laser is pointing roughly at us, or the brightness of a star is flickering for other artificial reasons, but as long as it's significantly more than 1/1000 per star observed, we may see one.  I predict we won't, but if a foundation wants to give someone $200,000 to look, it's not so bad.  (The Templeton Foundation has also supported efforts to give Christianity scientific legitimacy, and any money taken away from those is a good thing as far as I'm concerned.)
    _____________ 

    Zephyr López Cervilla October 14, 2012 3:00 AM (edited) +1
    I don't think there's so little chance that a laser beam is aimed at us, assuming that other civilizations are using laser beams to transfer energy from the star to the different planets and moons that they may be inhabiting or they have colonized for their exploitation.

    Each planet is orbiting around the star so the laser beams would be sweeping the orbital plane (its ecliptic) over a planetary year. On the other hand, in a given planetary system every planet is orbiting in a slightly different ecliptic (that's why the transits of Venus are rare), what extends the number of planes that their laser beams are regularly sweeping. 

    If they are also using their beams to transmit information between planets and between planets and moons, the number of planes swept by their beams would be even greater.

    Also, in case of existence of a Dyson sphere, this also needs to be orbiting around the star, necessarily with a much quicker period than any of the planets, so probably several laser sources placed at different locations around the star would take turns to emit their laser beams toward a given planet (unless the laser emitters had been placed over the poles of the star). 

    So what is the chance that the Earth is in one of those orbital planes or regularly crossing them? I'd say that roughly the same as the chance to detect a planetary transit due to change in the star brightness that can reveal the existence of a planet orbiting the system. 

    How many planetary systems have been discovered that way or can be discovered in the future? How many are estimated that can't be discovered that way because the Earth doesn't cross the ecliptics of any of its planets? 

    The ratio of the former and the latter values is probably an acceptable proxy of the chance to detect a laser beam of a given civilization in case they are used by other civilizations of the galaxy. If their are more than one, the chance to detect at least one would the sum of all those probabilities.
    _____________ 

    Misha Kandel October 14, 2012 2:56 AM
    Even if there was a laser beam aimed directly at us, our brightest minds would come up with some nonsense explanation : they would come up with some bunk about how it was really a spinning neutron star with some absurd magnetization. Piff! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGM-1
    _____________ 

    Bruce Cohen October 14, 2012 8:38 AM
    A Dyson Sphere can't be a solid shell; no material substance has the tensile strength to withstand the forces the gravity of the star would create (note that Larry Niven's Ringworld was made of an unobtainium named scrith, which was 40% opaque to meutrinos!). So it would have to be made of separate pieces in non-intersecting orbits.
    _____________ 

    Zephyr López Cervilla October 14, 2012 10:35 AM
    There are other forces acting in addition to gravity. Besides, the sphere doesn't have to be a rigid structure, it could be rather like a fishing net or a sail.
    _____________ 

    Related Wikipedia pages:
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dyson_sphere 
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free-space_optical_communication (*)
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laser_beam_profiler 

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laser#The_light_emitted 
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beam_diameter 
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beam_divergence 

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaussian_beam 
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tophat_beam 
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bessel_beam 

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rayleigh_scattering 
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rayleigh_range 
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mie_scattering 
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Light_scattering_by_particles 
    _____________ 
    *: On deep-space laser ranging demonstration 

    - Editors. Space probe breaks laser record. BBC News. January 6, 2006
    news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4587580.stm

    - Smith DE et al. Two-way laser link over interplanetary distance. Science (2006) vol. 311 (5757) pp. 53
    sciencemag.org/content/311/5757/53 

    - Jørgensen SE et al. Optisk kommunikation i deep space – Et feasibilitystudie i forbindelse med Bering-missionen. Speciale i fysik ved Niels Bohr Institutet for Astronomi, Fysik og Geofysik, udarbejdet på Dansk Rumforskningsinstitut (2003)
    silicium.dk/speciale.php 

    pig.sagepub.com/content/225/2/213 
    _____________ 

    URL source G+ post: plus.google.com/117663015413546257905/posts/FNW8J23U4rV 
    _______________________ 

    Reshared text:
    A hypothetical Kadarshev Type II Civilization is one that would use the whole energy output of its home star, perhaps by building a Dyson sphere around it.   Geoff Marcy of U. C Berkeley, who has discovered more extrasolar planets than anyone else, has just gotten a grant from the Templeton Foundation to study 1,000 extrasolar systems in the hopes of finding artificial changes in brightness.

    He'll get $200,000 over the next two years, some to purchase time at the Hawaii-based Keck telescopes.  Besides Dyson spheres, which would emit waste heat in the infrared, it seems he'll be looking for glimmerings of light.  “Technological civilizations may communicate with their space probes located throughout the galaxy by using laser beams, either in visible light or infrared light,” Marcy said in a statement. ”Laser light is detectable from other civilizations because the power is concentrated into a narrow beam and the light is all at one specific color or frequency. The lasers outshine the host star at the color of the laser.”

    For no particularly good reason, just a hunch, I bet he won't find anything.  But it's good to look!

    http://www.kurzweilai.net/dyson-sphere-hunt-using-kepler-data

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kardashev_scale
  • 1 plusses - 13 comments - 0 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-09-27 07:24:27
    scientificamerican.com - Why Airplane Windows Don't Roll Down
    By Life's Little Mysteries. September 25, 2012
    scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=why-airplane-windows-dont 

    Comment:
    Certainly, there are some technical reasons that explain why airplane windows for passengers can't roll down (some cockpit windows can be opened in airliners such as the McDonnell Douglas DC-10, or a vent in the case of the Boeing 747), but none of them are related to what has been suggested in recent posts (as far as I know). The argument of sudden depresurization fails for its own weight. If it was this of great concern the doors of the cabin couldn't be opened either, specially during flight, but on the contrary, the cabin doors do open. 

    For some reason many people have assumed that the possibility to open the cabin windows would mean their practicability by any passenger at any time and under any conditions, but this hasn't to be necessarily the case. There are technical solutions to prevent passengers from opening the windows when this weren't advisable. Likewise, in certain situations the passengers are instructed on how to open the doors even though they usually aren't allowed to do so.
    _______________________ 

    Excerpts from different sources:

    <<Further, the captain did not initiate the “Emergency Evacuation” checklist, which was required to be initiated during the preparation for landing. The “Emergency Evacuation” checklist includes depressurizing the airplane before landing.  If this checklist had been initiated, it would have provided another opportunity for the crew to accomplish the necessary depressurization that was missed on the “Fire & Smoke” checklist checklist includes depressurizing the airplane before landing.>>
    ntsb.gov/doclib/reports/1998/AAR9803.pdf (page 59)

    DC-10 FLIGHT MANUAL
    . . . DC-10 EMERGENCY EVACUATION (LAND)

    . . . INFLIGHT PREPARATION (IF REQUIRED)
    1. Crew & Couriers (flight Attendents and Passengers, if onboard) ...........NOTIFY

     A. On pasenger flights, time permitting: 
    . (1) Summon the Senior Flight Attendant to brief:
    . . (a) Nature of emergency.
    . . (b) Time remaining to prepare.
    . . (c) Cockpit commands "Brace For Landing."
    . . (d) Cockpit commands "Evacuate."
    . . (e) Special instructions.
    . (2) Brief passengers:
    . . (a) Nature of emergency.
    . . (b) Plan of action.
    . . (c) Follow Flight Attendent directions.
     B. On cargo aircraft the S/O briefs te jumpseaters.

    2. ATC and Company .....................NOTIFY

    3. Cockpit Doorlock CB (LM E-2) .....................TRIP

    4. Fuel .....................DAMP, AS REQUIRED

    5. Depressurization ...............DEPRESSURIZE BEFORE LANDING

     A. Cabin Pressure Auto/Man selector .....................MAN

     B. Manual Cabin Altitude control .....................OPEN

    6. Cockpit Loose Items .....................SECURED

    . . . THIRTY SECONDS PRIOR TO TOUCHDOWN

    7. Announce ....................."BRACE FOR LANDING"

    . . . GROUND EVACUATION AFTER STOPPED

    8. Parking Brake .....................SET

    9. Tower Ground .....................NOTIFIED

    10. Emergency Power Switch .....................ON

    11. Start Levels .....................OFF
    ntsb.gov/doclib/reports/1998/AAR9803.pdf (page 111)


    <<The flight engineer attempted to open the primary doors (doors L1 and R1),[16] but the doors would not immediately open.  Meanwhile, the captain attempted to open his cockpit window and felt resistance, and when he broke the air seal he heard air escape with a hissing noise.  He shouted to the others that the airplane was still pressurized.  The flight engineer then rotated the outflow valve control to the open position (thereby depressurizing the airplane), and again attempted to open the L1 and R1 doors.  Both of the evacuation slides deployed; however, the L1 door only partially opened. After the airplane was depressurized, both the captain and first officer opened their cockpit windows. The captain said that at that point the smoke was colored gray to black, and then turned black and had a “horrible acrid” smell.  He said he had to hold his breath until his window opened and the smoke “billowed out the window like a chimney.”>>
    ntsb.gov/doclib/reports/1998/AAR9803.pdf (page 9)
    ___________________ 


    Some examples of inflight fires:
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_Canada_Flight_797 
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Airtours_Flight_28M 
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saudia_Flight_163 
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ValuJet_Flight_592 
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_African_Airways_Flight_295 
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UPS_Airlines_Flight_6 
    *Here more: *
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Airliner_accidents_and_incidents_caused_by_in-flight_fires 
    Also related: 
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Airliner_accidents_and_incidents_involving_in-flight_depressurization 
    More general lists: 
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_accidents_and_incidents_on_commercial_airliners 
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Lists_of_aviation_accidents_and_incidents 
    _______________________ 

    <<At some point during the flight, a fire developed in the cargo section on the main deck; the fire was probably not extinguished before impact. The 'smoke evacuation' checklist calls for the aircraft to be depressurised, and for two of the cabin doors to be opened. No evidence exists that the checklist was followed, or the doors opened. A crew member might have gone into the cargo hold to try to fight the fire. A charged fire extinguisher was later recovered from the wreckage on which investigators found molten metal.>>
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_African_Airways_Flight_295#History_of_the_flight 
    _______________________ 

    <<The investigation revived safety concerns about the effects of smoke in the cockpit. The crash also revived concerns over whether smoke hoods should be allowed in the cockpit.[21] Prior to the crash of UPS Flight 6, debate over whether manufacturers and regulators had been doing enough to prevent airborne fires had occurred.[22] Around the time of the crash, the National Transportation Safety Board had asked the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to install automatic fire extinguisher systems in the holds of cargo aircraft. UPS Airlines followed FAA regulations, which stated that pilots should depressurize the main cabin and climb to an altitude of at least 20,000 feet (6,100 m) upon detection of a fire so as to deprive the flames of oxygen.[23] >>
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UPS_Airlines_Flight_6#Investigation

    References
    21. Malas, Nour and Andy Pasztor. "UPS Crash Puts Focus on Smoke in Cockpit." The Wall Street Journal. September 7, 2010. Retrieved September 8, 2010. 
    online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703713504575476081455429968.html 
    22. Cummins, Chip and Andy Pasztor. "UPS Cargo Plane Crashes Near Dubai." The Wall Street Journal. September 4, 2010. Retrieved September 8, 2010. 
    online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703946504575469830201125788.html 
    23. Downs, Jere. "NTSB has been seeking fire fighting equipment on cargo planes." The Courier-Journal. September 9, 2010.  
    courier-journal.com/article/20100909/BUSINESS/309090028/UPS-crash-comes-regulators-debate-fire-fighting-cargo-planes 
    _______________________ 

    <<At 06:12 BST, during the takeoff phase, Captain Peter Terrington and First Officer Brian Love heard a loud thump coming from underneath the plane. Thinking a tyre had burst, they abandoned takeoff and activated the thrust reversers. Taking care in applying gradual braking, the crew steered the plane onto a taxiway off to the right of the runway and into a slight prevailing wind. As the plane stopped, the crew discovered that the No. 1 engine was on fire.

    By this time, fuel spilling from the port wing combined with the light wind had fanned the fire into a giant blaze. Fire quickly found its way into the passenger cabin, creating toxic smoke and causing the deaths of 53 passengers and two cabin crew, 48 of them from smoke inhalation. 78 passengers and four crew escaped, with 15 people sustaining serious injuries. One passenger, a man rescued 33 minutes after the outbreak of fire after being found unconscious in the aisle, died in the hospital 6 days later as a result of his injuries>>
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Airtours_Flight_28M#Accident  
    _______________________ 

    Depressurisation As Fire Extinguisher?
    By
    faro  From Egypt, joined Aug 2007, 1363 posts, RR: 0
    Posted Fri Oct 7 2011 09:37:18 your local time (11 months 3 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 2562 times
    airliners.net/aviation-forums/tech_ops/read.main/306265 
    --------------------- 
    Markhkg  From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 957 posts, RR: 2
    Reply 1, posted Fri Oct 7 2011 10:39:03 your local time (11 months 3 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 2535 times:
    <<A second but related topic is smoke evacuation. This is typically used when there is a great deal of smoke in the cabin but (in general) the PIC is reasonably assured the fire is extinguished (introducing more oxygen to an unextinguished fire could be catastrophic). The B-747 in some older cabin crew manuals had a fairly unique procedure of having the flight crew descend the aircraft, depressurize the cabin and the cabin crew disarmed a main cabin door (usually two) and open it a "crack", allowing for air flow. The door handle was apparently also secured during this procedure. (Note: the cabin door is not fully opened.) Other aircraft, like the Gulfstream 550 has a dedicated "smoke evacuation" button, which in the case of the Gulfstream depressurizes a seal around the aft baggage door to allow for smoke to leave the aircraft.>>
    --------------------- 
    lowrider  From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 3220 posts, RR: 11
    Reply 3, posted Fri Oct 7 2011 11:27:28 your local time (11 months 3 weeks 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 2516 times:
    _<<Its more than a subject, it is in the QRH. The operating theory is that depressurizing the cabin up to FL250 will reduce the available oxygen enough to slow, if not extinguish most fires. I don't care to test this personally, but I see it mostly as measure to buy a little more time to get to an airport.>>
    --------------------- 
    CosmicCruiser  From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 2106 posts, RR: 17
    Reply 5, posted Fri Oct 7 2011 15:49:48 your local time (11 months 3 weeks 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 2403 times:
    <<Actually it's part of the checklist on the cargo jets I've flown. It worked as advertised for one of our crew a few years ago and probably saved their lives.>>
    --------------------- 
    francoflier  From France, joined Oct 2001, 2858 posts, RR: 11
    Reply 10, posted Fri Oct 7 2011 21:49:10 your local time (11 months 3 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 2244 times:
    <<It's still on the manuals today, up to the 744. The procedure is still taught to cabin and cockpit crew alike. There is a specially designed strap that holds the door handle in a certain position to keep it ajar. One or two doors are then opened (depending on the location of the smoke) to create a draft of air to evacuate said smoke.>>

    <<Note that the 747 also has a 'vent' behind the overhead C/B panel in the cockpit which can be opened by the flight crew to help evacuate cockpit smoke. ...The escape hatch technique is a lot more radical and effective, if unofficial, provided you're depressurized.

    As for the 744 cargo, main deck fire fighting procedure includes depressurizing the cabin to 25000 ft. As said above, it slows the fire rather than smother it. Every minute helps when you're possibly hours away from a suitable field in the middle of the Pacific ocean.>>
    --------------------- 
    jetpilot  From United States of America, joined May 1999, 3128 posts, RR: 34
    Reply 12, posted Sat Oct 8 2011 20:30:50 your local time (11 months 3 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 1977 times:
    <<It's easy to depressurize an aircraft. Just turn the bleeds off supplying pressurized air.>>
    --------------------- 
    Markhkg  From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 957 posts, RR: 2
    Reply 16, posted Sun Oct 9 2011 22:40:59 your local time (11 months 3 weeks 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 1726 times:
    Quoting CosmicCruiser (Reply 15):
    I can say that the procedure worked as advertised for out DC-10 crew yrs ago that landed in Newburg NY

    CosmicCruiser, was this N68055? It is a very interesting case study, but I was surprised that the effectiveness of raising the cabin altitude wasn't really explored by the NTSB. (It would have seemed to be the perfect case study for this.)

    For those interested, http://www.ntsb.gov/doclib/reports/1998/AAR9803.pdf 

    _One of the NTSB findings interested me, "The evacuation was delayed because the flightcrew failed to ensure that the
    airplane was properly depressurized.">>_
    --------------------- 
    KingairTA  From United States of America, joined Feb 2009, 374 posts, RR: 0
    Reply 18, posted Tue Oct 11 2011 23:07:50 your local time (11 months 3 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 1417 times:
    _<<On the C-130 Emergency depresuriztion was part of Fuselage fire/Smoke and Fume elimination. If the out flow valve and safety valve couldn't depress fast enough one could pull a handle and have the center overhead emergency hatch pop out dumping the cabin pressure almost instantaniously.>>

    Further reading:

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncontrolled_decompression 
    airliners.net/aviation-forums/tech_ops/read.main/306265 
    747 EMERGENCY CHECKLIST part2 
    iasa.com.au/folders/Safety_Issues/Cabin_Safety/deadlydoors.html 
    flightsafety.org/ccs/ccs_nov-dec02.pdf 
    http://www.fire.tc.faa.gov/2010Conference/files/Cargo_Fire/HillDepressurizationFreighter/HillDepressurizationFreighterPres.pdf 
    _________________________ 

    Other articles/blog entries on Mitt Romney's comment:

    gawker.com - Romney Doesn’t Know Why Airplane Windows Won’t Open, Calls The Closed Window Policy ‘A Real Problem’
    By Caity Weaver. September 24, 2012
    http://gawker.com/5945967/romney-doesnt-know-why-airplane-windows-wont-open-calls-the-closed-window-policy-a-real-problem

    huffingtonpost.com - UPDATE: Mitt Romney Wonders Why Ann Romney's Airplane Windows Don't Roll Down
    September 27, 2012
    huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/24/mitt-romney-airplane-windows_n_1910930.html?utm_hp_ref=mostpopular 

    nymag.com - Mitt Romney Doesn’t Get Why Airplane Windows Don’t Open [Updated]
    By Dan Amira. september 24, 2012
    http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2012/09/romney-wonders-why-airplane-windows-dont-open.html 

    blogher.com - Why We Can't Open The Windows Inside A Plane
    By avflox. September 25, 2012
    blogher.com/why-we-cant-open-windows-inside-plane 

    wonkette.com - Science Genius Mitt Romney Thinks Airplane Windows Should Open
    By Rebecca Schoenkopf. September 24, 2012
    http://wonkette.com/484977/science-genius-mitt-romney-thinks-airplane-windows-should-open 

    latimes.com - Mitt Romney pulls in $6 million at Beverly Hills fundraiser
    By Seema Mehta. September 23, 2012
    latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-romney-beverly-hills-fundraiser-20120922,0,2317962.story 

    Mitt Romney: I don't understand why plane windows don't open. !
    By Rachel Maddow (msnbc.com). September 24, 2012
    _________________________ 

    Related G+ posts: 
    plus.google.com/+CarterGibson/posts/6ypwiwnCvhq 
    plus.google.com/102150693225130002912/posts/2Z4pgYDFeEm 
    plus.google.com/+RobertLlewellyn/posts/HjbkQj8YGgt 
    plus.google.com/109667864053549756579/posts/jXZ54iGLEaF 
    plus.google.com/101752320499567895627/posts/17fGX5DsKrK 
    plus.google.com/114480095884024488890/posts/7x7aeqswEdW 
    plus.google.com/+DannySullivan/posts/Na1WQ8amoL3
    plus.google.com/112352920206354603958/posts/9rgGQG5ZHG5
    plus.google.com/105473622219622697310/posts/crGX5r5SBRy 
    plus.google.com/114096599366011465749/posts/TxaxwWyHG5N 
    plus.google.com/u/0/116963352715696645620/posts/T8wmqKLXM6T 
    plus.google.com/101896915525351208408/posts/MDiikrzRZBt 
    plus.google.com/116951714890124724209/posts/Cx3Kjgyskjs 
    _________________________ 
  • 1 plusses - 13 comments - 0 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-04-03 01:52:13
    examiner.com - George Zimmerman weighs 170#; Trayvon Martin 160#
    By Kyle Rogers. March 28, 2012

    Trayvon Martin: 6'0'' 160 lb.
    George Zimmerman: 5'9'' 170 lb.

    Excerpt:
    <<Literally tens of thousands of publications and media outlets have reported that George Zimmerman weighed 250 pounds and Trayvon Martin weighed 140 pounds.

    The weight of 250 pounds for George Zimmerman was based on a police report that was over six years old. He has since lost a lot of weight. Newer pictures of Zimmerman show a much slimmer man.

    Media outlets have reported several different heights for George Zimmerman. They have ranged from 5'2" to 5'9". The Sanford police report from the night of the shooting lists Zimmerman at 5'9".

    The police surveillance video, recently shown on ABC National News shows a fairly slender George Zimmerman the night of the attack. A close friend of Zimmerman, Joe Oliver, says Zimmerman is 5'8" and currently only weighs 170 pounds.

    The police estimated Trayvon at 6'0" and 160 pounds* when they wrote the police report the night he was shot. This was probably a conservative estimate, as his family has reported his height at 6'2".
    *Source: sanfordfl.gov/investigation/docs/Twin%20Lakes%20Shooting%20Initial%20Report.pdf
    Edit: the police have removed the report from their site. I've found another copy of it here:
    1. documentcloud.org/documents/329568-twin-lakes-shooting-initial-report.html
    2. scribd.com/gene_park_3/d/86834808-Twin-Lakes-Shooting-Initial-Report
    3. liveleak.com/view?i=25c_1333056517

    Literally, thousands of media outlets have either reported false weights, or have stated "Zimmerman outweighed Martin by 100 pounds." As far as I can tell, not a single media outlet has printed a retraction.>>

    Ref.:
    examiner.com/charleston-conservative-in-charleston-sc/george-zimmerman-weighs-170-trayvon-martin-160

    Picture of both (more recent): cdn2-b.examiner.com/sites/default/files/styles/large_lightbox/hash/05/1a/1332984930_zimmerman.jpg

    ----------------------------------

    From Wikipedia:

    Accusations of media bias
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shooting_of_Trayvon_Martin#Accusations_of_media_bias

    NBC alters 911 recording
    After playing a recording of Zimmerman's 911 call, NBC was accused of selectively editing it to make Zimmerman appear racist. On the recording played by NBC Zimmerman was heard saying, "This guy looks like he’s up to no good. He looks black." In the original 911 recording, however, Zimmerman actually said, "This guy looks like he’s up to no good. Or he’s on drugs or something. It’s raining and he’s just walking around, looking about." The 911 operator was then heard asking, "OK, and this guy - is he black, white or Hispanic?" Zimmerman answered, "He looks black."[128] The Washington Post wrote that NBC's alteration "would more readily paint Zimmerman as a racial profiler. In reality’s version, Zimmerman simply answered a question about the race of the person whom he was reporting to the police. Nothing prejudicial at all in responding to such an inquiry... it’s a falsehood with repercussions. Much of the public discussion over the past week has settled on how conflicting facts and interpretations call into question whether Zimmerman acted justifiably or criminally... To portray that exchange in a way that wrongs Zimmerman is high editorial malpractice..."[128] Sean Hannity said of this editing, "They forgot the dispatcher’s question! How could NBC, in good conscience, do that?" Brent Bozell was quoted as saying, "This isn’t bias, this isn’t distortion, this is an all-out falsehood by NBC News."[150]

    Publication of outdated photographs
    Associated Press reported that at the time of the shooting, Martin was older than "the baby-faced boy in the photo that has been on front pages across the country," and that Zimmerman wasn't "the beefy-looking figure in the widely published mugshot," and that these outdated photos "may have helped shape initial public perceptions of the deadly shooting."[151]

    References
    128. ^ a b c Wemple, Erik (March 31, 2012). "NBC to do 'internal investigation' on Zimmerman segment". The Washington Post.
    washingtonpost.com/blogs/erik-wemple/post/nbc-to-do-internal-investigation-on-zimmerman-segment/2012/03/31/gIQAc4HhnS_blog.html
    150. NBC News Accused of Editing 911 Call in Trayvon Martin Controversy, Hollywood Reporter, March 30, 2012
    hollywoodreporter.com/news/trayvon-martin-nbc-news-editing-911-call-306359
    151. Old photos may be deceptive in Fla. shooting case, San Francisco Chronicle, March 30, 2012
    sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2012/03/30/national/a124959D75.DTL&tsp=1

    ----------------------------------

    myfoxtampabay.com - Witness: Martin attacked Zimmerman
    Updated: Monday, 26 Mar 2012, 2:57 PM EDT
    Published : Friday, 23 Mar 2012, 5:47 PM EDT
    myfoxtampabay.com/dpp/news/state/witness-martin-attacked-zimmerman-03232012

    ORLANDO - A witness we haven't heard from before paints a much different picture than we've seen so far of what happened the night 17-year-old Trayvon Martin was shot and killed.

    The night of that shooting, police say there was a witness who saw it all.

    Our sister station, FOX 35 in Orlando, has spoken to that witness.

    What Sanford Police investigators have in the folder, they put together on the killing of Trayvon Martin few know about.

    The file now sits in the hands of the state attorney. Now that file is just weeks away from being opened to a grand jury.

    It shows more now about why police believed that night that George Zimmerman shouldn't have gone to jail.

    Zimmerman called 911 and told dispatchers he was following a teen. The dispatcher told Zimmerman not to.

    And from that moment to the shooting, details are few.

    But one man's testimony could be key for the police.

    "The guy on the bottom who had a red sweater on was yelling to me: 'help, help…and I told him to stop and I was calling 911," he said.

    Trayvon Martin was in a hoodie; Zimmerman was in red.

    The witness only wanted to be identified as "John," and didn't not want to be shown on camera.

    His statements to police were instrumental, because police backed up Zimmerman's claims, saying those screams on the 911 call are those of Zimmerman.

    "When I got upstairs and looked down, the guy who was on top beating up the other guy, was the one laying in the grass, and I believe he was dead at that point," John said.

    Zimmerman says the shooting was self defense. According to information released on the Sanford city website, Zimmerman said he was going back to his SUV when he was attacked by the teen.

    Sanford police say Zimmerman was bloody in his face and head, and the back of his shirt was wet and had grass stains, indicating a struggle took place before the shooting.

    ----------------------------------
  • 1 plusses - 13 comments - 0 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-11-30 10:20:31
    wired.com - Elon Musk’s Mission to Mars
    By Chris Anderson. October 21, 2012 
    wired.com/wiredscience/2012/10/ff-elon-musk-qa/all 

    Comment:
    Some of the things that explains Elon Musk are rather funny. I can't but agree with him in some of his comments. Here there is the most interesting part of the interview.

    Excerpt:

    Chris Anderson: You’re not a rocket scientist by training. You’re not a space engineer.

    Elon Musk: That’s true. My background educationally is physics and economics, and I grew up in sort of an engineering environment—my father is an electromechanical engineer. And so there were lots of engineery things around me. When I asked for an explanation, I got the true explanation of how things work. I also did things like make model rockets, and in South Africa there were no premade rockets: I had to go to the chemist and get the ingredients for rocket fuel, mix it, put it in a pipe.

    Anderson: But then you became an Internet entrepreneur.

    Musk: I never had a job where I made anything physical. I cofounded two Internet software companies, Zip2 and PayPal. So it took me a few years to kind of learn rocket science, if you will.

    Anderson: How were you drawn to space as your next venture?

    Musk: In 2002, once it became clear that PayPal was going to get sold, I was having a conversation with a friend of mine, the entrepreneur Adeo Ressi, who was actually my college housemate. I’d been staying at his home for the weekend, and we were coming back on a rainy day, stuck in traffic on the Long Island Expressway. He was asking me what I would do after PayPal. And I said, well, I’d always been really interested in space, but I didn’t think there was anything I could do as an individual. But, I went on, it seemed clear that we would send people to Mars. Suddenly I began to wonder why it hadn’t happened already. Later I went to the NASA website so I could see the schedule of when we’re supposed to go. [Laughs.]

    Anderson: And of course there was nothing.

    Musk: At first I thought, jeez, maybe I’m just looking in the wrong place! Why was there no plan, no schedule? There was nothing. It seemed crazy.

    Anderson: NASA doesn’t have the budget for that anymore.

    Musk: Since 1989, when a study estimated that a manned mission would cost $500 billion, the subject has been toxic. Politicians didn’t want a high-priced federal program like that to be used as a political weapon against them.

    Anderson: Their opponents would call it a boondoggle.

    Musk: But the United States is a nation of explorers. America is the spirit of human exploration distilled.

    Anderson: We all leaped into the unknown to get here.

    Musk: So I started with a crazy idea to spur the national will. I called it the Mars Oasis missions. The idea was to send a small greenhouse to the surface of Mars, packed with dehydrated nutrient gel that could be hydrated on landing. You’d wind up with this great photograph of green plants and red background—the first life on Mars, as far as we know, and the farthest that life’s ever traveled. It would be a great money shot, plus you’d get a lot of engineering data about what it takes to maintain a little greenhouse and keep plants alive on Mars. If I could afford it, I figured it would be a worthy expenditure of money, with no expectation of financial return.

    Anderson: You were going to buy a ride to Mars, in a sense.

    Musk: Right. So I started to price it out. The spacecraft, the communications, the greenhouse experiment: I figured out how to do all that for relatively little. But then came the rocket—the actual propulsion from Earth to Mars. The cheapest US rocket that could do it would have cost $65 million, and I figured I would need at least two.

    Anderson: So, $130 million.

    Musk: Yeah, plus the cost of everything else, which would have meant I’d spend everything I made from PayPal—and if there were any cost growth I wouldn’t be able to cover it. So next I went to Russia three times, in late 2001 and 2002, to see if I could negotiate the purchase of two ICBMs. Without the nukes, obviously.

    Anderson: Obviously.

    Musk: They would have cost me $15 million to $20 million each. That was certainly a big improvement. But as I thought about it, I realized that the only reason the ICBMs were that cheap was because they’d already been made. They were just sitting around unused. You couldn’t make new ones for sale at that price. I suddenly understood that my whole premise behind the Mars Oasis idea was flawed. The real reason we weren’t going to Mars wasn’t a lack of national will; it was that we didn’t have cheap enough rocket technology to get there on a reasonable budget. It was the perception among the American people—correct, given current technology—that it didn’t make financial sense to go.

    Anderson: Instead of buying rockets for a philanthropic mission, you realized that you needed to start a business to make them more efficiently.

    Musk: We needed to set rocket technology on a path of rapid improvement. In the course of trying to put together Mars Oasis, I had talked to a number of people in the space industry and got a sense of who was technically astute and who wasn’t. So I put together a team, and over a series of Saturdays I had them do a feasibility study about building rockets more efficiently. It became clear that there wasn’t anything to prevent us from doing it. Rocket technology had not materially improved since the ’60s—arguably it had gone backward! We decided to reverse that trend.

    Anderson: And you have reversed it.

    Musk: Six years after we started the company, we launched our first rocket, Falcon 1, into orbit in 2008. And the price—not the cost, mind you, but the total price to customers per launch—was roughly $7 million.

    Anderson: How did you get the price so low?

    Musk: I tend to approach things from a physics framework. And physics teaches you to reason from first principles rather than by analogy. So I said, OK, let’s look at the first principles. What is a rocket made of? Aerospace-grade aluminum alloys, plus some titanium, copper, and carbon fiber. And then I asked, what is the value of those materials on the commodity market? It turned out that the materials cost of a rocket was around 2 percent of the typical price—which is a crazy ratio for a large mechanical product.

    Anderson: How does that compare to, say, cars?

    Musk: It depends on the car. For Tesla it’s probably 20 to 25 percent.

    Anderson: An order-of-magnitude difference.

    Musk: Right. So, I thought, we should be able to make a much cheaper rocket given those materials costs. There must be some pretty silly things going on in the market. And there are!

    Anderson: Like what?

    Musk: One is the incredible aversion to risk within big aerospace firms. Even if better technology is available, they’re still using legacy components, often ones that were developed in the 1960s.

    Anderson: I’ve heard that the attitude is essentially that you can’t fly a component that hasn’t already flown.

    Musk: Right, which is obviously a catch-22, right? There should be a Groucho Marx joke about that. So, yeah, there’s a tremendous bias against taking risks. Everyone is trying to optimize their ass-covering.

    Anderson: That’s a nice phrase.

    Musk: The results are pretty crazy. One of our competitors, Orbital Sciences, has a contract to resupply the International Space Station, and their rocket honestly sounds like the punch line to a joke. It uses Russian rocket engines that were made in the ’60s. I don’t mean their design is from the ’60s—I mean they start with engines that were literally made in the ’60s and, like, packed away in Siberia somewhere.

    Anderson: Where else are there inefficiencies?

    Musk: Second, there’s this tendency of big aerospace companies to outsource everything. That’s been trendy in lots of industries, but aerospace has done it to a ridiculous degree. They outsource to subcontractors, and then the subcontractors outsource to sub-subcontractors, and so on. You have to go four or five layers down to find somebody actually doing something useful—actually cutting metal, shaping atoms. Every level above that tacks on profit—it’s overhead to the fifth power.

    Anderson: Is that just a function of bureaucracy?

    Musk: In many cases the biggest customer has been the government, and the government contracts have been what they call cost-plus: The company gets a built-in profit level no matter how wasteful its execution. There’s actually an incentive for it to make everything as expensive as it can possibly justify.

    Anderson: That sort of bureaucracy must also play into the bidding process.

    Musk: It’s infuriating. The Pentagon’s preferred approach is to do long-term, “sole-source” contracts—which means to lock up the entire business for one company! We’ve been trying to bid on the primary Air Force launch contract, but it’s nearly impossible, because United Launch Alliance, co-owned by Boeing and Lockheed Martin, currently has an exclusive contract with the Air Force for satellite launch. It’s totally inappropriate.

    Anderson: Wow, really?

    Musk: Even though we would save the taxpayers at least a billion dollars a year—and that’s a conservative estimate.

    Anderson: It sounds like your value proposition is not to outperform your competition—instead, you compete on price.

    Musk: Look, speed for a rocket is always going to be roughly the same. The convenience and comfort is going to be about the same. Reliability has to be at least as good as what’s been done before—otherwise people won’t use your rockets to launch multihundred-million-dollar satellites—but there’s not going to be much improvement there. So you’re really left with one key parameter against which technology improvements must be judged, and that’s cost.

    Anderson: So—how do you do it? What’s your process?

    Musk: Now I have to tell you something, and I mean this in the best and most inoffensive way possible: I don’t believe in process. In fact, when I interview a potential employee and he or she says that “it’s all about the process,” I see that as a bad sign.

    Anderson: Oh no. I’m fired.

    Musk: The problem is that at a lot of big companies, process becomes a substitute for thinking. You’re encouraged to behave like a little gear in a complex machine. Frankly, it allows you to keep people who aren’t that smart, who aren’t that creative.

    Anderson: So what have all your creative people come up with, then? What’s different in your basic technology versus 50 years ago?

    Musk: I can’t tell you much. We have essentially no patents in SpaceX. Our primary long-term competition is in China—if we published patents, it would be farcical, because the Chinese would just use them as a recipe book. But I can give you one example.

    Anderson: What is it?

    Musk: It involves the design of the airframe. If you think about it, a rocket is really just a container for the liquid oxygen and fuel—it’s a combination propellant tank and primary airframe. Traditionally, a rocket airframe is made by taking an aluminum plate perhaps a couple of inches thick and machining deep pockets into it. Then you’ll roll or form what’s left into the shape you want—usually sections of a cylinder, since rockets tend to be primarily cylindrical in shape. That’s how Boeing and Lockheed’s rockets are made, and most other rockets too. But it’s a pretty expensive way to do it, because you’re left with a tiny fraction of the plate’s original mass. You’re starting with a huge slab of material and then milling off what isn’t needed, so you get a huge loss of material. Plus, machining away all that metal takes a lot of time, and it’s very expensive.

    Anderson: What’s the alternative?

    Musk: It’s similar to the way that most airplanes are made: The stiffness is provided by ribs and hoops that are added on.

    Anderson: It’s basically aluminum origami—you’re cutting very precise grooves into it so it folds together into a stiff shape.

    Musk: But there’s a catch, because you can’t rivet a rocket like you can an airplane. The pressure differential of an airplane—the difference between the internal and external pressure during flight—is perhaps 7 to 10 psi. But in the case of a rocket, it’s likely to be 80 psi. It’s a lot harder for rivets to withstand that pressure with no leaks.

    Anderson: Right.

    Musk: So the approach used for aircraft is not exactly feasible for rockets. But there’s another way to do it, which is to use an advanced welding technology called stir welding. Instead of riveting the ribs and hoops, you use a special machine that softens the metal on both sides of the joint without penetrating it or melting it. Unlike traditional welding, which melts and potentially compromises some metals, this process works well with high-strength aluminum alloys. You wind up with a stiffer, lighter structure than was possible before. And your material loss is maybe 10 percent, just for trimming the edges. Instead of a ratio of purchased to flown material—what they call the “buy to fly” ratio—of maybe 10 to 20, you have a ratio of 1.1, 1.2 tops.

    Anderson: Wow. Why can you tell us about that?

    Musk: The reason I can talk about it is that nobody else knows how to build a rocket this way. [Laughs.]

    Anderson: Let’s talk about where all this is headed. You’ve brought the cost of rocket launches down by a factor of 10. Suppose you can bring it down even more. How does that change the game? It seems like when you radically reduce the price, you can discover a whole new market. It’s a form of exploration in itself.

    Musk: Right.

    Anderson: What glimpses of that new market have you seen?

    Musk: A huge one is satellites. There are a lot of applications for satellites that suddenly begin to make sense if the transportation costs are low: more telecommunications, more broadcast, better weather mapping, more science experiments.

    Anderson: So traditional satellite markets—but more of them, and cheaper.

    Musk: There’s also likely to be a lot more private spaceflight.

    Anderson: By that you mean tourism.

    Musk: Yeah, but I think tourism is too pejorative a word. You could argue that much of our government spaceflight has been tourism. But the main thing—the goal I still believe in for the long term—is to make life multi-planetary.

    Anderson: And Dragon, the spacecraft you berthed with the ISS in May, has features that might eventually prepare it for a manned Mars mission.

    Musk: Eventually, yes. The thrusters on Dragon are sized so they’ll be able to do launch escape—which means being able to move away from the rocket at a force of approximately 6 g’s. That same thrust level happens to be kind of a good number for supersonic retro-propulsion for landing on Mars.

    Anderson: Could you have sent Dragon to Mars instead of the ISS?

    Musk: Well, it would have gone very slowly—and when it arrived, it couldn’t have landed. It would have made a crater.

    Anderson: The issue is stopping once you get there.

    Musk: Version two of Dragon, which should be ready in three years, should be able to do it. But really, if humanity is to become multi-planetary, the fundamental breakthrough that needs to occur in rocketry is a rapidly and completely reusable rocket. In the absence of that, space transportation will remain two orders of magnitude more expensive than it should be.

    Anderson: Really?

    Musk: Imagine if you had to have a new plane for every flight. Very few people would fly.

    Anderson: Isn’t the fuel a huge portion of the expense?

    Musk: The cost of the propellant on Falcon 9 is only about 0.3 percent of the total price. So if the vehicle costs $60 million, the propellant is maybe a couple hundred thousand dollars. That’s with rocket propellant-grade jet fuel, which is three times the cost of normal jet fuel. That’s using helium as a pressurant, which is a very expensive pressurant. A next-generation rocket could use cheaper fuel and also be fully reusable.

    Anderson: Are you making an announcement right now?

    Musk: I hope we might unveil an architecture for that next year. I’d like to emphasize this is an aspiration for SpaceX—I’m not saying that we will do it. But I believe it can be done. And I believe that achieving it would be on a par with what the Wright brothers did. It’s the fundamental thing that’s necessary for humanity to become a space-faring civilization. America would never have been colonized if ships weren’t reusable.

    Anderson: Wasn’t the space shuttle reusable?

    Musk: A lot of people think it was reusable—but the main tank was thrown away every time. Even the parts that did come back were so difficult to refurbish that the shuttle cost four times more than an expendable rocket of equivalent payload capability.

    Anderson: It’s like sending Columbus’ ships out and bringing the lifeboat back.

    Musk: We’ve begun testing reusability with something called the Grasshopper Project, which is a Falcon 9 first stage with landing gear that can take off and land vertically.

    Anderson: A huge rocket, landing on its feet? Holy shit.

    Musk: Yeah, holy shit. The stages go to orbit, then the first stage turns around, restarts the engines, boosts back to the launch site, reorients, deploys landing gear, and lands vertically.

    Anderson: It’s like something out of a movie or my old Tintin books. It’s the way space was supposed to be.

    Musk: Exactly.

    Chris Anderson (@chr1sa) is editor in chief of Wired and the author of Makers: The New Industrial Revolution. He wrote about 3-D printing in issue 20.10.
    _____________________ 

    Comment:
    What I find unethical is his willingness to spur the "national will". Nations don't have will, perhaps he meant the populace of the nation, or the willingness of the government thanks to popular acceptance. If he needs funds for his project of creating Martian colonies, the right thing to do would be to create a foundation funded with voluntary fees and donations, or look for equity partners interested in investing in the development of commercial interplanetary travels and settlements in Mars.

    For some reason I have the impression that Chris Anderson has the tendency to consider as a loony anyone who dares to dissent from the offcial stance of public agencies like NASA, the professional consensus, or even the companies that have been in business for decades (Boeing, Lockheed Martin). It isn't just the skeptic tone frequently used by him during the interview (which is always preferable over flattery), it's that he even says so in the introduction:

    "When a man tells you about the time he planned to put a vegetable garden on Mars, you worry about his mental state."

    "All entrepreneurs have an aptitude for risk, but more important than that is their capacity for self-delusion. Indeed, psychological investigations have found that entrepreneurs aren’t more risk-tolerant than non-entrepreneurs. They just have an extraordinary ability to believe in their own visions, so much so that they think what they’re embarking on isn’t really that risky. They’re wrong, of course"
    — Chris Anderson
    _____________________ 

    via +Rodolphe D'Inca 
    URL source G+ post:
    plus.google.com/110978315648533764743/posts/Ckw1SUshV8g 
    URL related G+ posts:
    plus.google.com/114605547533973731226/posts/Km6N2i9jV84 
    plus.google.com/108268038346773463902/posts/X1DvfjR1jWe 
    _____________________ 
  • 3 plusses - 1 comments - 4 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-08-24 23:47:05
    bbc.co.uk - Date set for desert Earth
    By BBC News. February 21, 2000

    Comment:
    According to this calculation the Earth will become inhabitable after half a billion of years or perhaps after a billion years. Somewhere else I had read that it won't last much more than a billion years. This article was published 12 years ago, does anyone know of a more recent estimation of the remaining time of life on Earth?

    - BBC News. Date set for desert Earth. bbc.co.uk February 21, 2000 [based on Prof. James Kasting (Pennsylvania State University) calculations]
    news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/sci/tech/specials/washington_2000/649913.stm 

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Kasting 
    www3.geosc.psu.edu/~jfk4/PersonalPage/Kasting.htm 

    - J.F. Kasting, D. Catling. "Evolution of a Habitable Planet" Ann. Rev. Atron. Astrophys. 41: 429-463 (2003)
    www3.geosc.psu.edu/~jfk4/PersonalPage/Pdf/annurev_03.pdf 
    __________________________ 

    URL related G+ post: plus.google.com/115288001414266277268/posts/RdQdbEFxK3 
    __________________________ 
  • 0 plusses - 14 comments - 0 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-12-21 10:36:22
    discovermagazine.com - How common are godless liberals?
    By Razib Khan. February 24, 2012
    blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2012/02/how-common-are-godless-liberals 

    Comment: I wonder whether (American*) liberal atheists are really atheists. For instance, Marxism has been often characterized as a Christian heresy.
    (*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_liberalism_in_the_United_States)

    Excerpt from comments:

    Paul Vasquez Feb 24, 2012
    It's funny. I consider myself more of a humanist than an atheist because if I had the choice of sitting down for coffee with a liberal Christian or a conservative atheist, I think I would choose the liberal Christian. Conservative atheism always strikes me as people who just want to use atheism as an excuse for selfish and bad behavior.

    Betsy McCall Feb 24, 2012
    +Paul Vasquez Yeah, I think the author of the article is on to something when he says that the "conservatives" in the survey are probably libertarians. Of course, they are just as capable of being irrational as believers.

    Paul Vasquez Feb 24, 2012
    Yes, I think most conservative atheists are libertarians.
    _______ 

    Michael Bernstein Feb 24, 2012
    "When I see these results I’m always surprised by the proportions of atheists & agnostics who define themselves as conservative. It seems way too high. I think this is due to libertarians who check the conservative option."

    I think that sentiment probably reflects a bit of a biased view as to what conservatism is. There are definitely fiscal (and even social) conservatives that aren't religious.

    For example, a chunk of this group could be uncharitably labelled 'Rich folks who think religion is for the little people'. Among other aspects of this group, they are the ones who frequently use libertarians as catspaws, without actually being libertarian themselves.

    Another chunk could be labelled 'Goldwater and/or Buckley Conservatives'. The remaining ones may be getting chased out of the GOP these days, but they definitely exist, and don't really fit under the label 'libertarian'. 

    Note: I am NOT describing myself.
    _______ 

    Jeff Weiss Feb 24, 2012 (edited) +2
    There's no such thing as a socially conservative atheist. Or if there is, maybe they could explain why they oppose homosexuality or birth control, without mentioning religion.

    Betsy McCall Feb 24, 2012
    +Jeff Weiss I won't go so far as to say they don't exist, but I think it is a sign of not fully escaping the hold of "tradition", which almost by definition includes religion.

    Jeff Weiss Feb 24, 2012
    +Betsy McCall ok, so they can claim to be socially conservative, but then if asked to explain it, they would inevitably not be able to, right?
    _______ 

    Michael Bernstein Feb 25, 2012 (edited) +1
    Here is the thing: Ignoring for the moment party affiliation, socially conservative positions can range from "I want to turn the wheel back to an idyllic imagined past" to "hold on, let's slow down and not throw the baby out with the bathwater", just as social progressive positions can range from "lets move forward with all due haste and caution" to "damn the torpedos, full steam ahead to an imagined idyllic future".

    Importantly, people may peg the conservative/progressive meter differently depending on the issue (as the broad fiscal/social split shows in general principle), and the amalgam of positions an individual takes doesn't have to make sense or even be consistent.
    _______ 

    Zephyr López Cervilla Feb 25, 2012 (edited)
    I wonder whether the liberal atheists are really atheists. Socialism has been often characterized as a heresy of Christianity.
    _______ 

    Betsy McCall Feb 26, 2012
    +Zephyr López Cervilla I don't even know what that means. I'm liberal. I don't believe in god. I'm certainly not a Christian heretic.
    _______ 

    - Here you are, not very different from what I remembered. Instead of Socialism, they refer to Communism and Marxism, 

    <<The late Archbishop of Canterbury, William Temple, referred to Communism as a Christian heresy. He meant that Communism had laid hold on certain truths which are essential parts of the Christian view of things, although bound to them are theories and practices which no Christian could ever accept.

    II. 

    The theory, though surely not the practice, of Communism challenges us to be more concerned about social justice. With all of its false assumptions and evil methods, Communism arose as a protest against the injustices and indignities inflicted upon the underprivileged. The Communist Manifesto was written by men aflame with a passion for social justice. Karl Marx, born of Jewish parents who both came from rabbinic stock, and trained, as he must have been, in the Hebrew Scriptures, could never forget the words of Amos: "Let judgment roll down as waters, and righteousness as a mighty stream." Marx's parents adopted Christianity when he was a child of six, thus adding to the Old Testament heritage that of the New. In spite of his later atheism and antiecclesiasticism, Marx could not quite forget Jesus' concern for "the least of these." In his writings, he champions the cause of the poor, the exploited, and the disinherited. 

    Communism in theory emphasizes a classless society. Although the world knows from sad experience that Communism has created new classes and a new lexicon of injustice, in its theoretical formulation it envisages a world society transcending the superficialities of race and color, class and caste. Membership in the Communist party theoretically is not determined by the color of a man's skin or the quality of blood in his veins. 

    Christians are bound to recognize any passionate concern for social justice. Such concern is basic in the Christian doctrine of the Fatherhood of God and the brotherhood of man. The Gospels abound with expressions of concern for the welfare of the poor. Listen to the words of the Magnificat: "He hath put down the mighty from their seats, and exalted them of low degree. He hath filled the hungry with good things; and the rich he hath sent empty away." No doctrinaire Communist ever expressed a passion for the poor and oppressed such as we find in the Manifesto of Jesus which affirms: "The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he hath anointed me to preach the gospel to the poor; he hath sent me to heal the brokenhearted, to preach deliverance to the captives, and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty them that are bruised, to preach the acceptable year of the Lord." 

    Christians are also bound to recognize the ideal of a world unity in which all barriers of caste and color are abolished. Christianity repudiates racism. The broad universalism standing at the center of the gospel makes both the theory and practice of racial injustice morally unjustifiable. Racial prejudice is a blatant denial of the unity which we have in Christ, for in Christ there is neither Jew nor Gentile, bond nor free, Negro nor white.

    In spite of the noble affirmations of Christianity, the church has often lagged in its concern for social justice and too often has been content to mouth pious irrelevancies and sanctimonious trivialities. It has often been so absorbed in a future good "over yonder" that it forgets the present evils "down here." Yet the church is challenged to make the gospel of Jesus Christ relevant within the social situation. We must come to see that the Christian gospel is a two-way road. On the one side, it seeks to change the souls of men and thereby unite them with God; on the other, it seeks to change the environmental conditions of men so that the soul will have a chance after it is changed. Any religion that professes to be concerned with the souls of men and yet is not concerned with the economic and social conditions that strangle them and the social conditions that cripple them is the kind the Marxist describes as "an opiate of the people.">>

    — King, ML, Jr. Strength to Love. HarperCollins Publishers, 1963. "How should a christian view Communism?" (pp. 100-102)
    redmoonrising.com/AmericanBabylon/christandcomm.htm 
    amazon.com/dp/0060647108 (look up 'heresy')  
    ____________ 

    Also, 

    << Arnold Toynbee characterized Communist ideology as a "Christian heresy" in the sense that it focused on a few elements of the faith to the exclusion of the others.[52] Donald Treadgold interprets Toynbee's characterization as applying to Christian attitudes as opposed to Christian doctrines.[53] In his book, "Moral Philosophy", Jacques Maritain echoed Toynbee's perspective, characterizing the teachings of Karl Marx as a "Christian heresy". [54] After reading Maritain, Martin Luther King, Jr. commented that Marxism had arisen in response to "a Christian world unfaithful to its own principles." Although King criticized the Soviet Marxist-Leninist Communist regime sharply, he nonetheless commented that Marx's devotion to a classless society made him almost Christian. Tragically, said King, Communist regimes created "new classes and a new lexicon of injustice."[55]>>

    — Wikipedia editors. Christian views on poverty and wealth.
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_views_on_poverty_and_wealth#Marxism 

    References

    52. Toynbee A. A Study of History. 1961 (p. 545)
    "The Communist ideology was a Christian heresy in the sense that it had singled out several elements in Christianity and had concentrated on these to the exclusion of the rest. It had taken from Christianity its social ideals, its intolerance and its fervour."

    53. Treadgold DW. The West in Russia and China: Russia, 1472-1917. Cambridge University Press, 1973 (p. 256)
    books.google.com/books?id=Fg04AAAAIAAJ&q=Communist+ideology+Christian+heresy#v=snippet&q=Communist%20ideology%20Christian%20heresy&f=false 

    54. Maritain J. Moral Philosophy.
    "This is to say that Marx is a heretic of the Judeo-Christian tradition, and that Marxism is a 'Christian heresy', the latest Christian heresy"

    55. Jackson TF and King ML Jr. From civil rights to human rights: Martin Luther King, Jr., and the struggle for economic justice. University of Pennsylvania Press. 2007 (p. 42)
    books.google.com//books?id=B8k6btUYR68C&q=lexicon#v=snippet&q=lexicon 
    ____________ 

    Further references:

    <<For that matter, scholarship over the last 20 years, when more mainstream academics have begun to think more clearly about the subject of Marxism, has noted the strange respects in which Marxism itself reads like a Christian heresy, in which a new age is to be ushered in by a transformation of human nature in a grand historical dialectic. In traditional Christianity, the ennobling of human nature takes place because of Christ's Incarnation; in Marxism, the State takes His place. Marxism offers a theory of sin (private property) and salvation (collective ownership), a church that dispenses grace (the State, as administered by the vanguard of the proletariat), and a litany of saints and sinners. (Of course, it was far more violent than even the worst of the excesses of the Inquisition.) 

    So, in fact, it is not too much of a stretch for Christian heresy to embrace Marxism as a creed, since, as G.K. Chesterton said, heresy is often truth gone mad. Liberation theology is the admixutre of one small truth (God cares about the poor) with so much error that it resulted in a madness that saw Christians champion what amounted to terrorism against propertied elites. Of course, it didn't work out the way the theologians imagined it would. 

    The breeding ground for libertarian theology was, of course, Roman Catholicism, the world's largest branch of Christianity and the religion of Latin America. So long as socialism and communism were seen as essentially godless, they would have a limited appeal among a traditionally religious population group. But newly baptized, socialist theory had a great chance for political and popular success, despite a hundred years of failure in both theory and practice.>>

    — Sirico, Fr. Robert (Catholic priest and president of the Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty in Grand Rapids, Michigan.) Catholics for Marx. FrontPageMagazine.com. June 3, 2004
    webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:XuKPQDx2Zm4J:archive.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp%3FID%3D13586+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk 
    ____________ 


    <<Communism, Toynbee argued, is a species of Christian heresy. Is that true, do you think?  In what sense would you argue that it's true, if you agree?>>

    — Berlinski, Claire (Editor.) Communism as Christian Heresy Ricochet.com December 25, 2010
    ricochet.com/main-feed/Communism-as-Christian-Heresy 
    ____________ 

    +Betsy McCall: "I think the author of the article is on to something when he says that the "conservatives" in the survey are probably libertarians. Of course, they are just as capable of being irrational as believers."

    - Or just as capable of being irrational as liberal atheists. 

    URL source G+ post:
    plus.google.com/110240143550654748022/posts/5v5VXzyHWq6 
    ___________________ 
  • 1 plusses - 10 comments - 1 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2013-01-30 06:56:48
    itunes.apple.com - Bio 4125: Biology of Aging with Doc C
    By Dr. Gerald Cizadlo (College of St. Scholastica). January 15, 2009 to May 3, 2012
    itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/id302734065

    Comment:
    I've been listening to the first 6 lectures of this course (out of the 13 scheduled in 2009) and I'm confident to say that it is interesting enough to be worthy a listening. 

    There're some inaccuracies, such as the intrinsic factor to be required to absorbed vitamin K in the intestine rather than vitamin B12, although it was used as an example un a side comment during one of the lectures so Gerald Cizadlo probably chose it at that moment.

    Dr. Cizadlo also describes (in 2009) a possible mechanism to explain the lifespan extension under caloric restriction that has been observed in lab animals related to rate of the maturation of the immune system that doesn't match with the most widely theory nowadays accepted, if only because of the existence of organisms that don't have an adaptive immune system to mature and yet, they experience a very significant lifespan extension under caloric restriction.

    I can't agree with his view on the possible cause of an alleged programed aging in most organisms, according to Dr. Cizadlo, as a mechanism of adaptation of the population to an always changing environment.

    This may be true in some instances, but in others not so much. Some environments hardly have changed in millions of years. We would expect an extension of lifespan of at least some organisms in the most stable environments (e.g. rain forests) since in such conditions a quick population turnover wouldn't be so advantageous, but that's not the case. 

    Besides, supposed beneficial effect of aging as a means to facilitate the turnover of the population is watered down if we take into account that the individuals living in their natural habitat who reach advanced age are only a small fraction of the total population. Most of them will die of other causes like starvation, predation, parasitation, attacks from other individuals or accidents, so the few ancient individuals that remained alive wouldn't cause much of an effect.

    Finally, there are few organisms who doesn't show any sign of aging (e.g., some hydrozoans like Hydra or Turritopsis nutricula, some sponges, sea ​​anemones), some organisms with estimated genomic lifespans of thousands of years (e.g., Pando, 80,000—1,000,000 years of age, Posidonia oceanica, up to 100,000 years, Lomatia tasmanica, up to 43,500 years, Jurupa Oak, 13,000 years, Old Tjikko, 9,550 years, Old Rasmus, 9,500 years, Lagarostrobos franklinii, up to 10,500 years) that have adapted pretty well to the changes of the environment, whereas the existence of individuals with such old genomes hasn't apparently halted the rise of others with recombined genomes anew.

    References:
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydra_(genus)
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turritopsis_nutricula 

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pando_(tree) 
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Populus_tremuloides 

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posidonia_oceanica 

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lomatia_tasmanica 

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jurupa_Oak 
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quercus_palmeri 

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_Tjikko 
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Picea_abies 

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagarostrobos 

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_long-living_organisms 
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_oldest_trees 

    Further reading: (in the pipeline)
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_immortality 
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maximum_life_span 

    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19439974 
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15247078 
    ____________ 

    On Dr. Gerald Cizadlo:
    Biology Professor at The College of St. Scholastica
    faculty.css.edu/dwalton/bio/faculty_gcizadlo.htm 
    www2.css.edu/app/events/centennial/blog/index.cfm?cat=3&art=61 
    faculty.css.edu/gcizadlo 
    ____________ 

    itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/bio-4125-biology-aging-doc/id302734065 
    ___________________ 
  • 4 plusses - 0 comments - 3 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-08-05 02:44:35
    RESHARE:
    cancerresearchuk.org - The causes of cancer you can control
    By Jess Harris. December 7, 2011

    http://scienceblog.cancerresearchuk.org/2011/12/07/the-causes-of-cancer-you-can-control 
    Download a hi-res PDF of this graphic: http://scienceblog.cancerresearchuk.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Attributable-risk-circles-poster.pdf 

    Excerpt from comments:

    Samuel Mackrill Dec 7, 2011
    Where is wheat and sugar on there (cancer feeds on glucose)?
    Where is lack of vitamin D (this hormone is essential for your body to fight cancer)?
    If sunlight causes skin cancer why are most found on non-exposed areas (like the soles of your feet)? 
    The links to salt,red meat and low fruit/veg seem highly dubious to me.

    This is a great book if you want to know more:
    Cancer: Nutrition and Survival (Steve Hickey, Ph.D. and Hilary Roberts, Ph.D.)
    _____________________ 

    Kathy Castorina Dec 7, 2011+1
    +Samuel Mackrill I think wheat & sugar would fall under the overweight category, but I do get your point.
    _____________________ 

    Alex Luton Dec 7, 2011
    Maybe because sugar and wheat don't cause cancer?
    _____________________ 

    Zephyr López Cervilla Aug 5, 2012 4:31 AM (edited)
    +Daniel Cutler: "how can the point be made that increased glucose is a risk factor?"

    - In fact, higher glucose levels could be a risk factor for pancreatic cancer. I've heard that type 2 diabetes can lead to pancreatic cancer. As an anecdotal evidence, my uncle suffered type 2 diabetes to the point he needed insulin shots, and he eventually died of pancreatic cancer. 
    Also, insulin is a pro-proliferative hormone. Higher insulin levels caused by higher glucose levels can promote cell proliferation of precancerous cells. Thus, high glucose levels could be also indirectly a promoter of other kinds of cancer. 
    Besides, the insulin signaling pathway activates mTOR, what inhibits autophagy in cells. This is known to be a mechanism that protects cells from becoming cancerous: 

    There is evidence that proteins that are linked to tumorigenesis can regulate the rate of autophagy, with oncogenes in general blocking and tumour suppressors stimulating the process. The removal of damaged cellular components, especially damaged mitochondria, might decrease the level of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which in turn might reduce genomic instability or forestall cellular senescence. Such mechanisms might allow moderate increases in autophagy to reduce the incidence of cancer and prolong lifespan.

    - Finkel T et al. The common biology of cancer and ageing. Nature (2007) vol. 448 (7155) pp. 767-74
    nature.com/nature/journal/v448/n7155/full/nature05985.html 

    Also, 

    Stimulation of the class I PtdIns 3-kinase at the plasma membrane through the insulin receptor results in the generation of PtdIns(3,4)P2 and PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 (dark pink circles). These phosphoinositides allow binding and activation of Akt/PKB and its activator PDK-1. Along with amino acids, Akt/PKB activates mTor (additional components in this pathway are not depicted). Subsequent phosphorylation of a downstream effector, possibly analogous to Atg1 or other ATG gene products as demonstrated in yeast, inhibits autophagy.

    - Shintani T and Klionsky DJ. Autophagy in health and disease: a double-edged sword. Science (2004) vol. 306 (5698) pp. 990-5
    sciencemag.org/content/306/5698/990.full 
    _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 

    +Samuel Mackrill: "If sunlight causes skin cancer why are most found on non-exposed areas (like the soles of your feet)?"
    - Obviously, because there are other agents that can cause skin cancer apart from sunlight. What is unlikely is that those skin cancers that appear in your foot soles can be melanomas.
    _____________________ 

    URL source comments G+ post: plus.google.com/103561559026876981170/posts/2vasADVecpk 
    _____________________ 

    Reshared text:
    As you may have seen, our landmark report on lifestyle and cancer is in the news this morning, showing just how many cancers could be prevented if the UK got healthier. A third of all cancers could be prevented by stopping smoking, eating a balanced diet, cutting down on alcohol and maintaining a healthy weight. Of course, cancer risk is also affected by our family history, our genes, and by getting older – but the good news is that we can take positive steps to stack the odds of avoiding cancer in our favour. Read our blog for more info about the work: http://scienceblog.cancerresearchuk.org/2011/12/07/the-causes-of-cancer-you-can-control/
  • 4 plusses - 0 comments - 3 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-12-13 17:04:41
    fairtax.org - What is the FairTax legislation?
    Uploaded by FairTaxOfficial. April 21, 2012

    fairtax.org - How Fair Tax Works
    fairtax.org/site/PageServer?pagename=HowFairTaxWorks 

    Comment on retail sales tax:
    A decade ago I believed that a universal and uniform sales tax was the fairest and most reasonable taxation model because consumption was directly linked to the use of the public services funded by the tax payers. 

    However, in the last years I changed my view. I can think of several dysfunctions that a sales tax as the only source of public funding could cause in the economy. 

    In my opinion a solely sales tax would be choosing winners and losers, the winners, those who would make a heavier use of public infrastructure/services to save on production and distribution costs. Such bias doesn't promote efficiency because part of the costs isn't reflected the final price. Those are but hidden subsidies that distort free competition.

    Instead of a sales tax I support fees and finalist taxes on the users of each service or infrastructure. That way, all those added costs of taxes would be reflected in the sales price in a more accurate way that simply with a uniform sales tax on every product.

    For instance, if you want to make use of the roads to transport a pig herd to the slaughterhouse, then you should pay a special tax to maintain and improve the roads in the extent you make use of it.

    If your pigs farm is far from any nucleus of population, making it most costly to protect by security services, you should pay a premium price in order to have the police patrolling your area.

    Likewise any other public infrastructure that may be less cost effective for some users than others, water and energy supply, public sewer, garbage and wastes disposal, food safety, infectious disease control, flood and fire prevention and intervention to extinguish fires or rescue victims, etc. 

    Also, any military intervention to protect the interests of certain corporations, e.g., escorting oil shipments from the Persian Gulf should be funded by the owner of the cargo and/or the tankers so that it could be later faithfully reflected on the oil and fuel prices.

    All to ensure that the consequences of every action has their impact on those who are responsible.
    _________ 

    Homepage: fairtax.org/site/PageServer?pagename=homepage2 

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FairTax 
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Predicted_effects_of_the_FairTax 
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distribution_of_the_FairTax_burden 
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revenue_neutrality_of_the_FairTax 
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Americans_For_Fair_Taxation 

    mises.org/community/forums/p/11396/260986.aspx 
    guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/sep/12/paul-ryan-enslaves-friedrich-hayek-road-serfdom 

    #fairtax   #fairtaxact   #salestax   #retailsales  
    URL related G+ post:
    plus.google.com/117434629109685018105/posts/ggrN31MrLJC 
    _______________ 
  • 0 plusses - 12 comments - 0 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-09-09 01:13:45
    spacepolitics.com - Disappointed advocates, advocating scientists
    September 8, 2012

    spacepolitics.com/2012/09/08/disappointed-advocates-advocating-scientists 

    Excerpt from comments in G+ post:

    Betsy McCall Sep 8, 2012 7:48 PM  -  Google Reader  -  Public
    What you can do to help save the planetary science program at NASA.

    Larry Maxwell Sep 8, 2012 7:49 PM
    remove "lobbyist"

    Betsy McCall Sep 8, 2012 7:52 PM
    That word does not even appear on the whole page.  I checked.  So I have no clue what you are talking about.

    Larry Maxwell Sep 8, 2012 7:53 PM
    it is a direct answer to 'your' actual post.

    Betsy McCall Sep 8, 2012 7:55 PM
    My post was not a question.  It was a statement about the article.
    ________________________ 

    Zephyr López Cervilla Sep 8, 2012 10:26 PM (edited) +1
    I'd suggest voluntary donations. I can't see any reason that can justify that those people who don't want to fund it should be forced to do it. In this case you can't even claim that this kind of research will render any material benefit to them.
    If you think that people don't have enough money for donations, just look how much money they are capable to donate to political campaigns. Wouldn't it be enough with a hundred million dollars a year to fund that program? Some months ago Bill Maher donated a million dollars to the Democratic Presidential Campaign that will be burnt in advertising. Wouldn't he be willing to donate another million to NASA's planetary science program? And Sheldon Alison donated 5 million to Newt Gingrich's presidential campaign, what a waste of money! Perhaps he would sponsor the science planetary program if he were allowed to use the NASA logo in his casinos. He could even build a casino with the shape of a rocket.
    ________________________ 

    Betsy McCall Sep 8, 2012 11:39 PM +2
    +Zephyr López Cervilla Why should space missions only be funded by voluntary donations and not by tax dollars from everyone?  It's not like NASA is a religion.  And my tax dollars routinely go to fund things I don't approve of like military spending (just to use the most egregious example).   It's not a question of whether people have enough money for donations; I question the funding model's very premise.
    ________________________ 

    Zephyr López Cervilla Sep 9, 2012 2:06 AM (edited) 
    +Betsy McCall: "my tax dollars routinely go to fund things I don't approve of like military spending (just to use the most egregious example).   It's not a question of whether people have enough money for donations; I question the funding model's very premise."

    - There's a significant difference between military spending and the funding of the planetary exploration. The first is contemplated in the US Constitution as one of the functions attributed to the Federal Government.

    "We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."

    "The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States;"
    en.wikisource.org/wiki/Constitution_of_the_United_States_of_America 

    In contrast, how can you justify the public spending in the science planetary program based on the instances in which the Federal Government is legitimized by the Constitution to lay taxes? As a general welfare of the US? It's very dubious that that program will provide general welfare at all. 

    In my opinion that spending is way beyond the attributions of the Government. If you believe that the Constitution is outdated and should authorize the Federal Government to lay and collect taxes to fund planetary exploration, there are legal mechanisms to amend it.
    ________________________ 

    Zephyr López Cervilla Sep 9, 2012 6:12 AM (edited) AM
    BTW, in my mobile version of Google+ there's no link to the article, and the first lines of the text appear as if you were the person who has written it:

    Betse MacCall   Betsy McCall
    6 hours ago · Public 
    What you can do to help save the planetary science program at NASA.
    Don’t count the members of the space advocacy group the Space Frontier Foundation fans of either the Democratic or Republican parties’ positions on space. Last week they issued a press release critical of the Republican platform’s space language, suggesting it was as odds with broader party ideology. “NASA seems to be one Big Government program many Republicans love,” the Foundation’s statement reads, saying that while the platform in general is ... 
    ________________ 

    Here you are a post with a screenshot: 
    lh5.googleusercontent.com/-v9ZBAa_cbew/UEvslcSzzFI/AAAAAAAABh8/lRmVcLmznko/s960/IMG_0136.PNG 

    I haven't seen that this had happened before. It may be due to the fact that you had posted the link to this article from Google Reader.

    +Larry Maxwell: <<remove "lobbyist">>

    +Betsy McCall: "That word does not even appear on the whole page.  I checked.  So I have no clue what you are talking about."

    - I would just point out that "lobbyist" doesn't appear, but "lobbying" is written under the title.
    ________________________ 

    Betsy McCall Sep 9, 2012 5:59 AM
    +Zephyr López Cervilla There's nothing I can do about how Google shows up where you are.  But you misspelled my name, in two places.  Does Spain not have a y?

    A strict constructionist, eh?  The Constitution doesn't provide for a standing army, though it does provide for "defense".  In what way was the Iraq War a defensive one?  I would also challenge the notion that advancing scientific knowledge doesn't contribute to the general welfare.

    And Larry was "replying" to a question I never asked.
    ________________________ 

    via +Betsy McCall 
    URL source G+ post: plus.google.com/110240143550654748022/posts/R7AKB5RXgvD 
    ________________________ 
  • 0 plusses - 12 comments - 0 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2011-12-15 23:15:32
    The Physics of Falling LOLCats
    Permalink of this post: https://plus.google.com/u/0/114605547533973731226/posts/BiTpY2FtZCN
    Permalink of related post: https://plus.google.com/114605547533973731226/posts/ayCMj2KK2dz

    Rajini Rao - Newton's First Law is best illustrated by cats.

    Zephyr López Cervilla - What amazes me most about cats movements is their ability to rotate their bodies while they're in free fall, so they can land on their paws, and they do it all with a zero angular momentum.

    Manish Goregaokar - That's cos cats are like little parachutes when falling.. So the torque due to air drag provides the angular momentum..

    Zephyr López Cervilla - +Manish Goregaokar, this is not the case. I think it was published an article about it in Scientific American some years ago, and I think it was also explained in "Quirks and Quarks", a program of CBC Radio. Cats can twist their backbone so each half of their body can point downwards at each side. They manage not to go back to the original position by means of a series of alternating stretches and bending of each pair of paws from their twisting axis. At the end, those cats don't have any angular momentum (they don't rotate), but their belly and paws are facing down.
    Edit: What cats straighten and bend are actually their backs.
    In this video it can be clearly appreciated: http://video.nationalgeographic.com/video/player/animals/mammals-animals/cats/cats_domestic_ninelives.html
    I've found some references:

    1. Frohlich, Cliff. The Physics of Somersaulting and Twisting. Scientific American, March 1980, pp. 164-174. http://www.physics.utoronto.ca/~phy189h1/Physics%20of%20Somersaults%20and%20Twists.pdf
    An old article of Scientific American in PDF. I don`t think it was this one where I read it, but the process is explained with detail

    2. Nguyen, Huy D. How does a cat Always Land on Its Feet? Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Medical Engineering. http://helix.gatech.edu/Classes/ME3760/1998Q3/Projects/Nguyen/

    3. Gollin, George. The Physics of Dance (transparencies for a presentation I've given at Hope College on the Physics of Dance). Department of Physics, High Energy Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Chanpaign. November 1, 1996, and October 24, 1997.
    http://www.hep.uiuc.edu/home/g-gollin/dance/dance_physics.html
    Ever see a falling cat right itself? The cat has zero angular momentum at all times, but somehow manages to turn over. It works like this:
    Upside-down cat curves its back "the easy way."
    Cat straightens its back while bending around its middle to its right.
    Cat comes out of its bend-to-the-right while arching its back "the hard way."
    Cat straightens its back while bending around its middle to its left.
    Cat comes out of its bend-to-the-left while curving its back "the easy way."
    Here's a diagram: http://www.hep.uiuc.edu/home/g-gollin/dance/Image57.gif
    Dancers can also perform zero-angular-momentum turns. Some are catlike, some not...
    In some moves, the body parts which carry the initial angular momentum change during the course of the turn. An example: a tour jeté. The angular momentum associated with the raising of the left leg (1) is taken up by the trunk and arms (2), then the left leg (3), then both legs (4).
    http://www.hep.uiuc.edu/home/g-gollin/dance/Image58.gif
    The diagram is based on photos in Laws' and Harvey's book.

    4. Cat righting reflex. English Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat_righting_reflex

    5. Falling cat problem. English Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falling_cat_problem
    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/78/Cat_fall_150x300_6fps.gif

    6. High-rise syndrome. English Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-rise_syndrome

    7. Video: A Cat's Nine Lives. National Geographic
    http://video.nationalgeographic.com/video/player/animals/mammals-animals/cats/cats_domestic_ninelives.html
    Do cats always land on their feet? High-speed photography shows us the answer.

    8. Video: Why Cats Land on Their Feet. National Geographic News. September 28, 2006. http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/09/060928-cats-land-video.html
    It might sound like a form of urban anxiety, but high-rise syndrome is actually a serious problem for cats in the city. Adventurous felines don't always look before they leap, and many wind up in emergency care after they go careening through unscreened windows.
    But a mystery unfolded when doctors treating these "high-rise kitties" noticed a pattern: Cats that fell from great heights were less injured than those that took a modest dive.
    See slow-motion cameras reveal how a falling cat manages to land on its feet, and find out why—for these furry acrobats—the higher they are, the better they fall.

    9. Wells, Virginia. Why Cats Land on Their Feet. http://www.petplace.com/cats/why-cats-land-on-their-feet/page1.aspx

    10. Deveshvar, Manisha. Why do Cats Always Land on Their Feet? http://www.pitara.com/discover/5wh/online.asp?story=157

    11. The miracle of the falling cat. Brazillion Thoughts.
    http://scienceblogs.com.br/brazillion/2009/06/the_miracle_of_the_falling_cat/

    12. Do cats always land unharmed on their feet, no matter how far they fall? The Straight Dope. July 19, 1996. http://www.straightdope.com/columns/read/1143/do-cats-always-land-unharmed-on-their-feet-no-matter-how-far-they-fall

    13. Allen, Patricia E. The Physics of Cats. Appalachian State University. Tuesday, Jan 27, 2004. http://www.oapt.ca/aapt/2004_winter_meeting/The_Physics_of_Cats.pdf
    Brief with some references of experiments studying to cat falls.

    14. Galli, John Ronald. Angular momentum conservation and the cat twist. The Physics Teacher. September 1995. Volume 33, Issue 6, pp. 404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.2344252

    15. Diamond, Jared M. Why cats have nine lives. Nature 332, 586-587 (14 April 1988) | doi:10.1038/332586a0 http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v332/n6165/pdf/332586a0.pdf

    16. Kane, T.R., Scher, M.P. A dynamical explanation of the falling cat phenomenon. International Journal of Solids and Structures. Volume 5, Issue 7, July 1969, Pages 663-666 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0020768369900869

    17. Vnuk D. et al. Feline high-rise syndrome: 119 cases (1998-2001). Journal of Feline Medicine & Surgery. Volume 6, Issue 5, October 2004, Pages 305-312 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1098612X03001219

    18. Whitney W.O., Mehlhaff C.J. High-rise syndrome in cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1987 Dec 1;191(11):1399-403. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3692980

    URL source post: https://plus.google.com/114601143134471609087/posts/iQUXBxbECeC
  • 2 plusses - 7 comments - 1 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-05-20 22:16:51
    RESHARE:
    The Crooked Forest (Szczecin Landscape Park, Poland)

    Description:
    Poland’s Crooked Forest (Krzywy Las) is located some 30km south of the city of Szczecin, close to the Oder river.
    Over the years, many rumors have swirled about the origin of the 90 degree bend in the 300 or so pine trees, planted around 1930 in territory then a part of Germany. The most commonly accepted theory is that the trees were bent on purpose for use in furniture or boat making.
    http://vistu.la

    Comment:
    I don't believe that these pine trees can have 80 years, they look as if they were about 20 to 30 years old, even less if they grow faster than in the Mediterranean what I guess it's the case since the forests around the Baltic and in Scandinavia are very productive. Could the deformity of their trunk have affected their growth rate? Could their limited availability of light and soil due to the high population density in which they live have stunted the growth of the trees beyond certain size? More likely the latter, but in 80 years there would have been enough time for some trees could fall down or they were knocked down thus allowing the others to grow thicker and taller.

    URL source page:
    1. ilovepoland.co.uk/seven_secret_wonders_of_poland.htm

    URL related pages:
    1. news.discovery.com/earth/polands-crooked-forest-mystery-110628.html
    2. laughterizer.weebly.com/1/post/2011/7/polands-mysterious-crooked-forest.html (17 pics)
    3. ripleys.com/weird/daily-dose-of-weird-wtf-blog/strange-places-and-customs/crooked-forest

    via +J. Caleb Wherry
    URL via post: plus.google.com/109346400917224234002/posts/bu4QJsZMvPG

    Reshared text:
    CREEPY CROOKED FOREST
    Located in north west Poland (not far from Szczecin) is a pine forest that looks like it came right out of a Hans Christian Andersen story. Around four hundred trees in the forest have been formed with a 90° horizontal bend in it’s trunk before rising vertically again. The trees are believed to be about eighty years old and although there is no explanation for this freak of nature one widely held belief is that the trees were shaped this way by human hands (possibly by carpenters wanting to use the wood for furniture making).
  • 7 plusses - 0 comments - 1 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-09-26 00:49:03
    guardian.co.uk - Slavoj Žižek: 'Humanity is OK, but 99% of people are boring idiots'
    By Decca Aitkenhead. June 10, 2012
    Series: The G2 interview
    guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/series/g2-interview-decca-aitkenhead

    Comment: Even leftist newspapers publish good stuff now and then. Granted, you can still gather from this interview what you see fit.

    Excerpt:
    <<Waving the photographer off, he points in the distance across the Slovenian capital. "Over there, that's a kind of counter-culture establishment – they hate me, I hate them. This is the type of leftists that I hate. Radical leftists whose fathers are all very rich." Most of the other buildings, he adds, are government ministries. "I hate it.">>

    <<By the standards of cultural theory, Žižek sits at the more accessible end of the spectrum – but to give you an idea of where that still leaves him, here's a typical quote from a book called Žižek: A Guide for the Perplexed, intended to render him more comprehensible: "Žižek finds the place for Lacan in Hegel by seeing the Real as the correlate of the self-division and self-doubling within phenomena.">>

    <<In essence, he argues that nothing is ever what it appears, and contradiction is encoded in almost everything. Most of what we think of as radical or subversive – or even simply ethical – doesn't actually change anything.>>

    <<You wouldn't guess so from the energetic flurry of good manners with which he welcomes us, but he's quick to clarify that his attentiveness is just camouflage for misanthropy. "For me, the idea of hell is the American type of parties. Or, when they ask me to give a talk, and they say something like, 'After the talk there will just be a small reception' – I know this is hell. This means all the frustrated idiots, who are not able to ask you a question at the end of the talk, come to you and, usually, they start: 'Professor Žižek, I know you must be tired, but …' Well, fuck you. If you know that I am tired, why are you asking me?>>

    <<Most of all, he can't stand students. "Absolutely. I was shocked, for example, once, a student approached me in the US, when I was still teaching a class – which I will never do again – and he told me: 'You know, professor, it interested me what you were saying yesterday, and I thought, I don't know what my paper should be about. Could you please give me some more thoughts and then maybe some idea will pop up.' Fuck him! Who I am to do that?"

    Žižek has had to quit most of his teaching posts in Europe and America, to get away from these intolerable students. "I especially hate when they come to me with personal problems. My standard line is: 'Look at me, look at my tics, don't you see that I'm mad? How can you even think about asking a mad man like me to help you in personal problems, no?'" You can see what he means, for Žižek cuts a fairly startling physical figure – like a grizzly bear, pawing wildly at his face, sniffing and snuffling and gesticulating between every syllable. "But it doesn't work! They still trust me. And I hate this because – this is what I don't like about American society – I don't like this openness, like when you meet a guy for the first time, and he's starting to tell you about his sex life. I hate this, I hate this!">>

    <<"Yeah, because I'm extremely romantic here. You know what is my fear? This postmodern, permissive, pragmatic etiquette towards sex. It's horrible. They claim sex is healthy; it's good for the heart, for blood circulation, it relaxes you. They even go into how kissing is also good because it develops the muscles here – this is horrible, my God!" He's appalled by the promise of dating agencies to "outsource" the risk of romance. "It's no longer that absolute passion. I like this idea of sex as part of love, you know: 'I'm ready to sell my mother into slavery just to fuck you for ever.' There is something nice, transcendent, about it. I remain incurably romantic."

    I keep thinking I should try to intervene with a question, but he's off again. "I have strange limits. I am very – OK, another detail, fuck it. I was never able to do – even if a woman wanted it – annal sex." Annal sex? "Ah, anal sex. You know why not? Because I couldn't convince myself that she really likes it. I always had this suspicion, what if she only pretends, to make herself more attractive to me? It's the same thing for fellatio; I was never able to finish into the woman's mouth, because again, my idea is, this is not exactly the most tasteful fluid. What if she's only pretending?"

    He can count the number of women he has slept with on his hands, because he finds the whole business so nerve-racking. "I cannot have one-night stands. I envy people who can do it; it would be wonderful. I feel nice, let's go, bang-bang – yes! But for me, it's something so ridiculously intimate – like, my God, it's horrible to be naked in front of another person, you know? If the other one is evil with a remark – 'Ha ha, your stomach,' or whatever – everything can be ruined, you know?" Besides, he can't sleep with anyone unless he believes they might stay together for ever. "All my relationships – this is why they are very few – were damned from the perspective of eternity. What I mean with this clumsy term is, maybe they will last.">>

    <<By now I can see we're not going to get anywhere near Žižek's new book about Hegel, Less Than Nothing: Hegel and the Shadow of Dialectical Materialism. Instead, he tells me about the holidays he takes with his young son. The last one was to the Burj Al Arab hotel (jumeirah.com/Hotels-and-Resorts/Reiseziele/Dubai/Burj-Al-Arab), a grotesque temple to tacky ostentation in Dubai. "Why not? Why not? I like to do crazy things. But I did my Marxist duty. I got friendly with the Pakistani taxi driver who showed to me and my son reality.>>
    __________________________ 

    via +Bob Waycott 
    URL source G+ post: plus.google.com/100483191283941466086/posts/1teExFYJg9Q 
    __________________________ 
  • 4 plusses - 4 comments - 1 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-08-16 21:00:21
    RESHARE:
    pandyland.net - Instagram (Relaxing night in with a cocktail, my favorite book, and Mr Jingles. Bliss!!!)
    By Andy Pandy. C. July 22, 2012

    Source: pandyland.net/71

    Shake Shake Shake
    Nonnegut - A Man Without a Country
    Lady: "Sit here and don't move"
    Lady: "Make a funny face or something you little shit"
    Snap!
    Post: "Relaxing night in with a cocktail, my favorite book, and Mr Jingles. Bliss!!!"  Like - Comment - Share
    19:55
    0:27

    Comments on the cartoon: 
    gizmodo.com/5928058/how-all-those-a+little+too+cool-instagram-photos-really-happen
    gizmodo.co.uk/2012/07/how-all-those-a-little-too-cool-instagram-photos-really-happen


    URL source G+ post: plus.google.com/114096099683887759200/posts/55HRiUAZH8w 
    ___________________

    Reshared text:
  • 4 plusses - 4 comments - 1 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-05-05 05:34:53
    RESHARE:
    plus.google.com - Loosing track of you followers: you can´t see if someone circled you!
    By Max Huijgen. May 3, 2012

    Comment:
    I've been experiencing a similar problem. I can only see in my notifications the last 9-10 people who have circled me, plus others who added me several weeks ago. However, I've been recently circled by hundreds of new people that I can't identify. I still have them included in the list of more than 1,300 people who have circled me but this list isn't arranged according to the time they added me to their circles so it's rather hard to try to determine who is recent and who is not.

    URL source post: plus.google.com/112352920206354603958/posts/ifFxu72ZtAw

    Reshared text:
    Loosing track of you followers: you can´t see if someone circled you!
    You used to see a small icon to the right of someone´s name, but it disappeared today. So now our last possibility to see who has circled you has gone.

    If you read the attached post you will see that if you have more than 8-10K followers there is just no way left to know if someone has circled you. The user interface just stops after a number of ´Show more´

    There has always been an alternative to the UI, the trick I describe in the attached post, to just enter https://plus.google.com/u/0/_/socialgraph/lookup/followers/?m=1000000 but like I said on April 6th it´s now limited to a text file with no more than 10K followers whatever the number you use for m in the string above.

    *Do you feel you are entitled to know who is following you or is it none of your business and is it up to Google to decide if you can see your followers?

    After writing the below post which got about 100 comments I have contacted people from Google in charge of G+, on the limitation on the number of followers and I was promised a reaction (*). It´s now more urgent than ever!

    (*)I don´t mention their names as it´s no use bombarding people publically
  • 4 plusses - 6 comments - 0 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2013-03-09 22:01:53
    RESHARE:
    plus.goggle.com - Trojans and Hildas
    By John Baez. March 9, 2013
    plus.google.com/117663015413546257905/posts/XecfeBK9QER 

    Source of animated GIF: 

    astronomy.cz - Asteroid (and Comet) Groups
    By Petr Scheirich. 2005
    http://sajri.astronomy.cz/asteroidgroups/groups.htm 

    Related G+ post: 

    plus.goggle.com - Kirkwood gaps
    By John Baez. March 9, 2013 
    plus.google.com/117663015413546257905/posts/fmYcP2D2Mnh 
    _____________ 

    Reshared text:
    Trojans and Hildas.  Here are some asteroids viewed in a rotating frame of reference where Jupiter almost stands still.    The Trojans, in green, are asteroids that stay near the Lagrange points 60° ahead or behind Jupiter.  They go around the Sun once each time Jupiter orbits the Sun.  But the Hildas, in purple, go around the Sun 3 times while Jupiter goes around twice.  We say they're in a 3:2 resonance with Jupiter. 

    The Hildas seem to be moving in a triangular pattern.  But actually each one takes an elliptical orbit around the Sun.  There are three kinds of ellipses. Two go farthest from the Sun near the Lagrange points, while one goes farthest from the Sun opposite Jupiter.   Although the whole triangle of Hildas is nearly equilateral, it's not quite.  The side between the two Lagrange points is a bit different from the two other sides.   You can also see the whole triangle pulsing as Jupiter moves in and out!

    This animated gif is one of many made by Petr Scheirich, and you can have hours of fun looking at his website:

    • Petr Scheirich, Asteroid (and comet) groups, http://sajri.astronomy.cz/asteroidgroups/groups.htm.

    There's a lot to say about Trojans and Lagrange points, but let me talk about Hildas.  Over 1,100 Hildas have been found, the being Hilda, named after the discoverer's daughter.  It's big - 175 kilometers in diameter - but not very bright, because it's made of ancient stuff containing lots of carbon, similar to the nucleus of a comet.

    The Hildas don't form a 'true' asteroid family, because they aren't fragments of a single parent object.  Instead, they're a 'dynamical' family: they're defined by having similar orbits.    Any Hilda's orbit has an eccentricity less than 0.3, an inclination less than 20°, and a semi-major axis between 3.7 AU and 4.2 AU.  Remember, the semi-major axis of an ellipse is half the distance between the farthest points.

    So, the Hildas are outside the main asteroid belt, which lies between the 4:1 resonance with Jupiter at 2.1 AU and the 2:1 resonance at 3.0 AU.

    The density of Hildas near the triangle's corners is more than twice the density on the sides. The reason is that the Hildas move more slowly when they're farther from the Sun!   So, they stay near the corners for an average of 5.0-5.5 years, but move along the sides of the triangle more quickly, for 2.5 to 3.0 years. The overall period of the Hildas is about 7.9 years, which is 2/3 the period of Jupiter.

    For more, see:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilda_family

    #astronomy  
  • 5 plusses - 0 comments - 2 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2013-01-26 22:59:22
    RESHARE:
    plus.google.com - Scarecrows and Wreaths: Genetic Secrets of Efficient Food Crops
    By Rajini Rao. January 26, 2013

    Excerpt from comments:
    Richard Smith Jan 26, 2012 5:22 PM 
    <<For those discussing the greater water use efficiency of C4 plants; the most productive C4 plants are on average about 50% more water efficient than the most efficient C3 and this derives from the fact that, because CO2 is concentrated around RuBisCO, less CO2 uptake is required so the stomata can remain closed more of the time. Thus there is less transpiration.

    Because C4 plants need much less RuBisCO than C3 plants, and RuBisCO is the most abundant protein in most plants, C4 plants are also ~50% more efficient in their use of nitrogen, so they need less fertiliser.>>

    Richard Smith Jan 26, 2012 5:47 PM
    <<C4 plants account for ~40% of terrestrial biomass>>

    Question:
    I come up with a few questions that someone may know and be in the mood to answer:

    1. Is there any tree species among the C4 plants?

    2. Since C4 plants seem to have appeared independently several times over evolution, which C4 group appeared most recently and in which period? Is it the most widespread of them?

    3. Were there some particular environmental conditions during that period that could have favored their emergence, evolution and dissemination (warmer global or regional temperatures, lower CO2 atmospheric concentration, less abundant rainfall, more common drought, etc.)? 

    4. Is there any candidate in the fossil record of an ancient group of C4 plants that went extinct?

    5. As for the gas exchange through stomata, could carbonated water (with disolved CO2 / H2CO3) in the soil reduce the volume of water required for the Calvin Cycle/Dark Phase of the photosynthesis? If there's usually some contribution to the CO fixation from the CO2 disolved in the soil, what is the approximate percentage of that contribution?

    URL source G+ post: 
    plus.google.com/114601143134471609087/posts/aPKK1DLrcbj 
    _______________ 

    Reshared text:
    Scarecrows and Wreaths: Genetic Secrets of Efficient Food Crops
     
    • Ancient plants, like rice, wheat and barley, originating in the Mesozoic and Paleozoic eras, still form 95% of the Earth’s plant biomass. They use an enzyme known as RuBisCo (the most abundant protein on the planet!) to fix atmospheric carbon dioxide on to a 5-carbon sugar (ribulose bis-phosphate) to make 2 molecules of a 3-carbon sugar that eventually becomes sucrose. This is the C3 pathway, but it's not too efficient: the enzyme RuBisCo also catalyzes a competing reaction called "photorespiration" that adds oxygen to the 5-carbon sugar making a byproduct that takes many tedious and expensive steps to convert back to the useful sugar. These plants can also lose 97% of the water absorbed by the roots through stomata or pores on the underside of the leaves. If they close their stomata, they limit the diffusion of CO2 into leaves, so they have limited growth in hot, dry areas.

    • Fortunately, in the last 6-7 million years, another group of plants (sugarcane, maize, grasses) began to flourish that bypassed this problem. They evolved from the C3 plants independently, more than 60 times- a spectacular example of convergent evolution.  In these plants, a different enzyme is used to fix CO2 to make a 4-carbon sugar in the leaf cells, that is then shuttled into special wreath-like layer around the veins, known as Kranz sheath (German for wreath).  Kranz cells release CO2 from this intermediate, insulating and concentrating it around the Rubisco enzyme so that the wasteful side reaction does not occur. This highly effective C4 pathway boosts productivity by 50%. Even though C4 plants make up only 3% of plant species, they account for 30% of all carbon fixation on land.

    • How does one coax C3 plants to follow C4 pathways and boost food production in hot, dry areas, while removing more CO2 from the atmosphere? C3 plants have all the enzymes needed, but lack the specialized anatomy of the wreaths and the tight spacing between veins. It was assumed that engineering Kranz anatomy would be exceptionally difficult. In a breakthrough study, scientists noted common features of the Kranz sheath with root and stem bundles, suggesting a common developmental pathway. Working on a hunch, they showed that a gene called Scarecrow, regulates the special anatomy in both roots and leaves.  “Recapitulating the evolution of C4 structure in C3 plants is likely to be a much more manageable goal if the underlying regulatory components are already in place in roots and stems”.

    Image: Kranz anatomy in French Millet, a C4 plant. Note the bundle sheath, packed with green chloroplasts, around the central vein, and the tight spacing of less than 4 cells between the bundles. http://goo.gl/J004P  
    Read More: http://www.news.cornell.edu/stories/Jan13/Scarecrow.html
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C4_carbon_fixation

    Paper: Scarecrow plays a role in establishing Kranz anatomy in maize leaves. Slewinsky, T.L., et al. Plant Cell Physiol. 2012 Dec;53:2030-7. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcs147.

    #ScienceEveryday when it's not #ScienceSunday .
  • 5 plusses - 0 comments - 2 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-06-25 01:46:52
    xkcd.com - Gravity Wells

    URL large image: xkcd.com/681_large .
    ____________________ 

    Comment:
    I can't yet understand why the Earth's gravity well is 5,478 km deep in the main chart, whereas it's 6,379 km in its auxiliary chart (when compared with Moon's well), and on the other hand, Mars' gravity well is exactly 1,286 km deep in both the main chart as its auxiliary one. Since hte Moon orbits around the Earth, shouldn't the depth be higher from the top of the barrier that separates the Earth's gravity well from Venus' than from the barrier that separates the Earth's well from the Moon's? Otherwise, the Moon would escape from the Earth's gravity field to take its own independent orbit around the sun. 
    Also, what surface has been considered for the gaseous planets? The boundary in which the planet becomes opaque to the visible light from the exterior?
    ____________________ 

    Gravity wells scaled to Earth surface gravity

    This chart hows the "depth" of various solar system gravity wells.
    Each well is scaled such that rising out of a physical well of that depth —in constant  Earth surface gravity— would take the same energy as escaping from that planet's gravity in reality.
    Each planet is shown cut in half at the bottom of its well, with the depth of the well measured down to the planet's flat surface.
    The planet sizes are to the same scale as the wells.
    Interplanetary distances are not to scale.

    Depth = G · Planet_Mass / (g · Planet_Radius)

    G = Newton's Constant
    g = 9.81 m/s^2

    Neptune
    An even more glorious dawn awaits!

    Uranus

    Rings
    Saturn

    Titan
    Weeoooeeoooeeeooo
    Europa

    Jupiter
    Jupiter is not much larger than Saturn, but much more massive.
    At this size, adding more mass just makes it denser due to the extra squeezing of gravity.
    If you dropped a few dozen more Jupiters into it, the pressure would ignite fusion and make it a star.

    Io
    Ganymede

    Mars 1,286 km

    Deimos
    Phobos
    Mars 1,286 km

    Deimos to scale
    You could escape Deimos with a bike and a ramp.

    Phobos to scale
    A thrown baseball could escape Phobos.

    Moon 288 km
    Earth 5,478 km

    Moon 288 km
    Geosynchronous orbit
    GPS satellites
    ISS
    Shuttle
    Low Earth orbit
    Earth 6,379 km
    This is why it took a huge rocket to get to the Moon but only a small one to get back.

    It takes the same amount of energy to launch something on an escape trajectory away from the Earth as it would to launch it 6,000 km upward under constant 9.81 m/s^2 Earth gravity.
    Hence, Earth's well is 6,000 km deep.

    Venus
    Mercury
    To Sun, very very far down

    Local football team
    Very deep
    Your Mom
    ____________________ 
  • 2 plusses - 4 comments - 2 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-04-11 18:29:40
    Please, quit this new G+ layout, it doesn't work, and is crap. All the stream is place on hte left side of my screen and it can't be fixed.
    Edit:

    I tried expanding the text to see if this could recenter the stream (in the previous layout expanding it placed the stream on the left, and shrinking it put it back in the center) and now most links are out of their icons, the setting icon has disappeared, and now I can't go back to shrink since the icon has become irresponsive (with the browser Chrome). Right now I'm writing from Safari since from Chrome G+ has become almost inoperative.

    These are my complaints about the new Google+ layout:

    1. The stream is running on the left side is very uncomfortable to read. In the previous layout without expanding the text I could have the stream at the center. Now in the center of the screen I have nothing at all.
    2. It seems we've lost the option to select which circles are displayed in our stream. In the previous layout we could check which circles were displayed on the right side, watch only one circle or watch them all.
    3. Everything goes sluggishly, opening Google Feedback took ages.
    4. We've lost space for the stream on the upper side because the buttons that were placed on the upper left are now placed right on top of the stream.
    5. It looks like the FB layout. Instead of purple stream background we have grey. There's less contrast between the text of the comments and the background.
    6. This new layout seems also more memory consuming, I usually have no problems with multiple pages open at a time, but now everything is sluggish and my browser gets frozen every minute (in both Chrome and Safari).
    7. The new layout is also plain and inelegant. The boxes for posts and comments of different color from the background have removed the minimalist look of the previous layout.
  • 3 plusses - 7 comments - 0 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2013-01-21 05:48:07
    RESHARE:
    plus.google.com - Guns for Protection from Whom?
    Uploaded by Chris Dyer. January 20, 2013

    You need guns for protection from whom?
    It's not like the Government would ever ram a tank into the side of your house

    Reshared text:
    Via #FreeCitizensCoalition

    #Obama #Guns #2ndAmendment #RubyRidge #Waco #Statists #Tyrant #tyranny #WhiteHouse #Government  
  • 5 plusses - 2 comments - 1 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-12-12 02:18:29
    RESHARE:
    MinutemanMedia.org (otherwords.org) - Safety Net
    By Khalil Bendib. 2008
    zcommunications.org/saftey-net-by-khalil-bendib

    Safety Net
    Fanny Mae (Gov't. Bail Outs) / Too Big To Fail
    Freddie Mac
    Bear Sterns
    Banks
    Tax Payers

    A spin-off: otherwords.org/files/1692/Safety-Net.jpg?width=800 
    ___________

    Reshared text:
  • 4 plusses - 1 comments - 2 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2013-02-16 21:37:02
    bbc.co.uk - Masters of Money. Episode 2 of 3: Hayek (58 min 23 sec)
    By Stephanie Flanders (BBC economics editor) & The Open University.
    Aired on October 16, 2012 (BBC One) youtu.be/tdDGUl7SncQ 

    EXCERPT (from 56:29 to 57:24):
    Stephanie Flanders: "But no government has ever dared to implement Hayek's vision of a market free from the State's intervention, and when capitalism faced its biggest test since the 1930s politicians rushed to save the market from itself. But the biggest debate in Britain today is not about whether the Government is doing too much to prop up the economy but whether it's doing enough.

    Today Hayek's advice seems hardest to take than ever. You've got the global economy still struggling to put the financial crisis behind it, if it is behind it, and Hayek would say 'Government should just step back, take a cool look of the historical record, dismantle most of the machinery they've constructed for guiding the economy, take a deep breath, and let it go.'

    I don't see any government today ready to do that, and I don't think I ever will."
    _________ 

    bbc.co.uk - Masters of Money
    bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01mzqw9 

    Stephanie's blog on Hayek:
    bbc.co.uk - Masters of Money: Friedrich Hayek
    By Stephanie Flanders (BBC economics editor). September 24, 2012
    bbc.co.uk/news/business-19706272 

    open.edu - OU on the BBC: Masters of Money
    August 2, 2012
    open.edu/openlearn/whats-on/tv/ou-on-the-bbc-masters-money 
    _________ 

    Blurb of the episode:

    Hayek Episode 2 of 3
    According to conventional wisdom, today's global financial crisis happened because markets were not regulated enough. But what if the opposite is true? That it was excessive government meddling in the markets that caused the crash?

    In Masters of Money produced in partnership with The Open University, BBC economics editor Stephanie Flanders examines the extraordinary influence of three intellectual titans - Keynes, Hayek and Marx and shows how they shaped the 20th century and continue to have a huge impact on our world today.

    Stephanie turns her attention to the radical free-market economist Friedrich Hayek. Travelling from London to Vienna and America, she unravels the extraordinary life and influence of the only free-market thinker whose reputation has grown post-crisis.

    With contributions from Central bankers, politicians and a Nobel laureate, she explores why despite his enormous influence, no government has ever dared to fully implement Hayek's solution to the problems of capitalism - set it virtually totally free from state control.
    bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01n2rpx 
    _________ 

    YouTube videos of the 3 episodes:
    Ep.1 Masters Of Money - Part 1 - John Keynes (59 min 06 sec)
    Ep.2 Masters Of Money - Part 2 - Friedrich Hayek (58 min 23 sec)
    Ep.3 Masters Of Money - Part 3 - Karl Marx (58 min 49 sec)
    _________ 

    #hayek   #austrianeconomics   #freemarket   #ronpaul   #paulkrugman   #keynes   #keynesianeconomics   #keynesianism   #keynesian   #centralbank   #centralbanking  
    ____________________ 
  • 2 plusses - 1 comments - 3 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-09-12 02:56:28
    RESHARE:
    rt.com - Man sentenced to jail for collecting rainwater in Oregon
    July 31, 2012

    Excerpt:
    <<Harrington, of Eagle Point, Oregon, has been fighting for his right to do what he wishes with water since 2002. Now more than a decade after he first defended himself over allegations that the man-made ponds on his 170 acres of land violated local law, Harrington has been sentenced to 30 days behind bars and fined over $1,500.

    Authorities say that Harrington broke the law by collecting natural rain water and snow runoff that landed on his property. Officials with the Medford Water Commission contested that the water on Harrington’s property, whether or not it came from the sky, was considered a tributary of nearby Crowfoot Creek and thus subject to a 1925 law that gives the MWC full ownership and rights.>>

    <<"Thirty days in jail for catching rainwater?" Harrington tells the Mail Tribune. "We live in an extreme wildfire area and here the government is going to open the valves and really waste all the water right now, at the start of peak fire season.”>>

    <<Taking his outrage to CNS News, Harrington says that others should be fearful of how they could come after attack next. In his own case, he was issued permits in 2003 by the state that allowed him to do what he wished with the water on his own property. And although the state Water Resources Department saw no fault at first, they shortly after revoked that license and left Harrington to fight for another nine years.

    “The government is bullying. They’ve just gotten to be big bullies and if you just lay over and die and give up, that just makes them bigger bullies. So, we as Americans, we need to stand on our constitutional rights, on our rights as citizens and hang tough,” he tells CNS.>>

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medford,_Oregon 
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jackson_County,_Oregon 
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Butte_Creek 
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rogue_River_(Oregon) 
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rogue_Valley 
    satelliteviews.net/cgi-bin/g.cgi?fid=1119586&state=OR&ftype=stream 
    ________________________ 

    Excerpt from an unrelated article:

    datacenterknowledge.com - Facebook Has Spent $210 Million on Oregon Data Center
    By Rich Miller. January 30, 20112
    datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2012/01/30/facebook-has-spent-210-million-on-oregon-data-center 

    <<There are reports that Apple and at least one other large data center user have scouted locations in Prineville, as Facebook’s facility has attracted interest from other companies seeking to leverage the town’s ideal environment for using fresh air to cool servers.>>

    <<One area where local officials praised Facebook was its approach to water use. Carr said Facebook has used only 28 gallons of water per minute thus far, while other existing industrial users in Crook County use between 60 and 173 gallons per minute.>> 

    <<For Prineville, Facebook is a big business operation – a fact reflected in the power required to operate the first phase of the data center. The 28 megawatts of utility power for the 300,000 square foot first phase isn’t extraordinary for a data center of that size. But it stands out in Crook County, where all the homes and business other than Facebook use 30 megawatts of power. 

    Three Data Centers Possible
    Facebook began building its Prineville facility in early 2010, and began operations in April 2011. The company recently began building a second data center identical to the first, and its long-term plans for the campus include an option for a third 300,000 square foot facility. Based on the power requirements of the first building, that could translate into about 78 megawatts of electricity to support the campus. 

    Crook County Economic Development Manager Jason Carr, who discussed Facebook’s operations at a community forum last week, said the region will have no problem supporting that much demand from a single customer. Carr said the region has 720 megawatts of power available, with another 76 megawatts set to come online next year, and another 281 MW in mid-2014.>>

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prineville,_Oregon 
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crooked_River_(Oregon) 
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prineville_Reservoir 
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crook_County,_Oregon 

    URL source G+ post: plus.google.com/108207796400897790234/posts/2ZBK6Mn76V8 
    ___________________________ 

    Reshared text:
    Gary is lucky: the Medford Air Commission did not discover (yet) that he's collecting air within his house!
  • 2 plusses - 3 comments - 2 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-02-12 20:30:57
    RESHARE:
    bizarrocomic.blogspot.com - Introducing iPhone 5!
    By Dan Piraro w/ Levitin. September 5, 2010

    Introducing iPhone 5!*
    Plays 3D movies
    Washes your cat
    3D video camera
    Does your taxes & your hair
    Cleans teeth
    Cosmetic surgery
    Repairs appliances
    Cures flu
    Gives flu to your ex
    Masseuse
    Makes broccoli taste like chocolate
    Controls weather & stock market
    Predicts future, changes past
    Gets out of jail free
    Pie on demand
    Makes you invisible
    Enables time travel
    Spins straw into gold
    Exfoliation
    Attracts UFOs

    *Does not contain a phone.

    Reshared text:
    But still doesn't play Flash. :)
  • 2 plusses - 3 comments - 2 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-07-01 06:28:24
    RESHARE:
    Marilyn Monroe's Portrait (dirt on painted sheet-metal body)
    By Sister paper towel. c. 2011, c. Jilin (China)

    Comment 1:
    Why would she draw the mirror image of the original picture?
    thebeautybestro.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/marilyn-monroe011.jpg (the freckle is always located on the left side of Marilyn's face). Did she pick an inverted picture as a model (by mistake)? To avoid copyright infringement?

    Larger pics: 
    theinspiration.com/2012/01/art-by-tamara-navarro/

    Note: the artist is not Tamara Navarro: plus.google.com/photos/101054784820431082870/albums/profile Daniel Nicolajsen must have mis-tagged her.

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jilin

    Related articles: 

    whatsonsanya.com - 'Sister paper towel' in Jilin becomes online celeb for cleaning car with style
    November 24, 2011
    whatsonsanya.com/news-19000-sister-paper-towel-in-jilin-becomes-online-celeb-for-cleaning-car-with-style.html

    teacher at Jilin Architectural Engineering College of Art and Design  
    Sister paper towel  

    wantchinatimes.com - Jilin's 'sister paper towel' cleans car with style
    By Staff Reporter. November 23, 2011
    http://www.wantchinatimes.com/news-subclass-cnt.aspx?cid=1103&MainCatID=11&id=20111123000046

    Comment 2:
    It reminds me of Scott Wade's art (dirtycarart.com), but he used to paint with dirt on car windows. He hasn't posted anything in the last 3 years, perhaps he's already retired. She could preserve the "dirty car art" alive.
    - YouTube Videos: 
    1. Dirty Car Art 
    2. "Montañozo" Official Music Video - Grupo Fantasma 
    3. The Dirty Car Artist - Scott Wade (Official Video) 
    4. The Dirty Car Artist 
    - Gallery: dirtycarart.com/DCAGallery/index.html 

    Source pic:
    thebeautybestro.com/tag/marilyn-monroe 

    URL source G+ post: plus.google.com/106911578746797141737/posts/RfwYq3VVeD7
    __________________

    Reshared text:
  • 5 plusses - 3 comments - 0 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-09-15 21:35:12
    RESHARE:
    plus.google.com - Your Singularity Is Here (whatever)
    By Alexander Becker. September 14, 2012 

    Excerpt from comments:

    Zephyr López Cervilla Sep 15, 2012 2:25 PM
    The shape of the immense majority of this graph is simpy due to an artifact, we have more information about recent events than about ancient ones. This effect causes a strong bias at least until the invention and popularisation of the printing press. 

    For instance, biologic evolution doesn't fit that trend since it is ultimately driven by successful mutations, and the rate in which they occur hasn't sped up with time. The complexity of some pluricellular organisms has increased linearly, others not even so.
    _______________________________ 

    +Francois Demers Sep 15, 2012 7:37 PM (edited)   Oops!
    +Singularity Utopia I have to agree with +Dieter Mueller : you are a techno simpleton.

    DNA is merely organic machinery?!? Find one, just one, actual, practicing microbiologist who would agree with that statement. Have you ever heard of the role quantum events (chaotic, unpredictable) have played and are still playing in evolution?

    You need to understand what a metaphor is, its uses and limits. It means "it's kinda like".

    There are four popular metaphors for humanity: man as plant, man as animal, man as machine and man as man. Oops, sorry, the last is not a real metaphor (can you guess why?)

    You seem to be investing all your hopes for progress and solving human problems into strong AI. If a real artificial supermind ever appeared, why do you believe it would obey you? Explain to the rest of us how high intelligence promotes cheerfully embracing slavery.

    There are two very important gaps in the study of the human mind:

    1- the role and purpose of emotions (they are indispensable to intelligence but nobody knows why or what they contribute.) Only complete idiots have complete lack of affect. Your magical AI would require a poodle's compulsion to please. Otherwise, it could tear you apart the instant you turn it on (you will have to give it effectors).

    Please list the improvements of the human condition we owe to poodles.

    2- Roger Penrose demonstrated very effectively in his splendid book The Emperor's New Mind that strong AI, if possible at all, is in the very distant future. His arguments are mostly mathematical but I can translate them for you: there is a problem explaining how a blob of jelly can be self-aware and intelligent; no hope to answer the question until we have a complete theory of quantum physics. We don't and there is none is sight. Except for art, we can't make what we do not understand.

    And even if you were right, you have absolutely no clue at all of the complexity and energy costs involved in the actual engineering and large-scale deployment of your pixie dust nanobots and picoprinters.

    May I point out also that biological machine is an oxymoron?

    It may be useful as a metaphor but no real biologist ever stretches it past the order of complexity of a virus (viruses are teeny-weeny thingies that move and reproduce but are not alive because they do not eat).

    If you stretch that metaphor too far, everything is a machine at the molecular level.

    +Alexander Becker , more like this please. 
    _______________________________ 

    Zephyr López Cervilla Sep 15, 2012 9:50 PM (edited) +1
    +Francois Demers: "May I point out also that biological machine is an oxymoron?
    It may be useful as a metaphor but no real biologist ever stretches it past the order of complexity of a virus (viruses are teeny-weeny thingies that move and reproduce but are not alive because they do not eat).
    If you stretch that metaphor too far, everything is a machine at the molecular level."

    - After having searched the usual definition of "machine": 

    <<A machine is a powered tool consisting of one or more parts that is constructed to achieve a particular goal. Machines are usually powered by mechanical, chemical, thermal or electrical means, and are frequently motorized. Historically, a powered tool also required moving parts to classify as a machine; however, the advent of electronics technology has led to the development of powered tools without moving parts that are considered machines.
    The word "machine" is derived from the Latin word machina, which in turn derives from the Doric Greek μαχανά (machana), Ionic Greek μηχανή (mechane) "contrivance, machine, engine" and that from μῆχος (mechos), "means, expedient, remedy". The meaning of machine is traced by the Oxford English Dictionary to an independently functioning structure and by Merriam-Webster Dictionary to something that has been constructed. This includes human design into the meaning of machine.
    A simple machine is a device that simply transforms the direction or magnitude of a force, but a large number of more complex machines exist. Examples include vehicles, electronic systems, molecular machines, computers, television and radio.>>
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine 

    I don't see any reason for denying the existence of biological machines, or even consider those cells (cell colonies or more complex cell communities) specially if they have been modified (or assembled) by humans "to achieve a particular goal" (e.g., bacterial systems to synthesize a particular product) as complex machine systems. So more than a machine, each modified cell could be considered as a whole factory.
    Since there's no metaphor on this, you can't be stretching that metaphor too far.
    On the other and, I've found a mention on biological machines in the article about molecular machines: 

    <<The most complex molecular machines are found within cells. These include motor proteins, such as myosin, which is responsible for muscle contraction, kinesin, which moves cargo inside cells away from the nucleus along microtubules, and dynein, which produces the axonemal beating of motile cilia and flagella. These proteins and their nanoscale dynamics are far more complex than any molecular machines that have yet been artificially constructed.
    The detailed mechanism of ciliary motility has been described by Satir in a 2008 review article. A high-level-abstraction summary is that, "[i]n effect, the [motile cilium] is a nanomachine composed of perhaps over 600 proteins in molecular complexes, many of which also function independently as nanomachines.">>
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molecular_machine#Biological 

    Of course, Wikipedia isn't a scholarly reference, but it cites the following article that may well be considered as an academic reference: 

    - Satir P and Christensen ST. Structure and function of mammalian cilia. Histochem Cell Biol (2008) vol. 129 (6) pp. 687-93
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18365235 
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2386530 
    springerlink.com/content/x5051hq648t3152q/fulltext.pdf 

    The term "nanomachine" appears twice, and "machinery" thrice: 

    <<In eVect, the 9 + 2 axoneme is a nanomachine composed of perhaps over 600 proteins in molecular complexes, many of which also function independently as nanomachines. >>

    <<Remarkably, this machinery is conserved almost universally wherever cilia are built, and orthologs of the motors and IFT proteins are found in sensory cilia and their derivatives, such as the mammalian photoreceptor (Baker et al.  2003) and in primary cilia, as well as in protistan motile cilia.>>

    <<Cole DG (2003) The intraXagellar transport machinery of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. TraYc 4:435–442>>

    <<Kiprilov EN, Awan A, Velho M, Clement CA, Byskov AG, Andersen CY, Satir P, Bouhassira EE, Christensen ST, Hirsch RE (2008) Human embryonic stem cells in culture possess primary cilia with hedgehog signaling machinery. J Cell Biol 180:897–904>>

    Some examples of the use of the expression machine or nanomachine in title of articles published in specialized journals in the last few months [15/441]: 

    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22854913 
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22837385  
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22772556 
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22772555 
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22770366 
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22727666 
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22703552 
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22664199 

    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22649583 

    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22645361 
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22634726 
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22562135 
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22552632 
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22519960 
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22504172 
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22496630 
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22480731 
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22445226 
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22432702 
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22425326 
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22411979 
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22405842 
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22395152 
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22355141 
    _______________________________ 

    Francois Demers Sep 15, 2012 9:51 PM +1
    +Zephyr López Cervilla you understand what a ".gov" domain is?

    A prion is also a self-replicating molecular "machine" and considerably smaller than a virus. My point was that highly complex organised living critter, a flea for example, is not a machine.

    I am not seeing anything of a higher order of complexity than a virus in your list. (size, yes, complexity, no)
    _______________________________ 

    Zephyr López Cervilla Sep 15, 202 10:20 PM (edited)
    +Francois Demers: "My point was that highly complex organised living critter, a flea for example, is not a machine.
    I am not seeing anything of a higher order of complexity than a virus in your list. (size, yes, complexity, no)"

    - A highly complex organized group of machines are still a machine, so if you accept that biological machines are machines, any highly complex organized group of them plus structural elements is still a biological machine of higher order of complexity called cell. In my opinion, distinction that you do based on the order of complexity isarbitrary. 
    For instance, if the engine of an automobile is a machine, the whole automobile is another machine of a higher level of complexity (or a crane, a machine, in a large container ship, another machine of higher order of complexity).
    If you want, specific groups of machines working for a specific purpose or with a particular characteristic can be referred to as machinery, and the space and structural elements that contain and support the machinery or machineries, a factory (usually including the machinery).

    +Francois Demers: "you understand what a ".gov" domain is?"

    - Government, isn't it? the Internet domain used by US governmental agencies and organisms (e.g., the US National Institutes of Health, NIH). Are both things related?
    _______________________________ 

    Francois Demers Sep 15, 2012 10:22 PM +1
    +Zephyr López Cervilla brace yourself for a shock because two deep dark secrets of the universe shall now be revealed to you:

    1- All machines are molecular.
    2- The Dark Knight Rises really sucks.
    _______________________________ 

    Zephyr López Cervilla Sep 15, 2012 10:56 PM (edited)
    +Francois Demers: "1. All machines are molecular."

    - The term "molecular machine" isn't used to refer to the matter that forms a machine, but the size scale of the machine. 
     . . . 
    BTW, the major part of matter in metallic machines aren't molecules (not all the matter is in the form of molecules, nor even the solid matter): 

    <<A molecule ( /ˈmɒlɪkjuːl/) is an electrically neutral group of two or more atoms held together by covalent chemical bonds. [1][2][3][4][5][6] Molecules are distinguished from ions by their lack of electrical charge.>>
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molecule 
    _______________________________ 

    Comment: What a dickhead!

    URL source G+ post: plus.google.com/100500197140377336562/posts/P5QxQevCP1J 
    _______________________________ 

    Reshared text:
    Your Singularity Is Here

    There is much talk about the Singularity [1] lately with projects such as 2045 [2] and an amazing emergence of the idea of a singularity from science fiction to a quasi-implicit belief system of a world and culture obeying science without questioning.

    If you believe what pop-scientists spin and what real scientists present or if you just witness our techno-culture evolve, you have to be convinced, even by common wisdom, that the intellectually far-fetched and apparently arbitrary revolution is near —

    “The technological singularity is the hypothetical future emergence of greater-than-human superintelligence through technological means. Since the capabilities of such intelligence would be difficult for an unaided human mind to comprehend, the occurrence of a technological singularity is seen as an intellectual event horizon, beyond which events cannot be predicted or understood.” [3]

    But I have news for you, it’s here already, and this is what it looks like —

    Exhibit 1: Hugo Awards live stream shut down by a bot which erroneously determined copyright infringement

    “Unfortunately, the streaming was interrupted mid-ceremony when an automated program on the streaming website cancelled the channel for an assumed copyright infringement.” [4]

    Exhibit 2: Copyright bot boots NASA rover vid off YouTube

    “NASA’s video coverage and pics are actually generally copyright-free, which made the overzealous bot takedown even more ironic as it pulled the video from the space agency’s channel for infringing on the rights of Scripps Local News.” [5] (Yes, again, copyright infringement. Wait for the first errors in automated face-recognition systems.)

    Exhibit 3: Apple has been accused of “insulting” women after it censored the title of one of the books on its iBookstore

    “[The] book, which looks at social and sexual meanings of the vagina, is featured on the front of the iBook store as V****a even though the full title is clearly legible on its jacket. The word is also blanked out throughout the description.” [6] (Note: I assume that the front of the iBook store has an automated censorship system and that this is not a personal attack against the author.)

    Exhibit 4: Darpa’s Cheetah-Bot Designed to Chase Human Prey

    “As the name implies, Cheetah is designed to be a four-legged robot with a flexible spine and articulated head (and potentially a tail) that runs faster than the fastest human. In addition to raw speed, Cheetah’s makers promise that it will have the agility to make tight turns so that it can ‘zigzag to chase and evade’ and be able to stop on a dime.” [7][8]

    This is your singularity, it isn’t yet working exactly as envisioned, but it will gradually evolve and you will need to think about how much you want it to work perfectly and without errors or leeway.

    [1] Raymond Kurzweil: The Singularity Is Near
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Singularity_Is_Near
    [2] Russian Mogul Soliciting Billionaires to Achieve Immortality
    http://www.forbes.com/sites/davidthier/2012/08/03/russian-mogul-soliciting-billonaires-to-achieve-immortality/
    [3] Technological singularity
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technological_singularity
    [4] Watch the video that got the Hugo Awards live stream shut down and interrupted Neil Gaiman
    http://www.comicmix.com/news/2012/09/04/heres-the-video-that-got-the-hugo-awards-live-stream-shut-down/
    [5] The Irony of Automated DMCA Takedowns
    https://plus.google.com/u/0/100500197140377336562/posts/BszfPQ5H97g
    [6] Apple censorship of Vagina book ’an insult’ to women
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/apple/9540853/Apple-censorship-of-Vagina-book-an-insult-to-women.html
    [7] Darpa’s Cheetah-Bot Designed to Chase Human Prey
    http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/02/darpas-cheetah-bot-designed-to-chase-human-prey/
    [8] Pentagon’s Robot Cheetah Outruns Usain Bolt
    http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2012/09/darpa-robot-usain-bolt/
  • 2 plusses - 7 comments - 0 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-10-04 01:04:01
    researchnews.osu.edu - Omega-3 Supplements May Slow a Biological Effect of Aging
    By Emily Caldwell. October 1, 2012

    Questions:
    1. Why do you think that they didn't exclude those volunteers who were taking an aspirin a day? I only can think of a possible explanation.
    2. Did they compare change in telomerase activity vs. change in telomere length? If so, why didn't they show those results?
    Comment:
    I have the suspicion that the reason why the telomeres of the peripheral T-cells are more prone to lengthened with omega-3 supplementation is because with the modulation of the pro-inflammatory signal induced by omega-3, the T-cell precursors proliferate less, and as it's mentioned in the same paper that presents the results of this study,
    "Inflammation triggers T-cell proliferation, one known cause of telomere shortening."
    _________________ 

    Excerpt from Ohio State University press release:
    <<The study showed that most overweight but healthy middle-aged and older adults who took omega-3 supplements for four months altered a ratio of their fatty acid consumption in a way that helped preserve tiny segments of DNA in their white blood cells.>>

    <<Omega-3 supplementation also reduced oxidative stress, caused by excessive free radicals in the blood, by about 15 percent compared to effects seen in the placebo group.>>

    <<In another recent publication from this study, Kiecolt-Glaser and colleagues reported that omega-3 fatty acid supplements lowered inflammation in this same group of adults.>>

    <<Study participants took either 2.5 grams or 1.25 grams of active omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids>>

    <<Participants on the placebo took pills containing a mix of oils representing a typical American’s daily intake.>>

    <<Participants received either the placebo or one of the two different doses of omega-3 fatty acids. The supplements were calibrated to contain a ratio of the two cold-water fish oil fatty acids, eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), of seven to one. Previous research has suggested that EPA has more anti-inflammatory properties than DHA.>>

    <<Both groups of participants who took omega-3 supplements showed, on average, lengthening of telomeres compared to overall telomere effects in the placebo group, but the relationship could have been attributed to chance. However, when the researchers analyzed the participants’ omega-6 to omega-3 ratio in relationship to telomere lengthening, a lower ratio was clearly associated with lengthened telomeres.>>

    <<The researchers also measured levels of compounds called F2-isoprostanes to determine levels of oxidative stress, which is linked to a number of conditions that include heart disease and neurodegenerative disorders. Both omega-3 groups together showed an average overall 15 percent reduction in oxidative stress compared to effects seen in the placebo group.

    When the scientists revisited their earlier inflammation findings, they also found that decreases in an inflammatory marker in the blood called interleukin-6 (IL-6) were associated with telomere lengthening. In their earlier paper on omega-3s and inflammation, they reported that omega-3 supplements lowered IL-6 by 10 to 12 percent, depending on the dose. By comparison, those taking a placebo saw an overall 36 percent increase in IL-6 by the end of the study.

    “This finding strongly suggests that inflammation is what’s driving the changes in the telomeres,” Kiecolt-Glaser said.>>

    <<study co-author Ron Glaser, professor of molecular virology, immunology and medical genetics and director of the Institute for Behavioral Medicine Research (IBMR) at Ohio State.>>

    <<this population was disease-free and reported very little stress. The study included 106 adults, average age 51 years, who were either overweight or obese and lived sedentary lives. The researchers excluded people taking medications to control mood, cholesterol and blood pressure as well as vegetarians, patients with diabetes, smokers, those routinely taking fish oil, people who got more than two hours of vigorous exercise each week and those whose body mass index was either below 22.5 or above 40.>>

    <<Co-authors of the study include Elissa Epel, Jue Lin and Elizabeth Blackburn of the University of California, San Francisco; Rebecca Andridge and Beom Seuk Hwang of Ohio State’s College of Public Health; and William Malarkey of the IBMR.

    This work was supported in part by grants from the National Institutes of Health.

    OmegaBrite, a company based in Waltham, Mass., supplied the supplements as an unrestricted gift but did not participate in the study design, results or publication. Study co-authors Blackburn, Epel and Lin are co-founders of Telome Health Inc., a telomere measurement company>>

    Source:
    - Caldwell, Emily. Omega-3 Supplements May Slow A Biological Effect of Aging. The Ohio State University - Research and Innovation Communications. October 1, 2012
    researchnews.osu.edu/archive/omega3aging.htm 
    _______________________ 

    Reference paper:

    - Kiecolt-Glaser et al. Omega-3 fatty acids, oxidative stress, and leukocyte telomere length: A randomized controlled trial. Brain Behav Immun (2012) [uncorrected proof, article in press] 
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23010452 
    linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0889-1591(12)00431-X 
    sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088915911200431X 

    Excerpts of interest: 

    1.1. Telomeres, telomerase, inflammation, and oxidative stress

    Telomeres, the caps found at the ends of chromosomes, are essential for chromosomal stability and replication; the enzyme telomerase is important for telomere formation, maintenance, and restoration (Blackburn, 2005; Epel et al., 2004). A growing literature has linked shorter telomeres with health behaviors, age-related diseases, and earlier mortality (Brouilette et al., 2003; Epel et al., 2009; Kimura et al., 2008; Valdes et al., 2005).

    Telomeres can be maintained or lengthened by telomerase, an intra-cellular enzyme that adds telomeric DNA to shortened telomeres (Chan and Blackburn, 2003). Telomere length is also linked to, and likely regulated by, exposure to proinflammatory cytokines and oxidative stress (Aviv, 2006; Carrero et al., 2008; Damjanovic et al., 2007). Inflammation triggers T-cell proliferation, one known cause of telomere shortening (Aviv, 2004; Carrero et al., 2008; Gardner et al., 2005). Oxidative stress promotes telomere erosion during cellular replication in vitro and also stimulates the synthesis of proinflammatory cytokines (Aviv, 2006; Lipcsey et al., 2008).

    1.2. Telomeres, telomerase, and omega-3 PUFAs

    Although telomeres typically shorten with aging, shortening is not inevitable, and telomeres can also lengthen (Aviv et al., 2009; Ehrlenbach et al., 2009; Epel et al., 2009; Farzaneh-Far et al., 2010a; Nordfjall et al., 2009). It is important to identify malleable factors that might promote telomere stability over time. Based on theoretical and empirical reasons, it is possible that blood levels of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) may be one of the factors that can prevent telomere shortening over time. The omega-3 (n-3) PUFAs can reduce inflammation and decrease oxidative stress (Calder, 2005; Kiecolt-Glaser et al., 2011; Mori et al., 1999; Nalsen et al., 2006), described below, and thus could buffer telomeres from their damaging effects.
    In the Heart and Soul Study, which followed 608 people with stable coronary heart disease over 5 years, average telomere length increased in 23% of the individuals, shortened in 45%, and remained unchanged in 32% (Farzaneh-Far et al., 2010a). Slower telomere attrition was predicted by higher baseline levels of the two key n-3 PUFAs, eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexanoic acid (DHA), which were the only significant predictors out of 16 clinical and behavioral factors examined (Farzaneh-Far et al., 2010b). Each standard deviation increase in the DHA + EPA total was associated with a 32% reduction in the odds of telomere attrition. In a different pilot study, an intensive three-month lifestyle change program that included n-3 PUFA supplementation significantly increased telomerase activity (Ornish et al., 2008).

    1.3. The present study

    In our recent four-month randomized controlled trial (RCT), serum interleukin 6 (IL-6) decreased by 10% and 12% in our low (1.25 g/day) and high (2.5 g/day) dose n-3 PUFA groups, respectively, compared to a 36% increase in the placebo group (Kiecolt-Glaser et al., 2012). Similarly, low and high dose n-3 PUFA groups showed modest 0.2% and -2.3% changes in serum TNF-α, in contrast to the 12% increase in the control group. Depressive symptoms, the other primary trial outcome, were low at baseline and did not change. This study assessed the impact of n-3 PUFA supplementation, and consequent changes in the n-6:n-3 PUFA ratio, on secondary outcomes in our RCT: leukocyte telomere length, telomerase, and oxidative stress.

    2.2. Design and study components 164

    Data collection for this double-blind placebo-controlled four 165 month RCT began in September, 2006 and ended in February, 2011. At baseline and at 4 months we assessed telomere length, telomerase, and oxidative stress. Blood samples were collected between 7:00 and 9:00 AM to control for diurnal variation.

    2.2.1. Supplement and Placebo

    [ . . . ]
    Both the placebo and the* n-3 PUFA pills included 1 IU of vitamin E. In order to ensure integrity of the oil supplements, dietary oils were analyzed every 6–8 months* by gas chromatography of methylated fatty acids prepared in the Belury lab.

    2.6. Telomere length

    Peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) were purified from whole blood by density-gradient centrifugation in Lymphocyte Separation Medium (Mediatech, Inc.).
    [ . . . ]
    The telomere length measurement assay is adapted from the published original method by Cawthon (Cawthon, 2002; Lin et al., 2010a). The telomere thermal cycling profile consists of: Cycling for T(telomic) PCR: denature at 96 °C for 1 s, anneal/extend at 54 °C for 60 s, with fluorescence data collection, 30 cycles. Cycling for S (single copy gene) PCR: denature at 95 °C for 15 s, anneal at 58 °C for 1 s, extend at 72 °C for 20 s, 8 cycles; followed by denature at 96°C for 1s, anneal at 58°C for 1s, extend at 72 °C for 20 s, hold at 83 °C for 5 s with data collection, 35 cycles. The primers for the telomere PCR are tel1b [5'-CGGTTT(GTTTGG)5GTT-3'], used at a final concentration of 100 nM, and _tel2b_ [5'-GGCTTG(CCTTAC)5CCT-3'], used at a final concentration 282 of 900 nM. The primers for the single-copy gene (human beta-globin) PCR are hbg1 [5'- GCTTCTGACACAACTGTGTTCACTAGC-3'], used at a final concentration of 300 nM, and hbg2 [5'-CACCAACTTCATCCACGTTCACC-3'], used at a final concentration of 700 nM. The final reaction mix contains 20 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.4; 50 mM KCl; 200 lM each dNTP; 1% DMSO; 0.4x Syber Green I; 22 ng Escherichia coli DNA per reaction; 0.4 U of Platinum Taq DNA polymer- ase (Invitrogen Inc.) per 11 ll reaction; 0.5–10 ng of genomic DNA. Tubes containing 26, 8.75, 2.9, 0.97, 0.324 and 0.108 ng of a reference DNA (from Hela cancer cells) are included in each PCR run so that the quantity of targeted templates in each sample can be determined relative to the reference DNA sample by the standard curve method. Each concentration of the reference DNA is run as quadruplets and samples are run as triplicates. To control for inter-assay variability, 8 control DNA samples from cancer cell lines (including 293T, H1299, UMUC3, and UMUC3 cells infected with a lentiviral construct containing the telomerase RNA gene to extent telomeres, harvested at various population doublings after infection) are included in each run. In each batch, the T/S ratio of each control DNA is divided by the average T/S for the same DNA from 10 runs to get a normalizing factor. This is done for all eight samples and the average normalizing factor for all eight samples is used to correct the participant DNA samples to get the final T/S ratio. The T/S ratio for each sample is measured twice, each time in triplicate wells. When the duplicate T/S value and the initial value vary by more than 7%, the sample is run the third time and the two closest values will be reported. The formula to convert the T/S ratio to base pairs is base pairs = 3274 + 2413 * (T/S). The inter-assay coefficient of variation for telomere length measurement was 4.3% for this study.

    2.7. Telomerase activity

    PBLs were purified from whole blood as above. Cells were lysed with 1x CHAPS buffer (10 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5, 1 mM MgCl2, 315 1 mM EGTA, 0.1 mM benzamidine, 5 mM  β-mercaptoethanol, 0.5% CHAPS, 10% glycerol) on ice for 30 min and spun at 4 °C at 14 k rpm for 20 min to generate an extract corresponding to 10,000 cells/ll. Extracts were stored at -80° for batch analysis of telomerase activity. Telomerase activity was measured by the TRAPeze Telomerase detection kit (Millipore, Cat# S7700) using a modified protocol developed by the Blackburn lab (Lin et al., 2010a). Three concentrations (2000, 5000 and 10,000 cells) were used for TRAP reactions to ensure that the assay was in the linear range. Details of the method are published elsewhere (Lin et al., 2010a). The inter-assay coefficient of variation (CV) was 6.8%.


    2.8. Oxidative stress

    F2-isoprostanes provide the most reliable index of in vivo oxidative stress when compared to other well-known biomarkers (Milne et al., 2007). Plasma samples were analyzed by Vanderbilt’s Eicosanoid Core Laboratory, following their published protocol (Milne 331 et al., 2007).

    2.9. Statistical methods

    [ . . . ]
    Analysis of covariance was used to separately model change in telomerase (N = 94), telomere length (N = 106), and F2-isoprostanes (N = 97) from baseline to 4 months, adjusting for baseline levels, using all subjects with available four-month follow-up data. In order to control Type I error, the Tukey–Kramer method was used for between-group comparisons. Although supplementation group was the main predictor of interest, secondary analyses used change in continuous n-6:n-3 PUFA ratio in place of group because individuals differ in absorption and metabolism of n-3 PUFA supplements, as well as in adherence. Despite the relative balance between the groups due to the randomization, analyses were repeated controlling for age, gender, and sagittal abdominal diameter (SAD). Alpha was set to 0.05, and two-sided tests were conducted. All analyses were carried out in SAS version 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).

    3.1. Study population, baseline data

    Table 1 shows baseline characteristics of the analysis sample (N = 106), with 31 subjects in the placebo arm, 40 in the low dose fish oil arm, and 35 in the high dose fish oil arm. Randomization produced groups that did not differ on age, baseline FFQ dietary variables, sleep quality, depressive symptoms, and history of major depressive disorder, p > 0.19 for all tests. There were no baseline group differences on SAD or BMI (p > 0.60 for both). Using BMI cut points of 25 and 30 kg/m2, 100 participants (94%) were overweight, and 54 (51%) were obese. Groups were similar on telomere length, telomerase, and F2-isoprostanes at baseline (p > 0.26 for all tests).

    3.3. Changes in F2-isoprostanes

    Table 4 shows the significant group differences in changes in log-F2-isoprostanes after supplementation. The estimated mean *change in log-F2-isoprostanes was 0.073 for the placebo group, corresponding to an 8% increase in geometric mean.* In contrast, the estimated mean change in log-F2-isoprostanes was -0.094 for the low dose group and -0.086 for the high dose group, corresponding to decreases in the geometric mean of 9% and 8%, respectively. For both doses these changes were significantly different than the placebo group (Tukey–Kramer adjusted p = 0.02; p = 0.04, respectively), resulting in the intervention groups having a 15% lower geometric mean F2-isoprostanes at 4 months compared to control. There was not a significant difference between the two supplemented groups (p = 0.99). These results remained the same in analyses additionally controlling for age, gender and SAD.

    3.4. Changes in telomere length and telomerase

    The adjusted mean change in telomere length, expressed in base pairs (bp), was an increase of 21 bp for the low dose group 406 and an increase of 50 bp in the high dose group compared to a decrease of 43 bp for placebo (Table 4); however; differences between the groups were not significant. Telomere lengthening (defined as a positive change) was observed in 54% (n = 19) of the 2.5 g/d n-3 PUFA group and 53% (n = 21) of the 1.25 g/d n-3 PUFA group, but only 39% (n = 12) of the placebo group, though these differences were not significant (p = 0.39). There were no differences among the groups in change in telomerase activity at four months (Table 4). Models additionally controlling for age, gender, and SAD produced similar results.

    3.5. Changes in telomere length based on n-6:n-3 PUFA plasma ratios

    Secondary analyses explored the effect of changes in plasma n-6:n-3 PUFA ratios on changes in telomere length, since individuals differ in absorption and metabolism of n-3 PUFA supplements. Table 5 shows the resulting linear regression analysis, controlling for baseline telomere length and baseline n-6:n-3 PUFA ratio. A one unit decrease in n-6:n-3 PUFA ratio was associated with an estimated 20 bp increase in telomere length (p = 0.02).
    The analysis was repeated using the change in AA:(EPA + DHA) ratio in place of n-6:n-3 PUFA ratio; the AA:(EPA + DHA) ratio is favored by some researchers because of a more direct tie to eicosanoid metabolism. Since the change in AA:(EPA + DHA) ratio was highly correlated with the change in n-6:n-3 PUFA ratio (r = 0.90, p < 0.001), results were similar, with a one unit decrease in AA:(EPA + DHA) ratio associated with a 35 bp increase in telomere length (p = 0.08). Similarly, when the change in the sum of EPA, DHA, and DPA was used in place of either ratio, results were again comparable, with a one unit increase in EPA + DHA + DPA associated with a 22 bp increase in telomere length (p = 0.07). All results were similar after adjusting for age, gender, and SAD.

    3.6. Changes in telomere length related to IL-6

    Since supplementation reduced serum IL-6 in both low and high dose groups in the parent study (Kiecolt-Glaser et al., 2012), as a secondary analysis we investigated the association between *change in telomere length and change in IL-6* for the 101 subjects in the present study who had IL-6 data available at baseline and four months. There was a significant negative correlation between change in telomere length and change in IL-6 (Spearman r = -0.20, p = 0.05). Of the 51 subjects who experienced telomere lengthening, 61% (n = 31) had lowered IL-6, compared to 34% (n = 17) of the 50 who did not experience telomere lengthening (p = 0.007).

    4.1. Intervention-related changes

    [ . . . ]
    Telomerase activity level did not change in our sample, in contrast to the changes observed following an intensive three-month lifestyle change program in a different study group – men with early prostate cancer – that included 3 g/day of fish oil (Ornish et al., 2008). That intervention also included dietary change (low-fat and high plant-based), aerobic exercise, and stress management. Further, as that previous study had no non-intervention control group, those data must be interpreted cautiously as regards involvement of n-3 PUFAs.
    Depressive symptoms were quite low at baseline in this sample, and did not change (Kiecolt-Glaser et al., 2012). However, prior studies that have linked lower n-3 PUFA plasma levels and depression suggest a potential benefit for more distressed groups (Appleton et al., 2010; Hibbeln, 1998). Depression and chronic stress have been associated with shorter telomeres (Damjanovic et al., 2007; Epel et al., 2004; Wolkowitz et al., 2010). Depression and chronic stress boost inflammation (Glaser and Kiecolt-Glaser, 2005; Kiecolt-Glaser et al., 2003) as well as oxidative stress (Epel et al., 2004; Wolkowitz et al., 2010), and could speed telomere erosion through these pathways. Accordingly, n-3 PUFA supplementation might also slow telomere attrition by enhancing mood in more depressed samples.
    Although age-related reductions in telomeres are the average situation, recent studies showed that telomeres can both shorten and elongate in vivo, and leukocyte telomere length can change 491 within a period of months (Shlush et al., 2011; Svenson et al., 2011). Alterations in oxidative stress were highlighted as a potential mechanism in two recent reports (Shlush et al., 2011; Svenson 494 et al., 2011). Our data suggest that a dietary intervention that reduces the joint burden of oxidative stress and inflammation may in turn have positive consequences for telomere length. During aging there is a shift from naïve to memory T-cells, and the latter have shorter telomeres (Svenson et al., 2011). We do not know if the reductions in inflammation and oxidative stress in our n-3 PUFA supplemented participants reflected shifts in leukocyte subpopulations that contributed to the telomere changes observed, one limitation of the present study.
    [ . . . ]
    It would have been desirable to examine n-6 and n-3 PUFAs in red blood cells (RBCs) in addition to plasma levels. Circulating PUFA levels reflect the interplay among dietary intake, absorption, and metabolism and are not always strongly correlated with dietary intake of fatty acids (Fusconi et al., 2003; Seierstad et al., 2005). RBC PUFA levels reflect longer-term PUFA consumption as the turn-over is slow and more reliable (Harris, 2008, 2009). For example, DHA levels in RBCs are thought to indicate dietary fat intake for the past four months, while levels in plasma may only mirror intake from the last few days (Arab, 2003; Sun et al., 2007). However, our intervention spanned four months and serum and plasma proinflammatory cytokines can change in hours (Glaser and Kiecolt-Glaser, 2005); for example, infusion of a fish oil-based lipid emulsion substantially reduced monocyte production of IL-6, TNF-α, IL-1, and IL-8 in response to endotoxin (Mayer et al., 2003). For these reasons, plasma PUFA data were essential to assess recent dietary influences on inflammatory markers in this study. As described earlier, the n-6 and n-3 PUFAs compete for key enzymatic pathways, and thus the relative balance is of interest (Simopoulos, 2008). ATTICA, a large health and nutrition survey of healthy Greek adults, showed that higher n-6:n-3 PUFA plasma ratios were associated with higher TNF-α and IL-6 (Kalogeropoulos et al., 2010).

    4.2. Health implications

    We found that telomere length increased with decreasing n-6:n-3 PUFA ratios. These data suggest that rather than just considering the absolute amount of n-3 PUFA, the background levels of both the n-6 and the n-6:n-3 PUFAs should also be taken into account for clinical studies or for evaluation of nutritional interventions. For example, the n-6:n-3 PUFA ratio can be altered by increasing n-3 PUFA supplementation, but also by decreasing n-6 intake.
    Several large studies have linked higher n-3 PUFA levels with lower all-cause mortality (Lee et al., 2009; Pottala et al., 2010) including a large 3.5 year trial (Marchioli et al., 2002). The n-3 PUFA’s anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties provide one obvious pathway for these reductions in mortality, consistent with the finding that decreases in IL-6 were associated with telomere lengthening in this study. Our data suggest that the n-3 PUFAs can impact cell aging in addition to inflammation and oxidative stress. This translational research broadens our understanding of the n-3 PUFA’s potential therapeutic effects.
    Short telomeres predict early disease, and slowing immune cell aging could have broad effects by slowing the onset of age-related diseases. Recent work has demonstrated the causal effect of telomerase deficiency and telomere shortening on cellular health and premature aging and mortality in rodents (Bernardes de Jesus et al., 2012; Jaskelioff et al., 2011; Sahin et al., 2011). In summary, the current study provides compelling initial evidence that lower n-6:n-3 PUFA ratios may be beneficial for slowing biological aging.

    Conflict of interest statement

    Drs. Blackburn, Epel, and Lin are co-founders in Telome Health, Inc., a telomere measurement company.
    _______________________ 

    Previous paper with other results from the same study:

    - Kiecolt-Glaser JK et al. Omega-3 supplementation lowers inflammation in healthy middle-aged and older adults: a randomized controlled trial. Brain Behav Immun (2012) vol. 26 (6) pp. 988-95
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22640930 
    linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0889-1591(12)00118-3 
    sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889159112001183 

    Excerpts of interest:

    A number of epidemiological and observational studies have demonstrated that lower n-3 PUFA levels are associated with higher serum IL-6, TNF-a, and CRP (Farzaneh-Far et al., 2009; Ferrucci et al., 2006; Kalogeropoulos et al., 2010; Kiecolt-Glaser et al., 2007). In contrast, comparisons of supplemented and placebo groups in n-3 PUFA randomized controlled trials (RCTs), the gold standard for demonstrating causality, have not produced reliable serum cytokine differences (Calder et al., 2009; Fritsche, 2006; Kiecolt-Glaser et al., 2011; Sijben and Calder, 2007). Problematic methodological issues that muddy interpretation have included severely underpowered small treatment groups (e.g., 8–10 per group), low n–3 PUFA supplementation doses, insensitive cytokine assays, use of young and healthy subjects and/or highly-trained athletes, and very low levels of baseline inflammation. For example, serum cytokines did not differ significantly among 58 monks who received 0, 1.06, 2.13 or 3.19 g/d of n-3 PUFAs for a year (Blok et al., 1997); however, basal cytokine data did not differ between vegetarians and non-vegetarians even before supplementation, suggesting that the monks’ extremely healthy lifestyle limited the ability to see meaningful downward change.
    The strongest RCT support for the n-3 PUFA’s anti-inflammatory properties has come from studies with older, hypertriglyceridemic or diabetic individuals with elevated inflammatory markers (Fritsche, 2006; Sijben and Calder, 2007; Wu, 2004; Yusof et al., 2008). Consequently, it has been suggested that cytokine produc- tion in healthy people is relatively insensitive to long-chain n-3 PUFAs (Sijben and Calder, 2007; Wu, 2004).

    2.1. Participants

    The 138 participants, 45 men and 93 women, ranged in age from 40 to 85 (Table 1). Campus and community print and web-based announcements were used for recruitment. The institutional review board approved this study, and each participant provided informed consent.
    The online screening form assessed health history, medications, and health behaviors. Exclusions included psychoactive drugs or mood altering medications, lipid-altering drugs, beta blockers, steroids, regular use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs other than an aspirin a day, ACE-inhibitors, prostaglandin inhibitors, heparin, warfarin, and alcohol/drug abuse (Buckley et al., 2004; Ferrucci et al., 2006). We also excluded pregnant or nursing women, vegetarians, diabetics, people who routinely took fish oil or flaxseed supplements or ate more than two portions of oily fish per week, smokers, and individuals with recurrent digestive problems, convulsive disorders, and autoimmune and/or inflammatory diseases. Individuals who typically engaged in 2 or more hours of vigorous physical activity per week, as well as individuals with a body mass index (BMI) less than 22.5 or greater than 40 were excluded (Fernandez-Real et al., 2003).
    In addition, we used participants’ ability to follow the regimen as a criterion for study entry. Participants received a 7-day supply of placebo capsules (single blind) at the subsequent in-person screening session, and those who had taken less than 80% of the capsules a week later were dropped before randomization. We also verified height and weight at the screening visit.

    2.2.1. Supplement and placebo

    This three-arm parallel group RCT compared responses to (A) 2.496 g/d n-3, (B) 1.25 g/d n-3, and placebo, or (C) placebo. All participants took 6 pills (3 g oil) per day. For the two omega-3 groups, each 500 mg gel capsule contained 347.5 mg eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and 58 mg docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). Thus, for the high dose group the full daily supplement would equal 2085 mg/d of EPA and 348 mg/d of DHA. We chose the 7:1 EPA/DHA balance because of evidence that EPA has relatively stronger anti-inflammatory and antidepressant effects than DHA (Lin et al., 2010; Sijben and Calder, 2007). The placebo was a mixture of palm, olive, soy, canola, and coco butter oils that approximated the saturated:monounsaturated:polyunsaturated (SMP) ratio consumed by US adults, 37:42: 21 (USDA Continuing Survey of Food Intake by Individuals, 1994–1996). OmegaBrite (Waltham, MA) supplied both the n-3 and the matching placebo; all pills were coated with a fuchsia coloring. OmegaBrite added a mild fish flavor to the placebo to help disguise any differences between the n-3 PUFA pills and the placebo, and we told participants about the fish flavoring to promote blindness (Stoll et al., 2001).

    2.3. Health-related behaviors

    Participants’ height and weight were assessed at the screening visit, and participants were weighed during each subsequent visit. At each study visit, participants were evaluated for changes in fatty acid composition of plasma and PBMCs, mood, and proinflammatory cytokines.
    Adipose tissue in the abdomen may secrete up to three times as much IL-6 as other subcutaneous fat tissues (Browning, 2003). Sagittal abdominal diameter measurements provided data on abdominal fat.

    2.7. Sample size

    Sample size was based on detection of conservative effect sizes for the lower dose versus placebo comparisons for the primary outcome of cytokine levels. The literature suggested that the higher dose would have a greater effect, thus we expected the higher dose versus placebo contrast to have more power than low versus pla- cebo. All power analyses were based on contrasts within mixed effect linear models with two-sided alpha = 0.05 and assumed a 10% attrition rate. Our conservative estimated effect size was a decrease in IL-6 of 0.45 pg/mL in the low dose group, extrapolated from results from Ferrucci et al. (2006). Pilot data from our lab provided an estimate of standard deviation of 0.88 pg/mL, thus to achieve 85% power a sample size of 46 in each group was required.

    3.1. Study population, diet, and health behaviors

    Randomized groups were equivalent on key dimensions (Table 1). Randomization produced groups that did not differ on age, baseline FFQ dietary variables, depression, and sleep quality, p > 0.2 for all tests. Using BMI cut points of 25 and 30 kg/m2, 125 (91%) were overweight, and 65 (47%) were obese, respectively. There were small differences between groups on weight at baseline (p=0.002), with the placebo group having the lowest average weight, however there were not significant differences in either sagittal abdominal diameter or BMI (p > 0.05 for both).
    Analyses of FFQ data at the last visit revealed no differences among the groups in reported changes in intake of calories, fiber, total fat, protein, saturated fat, monounsaturated fat, polyunsaturated fat, omega-3 fatty acids, or linoleic acid during the study period, P > .11 for all tests. Similarly, sleep and exercise did not show differential group changes, P > .26 for both. Both the lower and higher n-3 groups had modest but statistically significant increases in weight across the trial (average pounds gained: 2.1 lbs and 2.5 lbs in the two groups, respectively), compared to no change in the placebo group (average pounds gained: 0.39 lbs). However, the increased weight would have theoretically fueled inflammation in this overweight sample which was not observed.
    Few participants reported taking any medication during the study, and the numbers did not differ among groups. The most common medications were multivitamins (n = 42), NSAIDs (n = 29; 15 aspirin, 8 ibuprofen, 5 naproxen, 1 meloxicam), antihistamines (n = 13), estrogen with or without progesterone (n = 10), and levothyroxine (n = 10).

    3.4. Changes in fatty acids

    Baseline levels of plasma fatty acids as well as changes over time for the three groups are summarized in Table 3. As expected, randomization produced groups that did not differ on EPA (p = 0.73), DHA (p = 0.38), or total n-3 (p = 0.41) at baseline. By the end of the study period plasma levels of EPA were approximately 3.5-fold higher in the 1.25 g/d n-3 group and 6-fold higher in the 2.5 g/d n-3 group (P < 0.0001 for both), and plasma DHA levels were approximately 1.4-fold higher in the 1.25 g/d n-3 group and 1.5-fold higher in the 2.5 g/d n-3 group (P < 0.0001 for both). The n-6:n-3 ratio was significantly decreased after supplementa- tion for both low and high dose groups (P < 0.0001 for both).

    3.5. Primary Outcomes

    Results for inflammatory outcomes and depression symptoms are summarized in Table 5. After adjusting for gender and sagittal abdominal diameter, there were significant supplementation effects on cytokines as evidenced by significant group by visit inter- actions for both TNF-α (p = 0.0002) and IL-6 (p = 0.0003). The estimated mean change in log-TNF-α from visit 1 to visit 5 was 0.11 units for the placebo group, corresponding to a 12% increase in the geometric mean of TNF-α. In comparison, the estimated mean change in log-TNF-α was *0.0002 units for the 1.25 g/d and -0.024 for the 2.5 g/d group, corresponding to changes of 0.2% and -2.3%, respectively. After Bonferroni-adjustment, these group differences were significant for the comparison of placebo to 1.25 g/d (p = 0.03) and placebo to 2.5 g/d (p = 0.004); no significant difference was noted between the two supplementation doses (p = 1.0).
    A similar pattern was observed for IL-6. The estimated mean change in log-IL-6 from visit 1 to visit 5 was 0.31 units for the placebo group (36% increase), -0.106 for the 1.25 g/d group (10% decrease), and -0.123 for the 2.5g/d group (12% decrease). Significant differences were observed between placebo and 1.25 g/d (p = 0.0003) and placebo and 2.5 g/d (p = 0.0002), but not between the two doses of fish oil (p = 1.0). To ensure that results were not driven by a small number of highly influential data points, residual plots were examined and one subject in the placebo group who appeared to be an outlier was removed and analyses were rerun. Resulting conclusions were the same and are not shown.
    There did not appear to be group effects on depression (p = 0.86), adjusting for gender. There was a trend toward larger decreases in depression from visit 1 to visit 5 for the two fish oil groups than the placebo, but no differences were statistically significant.

    4.1. Intervention-related reductions in inflammation

    Omega-3 supplementation significantly altered production of serum cytokines. IL-6 decreased by 10% and 12% in our low and high dose n-3 groups, respectively, compared to a 36% increase in the placebo group. Similarly, low and high dose n-3 groups showed modest 0.2% and -2.3% changes in TNF-α, compared to a 12% increase in the control group. This is the first well-powered trial to show significant changes in serum cytokines in healthy middle-aged and older adults.

    4.2. Randomized PUFA trials

    The largely negative serum cytokine data from prior n-3 PUFA trials have led to the suggestion that cytokine production is relatively insensitive to the n-3 PUFAs among healthy individuals, i.e., people who do not have chronic inflammatory diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease, rheumatoid arthritis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or diabetes (Sijben and Calder, 2007; Wu, 2004). However, there are several notable differences between our study and prior RCTs. We carefully assessed variables known to influence inflammation including smoking, medication use, physical activity, and abdominal adiposity. We had minimal attrition; only 5 of our 138 subjects failed to complete the full trial. Our rigorous exclusion criteria produced a group of overweight sedentary adults who were more likely to have an inflammatory profile and who were otherwise healthy aside from their weight.
    [ . . . ]
    In prior work from our laboratory, 68 medical students received either 2.5 g/d n-3 or a placebo for 12 weeks (Kiecolt-Glaser et al., 2011). Compared to controls, those students who received n-3 showed a 14% decrease in lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulated IL- 6 production. Planned secondary analyses that used the plasma n-6:n-3 ratio in place of treatment group showed that decreasing n-6:n-3 ratios led to reductions in stimulated IL-6 and TNF-α production, as well as marginal differences in serum TNF-α. The absence of significant serum inflammatory changes was likely related to the very low baseline levels of serum cytokines in the healthy, young, and relatively thin population.

    4.3. Dosage and risks

    Neither our IL-6 nor our TNF-α data showed significant differences between our 1.25 and 2.5 g/d n-3 dose, although both clearly differed from the placebo. One review concluded that while the effects were inconsistent, it appeared that significant changes in cytokine production by lymphocytes only occurred with P2.0 g/d of EPA + DHA (Sijben and Calder, 2007). In addition, variables such as typical dietary intake influence responses (Yee et al., 2010), and our sample had a higher than expected average n-6:n-3 ratio at baseline, as described earlier. The FDA has concluded that intakes of up to 3 g/d of marine n-3 PUFAs are ‘‘Generally Recognized As Safe’’ (Kris-Etherton et al., 2002); our higher dose, 2.5 g/d, fell within that range and would appear to be a good choice for future studies.
    Side effects were infrequent and did not differ between groups. These data are in accord with the low incidence reported in large n-3 PUFA studies (Leaf et al., 1994; Valagussa et al., 1999).

    4.4. Health implications

    Several large studies have linked higher n-3 PUFA levels with lower all-cause mortality (Lee et al., 2009; Pottala et al., 2010), including a large 3.5 year trial (Marchioli et al., 2002). The n-3 PUFA’s anti-inflammatory properties provide one obvious pathway for these reductions in mortality. Inflammation is a robust and reli- able predictor of all-cause mortality in older adults (Pedersen and Febbraio, 2008). Chronic inflammation has been linked to a spec- trum of health problems including depression, cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis, cancer, and arthritis (Pedersen and Febbraio, 2008). In fact, more globally, chronic inflammation has been suggested as one key biological mechanism that may fuel declines in physical function leading to frailty, disability, and, ultimately, death.
    _______________________ 

    Related paper of a previous study by the same group:

    - Kiecolt-Glaser JK et al. Omega-3 supplementation lowers inflammation and anxiety in medical students: a randomized controlled trial. Brain Behav Immun (2011) vol. 25 (8) pp. 1725-34
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21784145 
    linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0889-1591(11)00468-5 
    sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889159111004685 
    _______________________ 

    Related information available at MedLine Plus:

    nlm.nih.gov - Fish Oil
    Retrieved on October 3, 2012
    nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/druginfo/natural/993.html 

    Excerpt of interest:

    How effective is it?
    Natural Medicines Comprehensive Database rates effectiveness based on scientific evidence according to the following scale: Effective, Likely Effective, Possibly Effective, Possibly Ineffective, Likely Ineffective, Ineffective, and Insufficient Evidence to Rate.

    The effectiveness ratings for FISH OIL are as follows:

    Effective for...

    - High triglycerides. High triglycerides are associated with heart disease and untreated diabetes. To reduce the risk of heart disease, doctors believe it is important to keep triglycerides below a certain level. Doctors usually recommend increasing physical activity and restricting dietary fat to lower triglycerides. Sometimes they also prescribe drugs such as gemfibrozil (Lopid) for use in addition to these lifestyle changes. Now researchers believe that fish oil, though not as effective as gemfibrozil, can reduce triglyceride levels by 20% to 50%. One particular fish oil supplement called Lovaza has been approved by the FDA to lower triglycerides. Lovaza contains 465 milligrams of EP and 375 milligrams of DHA in 1-gram capsules.

    Likely effective for...

    - Heart disease. Research suggests that consuming fish oil by eating fish can be effective for keeping people with healthy hearts free of heart disease. People who already have heart disease might also be able to lower their risk of dying from heart disease by eating fish or taking a fish oil supplement. However, for people who already take heart medications such as a “statin,” adding on fish oil might not offer any additional benefit.

    Possibly effective for...

    - High blood pressure. Fish oil seems to produce modest reductions in blood pressure in people with high blood pressure. The omega-3 fatty acids in fish oil seem to be able to expand blood vessels, and this brings blood pressure down.
    - Rheumatoid arthritis. Fish oil alone, or in combination with the drug naproxen (Naprosyn), seems to help people with rheumatoid arthritis get over morning stiffness faster. People who take fish oil can sometimes reduce their use of pain medications such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).
    - Menstrual pain (dysmenorrhea). Taking fish oil alone or in combination with vitamin B12 seems to improve painful periods and reduce the need for pain medications such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).
    - Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children. Taking fish oil seems to improve thinking skills and behavior in 8 to 12 year-old children with ADHD.
    - Raynaud’s syndrome. There’s some evidence that taking fish oil can improve cold tolerance in some people with the usual form of Raynaud’s syndrome. But people with Raynaud’s syndrome caused by a condition called progressive systemic sclerosis don’t seem to benefit from fish oil supplements.
    - Stroke. Moderate fish consumption (once or twice a week) seems to lower the risk of having a stroke by as much as 27%. However, eating fish doesn’t lower stroke risk in people who are already taking aspirin for prevention. On the other hand, very high fish consumption (more than 46 grams of fish per day) seems to increase stroke risk, perhaps even double it.
    - Weak bones (osteoporosis). Taking fish oil alone or in combination with calcium and evening primrose oil seems to slow bone loss rate and increase bone density at the thigh bone (femur) and spine in elderly people with osteoporosis.
    - Hardening of the arteries (atherosclerosis). Fish oil seems to slow or slightly reverse the progress of atherosclerosis in the arteries serving the heart (coronary arteries), but not in the arteries that bring blood up the neck to the head (carotid arteries).
    - Kidney problems. Long-term use (two years) of fish oil 4-8 grams daily can slow the loss of kidney function in high-risk patients with a kidney disease called IgA nephropathy. Fish oil also seems to reduce the amount of protein in the urine of people who have kidney disease as a result of diabetes.
    - Bipolar disorder. Taking fish oil with the usual treatments for bipolar disorder seems to improve symptoms of depression and increase the length of time between episodes of depression. But fish oil doesn’t seem to improve manic symptoms in people with bipolar disorder.
    - Psychosis. Taking a fish oil supplement might help prevent full psychotic illness from developing in people with mild symptoms. This has only been tested in teenagers and adults up to age 25.
    - Weight loss. Some evidence shows that eating fish improves weight loss and decreases blood sugar in overweight people and people with high blood pressure. Preliminary research also shows that taking a specific fish oil supplement 6 grams daily (Hi-DHA, NuMega), providing 260 mg DHA/gram and 60 mg EPA/gram, significantly decreases body fat when combined with exercise.
    - Endometrial cancer. There is some evidence that women who regularly eat about two servings of fatty fish per week have a reduced risk of developing endometrial cancer.
    - Age-related eye disease (age-related macular degeneration, AMD). There is some evidence that people who eat fish more than once per week have a lower risk of developing age-related macular degeneration.
    - Reducing the risk of blood vessel re-blockage after heart bypass surgery or “balloon” catheterization (balloon angioplasty). Fish oil appears to decrease the rate of re-blockage up to 26% when given for one month before the procedure and continued for one month thereafter. Apparently, taking fish oil before surgery is important. When taken for less than one month before angioplasty, fish oil doesn’t help protect the blood vessel against closing down.
    - Recurrent miscarriage in pregnant women with antiphospholipid syndrome. Taking fish oil seems to prevent miscarriage and increase live birth rate in pregnant women with a condition called antiphospholipid syndrome.
    - High blood pressure and kidney problems after heart transplant. Taking fish oil seems to preserve kidney function and reduce the long-term continuous rise in blood pressure after heart transplantation.
    - Damage to the kidneys and high blood pressure caused by taking a drug called cyclosporine. Cyclosporine is a medication that reduces the chance of organ rejection after an organ transplant. Fish oil might help reduce some of the unwanted side effects of treatment with this drug.
    - Movement disorder in children (dyspraxia). Taking fish oil orally, in combination with evening primrose oil, thyme oil, and vitamin E (Efalex, Efamol Ltd), seems to improve movement disorders in children with dyspraxia.
    - Developmental coordination disorder. A combination of fish oil (80%) and evening primrose oil (20%) seems to improve reading, spelling, and behavior when given to children age 5-12 years with developmental coordination disorder. However, it doesn’t seem to improve motor skills.
    - Preventing blockage of grafts used in kidney dialysis. Taking fish oil orally seems to help prevent clot formation in hemodialysis grafts.
    - Psoriasis. There is some evidence that administering fish oil intravenously (by IV) can decrease severe psoriasis symptoms. But taking fish oil by mouth doesn’t seem to have any effect on psoriasis.
    - High cholesterol. There is interest in using fish oil in combination with “statin” drugs for some people with high cholesterol. Doctors were worried at first that taking fish oil might interfere with statin treatment, but early studies show this is not a problem, at least with the statin called simvastatin. Scientists think fish oil may lower cholesterol by keeping it from being absorbed in the intestine. There is some evidence that using vitamin B12 along with fish oil might boost their ability to lower cholesterol.
    - Coronary artery bypass surgery. Taking fish oil seems to prevent coronary artery bypass grafts from re-closing following coronary artery bypass surgery.
    - Cancer-related weight loss. Taking a high dose (7.5 grams per day) of fish oil seems to slow weight loss in some cancer patients. Some researchers believe these patients eat more because the fish oil is fighting depression and improving their mood.
    - Asthma. Some research suggests fish oil may lower the occurrence of asthma in infants and children when taken by women late in pregnancy. Furthermore, fish oil seems to improve airflow, reduce cough, and lower the need for medications in some children with asthma. However, fish oil treatment doesn’t seem to provide the same benefit for adults.

    Possibly ineffective for...

    - Chest pain (angina).
    - Gum infection (gingivitis).
    - Liver disease.
    - Leg pain due to blood flow problems (claudication).
    - Preventing migraine headaches.
    - Preventing muscle soreness caused by physical exercise.
    - Breast pain.
    - Skin rashes caused by allergic reactions.
    - Stomach ulcers.

    Likely ineffective for...

    - Type 2 diabetes. Taking fish oil doesn’t seem to lower blood sugar in people with type 2 diabetes. However, fish oil can provide some other benefits for people with diabetes, such as lowering blood fats called triglycerides.
    [ . . . ]

    nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/druginfo/natural/993.html#Effectiveness 
    _______________________ 

    Links to other science news outlets:
    sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/10/121001140957.htm 
    medicalxpress.com/news/2012-10-omega-supplements-biological-effect-aging.html 
    esciencenews.com/articles/2012/10/01/omega.3.supplements.may.slow.a.biological.effect.aging 
    scienceblog.com/56909/omega-3-supplements-may-slow-a-biological-effect-of-aging 
    _______________________ 

    URL related G+ posts: plus.google.com/102370347732140106252/posts/C9p4AJG2xtY 
    plus.google.com/105903603302602842440/posts/fuEu9ixJx7S 
    plus.google.com/117029437254252483108/posts/7BvUQpWDxx9 
    _______________________ 
  • 4 plusses - 2 comments - 1 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-09-05 16:47:57
    carrotmuseum.co.uk - World Carrot Museum
    1996-2012

    Comment:
    Compulsive carrot-eaters like me or people interested in learning about why we eat what we eat and what alternative foods are available will probably find this website appealing and useful.

    Recommended sections:

    - History of the carrot:
    carrotmuseum.co.uk/history.html 
    carrotmuseum.co.uk/history1.html 
    carrotmuseum.co.uk/history2.html 
    carrotmuseum.co.uk/history3.html 
    carrotmuseum.co.uk/history6.html 
    carrotmuseum.co.uk/history4.html 
    carrotmuseum.co.uk/history5.html 

    - Ancient illustrations: 
    carrotmuseum.co.uk/manuscripts.html 

    - The carrot today: 
    carrotmuseum.co.uk/today.html 

    - Pigments: 
    carrotmuseum.co.uk/carrotcolours.html 

    - Wild carrot: 
    "WARNING - Please do not attempt to use these recipes and methods if you cannot positively identify and distinguish Queen Anne's Lace from poison Hemlock, as Hemlock is extremely poisonous and looks very similar."
    carrotmuseum.co.uk/queen.html 

    - Cultivation: 
    carrotmuseum.co.uk/cultivation.html 
    ______________________ 
  • 4 plusses - 2 comments - 1 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-09-18 23:31:19
    examiner.com - New polls show unusual staying power for Gary Johnson
    By Matthew Reece. September 15, 2012

    Van Rooyen Sep 17, 2012
    "We are not withholding our votes from the GOP. Our votes do not belong to the Republican Party. They are ours to do with as we please. But, you do bring up some interesting questions about our votes.

    Why do people vote?
    Do they think one single vote counts?
    Do they really believe they personally are going to sway the election?

    No, of course not.

    Voting is an act of expression, a way to tell the world the type of person you are and what ideals you hold dear. Probably we will not win in 2012 but we can show the two party establishment how many are disenchanted by this duopoly. We can show them that no matter how they oppress us, either the RNC or the DNC, we will not be swayed to participate in their two party systems.

    If we cannot go through them we WILL go around.
    It has and will take time, but we will arrive in the place we have envisioned non-the-less."

    Matthew Reece ·  Top Commenter · UNC Wilmington Sep 18, 2012
    "Gary Johnson could do better than Ross Perot. About 18% of the electorate are supporting Mitt Romney only because they want to vote for the person who can beat Obama. If it becomes clear that Romney has no chance of winning, then those people are up for grabs. This could be the difference between Johnson getting 6% and Johnson getting 24%."
    _________________________________ 

    examiner.com - Interview with Barbara Howe, Part 2
    By Matthew Reece. August 24, 2012

    Matthew Reece: Last question. What do you say to voters who are leaning toward Pat McCrory or Walter Dalton, but have not made up their minds?

    Barbara Howe: One of the arguments we get as Libertarians is “Well, if I vote for you, I'm going to waste my vote because one of those other guys is going to win. So I've got to keep Walter Dalton from winning so I've got to vote for Pat McCrory, or I've got to keep Pat McCrory from winning so I've got to vote for Walter Dalton.” You've only got one vote. One vote. And no gubernatorial election has ever been decided by one vote. You have to cast your vote for the person you really want to win. If you're voting for Dalton or McCrory because you don't want the other guy to win, they're not going to know that's why you cast [your] vote. They're going to think its an endorsement of what they believe. So cast your vote for the person you really want to win. I hope its me. If its not me, I'll accept that. But don't cast your vote because you're afraid of a wasted vote.
    examiner.com/article/interview-with-barbara-howe-part-2 

    Related articles:

    examiner.com - Interview with Gov. Gary Johnson, Part 1
    By Matthew Reece. July 22, 2012
    examiner.com/article/interview-with-gov-gary-johnson-part-1 

    examiner.com - Interview with Gov. Gary Johnson, Part 2
    By Matthew Reece. July 25, 2012
    examiner.com/article/interview-with-gov-gary-johnson-part-2 

    examiner.com - Interview with Barbara Howe, Part 1
    By Matthew Reece. August 23, 2012
    examiner.com/article/interview-with-barbara-howe-part-1 

    examiner.com - Interview with Barbara Howe, Part 2
    By Matthew Reece. August 24, 2012
    examiner.com/article/interview-with-barbara-howe-part-2 
    _________________________________ 

    via +Sam Vekemans 
    URL via G+ post: 
    plus.google.com/117921658240148036148/posts/9SaLDT189jq 
    URL source G+ post: 
    plus.google.com/113147028533760993635/posts/aaRR9ecQq9W _________________________________ 
  • 2 plusses - 0 comments - 3 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-08-15 10:01:14
    RESHARE:
    plus.google.com - Libertarian Candidate for President Gary Johnson on the Issues One by One
    Uploaded by Cole Cummings. August 14, 2012

    Disclaimer:
    I don't agree 100% on all the issues. I don't care late abortions. I would legalize any drug no matter how harmful it may be, with the only exception of fraudulent sale, incorrect description of the product (e.g., in the concentration of active compounds) and adulteration with unidentified substances. I do agree with the flat consumption tax (plus other opt-in fees for public services) but not with the flat income tax (unless it's 0%). I prefer Ron Paul's more cautious stance on Climate Change. In any case, any potential intervention should be taken voluntarily at the individual/nongovernmental level. I also like Ron Paul's proposal to allow the introduction of other kind of currency (e.g., gold, silver) in the market to compete with fiat money. 
    I would have liked he had proposed the repeal of laws protecting intellectual property rights but I guess this would have been a too big leap forward for any politician who would be afraid to frighten many of his or her potential voters.
    Overall, Gary Johnson's position on these issues is much more libertarian than any other presidential candidate in the US and probably anywhere else.

    Reshared text:
    Libertarian Candidate for President Gary Johnson on the issues one by one:

    ABORTION
    Governor Johnson states that he supports the right of a woman to choose up to viability of the fetus. He opposes late term or partial birth abortion and signed legislation as governor outlawing the procedure in New Mexico. He has stated multiple times that he supports parental notification laws and counseling. He has also stated that he opposes government funding for abortions. These beliefs were stated in the South Carolina debate and in a CSPAN interview during the presidential campaign.

    CHINA
    Governor Johnson does not view China's policies on trade or currency as a threat to the United States. He opposes US government interference in the market to offset Chinese government involvement in trade and subsidies. Ultimately, he beilieves that Chinese government intervention will only affect China negatively in the future.

    CIVIL LIBERTY
    Governor Johnson and the Libertarian party are strong proponents of civil liberties. However, Governor Johnson and the party define the term "civil liberty" on very broad terms. It is true that Governor Johnson opposes easdropping, opposes torture, opposes detainment without arrest of foreign nationals and US citizens, supports the repeal or sunsetting of the PATRIOT Act, and supports repealing the detention measures of the NDAA.

    DEFICITS & DEBT
    In a Fox News / Google debate, Governor Johnson promised that if elected he would submit a balanced budget to congress in the year 2013, and to veto legislation where expenditures exceed revenue. As proof of this promise, he noted that he vetoed more bills than any governor in the history of the United States while in that office. He continued by stating that he would advocate for throwing out the entire federal tax system and replacing it with a consumption tax, the fair tax.

    EDUCATION
    Governor Johnson is a strong supporter of school choice and returning control of education to the state, local agencies, and parents. Governor Johnson asserts that the diversity of choice created by allowing parents to decide where their children will attend school will allow the free market to foster better education tools and results.

    ENERGY
    Governor Johnson advocates for a free market approach to energy and and a complete removal of government from the energy sector of the economy. This includes ending subsidies to ethanol and other alternative energy markets as well as special incentives to oil, gas and other established forms of energy.

    With respect to global warming, Governor Johnson has stated at a campaign event in 2010 that even if man made global-warming was a given, the effects are grossly exaggerated and the amount of money being spent is misguided.

    FOREIGN POLICY
    Governor Johnson advocates for a foreign policy based upon bringing the troops home from Iraq, Afghanistan, and numerous other bases and leading by example. Part of this belief is based upon the view that the US should simply not be involved in nation building and part is based upon economic realities within the US.

    During the 2012 Presidential campaign, Governor Johnson put out a commercial entitled "Peace is Cheaper." The two minute video stated that Democrats and Republicans are two sides of the same coin, Thelma and Loise driving the country off the cliff. The video states that peace is simply cheaper than war and asks the people to elect peace.

    GAY MARRIAGE
    Governor Johnson has a libertarian viewpoint on marriage. He does not believe that government should be involved in marriage, and that all couples should on level ground with respect to the government. Recently, Governor Johnson has acknowledged that government simply will not remove itself from marriage and that he therefore supported marriage equality.

    HEALTHCARE
    Governor Johnson supports a free market approach to health care. He is opposed to government control of the health care market and would seek to severly limit the intrusion of government into the health care market.

    ILLEGAL DRUGS
    Governor Johnson supports the full legalization of marijuana to bring the industry into the light and to add a source of revenue to the government instead of fighting a losing war on drugs that utilizes resources in an effort to lock up people whose only fault is that they are addicted to drugs. In describing this move, Governor Johnson states that we should enact sentencing reform, supply treatment on demand, and enact honest drug education for our children. He supports heroin maintenance and other harm reduction measures and states that this is a move from a criminal to a medical model of dealing with drug usage.

    IMMIGRATION
    Governor Johnson believes in open borders and amnesty for illegal aliens. He has stated that the border should be dealt with on a free market basis to make it as easy as possible to come to the US and start working. This is based on the libertarian viewpoint that each person has the right to seek out employment and that markets will function best to establish workforces and people will react to those markets.

    INTERNET FREEDOM
    In January of 2012, Governor Johnson's campaign website was blacked out along with a number of other popular websites including wikipedia in protest of SOPA and PIPA type legislation. This story was reported by reason.com, which shows the text that was given on the campaign site and the image that was shown.

    SOCIAL SECURITY
    Governor Johnson has stated that reforming social security is a necessity. One of the items that Governor proposes is to change the method of calculating the "escalator," or the cost of living increase from being based on wage growth to being based on inflation. He states that this will more properly reflect the realities of a dollar with a declining purchasing power.

    TARP
    Governor Johnson has stated that he would have opposed the TARP program. He notes that the involvement of Henry Paulson in the bailouts of certain companies amounts to an inside job.

    TAXES
    Governor Johnson has stated that the U.S. tax system imposes an enormous toll on productivity through high marginal rates, absurd complexity, loopholes for the well connected, and incentives for wasteful decisions.

    Governor Johnson also supports the Fair Tax as a mechanism to solve a number of issues. One of these issues is immigration whereas illegal aliens cannot avoid paying a consumption tax. Another area is corporate loopholes where corporations cannot find loopholes for a law that does not have any. However, Governor Johnson has also stated that he is not hanging his hat on the fair tax in that the tax system can be altered without moving to a consumption tax.

    Eliminate punitive taxation of savings and investment
    Simplify the tax code; stop using it to reward special interests and control behavior
    Adopt a flat tax on income or consumption
    End the corporate tax rate

    THE CONSTITUTION
    We believe that the Constitution should be interpreted according to its original meaning. After great deliberation, the Founders clearly based the blueprint for our government on the fundamental idea that there must be strict constraints on Federal power — an idea from which we have strayed much too far. We believe that the proper balance needs to be restored between the different branches of government. This includes the rights of states.

    THE ECONOMY
    Governor Johnson is a strong supporter of removing the governemnt as much as possible from the economy and allowing the free markets to act. He opposes a keynesian economic model where government provides tax breaks and subsisdies to certain industries.

    THE PAUL RYAN PLAN
    Gary Johnson: "As president I would sign the plan into law, because it does move forward on the issue. But I think it doesn’t go far enough.

    I hate to use the word cut, because somehow that implies hardship. But I believe there would be best practices that emerge that would allow us to do that and still live within our means.

    I'm in the camp that believes we’re on the verge of a financial collapse, because there’s just no repaying 14 trillion dollars in debt with a $1.65 trillion dollar deficit going forward.

    So if the Paul Ryan Medicare plan is the best that comes out of Congress, yes, I would sign that. But could Congress do better? Yes, and that’s what I would advocate."

    THE WAR IN AFGHANISTAN
    Governor Johnson has stated that he supported the initial invasion of Afghanitan, but that the objectives there were accomplished six months after the invasion. He supports the immediate removal of troops from Afghanistan. 
  • 1 plusses - 8 comments - 0 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-10-07 02:37:51
    RESHARE:
    news.discovery.com - Ancient Fortress Found in Spain
    By Rossella Lorenzi. October 2, 2012

    Dating: ≈ 2,200 B.C.
    Archeological site: La Bastida de Totana (Totana, Murcia)
    es.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Bastida_de_Totana 

    Excerpt:
    <<structure with 4,200-year-old outer walls and six pyramid-shaped towers>>
    <<built with large stones and lime mortar and consisted of 10-foot-thick walls that were once 22 feet high and imposing pyramid-based towers.>>

    <<unearthed ‬six towers along a length of‭ ‬230 feet,‭ although‬ the full perimeter of the fortification measured about 1,000 feet.>>
    <<The entrance to the enclosure consisted of a passageway built with strong walls and large doors at the end,‭ ‬held shut with thick wooden beams.‭>>

    <<One of the most relevant elements of the discovery was the secondary door, located near the main entrance.‭ ‬
    The door's arch is in very good conditions and is the first one to be found in prehistoric Europe.>>

    <<Protecting a city located on top of a hill and extending over ‭‬10 acres, the fortress was designed‭ ‬by people experienced in fighting methods>>
    <<The model is typical of ancient Mediterranean civilizations, including the second city of Troy in Turkey, and the urban world of the Middle East‭ (‬Palestine,‭ ‬Israel and Jordan‭)‬.>>

    <<the fortress contained unique military features. For example, the lime mortar offered exceptional solidity to the construction,‭ ‬strongly holding the stones and making the wall impermeable,‭ ‬as well as eliminating any elements attackers could hold on to.‭
    The postern gate,‭ ‬as a hidden and covered entrance,‭ ‬demanded great planning of the defensive structure as a whole and of the correct engineering technique to fit it perfectly into the wall.‭>>‭

    <<Previous excavations had already revealed the existence of a pool capable of storing over 100,000 gallons, and large houses and public buildings which were alternated with smaller constructions,‭ ‬all separated by entries,‭ ‬passageways and squares.‭>>
    <<La Bastida will be fully excavated with the aim of transforming it into an open archaeological park that will include a monographic museum and a research and documentation center.>>

    Photos: -- Frontal view of the fortification, with several of the walls and the towers visible. Credit: ASOME-UAB.
    -- Detail of the eastern part of the wall with square towers (right), monumental entrance (centre) and postern (bottom left, signalled with an arrow).Credit: ASOME-UAB.
    _______________________ 

    URL source G+ post: plus.google.com/106599561297571136878/posts/XiDwgyqpUQH 
    _______________________ 

    Reshared text:
    4,200 year old fortress being unearthed in Spain- La BasTida de Totana

    Like most fortresses in Europe, this one reflects the level of concern the builders must have had towards invaders... it is clear to me that they did not want to take any chances.

    "-consisted of 10-foot-thick walls that were once 22 feet high"
    "- six towers along a length of‭ ‬230 feet,"
    "-full perimeter of the fortification measured about 1,000 feet."

    "It was not until some‭ ‬400‭ ‬to‭ ‬800‭ ‬years later that civilizations like the Hittites and Mycenaeans,‭ ‬or city-states such as Ugarit,‭ ‬incorporated the innovative methods seen at La Basida"
  • 3 plusses - 3 comments - 1 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2013-05-19 20:44:53
    RESHARE:
    memegenerator.net - You're under Arrest!

    You're under arrest!
    For resisting arrest!

    #Kokesh   #adamkokesh  

    Reshared text:
  • 5 plusses - 0 comments - 1 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-11-01 02:51:49
    RESHARE:
    sciencedaily.com - Exhaustive Family Tree for Birds Shows Recent, Rapid Diversification
    October 31, 2012

    Comment: Where did they get that this was study was made by a Yale-led scientific team?
    It's amazing that they collected DNA samples from individuals of so many species. I guess they didn't bother to collect more than one sample from groups of very closely related species

    Reference:
    - Jetz W et al. The global diversity of birds in space and time. Nature doi:10.1038/nature11631, October 31, 2012
    nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nature11631.html 

    Supplementary Information (2.3M) [ open access ] (40 pages)
    This file comprises 1) Supplementary Methods, which include Figures 1-5 and Tables 1-3; 2) a Supplementary Discussion, which includes Figures 1-7 and Table 1; 3) an Inventory of the zipped Supplementary Data Files (see separate file); and 4) Supplementary References.
    nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/extref/nature11631-s1.pdf 

    Supplementary Data (1.9M)  [ open access ]
    This zipped file contains the Supplementary Data files - see Supplementary Information file (pg 32) for details.
    nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/extref/nature11631-s2.zip 

    ABSTRACT
    [ . . . ]
    <<Here we present, analyse and map the first complete dated phylogeny of all 9,993 extant species of birds, a widely studied group showing many unique adaptations. We find that birds have undergone a strong increase in diversification rate from about 50 million years ago to the near present. This acceleration is due to a number of significant rate increases, both within songbirds and within other young and mostly temperate radiations including the waterfowl, gulls and woodpeckers. Importantly, species characterized with very high past diversification rates are interspersed throughout the avian tree and across geographic space. Geographically, the major differences in diversification rates are hemispheric rather than latitudinal, with bird assemblages in Asia, North America and southern South America containing a disproportionate number of species from recent rapid radiations. The contribution of rapidly radiating lineages to both temporal diversification dynamics and spatial distributions of species diversity illustrates the benefits of an inclusive geographical and taxonomical perspective.>>
    [ . . . ]

    These authors contributed equally to this work.
    W. Jetz, G. H. Thomas & J. B. Joy

    Affiliations
    Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, 165 Prospect Street, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8106, USA
    W. Jetz
    Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK
    G. H. Thomas
    Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, British Columbia V5A 1S6, Canada
    J. B. Joy & A. O. Mooers
    Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 49, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia
    K. Hartmann

    Contributions
    W.J., A.O.M., and G.H.T. conceived of the study; K.H., W.J., J.B.J., A.O.M. and G.H.T. developed the methods; W.J., J.B.J. and G.H.T. collected the data; W.J., J.B.J. and G.H.T. conducted the analyses; W.J., J.B.J., A.O.M. and G.H.T. wrote the paper. W.J., J.B.J, G.H.T. and A.O.M. contributed equally to the study.
    _______________ 

    Related webpages:

    pan-aves.blogspot.com - Pan-Aves
    http://pan-aves.blogspot.com 

    news.sciencemag.org - ScienceShot: A Tree for All Birds
    By Elizabeth Pennisi. October 31, 2012
    news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2012/10/scienceshot-a-tree-for-all-birds.html 

    From here:

    <<A Yale-led scientific team has produced the most comprehensive family tree for birds to date, connecting all living bird species — nearly 10,000 in total — and revealing surprising new details about their evolutionary history and its geographic context.>>

    news.yale.edu - Exhaustive family tree for birds shows recent, rapid diversification
    By Eric Gershon. 31 October 2012
    news.yale.edu/2012/10/31/exhaustive-family-tree-birds-shows-recent-rapid-diversification 

    Obviously it's inaccurate.

    yale.edu/jetz - Jetz Lab
    _Global Biodiversity, Ecology & Conservation
    of Terrestrial Vertebrates_

    via +mary Zeman 
    URL via G+ post: plus.google.com/116127033078839124702/posts/DRQksCi3nCp 
    _____________ 

    Reshared text:
    Exhaustive Family Tree for Birds Shows Recent, Rapid Diversification
    A Yale-led scientific team has produced the most comprehensive family tree for birds to date, connecting all living bird species -- nearly 10,000 in total -- and revealing surprising new details about their evolutionary history and its geographic context.
    Analysis of the family tree shows when and where birds diversified -- and that birds' diversification rate has increased over the last 50 million years, challenging the conventional wisdom of biodiversity experts.
    "It's the first time that we have -- for such a large group of species and with such a high degree of confidence -- the full global picture of diversification in time and space," said biologist Walter Jetz of Yale, lead author of the team's research paper, published Oct. 31 online in the journal Nature.
    He continued: "The research highlights how heterogeneously fast diversifying species groups are distributed throughout the family tree and over geographic space. Many parts of the globe have seen a variety of species groups diversify rapidly and recently. All this leads to a diversification rate in birds that has been increasing over the past 50 million years."
    The researchers relied heavily on fossil and DNA data, combining them with geographical information to produce the exhaustive family tree, which includes 9,993 species known to be alive now.
    "The current zeitgeist in biodiversity science is that the world can fill up quickly," says biologist and co-author Arne Mooers of Simon Fraser University in Canada. "A new distinctive group, like bumblebees or tunafish, first evolves, and, if conditions are right, it quickly radiates to produce a large number of species. These species fill up all the available niches, and then there is nowhere to go. Extinction catches up, and things begin to slow down or stall. For birds the pattern is the opposite: Speciation is actually speeding up, not slowing down."
    The researchers attribute the growing rate of avian diversity to an abundance of group-specific adaptations. They hypothesize that the evolution of physical or behavioral innovations in certain groups, combined with the opening of new habitats, has enabled repeated bursts of diversification. Another likely factor has been birds' exceptional mobility, researchers said, which time and again has allowed them to colonize new regions and exploit novel ecological opportunities.
    In their analysis, the researchers also expose significant geographic differences in diversification rates. They are higher in the Western Hemisphere than in the Eastern, and higher on islands than mainlands. But surprisingly, they said, there is little difference in rates between the tropics and high latitudes. Regions of especially intense recent diversification include northern North American and Eurasia and southern South America.
    "This was one of the big surprises," Jetz said. "For a long time biologists have thought that the vast diversity of tropical species must at least partly be due to greater rates of net species production there. For birds we find no support for this, and groups with fast and slow diversification appear to occur there as much as in the high latitudes. Instead, the answer may lie in the tropics' older age, leading to a greater accumulation of species over time. Global phylogenies like ours will allow further tests of this and other basic hypotheses about life on Earth."
    Other authors are G.H. Thomas of the University of Bristol in the United Kingdom; J.B. Joy of Simon Fraser University in Canada; and K. Hartmann of the University of Tasmania in Australia.
    The work was supported by the National Science Foundation, NASA, the Natural Environment Research Council (U.K), the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Simon Fraser University, and the Yale Institute of Biospheric Studies.
  • 5 plusses - 0 comments - 1 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-10-10 21:59:40
    nature.com - DNA has a 521-year half-life
    By Matt Kaplan. 10 October 2012

    <<The bones, which were between 600 and 8,000 years old, had been recovered from three sites within 5 kilometres of each other, with nearly identical preservation conditions including a temperature of 13.1 ºC.>> [...] <<By comparing the specimens' ages and degrees of DNA degradation, the researchers calculated that DNA has a half-life of 521 years>>

    Comment:
    So it has a 521-year half life under those particular conditions. Unlike radioactive isotopes, DNA decay heavily depend on environmental conditions.

    Also, they assume that the DNA can't be preserved much longer in other organisms such as in bacterial spores or or virus protein inclusions (e.g., polyhedrin crystals/polyhedra) under favorable conditions (dehydration, lower exposure to radiation, stable surrounding environment).

    I remember a recent announcement of a lyophilized "live" virus vaccine that unlike other live vaccine it doesn't need refrigeration to remain effective, what indicates that the absence of water can significantly extend the period of time during which the DNA remains functional in absence of DNA repair enzymes.

    There have been some claims to have revived some bacterial spores after million of years in suspended animation (extremescience.com/oldest-living-thing.htm), their ancient age is disputed, though (see references below). But even if none of those cases are actually ancient microorganisms it doesn't necessary mean they can't exist.
    ________________ 

    Excerpt from related paper:

    <<There are many arguments against the possibility of very long-term survival. Hydrolysis and oxidation of DNA occur in cells and if energy is not available for repair, then DNA will degrade over several thousand years, largely through depurination (Lindahl 1993). However, high salt concentration markedly reduces the rate of depurination (Lindahl 1993) and significantly protects RNA from heat inactivation (Tehei et al. 2002). Haloarchaea have an intracellular KCl concentration of 4–5 M and would be particularly at risk from ionizing radiation from 40K, although calculations based on Sneath (1962) suggest that a lethal dose would not be generated even over at least 10^9 years (Grant et al. 1998b). Haloarchaea do not form resting stages like endospores, which are known to survive for some thousands of years in a profoundly dehydrated state, largely excluding oxygen (Nicholson et al. 2000). Haloarchaea may nevertheless be good candidates for long-term suspended animation, in that high levels of ions in the environment may generate conditions for macro- molecules akin to dehydration, plus producing low oxygen concentration.>> (Grant 2004)
    ________________ 

    Reference paper:

    - Allentoft ME et al. The half-life of DNA in bone: measuring decay kinetics in 158 dated fossils. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences (2012), published online.
    rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/early/2012/10/05/rspb.2012.1745 
    ________________ 

    Related papers: (all open access)

    - Graur D and Pupko T. The Permian bacterium that isn't. Mol Biol Evol (2001) vol. 18 (6) pp. 1143-6
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11371604 
    mbe.oxfordjournals.org/content/18/6/1143.long 

    - Maughan H et al. The paradox of the "ancient" bacterium which contains "modern" protein-coding genes. Mol Biol Evol (2002) vol. 19 (9) pp. 1637-9
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12200492 
    mbe.oxfordjournals.org/content/19/9/1637.full 

    - Grant WD. Life at low water activity. Philos Trans R Soc Lond, B, Biol Sci (2004) vol. 359 (1448) pp. 1249-66; discussion 1266-7
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15306380 
    rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/359/1448/1249 
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1693405 

    - Willerslev E and Hebsgaard MB. New evidence for 250 Ma age of halotolerant bacterium from a Permian salt crystal: Comment and reply. Geology (2005) vol. 33 (1) pp. e93-e93
    geology.gsapubs.org/content/33/1/e93.1.full 

    - Willerslev E and Cooper A. Ancient DNA. Proc Biol Sci (2005) vol. 272 (1558) pp. 3-16
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15875564 
    rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/272/1558/3.long 
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1634942 
    ________________ 

    Related website pages:

    - Keller, Elizabeth. Oldest Living Organism: Ancient Bacteria Bacillus permians. Extreme Science
    extremescience.com/oldest-living-thing.htm 

    - List of long-living organisms; 2. Revived into activity after stasis. Wikipedia in English
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_long-living_organisms#Revived_into_activity_after_stasis 

    - Longevity; 7. Non-human biological longevity. Wikipedia in English
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longevity#Non-human_biological_longevity 

    - Ancient DNA. Wikipedia in English
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_DNA 
    ________________ 

    via +Rebecca Spizzirri 
    URL source G+ post: plus.google.com/114114214363012524277/posts/5KqhGsr21xW 
    ____________________________ 
  • 5 plusses - 0 comments - 1 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-05-29 03:22:28
    RESHARE:
    tumblr.com - Old People at Weddings...
    By GirlFromParis

    Old people at weddings always poke at me and say "You're next." So, I started doing the same thing to them at funerals.

    via +Andrew King
    URL via post: plus.google.com/113668134679456528240/posts/QacDtektJ6e

    Reshared text:
  • 5 plusses - 0 comments - 1 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-11-09 06:03:44
    Right to Know: Vote Yes on Prop 37

    Comment:
    Forget any safety, health or environmental concerns. Labeling GMOs ingredients using the same names as non GMOs is clear fraud. GMOs are hybrids, what means they aren't members of the same species as the organisms of origin. Likewise the "durum wheat" ( Triticum durum ) is not labeled simply as "wheat" ( T. aestivum ), which are hybrids ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wheat#Genetics). Would you support that was legal to sell beefalo meat (the hybrid between American bison and domestic cattle en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beefalo) labeled as bison meat? No, right? because it is fraud.

    News update:
    <<With 98.5% of the vote in California counted Proposition 37 is behind 47% to 53% and is not expected to win.>> anh-usa.org/prop-37-defeated 

    Related article:

    huffingtonpost.com & summertomato.com - Why I'm Voting Yes on Prop 37: Label Genetically Modified Foods
    By Darya Pino, Ph.D. October 29, 2012
    huffingtonpost.com/darya-pino/prop-37-genetically-modified-food_b_2040371.html 
    Funny disputes and ad hominem arguments at 
    summertomato.com/why-im-voting-yes-on-prop-37-label-genetically-modified-foods (comments section of the original article)

    Related links: 
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Food_labelling_Regulations 
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nutrition_facts_label 
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_Packaging_and_Labeling_Act 
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandatory_labelling 
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Packaging_and_labeling 
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetically_modified_food_controversies#Labeling 
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Genetically_modified_food_controversies 

    gmfreecymru.org/documents/secrecyandspoiler.html 
    biotech-info.net/ASA_response.html 
    psrast.org/psrlet.htm 
    online.liebertpub.com/doi/abs/10.1089/jmf.1998.1.241 

    nature.com/nature/journal/v401/n6753/full/401525a0.html 
    oregonstate.edu/instruct/bi430-fs430/Documents-2004/5A-FOOD%20REG/beyond_substantial_equivalence.pdf 
    planet-diversity.org/fileadmin/files/planet_diversity/Programme/Workshops/Codex_Alimentarius/Beyond_Substantial_Equivalence.pdf 

    the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/21059/title/Better-safety-checks-needed-on-GM-foods 


    openlearn.open.ac.uk/mod/oucontent/view.php?id=398604 
    openlearn.open.ac.uk/mod/oucontent/view.php?id=398604&section=4.5 
    openlearn.open.ac.uk/mod/oucontent/view.php?id=398604&section=4.6 

    #prop37   #proposition37  
    Related G+ posts: 
    plus.google.com/114605547533973731226/posts/RLqYBpq9P7F 
    plus.google.com/110891235985394924742/posts/WayLkCB5Syi 
    _____________
  • 0 plusses - 9 comments - 0 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-05-28 19:15:15
    Question:
    I've been notified that +James Salsman had "interacted with" me, and +Matt Kuenzel had also commented on the same post. The following is the URL of that post:
    plus.google.com/109017328710054242431/posts/aPitzHwcZLw However, by the time that I revised my notifications the post no loger existed (according to G+). Nevertheless, I suspect for which I can't revise that post is due to the fact that +Sarah Kavassalis seems to have blocked me after I commented on that post since at this moment I can't see any of her other posts either.

    - So, could any of you post here what you commented on that post? If the post still exists, can you copy your comment and paste it here?

    I had copied some of the earlier comments to add them on another post (all my comments except for one, and a few others of two other people). I post them here for identification purposes in case the post actually no longer exists. I also include the link attached to the original post:
    O.P.:

    Sarah Kavassalis May 28, 2012 2:03 AM Public
    Huh. Certainly makes the 'how do we get people to take the environment more seriously?' question more difficult if 'education' isn't really the answer.
    eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2012-05/yu-ysc052512.php
    ---------------------------------

    Comments:
    ...
    Zephyr López Cervilla May 28, 2012 2:49 AM
    Researcher Ellen Peters of Ohio State University said... "What this study shows is that people with high science and math comprehension can think their way to conclusions that are better for them as individuals but are not necessarily better for society."
    eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2012-05/yu-ysc052512.php

    - So Ellen Peters et al. arrogated to themselves the authority to determine what is better for society?
    ---------------------------------

    aimee whitcroft May 28, 2012 3:00 AM
    Um, many people would agree that treating our environment well is, indeed, a good thing for society overall (even if individuals are sometimes inconvenienced). And, to be honest, it is often pretty clear when an action is positive for, or damaging to, a society. It's kinda how we end up having laws and so forth.
    ---------------------------------

    Zephyr López Cervilla May 28, 2012 3:48 AM
    So for instance, was the Neolithic Revolution a good thing for society overall? Unlike some people beliefs, people usually lived well in the Paleolithic Age. In fact, their health and living conditions were much better than later.
    And for the environment? What was it better, the wild environment or the land progressively occupied for crops and animal husbandry with a relatively small number of species?
    What about the Industrial Revolution? Was it good for society? and for the environment?
    Changes usually imply a tradeoff. Some people are harmed, some other are able to find opportunities. Many people have fear to change, but either founded or not change is inevitable.
    For example, the farming revolution [under those conditions] was unstoppable. Those societies who continued living in a hunter and gatherer economy were progressively pushed and forced to leave their land by other more numerous farming peoples despite their better living conditions.
    ---------------------------------

    aimee whitcroft May 28, 2012 3:48 AM
    Zephyr, this thread (and the post which started it) are clearly about climate change, and getting the public (and politicians) to behave in a way which suggests they understand the immediacy of the problem. The scientists made that clear, and were certainly not appointing themselves the deciders of all that is good/bad. Beware extrapolation outwards where it's not needed.
    ---------------------------------
    Zephyr López Cervilla May 28, 2012
    ...
    <<
    Current status of human civilization

    Michio Kaku suggested that humans may attain Type I status in about 100–200 years, Type II status in a few thousand years, and Type III status in about 100,000 to a million years.
    Carl Sagan suggested to define intermediate values (not considered in Kardashev's original) by interpolating and extrapolating the values given above for types 1, 2 and 3, by using the formula
    K = log10(M·W) / 10,
    where value K is a civilization's Kardashev rating and MW is the power it uses, in megawatts. He calculated humanity's civilization type (in 1973) to be about 0.7, with respect to this extrapolation (apparently using 10 terawatt (TW) as the value for 1970s humanity).
    In 2008, total world energy consumption was 474 exajoules (474×1018 J=132,000 TWh), equivalent to an average energy consumption rate of 15 terawatts (1.504×1013 W - 0.7 Kardashev scale).
    The total photosynthetic productivity of earth is between ~1500–2250 TW, or 47,300–71,000 exajoules per year. Using a figure of 178,000 TJ of solar energy hitting the Earth's surface (see Earth's energy budget), the total photosynthetic efficiency of the planet is 0.84% to 1.26%, making nature a 0.8 Kardashev scale civilization.

    Further information: World energy resources and consumption
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_energy_resources_and_consumption
    >>
    URL source:
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kardashev_scale#Current_status_of_human_civilization
    ---------------------------------
    URL G+ post: plus.google.com/109017328710054242431/posts/aPitzHwcZLw
  • 0 plusses - 9 comments - 0 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-01-28 03:32:51
    RESHARE:
    shitbrix.com - Mindfuck

    via +Andre Matton

    Reshared text:
    When u see it, +1, reshare & disable comments =))))))))))))
  • 0 plusses - 9 comments - 0 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-07-21 16:31:12
    njaes.rutgers.edu - Misquotes in "Variation in Mineral Composition of Vegetables"
    By Joseph R. Heckman (Crop Science Dept. Rutgers Univ. ) March 11, 1991

    A study conducted at Rutgers University (Bear et al., 1948) is frequently misquoted as evidence supporting the position that organically grown vegetables are significantly superior in minerals and trace elements to conventionally grown vegetables. In reviewing the original publication, one can clearly see that this was not the intention of the study nor does it give support to this premise. The purpose of the study was to compare the mineral composition of vegetables "as one proceeds from south to north and from east to west in the United States."

    Question:
    +David Whitlock,
    Didn't +Cheryl Ann MacDonald, Psy'D. also block you after your critical comments on her post about the nutritional superiority of organic agriculture?: 
    plus.google.com/113063416882359851238/posts/aYght1jRQai 
    _____________________ 

    Excerpt from comments:

    Cheryl Ann MacDonald, Psy'D. Jul 13, 2012 (edited)  -  Public
    The term organic when it refers to food production is the method that farmers follow to grow their products, and how they manufacture their products, such as meat, vegetables, fruit, grains, and dairy products. Organic fruits, vegetables’ and grains are grown in nutrient rich soil, and must be kept separate from the conventional products. Farmers do not use pesticides, petroleum-based fertilizers, sewage fertilizers, and involve minimal amounts of bioengineered genes (GMOs).

    Why choose to follow the Organic Diet?
               Nutritional Benefits
               Reduction of Allergies
               Weight Loss
               A Healthier Planet
    Making a commitment to changing food habits is a start towards physically improving health. Beyond eating more fruits, vegetables, whole grains and good fats, there are the ethical questions related to food safety, nutrition, and land sustainability. I believe we should consider how foods are grown or raised, when we think about making healthier food choices.  There are many benefits to organic foods that cannot be matched by eating a conventional diet.  For a more in depth read http://bit.ly/zo29Ic #stopmonsanto  
    Image via +Tonia Wierzel & thank you.
    _____________________ 

    Zephyr López Cervilla Jul 10, 2012 +1
    This chart is totally unreliable.
    _____________________ 

    David Whitlock Jul 10, 2012 +2
    The chart is a fraud.  The study was not about organic vs conventional, it was about mineral gradients from north to south.

    https://njaes.rutgers.edu/pubs/bearreport/misquotes.asp 
    _____________________ 

    Cheryl Ann MacDonald, Psy'D. Jul 10, 2012
    Is this all you are going to say +Zephyr López Cervilla?  No follow up, no link ect.. to support your argument?
    _____________________ 

    *Cheryl Ann MacDonald, Psy'D.*Jul 10, 2012 (edited) +1
    I went to this link +David Whitlock and my computer says it is an unreliable site? I went anyway and this study is from 1948 and refers to a 1991 chart not this one! 
    _____________________ 

    Hippie Butter Jul 10, 2012 +2
    We're going all organic very soon! Great information.
    _____________________ 

    Cheryl Ann MacDonald, Psy'D. Jul 10, 2012 +1
    Upon further research here is another link http://eco-gardeners.com/2010/04/rutgers-university-study-organic-vs-conventional-produce/
    _____________________ 

    Zephyr López Cervilla Jul 10, 2012 (edited) +2
    I've already heard of some study comparing the nutritional value of organic versus conventional and the conventional products actually had higher concentration of most nutrients than the organic products (including vitamins), thee weren't huge differences, but still statistically significant. It will take me some time to find the original source since the study was mentioned in some episode of the last 2-3 years of a very long weekly podcast. I will probably find some information much quicker in a random search.
    BTW, the link to unreliable site seems OK, it'd from an academic institution: rutgers.edu
    _____________________ 

    Cheryl Ann MacDonald, Psy'D. Jul 10, 2012 (edited) +1
    I will wait for the link +Zephyr López Cervilla, no problem!  In the meantime here is another http://www.becomehealthynow.com/article/foodfacts/318
    _____________________ 

    David Whitlock Jul 10, 2012 +1
    +Cheryl Ann MacDonald, Psy'D.  If you look at table 2 of the report.
    https://njaes.rutgers.edu/pubs/bearreport/table2.asp
    The numbers are as they said, the lowest numbers are claimed to be the "conventional" and the highest are claimed to be the "organic". 
    This is from a paper that was published in 1949 by Firman E. Bear,
    Stephen J. Toth and Arthur L. Prince.  Google scholar lists 10 versions on the web.
    http://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=8286511368903016212&hl=en&as_sdt=0,44
    It is a clear case of fraud. 
    _____________________ 

    *Cheryl Ann MacDonald, Psy'D.*Jul 10, 2012
    Thank you +Hippie Butter :)  I knew this post would create some "issues"  :)
    _____________________ 

    Cheryl Ann MacDonald, Psy'D. Jul 10, 2012 +1
    This is simply an organic search list +David Whitlock but I will indeed investigate!
    _____________________ 

    *Cheryl Ann MacDonald, Psy'D.*Jul 10, 2012 +1
    Here we go from one of the articles that +David Whitlock suggested!          http://www.mindfully.org/Food/Organic-Crops-Superior-WorthingtonJul99.htm

    Zephyr López Cervilla Jul 10, 2012 (edited) +1
    Well, the kind of crop with higher nutritional value seems to vary depending on the nutrient: 

    "organic crops often have higher dry matter, ascorbic acid, phenolic, and sugar and lower moisture, nitrate, and protein contents and yields than conventionally grown crops."

    - Lester GE and Saftner RA. Organically versus Conventionally Grown Produce: Common Production Inputs, Nutritional Quality, and Nitrogen Delivery between the Two Systems. J Agric Food Chem. 2011 Oct 12;59(19):10401-6.
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21910454 

    As for the chart, I'm pretty sure that at least one of the values has nothing to do with the composition of organic versus conventional: potassium. Potassium salts are included in the most common inorganic fertilizers (N,P,K), that's also why in the conventional crops the nitrate contents are higher than in the organic.

    Edit:
    More detailed information on the nutritional value of different crops: 

    NUTRITIONAL VALUE
    As a general rule, in studies that have paired common production variables and methodologies, organic crops tend to have more vitamin C, sugars, and phenolics and fewer nitrates33␣37 than conventionally grown produce, which corroborates findings of the aforementioned nutritional reviews. Organic crops also tend to have more dry matter and less moisture, less protein, and lower yields.38,39 Patterns of differences between organic and conventional foods with respect to heavy metals or specific minerals are not apparent. However, individual studies show differing levels of some minerals, but differences are dependent upon the particular fruit, leafy vegetable, or root crop. For example, when organically versus conventionally grown produce samples were compared, carrots ( Dacus carota L.) had higher B, Cu, Mn, and N,40 potatoes ( Solamun tuberosum L.) had higher Mg,41 cabbage ( Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata) had higher Mn, N, and Zn,40 and sweet corn ( Zea mays L.) had higher Ca, Cu, Mg, and P, 41 whereas tomatoes ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) were higher in Ca, N, Na. and P.42 Juice from organically versus conventionally grown grapefruit ( Citrus paradisi Macf.) early in the harvest season (November) had higher levels of K, Mg, and N, but by harvest season’s end (March) there were no differences in the levels of those minerals or in B, Ca, Cl, Cu, Fe, Mn, Na, P, or Zn levels.43
    Organic versus conventional crops show lower levels of chlorophylls,44 β-carotene,45 and lycopene.43 Evidence for B-complex vitamins being higher in organic versus conventional foods is inconclusive, whereas levels of antioxidant compounds tend to be higher in organic foods compared with conventional foods. Organically versus conventionally grown kiwifruits ( Actinidia deliciosa Liang et Ferguson) were 15% higher in total phenolics,46 and in organically versus conventionally grown sweet pepper fruit ( Capsicum annuum L.), phenolics were 20␣25% higher depending on the degree of ripening.47 Caris-Veyrat et al.48 found that tomatoes grown organically were higher on a fresh weight basis for some phenolics, but when the data were expressed on a dry weight basis, no differences in individual phenolic levels were detectable. Thus, the higher moisture content of conventionally grown food likely provides not only greater weight, that is, higher yields (tonnage) but also the possibility of nutrient dilution relative to drier organically grown crops. The expression of data on both fresh and dry weight bases is imperative in the comparison of these two agrosystems. Zhao et al.49 in their review of organic versus conventional production enhancement of antioxidants, phenolics, and other phytochemicals stated that “evidence seems to favor enhancement by organic production systems”.  However, they hastily cautioned that “there has been little systematic study of the factors that contribute to increased phytochemical content in organic crops and it remains to be seen whether consistent differences will be found, and the extent to which biotic and abiotic stresses, and other factors such as soil biology, contribute to those differences”.

    Comparison organic Vs. conventional yields:

    - Seufert V et al. Comparing the yields of organic and conventional agriculture. Nature (2012) vol. 485 (7397) pp. 229-32
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22535250

    - Reganold JP and Dobermann A. Agriculture: Comparing apples with oranges. Nature (2012) vol. 485 (7397) pp. 176-7
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22575951.1 
    _____________________ 

    Cheryl Ann MacDonald, Psy'D. Jul 10, 2012 +1
    "Several studies have reported an increase in vitamin, mineral, and phytochemical content of organic produce, and while I would LOVE to believe them, these findings must be taken with a grain of salt due to the major problems with study design variability and just poor science in some cases."  This one is from a scientists point of view who HATES the word Organic http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/2011/08/11/nutritional-differences-in-organic-vs-conventional-foods-and-the-winner-is/ 
    _____________________ 

    Cheryl Ann MacDonald, Psy'D.Jul 16, 2012 (edited) +1
    Hi +Zephyr López Cervilla great article source! But it really doesn't say too much, except the verdict is still out when comparing minerals, vitamins, etc. I really am open to debate, especially since labeling GMO's is on the ballet in my state in November. But even if all the info in this chart is wrong. There are still the issues related to 1) Poor taste 2) Pesticides in your body & how they effect the body 3) Severe damage to farm land soil due to pesticides. (Not to mention many other problems)
    _____________________ 

    David Whitlock Jul 11, 2012 +3
    The problem with only organic is that it doesn't provide enough fertilization. 

    The reason there is enough manure for existing organic production is because there are animals fed crops grown via non-organic methods using synthetic fertilizers and the manure from those animals becomes "organic" as it passes through the animal. 

    Any kind of manure is defined to be organic and doesn't need to be tested or assayed for anything else.  There was a big problem with this because arsenic is fed to chickens to accelerate growth and make their meat a certain color.  Manure from these arsenic-fed chickens was deemed "organic" simply because it was manure, it didn't matter what the chickens had been fed.  Eli Lilly was the manufacturer of the arsenic compound and they have stopped producing it.  It isn't clear if chicken producers have not found another source. 

    Using synthetic ammonia, mined potash, or phosphate fertilizer to fertilize crops is forbidden in organic practice, but fertilizing using manure from animals that were fed crops grown using synthetic fertilizers is completely acceptable. 

    If all crops were organic, there would not be enough NPK from organic fertilizers for those organic crops to get yields approaching current organic yields. 
    _____________________ 

    Cheryl Ann MacDonald, Psy'D. Jul 11, 2012 (edited)
    We will have to agree to disagree on this one +David Whitlock as Organic Farming principles are almost totally eased out in the states & conventional farming/agric. is indeed polluting our land & bodies. I want labeling and more organic, non gmo foods to be in ample supply for all. (you are a scientist who is in favor I am aware)
    _____________________ 

    Hippie Butter Jul 11, 2012 +1
    Organic Industrial Hemp doesn't need extra NPK to get good yields. If hemp is grown in between other crops it helps replenish the soil so it doesn't need synthetic fertilizers. Thats what Organic Canadian Farmers do all the time.
    _____________________ 

    David Whitlock Jul 11, 2012 +3
    +Hippie Butter Hemp is not magic.  It does fix nitrogen, but it can't create P and K out of nothing.  All foods that are harvested remove NPK and trace minerals from the soil.  Those elements have to be replaced or the soil will eventually be depleted.  Plants don't care the source of NPK and trace minerals.  Plants can't tell the difference between ammonia from manure or ammonia from synthetic fertilizer.  Plants can only absorb nitrogen after it has been mineralized, organic compounds broken down and the nitrogen available as ammonia or nitrate.

    Organic farming now replaces those elements depleted from the soil by using manure from animals fed on crops grown using synthetic fertilizers.  The ultimate source of most "organic" NPK and trace minerals is crops grown using synthetic fertilizers and passaged through animals to make them "organic".  N can be fixed by plants.  The other elements can't be.

    +Cheryl Ann MacDonald, Psy'D.  I have no objection to people doing organic farming as a hobby, or for rich people spending more of their income on more expensive organic food.  Poor people don't have the luxury of spending more to get equivalent nutrition.

    I am a scientist.  I understand soil chemistry and how plants absorb nutrients of different types, and how plants can't tell the difference between organic and non-organic fertilizer.

    I do object to people spreading false information about anything, organic or conventional.  That was why I commented on the original post.  The chart is wrong, and was deliberately generated so as to be deceitful and to fraudulently claim that organic is better.

    Everyone is entitled to their own opinion about organic vs conventional farming methods.  No one is entitled to their own facts.  

    My concern is not with the wealthy, it is with the poor, those who have limited means and have to choose what to purchase very carefully.  Do they buy something labeled organic, or something labeled conventional?  If they are lied to by fraudulent charts like the one above, they may be tricked into wasting their limited resources on organic food and unjustly enrich organic farmers (unjust enrichment because it was due to fraud) because they have been told that "organic is better".

    Your link about Monsanto's “lies” has some truthfulness problems of its own.  The claims Roundup promoting a new fungus are extraordinary.  

    http://www.biofortified.org/2011/02/extraordinary-claims%E2%80%A6-require-extraordinary-evidence/

    I would like to see some evidence beyond extraordinary claims that don't fit with a science-based understanding of reality.  It is now a year and a half later and there is nothing in the scientific literature to support these claims (which if true would be a Ticket to Stockholm and a gold medal from the Nobel Committee).  

    If organic is better, then it should be easy to demonstrate that it is with scientific measurements.  Lets see the data.  Lets hold everyone to the same standards.  You want to make claims about how nutritious your product is, lets see the analysis showing that your claims are true and not just made up.  There is tremendous variability in nutritional content of foods grown in different regions.  To a large extent people can compensate by eating a varied diet.

    Manure as fertilizer has its own problems, E coli is a major food borne pathogen that causes lots of illness and even death.  Those problems are different than the problems of synthetic fertilizer.  For poor people in sub-Saharan Africa, the problem is the cost of fertilizers of any type.
    _____________________ 

    Cheryl Ann MacDonald, Psy'D .Jul 12, 2012 +1
    +David Whitlock Your philosophy is killing the land, water & people that eat the food! People are literally dying from handling and processing these foods (look at the evidence) I have great objection to this form of supposedly feeding the planet! And no one said HEMP is the cure all.... +Hippie Butter was just giving an example of another way. You must be kidding here :) or not because of working in the field, I believe your eyes are blinded! Now how much evidence do people behind Monsanto want? This debate is only political and economic.....period, and the price is effecting millions of people, the entire land of this planet and our entire water supply. A truly narcissistic practice. 

    URL source G+ post: plus.google.com/113063416882359851238/posts/aYght1jRQai
    _____________________ 
  • 2 plusses - 4 comments - 1 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-07-01 00:33:02
    RESHARE:
    phdcomics.com - If TV science was more like real science
    Uploaded by Joshua Roy. On June 30, 2012

    Comment:
    There are already a couple of sequencing techniques that aren't based on separating DNA molecules of different length in a gel (or capillaries) or anything like that, and one of them has been already marketed, that kit that comes in a case with a built-in USB connector. If I remember well it is based on molecular 3D primary structure recognition. I think this method promises sequencing the whole genome of an individual for about $1,000, although it is expected to be primarily used to sequence shorter DNA sequences.
    The other technique recognizes the nucleotides that the DNA polymerase is adding to make the complementary strand out of the template, and at real time. This other technique will be a great addition for research since it gives you new information on how the DNA is replicated at the single-base level (although not using the original polymerases nor under conditions equivalent to the conditions within the cell nucleus, at least not yet).
    ___________________ 

    If TV science was more like real science

    Serial killers would have plenty of time to get away.
    - Quick, run a PCR DNA analysis on that sample!
    - Yeah, that's an overnighter.
    Special agents would never figure out who the villan is.
    - We reconstructed this image from a 4-pixel photo.
    - Turns out, it's theoretically impossible.
    Myth debunking would never het past peer review.
    - What do you mean one data point is not enough?
    - What's a "control"?
    Robots would never take over the world.
    - It was working a second ago!

    URL source G+ post: plus.google.com/115288001414266277268/posts/iUBTPw8Dfet

    Reshared text:
  • 2 plusses - 4 comments - 1 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2013-02-22 23:45:37
    RESHARE:
    behance.net - The Legion of Real Life Supervillains by Butcher Billy
    behance.net/gallery/The-Legion-of-Real-Life-Supervillains-by-Butcher-Billy/7095371 

    "There's no need to discuss innocence or guilt. We know he's guilty."
    — George W. Bush, 43rd President of the US (October 2001)

    - Staff and agencies. Bush rejects Taliban offer to hand Bin Laden over. The Guardian. Sunday October 14, 2001
    guardian.co.uk/world/2001/oct/14/afghanistan.terrorism5 

    “The FBI gathers evidence. Once evidence is gathered, it is turned over to the Department of Justice. The Department of Justice then decides whether it has enough evidence to present to a federal grand jury. In the case of the 1998 United States Embassies being bombed, bin Laden has been formally indicted and charged by a grand jury. He has not been formally indicted and charged in connection with 9/11 because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting bin Laden to 9/11.”
    — Rex Tom, FBI Director of Investigative Publicity (2006)

    - Staff reporter. Osama Bin Laden never charged for 911 - Inside Job likely. International Business Times. May 2, 2011
    ibtimes.com/osama-bin-laden-never-charged-911-inside-job-likely-210784 

    <<The presumption of innocence, sometimes referred to by the Latin expression Ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat (the burden of proof lies with who declares, not who denies), is the principle that one is considered innocent until proven guilty. Application of this principle is a legal right of the accused in a criminal trial, recognised in many nations. The burden of proof is thus on the prosecution, which has to collect and present enough compelling evidence to convince the trier of fact, who is restrained and ordered by law to consider only actual evidence and testimony that is legally admissible, and in most cases lawfully obtained, that the accused is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. If reasonable doubt remains, the accused is to be acquitted.>>
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presumption_of_innocence 

    URL via G+ post: 
    plus.google.com/106187383760898046252/posts/Xg6ZJ5rTmDy 
    URL source G+ post: 
    plus.google.com/103056961644777255745/posts/7saXgSTJFHs 
    _________________ 

    Reshared text:
    #Superschurken  

    http://www.behance.net/gallery/The-Legion-of-Real-Life-Supervillains-by-Butcher-Billy/7095371
  • 4 plusses - 1 comments - 1 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2013-03-04 22:02:25
    ucr.edu - Why is the sky blue?
    By Philip Gibbs. May, 1997
    math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/BlueSky/blue_sky.html 

    Sections:
    1. Tyndall Effect (Rayleigh scattering)
    2. Dust or Molecules?
    3. Why not violet?
    4. Sunsets
    5. Blue Haze and Blue Moon
    6. Opalescence
    7. Why is the Mars sky red?

    Excerpt:

    Dust or Molecules?
    "Tyndall and Rayleigh thought that the blue colour of the sky must be due to small particles of dust and droplets of water vapour in the atmosphere.  Even today, people sometimes incorrectly say that this is the case.  Later scientists realised that if this were true, there would be more variation of sky colour with humidity or haze conditions than was actually observed, so they supposed correctly that the molecules of oxygen and nitrogen in the air are sufficient to account for the scattering.  The case was finally settled by Einstein in 1911, who calculated the detailed formula for the scattering of light from molecules; and this was found to be in agreement with experiment.  He was even able to use the calculation as a further verification of Avogadro's number when compared with observation.  The molecules are able to scatter light because the electromagnetic field of the light waves induces electric dipole moments in the molecules.

    Why not violet?
    If shorter wavelengths are scattered most strongly, then there is a puzzle as to why the sky does not appear violet, the colour with the shortest visible wavelength.  The spectrum of light emission from the sun is not constant at all wavelengths, and additionally is absorbed by the high atmosphere, so there is less violet in the light.  Our eyes are also less sensitive to violet.  That's part of the answer; yet a rainbow shows that there remains a significant amount of visible light coloured indigo and violet beyond the blue.  The rest of the answer to this puzzle lies in the way our vision works.  We have three types of colour receptors, or cones, in our retina.  They are called red, blue and green because they respond most strongly to light at those wavelengths.  As they are stimulated in different proportions, our visual system constructs the colours we see.

    When we look up at the sky, the red cones respond to the small amount of scattered red light, but also less strongly to orange and yellow wavelengths.  The green cones respond to yellow and the more strongly scattered green and green-blue wavelengths.  The blue cones are stimulated by colours near blue wavelengths, which are very strongly scattered.  If there were no indigo and violet in the spectrum, the sky would appear blue with a slight green tinge.  However, the most strongly scattered indigo and violet wavelengths stimulate the red cones slightly as well as the blue, which is why these colours appear blue with an added red tinge.  The net effect is that the red and green cones are stimulated about equally by the light from the sky, while the blue is stimulated more strongly.  This combination accounts for the pale sky blue colour.  It may not be a coincidence that our vision is adjusted to see the sky as a pure hue.  We have evolved to fit in with our environment; and the ability to separate natural colours most clearly is probably a survival advantage."

    Related webpages: 
    sciencemadesimple.com/sky_blue.html 
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rayleigh_scattering 
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mie_scattering 
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diffuse_sky_radiation 
    _______________ 
  • 3 plusses - 0 comments - 2 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2013-02-17 05:13:02
    RESHARE:
    Milton Friedman - Director's Law "The Robin Hood Myth" (9 min 56 sec)
    Uploaded by LibertyPen. 1977-78 
    Excerpt from Milton Friedman Speaks
    freetochoose.net/store/product_info.php?products_id=152 

    Milton Friedman: "Director's law is that almost invariably Government's programs benefit the middle income class at the expense of the very poor and the very rich."

    <<Director's law states that the bulk of public programs are designed primarily to benefit the middle classes but are financed by taxes paid primarily by the upper and lower classes. The empirically derived law was first proposed by economist Aaron Director (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Director).
    The philosophy of Director's law is that, based on the size of its population and its aggregate wealth, the middle class will always be the dominant interest group in a modern democracy. As such, it will use its influence to maximize the state benefits it receives and minimize the portion of costs it bears.>>
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Director%27s_Law 

    Comment:
    The middle class controls the government to spend taxpayer money for its own profit and greed, but this is sold to the working class (and to themselves) with the equal opportunities mantra.
    I remember having been well aware of this phenomenon back in the days when I couldn't afford to pay for any of the low-price subsidized travel plans or price cuts in other products offered to young people until I was already too old to qualify for them. In general, the positive discrimination toward the young is actually a hidden subsidy to the young middle class guys, whereas the young poor ones don't see a dime.

    URL source G+ post: 
    plus.google.com/115234319467908018169/posts/6aYwgWa9SxP 
    _________________ 

    Reshared text:
  • 3 plusses - 0 comments - 2 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-05-29 03:30:48
    RESHARE:
    plus.google.com - How to Kill a Mockingbird
    Uploaded by Lee Grupsmith. February 27, 2012

    Cat: "There's nothing in here on how to kill a mockingbird!"

    #delusionalliterature #demotivationalliterature
    URL via post (extended circles): plus.google.com/104870906504344019966/posts/3hvMH6VP5YA

    Reshared text:
    Tonight's literary funny.
  • 3 plusses - 0 comments - 2 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2013-01-23 02:09:02
    ns.umich.edu - Pregnant primates miscarry when new male enters group
    By Ann Arbor. Feb 22, 2012

    The "Bruce effect" – in which pregnant females spontaneously miscarry after being exposed to an unfamiliar male – has been found repeatedly in laboratory rodents. However, no conclusive evidence for this effect had ever been demonstrated in a wild population prior to this study. Geladas are Old World monkeys that are close relatives of baboons.
    ns.umich.edu/new/releases/20239-pregnant-primates-miscarry-when-new-male-enters-group 

    Comment: 
    Worthy a look even only because of the pics.

    Further reading:

    Paper:
    - Roberts EK et al. A Bruce effect in wild geladas. Science (2012) vol. 335 (6073) pp. 1222-5
    sciencemag.org/content/335/6073/1222.abstract 

    University of Michigan - Gelada Research Project
    umich.edu/~gelada/UMGRP/Home.html 
    Research 
    umich.edu/~gelada/UMGRP/Research.html 
    Publications 
    umich.edu/~gelada/UMGRP/Publications.html 

    Radiophonic interview about this study:
    - Beehner, Jacinta (guest) and McDonald, Bob (host). Gelada Monkey Miscarriage. Quriks and Quarks (CBC Radio One). Feb 25, 2012
    cbc.ca/quirks/episode/2012/02/25/february-25-2012 
    cbc.ca/player/Radio/Quirks+and+Quarks/Excerpts/ID/2201698837

    Gelada baboon ( Theropithecus gelada )
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gelada

    Other reports of naturally occurring non-accidental miscarriages:

    2. Elk/Wapiti ( Cervus canadensis )
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elk

    2a. Adaptive Fetal Sex Allocation in Elk: Evidence and Implications http://www.jstor.org/pss/3802829 

    2b. Fetus Resorption in Elk
    http://www.jstor.org/pss/1378136 

    2c. A comment on Annual Count Shows Huge Decline In Yellowstone National Park Elk Herd, But How Accurate Is It?
    A study recently has shown that fewer elk cows are even pregnant in wolf populated areas. They are run and spooked to the point that they don't have the nutrition necessary to carry a pregnancy. In nature, the female is most important, keeping her alive comes first, so nutritional intake, whatever it may be, will go to maintain the life of the cow.
    http://www.nationalparkstraveler.com/2011/01/annual-count-shows-huge-decline-yellowstone-national-park-elk-herd-how-accurate-it7458

    3. Grizzly bear ( Ursus arctos horribilis )
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grizzly_bear 

    3a. Bear Reproduction
    After mating, the female may be pregnant, but that does not mean she will give birth to cubs. There is an old joke that you can't be half pregnant, but bears have proven this statement to be false. Bears, weasels and some seals have developed a process called delayed implantation. The fertilized egg develops into a small embryo called a blastocyst. This is where the interesting stuff begins. After this brief period of development, of the fertilized egg suddenly stops growing and simply floats freely in the uterus for several months.
    If a sow is in peak condition when she heads into her winter den, the embryo implants in the uterus and begin to develop. She'll wake up during January or February to give birth . Black bears give birth to between one and four cubs, with two being the most common. Grizzlies also average two cubs, with rarely more being produced.
    If the sow is not in peak condition at the onset of hibernation, her body will reabsorb the embryo and not give birth that year. This gives bears more control over their reproductive rate than just about any other animal...
    http://www.mountainnature.com/Wildlife/Bears/BearReproduction.htm 

    #miscarriage   #abortion   #delayedimplantation   #implantation   #gelada   #bleedingheartbaboon   #elk   #elks   #wapiti   #wapitis   #grizzlybear   #grizzlybears   #grizzly   #grizzlies  

    URL related G+ posts:
    plus.google.com/108257153502707936410/posts/9ZHCiM2Rk2Y 
    plus.google.com/108257153502707936410/posts/RPn41FnQaaj 
    ____________ 
  • 3 plusses - 2 comments - 1 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-10-19 00:51:56
    RESHARE:
    Online 3rd-party US presidential debate.
    Guests: Gary Johnson (Libertarian Party) and Jill Stein (Green Party) 
    Additionally, a televised 4-candidate 3rd-party US presidential debate on October 23 at 20:00 CDT: freeandequal.org/live

    Reshared text:
    Are you watching the Presidential debate between Gov. Gary Johnson and Dr. +Jill Stein? Watch here:
  • 3 plusses - 2 comments - 1 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-09-21 22:59:37
    star.stanford.edu - Sprites and Elves
    By W. Wayt Gibbs (San Francisco). 1997

    "Lightning's strange cousins flicker faster than light itself"

    Excerpt:
    <<When researchers pointed their cameras to pick up sprites, they were surprised to discover that other bizarre light shows also illuminate the high altitudes. Vast blue jets, rising from clouds at 300 times the speed of sound in air, form cones of light that stand 40 kilometers tall. Then in mid-December a group of Stanford University researchers, led by Umran Inan of Stanford University, reported at the American Geophysical Union meeting in San Francisco that they had clocked yet another form of stratospheric lightning, one that, paradoxical though it may seem, propagates faster than the speed of light. These halos of red light, dubbed elves, were first conclusively recorded by Japanese scientists in 1995. But little was known about their structure and movement until Inan's group imaged the phenomenon with The Fly's Ey--a custom-built instrument that chains together 12 highly sensitive photodetectors, each in its own 45-centimeter (18-inch) barrel and each pointing to a different part of the sky. 

    The Stanford researchers managed to get a good look at 10 elves. All started just above a groundstroke of normal lightning but expanded into rings up to 300 kilometers (200 miles) across in less than a thousandth of a second. Although the elves appear to spread faster than light, analysis of the physics behind elves demonstrates that no particles actually move that fast, so Einsteinian relativity is not violated. The faster-than-light illusion seems to be caused by successively distant air molecules lighting up in rapid-fire sequence, like the strobe lights running along an airport runway. 

    Inan and Yuri Taranenko of Los Alamos National Laboratory have developed mathematical models which they think may explain what causes elves. According to their simulation, the key is the electromagnetic pulse produced by lightning strokes. This pulse expands like a balloon, upward and away from the groundstroke. If the pulse is strong enough, the theory goes, it energizes the ions and free electrons at the border between the stratosphere and ionosphere enough to make the charged particles shine red. 

    So, although the electromagnetic pulse expands at exactly the speed of light, Inan explains, the ring of shining particles formed at the lower edge of the ionosphere grows faster--just as a balloon released underwater will, as it breaks the surface, create a ripple that moves much faster outward than the rate at which the balloon rises upward. Zeus himself might be impressed. >>

    Comment:
    Doesn't this phenomenon let information travel faster than the speed of light? I thought this wasn't possible either.

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Upper-atmospheric_lightning#ELVES 
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sprite_(lightning) 
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrestrial_gamma-ray_flash 
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_ray_visual_phenomena 
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherenkov_radiation 

    - Narici L et al. ALTEA: Anomalous Long Term Effects in Astronauts. A probe on the influence of cosmic radiation and microgravity on the central nervous system during long flights. Adv. Space Res. (2003) vol. 31 (1) pp. 141-146
    http://people.roma2.infn.it/~morselli/A94Altea.pdf 
    ________________________ 
  • 3 plusses - 2 comments - 1 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-09-12 03:33:32
    mathbabe.org - The Meritocracy Myth
    By Cathy O’Neil (mathbabe). May 5, 2012

    <<
    There is no such thing as a meritocracy
    Having been in academic mathematics and a quant in a hedge fund, I’d guess I’ve experienced what comes closest in many people’s minds as the closest to a meritocratic system. But my experience is that it’s anything but, even in these highly quantitative settings.

    Instead, as it probably is everywhere, the job environment is a huge social game where it matters, a lot, what kind of priorities you demonstrate and what kind of other signals you give off or respond to. We don’t expect people to play golf and smoke cigars in academia but caring about teaching, or worse, getting a teaching award, can be the kiss of death.

    I’m not saying that your personal efforts don’t matter at all, because they do, and you do need to produce stuff, and at a certain rate, but even “personal efforts” are first of all received in the context of a social order (i.e. the perceived importance of your efforts at the very least is a social invention), and second of all they’re are not really personal – one frames the questions one answers with the help of the community, so it’s important you have a good connection and social acceptance in that community (i.e. access to the experts).>>
     . . . 
    <<In other words, I’m not holding my breath for a truly meritocratic system. It’s just not what humans evolved for. Let’s acknowledge that and work on how to make the system responsive to good ideas anyway (whatever the system is).

    Successful people want to believe that there is such a thing as meritocracy
    This begs the question, why do people like Jack Welch and Larry Summers hold on so tight to the myth of meritocracy? My theory is that it serves a two-fold goal: as advertisement for new people and as a validation of the winners in the system.

    At the same time, the `winners’ of the social game want desperately to think they did amazing stuff in order to be so successful. They hold on to the myth of meritocracy as a religious belief, and it is pure dogma by the time they reach upper management.>>
     . . . 
    <<They are true believers, because their entire egos are built on this belief, and it doesn’t matter how much counter-evidence is presented to them, even in the form of humans in the room with them.>>
    ___________________________ 

    via +Julien Martin 
    URL source G+ post: plus.google.com/108207796400897790234/posts/YGCK3bNpmxc 
    ___________________________ 
  • 2 plusses - 1 comments - 2 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-11-07 03:27:16
    Have you seen the provisional results in Florida, Ohio and Virginia? 
    google.com/elections/ed/us/results 
    FL General Election November 6, 2012
    100% reporting (6089/6089)
    Candidate | Popular Vote | Electoral
    Barack Obama | 49.9% 4,141,300 | 29
    Mitt Romney | 49.3% 4,093,807 | 0
    Gary Johnson | 0.5% 43,615 | 0
    Jill Stein | 0.1% 8,708 | 0
    Roseanne Barr | 0.1% 7,988 | 0
    Tom Stevens | <0.1% 3,799 | 0
    Virgil Goode | <0.1% 2,531 | 0
    Rocky Anderson | <0.1% 1,714 | 0
    Tom Hoefling | <0.1% 917 | 0
    Andre Barnett | <0.1% 794 | 0
    Stewart Alexander | <0.1% 779 | 0
    Peta Lindsay | <0.1% 315 | 0
    ____________ 

    OH General Election November 6, 2012
    99.7% reporting (9526/9550)
    Candidate | Popular Vote | Electoral
    Barack Obama | 50.1% 2,672,302 | 18
    Mitt Romney | 48.2%% 2,571,539 | 0
    Gary Johnson | 0.9% 48,672 | 0
    Jill Stein | 0.3% 17,657 | 0
    Richard Duncan | 0.2% 12,032 | 0
    Virgil Goode | 0.1% 7,838 | 0
    Stewart Alexander | 0.1% 2,858 | 0
    ____________ 

    VA General Election November 6, 2012
    99.6% reporting (2575/2585)
    Candidate | Popular Vote | Electoral
    Barack Obama | 50.8% 1,854,723 | 13
    Mitt Romney | 47.8% 1,747,386 | 0
    Gary Johnson | 0.8% 30,021 | 0
    Virgil Goode | 0.4% 13,458 | 0
    Jill Stein | 0.2% 8,366 | 0
    ____________ 

    US General Election November 6, 2012
    Candidate | Popular Vote | Electoral
    Barack Obama | 50.3% 59,725,608 | 303
    Mitt Romney | 48.1% 57,098,650 | 206
    Gary Johnson | 1.0% 1,139,562 | 0
    Jill Stein | 0.3% 396,684 | 0
    Roseanne Barr | <0.1% 48,797 | 0
    Rocky Anderson | <0.1% 34,521 | 0
    Thomas Hoefling | <0.1% 28,099 | 0
    Tom Hoefling | <0.1% | 28,099 | 0
    Jerry Litzel | <0.1% 12,895 | 0
    Jeff Boss | <0.1% 12,895 | 0
    Randall Terry | <0.1% 12,895 | 0
    Merlin Miller | <0.1% 12,895 | 0
    Jill Reed | <0.1% 12,032 | 0
    Richard Duncan | <0.1% 12,032 | 0
    None of these candidates | <0.1% 5,753 | 0
    Andre Barnett | <0.1% 4,704 | 0
    Chuck Baldwin | <0.1% 4,704 | 0
    Barbara Washer | <0.1% 4,704 | 0
    Tom Stevens | <0.1% 4,001 | 0
    Stewart Alexander | <0.1% 3,897 | 0
    Virgil Goode | <0.1% 3,553 | 0
    Will Christensen | <0.1% 3,553 | 0
    James Harris | <0.1% 3,427 | 0
    Jim Carlson | <0.1% 3,169 | 0
    Sheila Tittle | <0.1% 2,470 | 0
    Peta Lindsay | <0.1% 1,518 | 0
    Gloria La Riva | <0.1% 1,518 | 0
    Jerry White | <0.1% 1,126 | 0
    Dean Morstad | <0.1% 1,107 | 0
    Jack Fellure | <0.1% 503 | 0
    270 electoral votes to win
    ____________ 

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swing_state 
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_states_and_blue_states 
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_2012

    rt.com/on-air/rt-america-air 
    rt.com/usa/news/secede-president-puerto-rico-109 
    rt.com/usa/news/johnson-race-colorado-election-881 
    rt.com/usa/news/us-stein-johnson-foreign-036 

    nbcnews.com/id/49511224 

    plus.google.com/114605547533973731226/posts/enyVUpKB5XF 
  • 3 plusses - 4 comments - 0 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-06-14 17:22:43
    RESHARE:
    plus.google.com - Silly Stats
    By Someone. Somewhen.

    Comment:
    "In an average day your hand will have into indirect contact with 15 penises (touching door handles, etc.)
    - That's why I touch door handles with my penis, to cut out the middle man.

    Source: they made it up

    URL source G+ post: plus.google.com/u/0/114228869493885222559/posts/gAJC69xrF78

    Reshared text:
    Just remember, its not about being right or wrong, its about grossing people out and having a laugh :)
  • 3 plusses - 4 comments - 0 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-06-03 15:18:39
    plus.google.com - The Bulldogs of Global Warming  
    James Salsman, Nick Austin, Tony Sidaway, Jim Wise. October 17, 2012 
     
    Comment:  
    In my opinion the second graphic, the atmospheric CO2 concentration from the year 1700 to 2600 (see link included in this post below) has a serious flaw, it predicts that the atmospheric CO2 concentration will increase until 2600 up to a level more than 20 times the current concentration. Since the main contributor of the CO2 emissions in the atmosphere responsible of that increase is assumed is going to be the human activity, this implies that humans will have to add all this amount of CO2 over the next 600 years, and also means that the rate of our CO2 emissions is going to progressively increase in the next 250 years. 
    To generate such amount of CO2, we would have to resort to almost any possible available fossil fuel reserve so that we could burn it. Not only oil, but also oil sands, natural gas and specially the coal reserves, much more abundant.  
    Although in my opinion nuclear energy is unlikely to become the alternative capable to replace fossil fuels in the next 40 years as the main source of energy (building fission nuclear plants is just too expensive and complex), I still believe that humans will be capable to develop other alternative energies, abundant and affordable (such as nuclear fusion) in the next 3 centuries.

    P.S.:  
    BTW, +James Salsman, although point A is partially wrong (this particular graph does not predict a doubling in CO2 concentration from 1990 to 2010), +Jim Wise was right in that points B and C are clearly independent from A. Therefore, B and C can be either false or true regardless of the falsity or truthfulness of A:  

    A.) global carbon levels did not double between 1990 and 2010 as that graph predicts they would have 

    B.) Mann quite correctly revised his hockey stick model to push the predicted spike about 30 years down the road 

    C.) global temperatures were (depending on the model you look at) either flat or showed a slight increase from 1998-2008, but did not grow nearly as much in that period as they did from 1988-1998 

    James Salsman Oct 17, 2011
    +Jim Wise do you remember A, B, and C above? You were wrong about A, and then you said B and C didn't depend on them when they do. 
    ------------------------------- 

    Excerpt from comments:  

    James Salsman Oct 18, 2011 (edited)  -  Public (locked) [ O.P.
    Is this video correct when it says that the doubt engendered against the scientific understanding of climate change has been the most deadly, even deadlier than tobacco, or are the attempts to undermine the scientific understanding of the deleterious effects of income inequality described in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Spirit_Level:_Why_More_Equal_Societies_Almost_Always_Do_Better causing even more preventable deaths than climate change and tobacco? 

    Via +Angela Adkins and +Bora Zivkovic 
    [VIDEO: http://vimeo.com/29107248 ]  
    ------------------------------- 
    Jim Wise Oct 16, 2011
    Or: ``people who disagree with me: threat, or menace?'' :-)
    ------------------------------- 
    James Salsman Oct 17, 2011 (edited)
    +Jim Wise do you mean people who disagree with you, or people who disagree with the peer reviewed secondary literature?
    ------------------------------- 
    Jim Wise Oct 17, 2011 (edited) 
    Mostly I mean people who feel that "science" means not having to defend their positions. :-)

    From where I'm sitting, declaring any position "the consensus" and thinking that means you don't have to respond with counter arguments when someone disagrees with you has nothing to do with science. It's a lot more like religion (and even there it's doing it wrong) -- and I never argue about religion in public. :-)

    So, I'll leave with a reminder of the late Michael Crichton's excellent take on the subject in his CalTech Michelin lecture:

    http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/07/09/aliens-cause-global-warming-a-caltech-lecture-by-michael-crichton/

    feel free to respond with name-calling and accusations that I (or Messrs. Watt or Crichton) are in the pay of big oil. That's not science either, fwiw. :-)
    ------------------------------- 
    Nick Austin Oct 17, 2011 (edited)+2
    +Jim Wise Science is about using logic and reason to seek reality. Therefore, using science is quintessentially defending your position. :-)

    If one is advocating positions which are contrary to scientific understanding, the burden of proof is firmly on them.
    ------------------------------- 
    James Salsman Oct 17, 2011 (edited)
    +Jim Wise I will not dignify the pride you take in your own ignorance with accusations of anything, but why do you ask that I call you names? I am sure you are a fine person even if deluded by paid marketing efforts.

    +Josh Musket Climate change has been a pretty big cause of death in Pakistan for the past two years, and if Australia and the Mississippi river valley keep taking on rainfall as they have been, I don't know what will happen. Thanks for your help with grammar.
    ------------------------------- 
    Tony Sidaway Oct 17, 2011 +3
    Jim, climate change science does have a consensus, but saying that doesn't mean it has to be defended scientifically is simply a misreading. Mann's hockey stick has emerged as the winner despite some serious counter-arguments, for instance, but it could yet be overturned.

    The problem with I have so many opponents of science is that they seem so disconnected from science. This applies equally to creationism (or "intelligent design" as its current formulation is known) and to the various pseudo-scientific attacks on scientific medicine, vaccination, and even climate research.

    If you're going to change a field of science you have to do more than disagree with the other experts in the field and declare yourself the winner by default when you fail to convince. You have to disprove a lot of very well established science, and thus convince the mainstream that their position is untenable.

    Every thriving field of science had achieved that seemingly impossible objective of convincing other scientists with new evidence or new reasoning. It's simply not enough to say you are right because you disagree with everybody else.
    Collapse this comment
    ------------------------------- 
    Josh Musket Oct 17, 2011 (edited)
    Oh, and now that I've got the video to load and have seen that it's about that same link of corporate propaganda, I'll provide a list of some groups it doesn't mention in the video: The Heartland Institute, the Cato Institute, Discovery Institute, Heritage Foundation, The Advancement of Sound Science Center, Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change, George Mason University, there are probably more.

    To address the initial question posed in this post, I think the root cause of inequality (income and most other kinds) is linked to the root cause of science denial.
    ------------------------------- 
    Jim Wise Oct 17, 2011 
    +Tony Sidaway, I'm curious if you see any discord between what you're saying, and the approach to the issue taken by +James Salsman and +Josh Musket. :-)

    I think the moment I really began to have my doubts about the way Global Warming science was being conducted was when SciAm ran with the cover story "Science Defends Itself Against The Skeptical Environmentalist" -- and a number of luminaries of the GW movement showed up to back this idea.

    The moment science becomes something which must be "defended" against disagreeing hypotheses -- and whether wrong or right, Lomborg's TSE is an argument from statistics, copiously supported with data, for a specific, and in the long run testable, hypothesis -- we're doing it wrong. And if that's the argument that supporters of AGW feel they have to make, how can I not doubt their confidence in the evidence?

    But again, I never argue about religion in public, and there are too many people here eager to declare disagreement to be ignorance (or malice), so I'm going to bed now.

    Have a nice evening. :-)
    ------------------------------- 
    James Salsman Oct 17, 2011
    Whenever anyone asks about the hockey stick graph, ask them how it compares to http://talknicer.com/co2.png 
    ------------------------------- 
    Nick Austin Oct 17, 2011
    +Jim Wise If you should care to educate yourself later:
    I'll just leave this here: http://www.skepticalscience.com/Newcomers-Start-Here.html ;-)
    ------------------------------- 
    Jim Wise Oct 17, 2011
    +James Salsman: Neat how the axes of the top graph are laid out to make a 1/3 or so increase (look at Y) look like a tenfold multiplication. Science!

    Is a 1/3 increase significant? I couldn't tell you. I would point out, though, that between 2000 (marked "now" on the bottom graph and now, global temperatures have not increased as much as Mann's model predicted. As for the rest of his model (the sharp curve up which in the earlier papers was supposed to have started by now, and in the bottom graph has been pushed comfortably out into the (for now) non-falsifiable future), that is the question, isn't it?
    ------------------------------- 
    James Salsman Oct 17, 2011
    +Jim Wise you didn't look at the lower half of http://talknicer.com/co2.png did you? It makes up for the difference correctly. How many years old do you think the Earth is?
    ------------------------------- 
    Tony Sidaway Oct 17, 2011
    This is where I block Jim. Certainty allied to ignorance is a waste.
     ------------------------------- 
    Jim Wise Oct 17, 2011
    I did. Note that the entire variation it shows up to 2000 fits into what it describes as normal variation in the last 20 years -- and the level of increase it predicts would have happened by 2010 (10 years after "now" on the graph)... didn't happen. 
    ------------------------------- 
    Nick Austin Oct 17, 2011
    +Jim Wise I didn't know we had a climate scientist in our midst! Do you have a link to the paper you published discussing the discrepancies you've identified? I checked Nature, and Science but your name did not come up. ;-) 
    ------------------------------- 
    Jim Wise Oct 17, 2011
    Interesting argument -- Whatever being so sure of an idea that you would block anyone who's not sure of it it, it sure doesn't sound like science to me. Science is not, after all, about certainty. 

    +Nick Austin: I'm sorry, what part of what I just said are you looking for a cite on:

    A.) that global carbon levels did not double between 1990 and 2010 as that graph predicts they would have?

    B.) that, given this, Mann quite correctly revised his hockey stick model to push the predicted spike about 30 years down the road? (there's nothing wrong with updating a model when new data comes in!)

    C.) that global temperatures were (depending on the model you look at) either flat or showed a slight increase from 1998-2008, but certainly did not -- as predicted -- grow nearly as much in that period as they did from 1988-1998?

    As far as I'm aware, these are the only claims I've made here. If your extensive research on this subject leads you to believe otherwise, I'd love to see some good articles on why. 

    But if you feel that I'm not qualified to hold an opinion here, and us mere mortals should simply take all this as received wisdom because we're not fit to judge, well, you'll have to excuse me -- I'm not dressed for church. :-)
    ------------------------------- 
    James Salsman Oct 17, 2011
    +Jim Wise seriously, about how old do you think the Earth is?
    ------------------------------- 
    Jim Wise Oct 17, 2011
    I'm sorry, what? Our current best guess is that it is between 4 and 5 billion years old -- and if new data comes in, we'll revise that up or down as fits. 

    Why? How old do you think it is, and why do you think that's at all relevant to this discussion?
    ------------------------------- 
    Jim Wise Oct 17, 2011
    Or is that another one of those things I'm not supposed to have an opinion on until I'm published in Nature or Science? This dogma stuff always confuses me, and I wouldn't want to commit a faux pas... :-)
    ------------------------------- 
    James Salsman Oct 17, 2011 (edited)
    +Jim Wise counting granite from supernova or cooling? This has to do with whether to tie it all in to radiochemistry or mitochondrial drift.
    ------------------------------- 
    Jim Wise Oct 17, 2011
    Radiation-based dating gives us a ballpark for when a given piece of matter cooled into a solid. Taking the values for the oldest known space rock as an upper bound and the values for the oldest sample believed to be terrestrial gives us that range. 

    New samples -- or new dating techniques -- could shift that range. 

    So I guess this is something I'm allowed to have an opinion on? This is all very confusing -- maybe a couple of you true believers could get together and write up a catechism so us laymen can figure out which opinions we're allowed to question!
    ------------------------------- 
    Jim Wise Oct 17, 2011
    (I see you clarified the question in an edit -- yes, having come on this from astronomy, I know more about the radiometric approach. Maybe you should make the right answer clear in that catechism. :-) )
    ------------------------------- 
    Nick Austin Oct 17, 2011
    +Jim Wise So you looked at the current state of climate science, and your takeaway is what?
    You disagree that man-made climate change is happening? Or you disagree that it's a hugely important issue which needs a large scale and immediate response?

    These are the reality.

    If you fall off of these paths, you need to provide strong evidence to explain your position.
    The standard way to present this sort of evidence is by publishing a paper in the established scientific journals.

    An extraordinary claim requires extraordinary proof.
    ------------------------------- 
    Jim Wise Oct 17, 2011
    +Nick Austin, as I've said, I'm only aware of three claims I've made in this thread (A, B, and C) above. If you think I'm wrong on any of these, by all means post your sources, and I'll post mine. 

    Beyond that, I don't know if the warming we saw in 1988-1998 will continue after the current flat decade. I don't know if man-made carbon is the cause of the warming in that decade, or of any warming we might see in the next. 

    I do know that the shakiness of methodology which shows in the "climategate" mails, and the fact that most of the "science" being done at the moment consists of politicking and name-calling is a big part of why I'm so unsure of the quality of the science here. 

    If all y'all would spend less time looking for heretics to burn, and more time writing up that catechism, maybe I'd be clearer on just what you want me to believe. Right now, I'm not. :-)
    ------------------------------- 
    Nick Austin Oct 17, 2011
    +Jim Wise You can find a good summary of the science here:
    http://www.skepticalscience.com/big-picture.html

    Thanks!
    ------------------------------- 
    Nick Austin Oct 17, 2011 +1
    +Jim Wise We're giving you a hard time, since you sound like this guy: (Hint: not like Dr. Jenkins ;-) )
    http://undsci.berkeley.edu/images/us101/balance.gif

    From: http://undsci.berkeley.edu/article/sciencetoolkit_04

    Thanks!
    ------------------------------- 
    Jim Wise Oct 17, 2011
    Yes, I've read that. Have you read (to pick one example):

    http://wattsupwiththat.com/reference-pages/global-temperature/

    ?

    (Cue name-calling and accusations of malice against Watts. It's okay -- I'll wait right here while you guys finish your little ritual, and when the priest dismisses the congregation, we can continue. )
    ------------------------------- 
    Jim Wise Oct 17, 2011
    Oh, I'm sorry -- I seem to have taken one of those opinions us laymen aren't allowed to hold. This is all very hard to follow, since in all these posts, you have yet to tell me which of the three opinions I've stated above (A, B, or C) you actually disagree with. 

    This religion stuff is baffling. I'm going to bed. I'll see you tomorrow at matins. :-)
    ------------------------------- 
    James Salsman Oct 17, 2011
    +Jim Wise why are you asking for a statement of religious doctrine while saying you seek science? What do you think of Proverbs 14:31? Do you mind if I block you out of courtesy for my readers who understand reality?
    ------------------------------- 
    Nick Austin Oct 17, 2011
    +Jim Wise That page has nothing but a lot of random data?

    We should ask somebody who has the training and experience to get to the big picture (I'll refer to such people as "climate scientists" in the future) what they think about it, instead of coming up with a layman's reading.

    You can find their analysis here:
    http://www.skepticalscience.com/big-picture.html

    And here:
    http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/publications_and_data_reports.shtml

    Thanks!
    ------------------------------- 
    Nick Austin Oct 17, 2011
    +Jim Wise I'm not sure if it's religion, but you do seem to have some kind of self delusion going on. :-)
    ------------------------------- 
    Jim Wise Oct 17, 2011
    It's your congregation -- feel free to cast me out at any time. :-)

    I'm looking for science, actually, but all I'm getting is repeated assertions that the laity are not allowed to question received opinion. Whatever that is, it sure ain't science -- dogma seems the best fit, as far as I can tell. 

    Anyway, block away, if that's how science is done around here. :-)
    ------------------------------- 
    Bob Calder Oct 17, 2011 +3
    Religion! lulz
    Trolling.
    ------------------------------- 
    James Salsman Oct 17, 2011
    +Jim Wise how do you search the peer reviewed secondary literature?
    ------------------------------- 
    Nick Austin Oct 17, 2011
    +Jim Wise Here is the link for the science, I guess a technical issue is blocking them from your view:
    http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/publications_and_data_reports.shtml

    Perhaps you're immune to the reports now?

    ;-)
    ------------------------------- 
    Nick Austin Oct 17, 2011
    We cannot cast you out of the "congregation" of logic and reason. You can only self banish. But take heart, for you can choose to come back any time you like.

    "You're entitled to your own opinions, but not your own facts." 

    Jim WiseOct 17, 2011 (edited)
    Which always sounds nice, +Nick Austin, but of the three opinions I've expressed here:

    A.) that global carbon levels did not double between 1990 and 2010 as the graph +James Salsman linked predicts they would have.

    B.) that, given this, Mann quite correctly revised his hockey stick model to push the predicted spike about 30 years down the road (there's nothing wrong with updating a model when new data comes in!).

    C.) that global temperatures were (depending on the model you look at) either flat or showed a slight increase from 1998-2008, but certainly did not -- as predicted -- grow as much or nearly as much in that period as they did from 1988-1998.

    you have yet to tell me which (if any) you believe are counterfactual. :-)

    To be clear: I don't know if Mann's updated hockey stick model is correct. All we can do -- scientifically at least[1] -- is look at the data.

    It's a matter of publicly available data (and I've linked above to a page linking all the main data sets) that the original model, although a very good fit for the years leading up to 1998[2], in which temperature was indeed increasing, did not accurately predict global temperature behavior in the next ten years, when temperatures either stayed flat or rose only slightly, depending on which data set you look at. I believe both sides of the debate should be able to agree on this much, right? (if you disagree, let me know!)

    So now, the question is whether the updated model is a good predictor of what will happen from here. Surely the way to answer that is to compare it to the data, not to accuse anyone who isn't sure of ignorance or malice, right? That's how science works, right?

    (I'll pause here while our host decides if he still wants to block me, and while you guys decide which of the received wisdom I'm sinning against in this post -- remember, even the inquisition hung a statement of the poor heretic's sins next to the pyre!)

    [1] politically, name-calling is always more fun and less work, and insisting that your theories be taken as received wisdom and never questioned is even more fun -- just look at this thread. :-)

    [2] of course, the "climategate" emails have since shown us how much of this fit was due to intentional fudging, but that's okay -- let's look at the sausage, not the factory.
    ------------------------------- 
    James Salsman Oct 17, 2011 (edited)
    +Jim Wise do you mean to say http://talknicer.com/co2.png predicts atmospheric carbon would double by 2010 or 2060? 
    ------------------------------- 
    Jim Wise Oct 17, 2011
    The deviation from the historical norm of 0.00027 (the writing on the graph states 0.027 -- neither units, nor, more importantly, a source[1] are given). The value in 2000 is as shown in the graph. The increase from there is not. Do you disagree? Remember that a key component of the Hockey Stick model is that changes in both carbon and temperature variation are supposed to be accelerating. In the actual data, carbon is indeed continuing to increase, but at a more-or-less constant pace... and temperature has stayed flat or increased only slightly since 1998.


    [1] source is important -- note that the Scripps Institute, source of the Keeling carbon data (the dataset that curve most resembles, though it is, of course, unsourced) take their measurements at a location in Mauna Loa in close proximity to...

    ... wait for it...

    one of the world's most active volcanoes. Other datasets from the same period also show a rise in atmospheric carbon (hardly surprising), but not as steep.
    ------------------------------- 
    Jim Wise Oct 17, 2011 (edited)
    And so we're clear, that's "A" from my three opinions. Care to comment on B or C? Because if we were to stipulate that the increase in carbon content was accelerating (and the data doesn't show this), while temperatures were remaining flat, or increasing at a slowed pace (again, depending on the dataset), then wouldn't that weaken the alleged causal link between carbon level and temperature?
    ------------------------------- 
    James Salsman Oct 17, 2011 (edited)
    +Jim Wise dude, tell me you can count zeros. Where do you see "0.027"? The sources are NCAR ice core samples and Mauna Loa. I appreciate that you are suggesting alternative hypotheses. Do you suppose anyone has ever checked Mauna Loa station data from samples way out in the middle of the ocean?
    ------------------------------- 
    Jim Wise Oct 17, 2011
    ".027 +/- 0.005%" is the value given in the note directly over the year "1750".

    .00027 is the (correct) value in the axis.

    Note that the NCAR values and Mauna Loa values do not overlap -- and the increase is entirely within the period covered by the (problematic) Mauna Loa data.
    ------------------------------- 
    James Salsman Oct 17, 2011 (edited)
    I see 0.027 and its tolerance are both percentages. That was also from ice core data. What data do you have for atmospheric CO2 variation over the past 20,000 years?
    ------------------------------- 
    Jim Wise Oct 17, 2011 (edited)
    I see. By the way, if you get a hankering to update that graph, you can pull the live NOAA Mauna Load data from here:

    ftp://ftp.cmdl.noaa.gov/ccg/co2/trends/co2_mm_mlo.txt

    Let me know when you see that acceleration you're looking for, because while nicely up-and-to-the-right, the slope looks pretty constant to me across the measurement period.
    ------------------------------- 
    James Salsman Oct 17, 2011
    +Jim Wise thanks. To answer your earlier question, both B and C depended on A being correct. Now please have a look at http://www.eia.gov/oiaf/aeo/images/figure66-lg.jpg Why do you think the government uses your taxes to tell you that wind will suddenly stop growing in two years, and level off, even though it's been on an exponential curve? If you're stumped, you can ask http://www.eia.gov/about/john_conti.cfm how long his Bush appointee boss worked for the fossil fuel industry. 
    ------------------------------- 
    Jim Wise Oct 17, 2011
    I don't think B and C do depend on A. If temperature rise has leveled off, this changes the picture, whether carbon concentration is growing or not:

    * if growth in carbon concentration were accelerating, but temperature has leveled off, the relation between the two in the Mann model does not fit.

    * if carbon concentration is leveling off, and so is temperature, then the increase in both forecast by the Mann model does not fit.

    The Mann model calls for both rates of change to be accelerating sharply. The current data has already falsified the original model -- which is fine, that's what measurement is for! -- now the question is whether the updated model will prove a good predictor.

    So, looking just at C, do you believe that global temperatures rose as much from 1998-2008 as they did from 1988-1998? What do you believe the global temperature chart of 2008-2018 will look like?
    ------------------------------- 
    Nick Austin Oct 17, 2011
    +Jim Wise Okay. I let all of the things you've stated stand as uncontested facts.
    What's your analysis, given this new data?
    ------------------------------- 
    Jim Wise Oct 17, 2011 (edited)
    Well, for starters, I'm looking for a model of future climate which accounts for the lack of global warming in the period 1998-2011. The Mann model hasn't, so far. If the model sees a correlation with carbon, it should match that data too, of course (and not, as the Mann model did, predict an acceleration which didn't happen).

    One place to look for such a model is in solar activity -- and a number of peer-reviewed papers in that area have started to appear -- but that's only one possibility. Another possibility would be feedback effects on carbon absorption by the ocean.

    In any case, a model must correctly predict the past before we can start evaluating its prediction of the future, right?
    ------------------------------- 
    James Salsman Oct 17, 2011 (edited)
    +Jim Wise I care more about precipitation than temperature. Are you familiar with the trend in the cost of extreme weather events?

    Why do you think that your B and C above do not depend on A? You wrote:

    "A.) global carbon levels did not double between 1990 and 2010 [sic]....  

    "B.) given this, Mann....

    "C.) global temperatures ... certainly did not -- as predicted -- grow as much...."

    You first misrepresent a graph to say it's much more sharply increasing than it is, and then complain that temperatures didn't rise as fast as you mistakenly thought the graph showed. Then when called on it, you say that the comparison was not a dependency. Would you allow anyone who has such little respect for the truth to post comments on your shares?
    ------------------------------- 
    Jim Wise Oct 17, 2011
    +James Salsman Because carbon prediction and temperature prediction are two different aspects of Mann's model, and because Mann's model could have been revised with or without it's failure to predict either well for the period 1998-2008.

    You could clearly believe that (B) Mann revised his model, without believing (A) that the old model failed to predict carbon levels through 2008.

    Likewise, you could clearly believe that temperature stayed more or less flat from 1998-2008 (C) without believing that Mann's model failed to predict carbon (A).

    So, which of the three do you believe to be incorrect?
    ------------------------------- 
    James Salsman Oct 17, 2011
    +Jim Wise you have already admitted that (A) was vastly incorrect, in that talknicer.com/co2.png does not double from 1990 to 2010, it doubles from steady state to 2060 and accelerates from there. If I block you, will you agree to tell people it was because I thought you had abject disrespect for the truth, and give them a link to this share?
    ------------------------------- 
    Jim Wise Oct 17, 2011 (edited)
    It's your thread -- you're welcome to block me at any time.

    But -- so I understand where you're saying I'm wrong -- are you now stating that either the Mann model or the sketch you posted does not claim the rate of growth of atmospheric carbon will accelerate from 2000 to 2010 vs. the previous decade? If so, when do you believe that sketch shows the acceleration starting? Because even the Mauna Loa dataset -- which I've linked, and which is the most growth-friendly of the available datasets -- shows no change in the rate of growth at any point from 1958 to the present.

    You are correct that it's the change in global carbon levels from the historical average, not the raw level that the graph shows doubling by 2010 -- my original post was unclear on this (much as the top graph at that link is) -- but you do agree it didn't happen, right? 
    ------------------------------- 
    Nick Austin Oct 17, 2011
    +Jim Wise Here is the problem. You're trying to debate climate science with random people on Google+.

    We are not climate scientists, so we rely on what they tell us.

    I'm sure you can understand why we take the word of over 800 professional scientists, 27 scientific organizations, the Academies of Science from 19 different countries, and Al Gore over "Jim Wise", Dude on the Internet(tm)?

    Credibility is earned. You are not entitled to have your opinion taken seriously.

    Thanks!
    ------------------------------- 
    James Salsman Oct 17, 2011 (edited)
    +Jim Wise in fact the rate of growth has been increasing quite sharply. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:CO2_increase_rate.png Will you please answer: If I block you, and someone asks you why, will you agree to tell them that the reason was your apparent lack of respect for the truth, and give them a link to this thread? 
    ------------------------------- 
    Jim Wise Oct 17, 2011 (edited)
    I'm not asking you to take my opinion seriously.

    I'm trusting your interpretation of the received wisdom to have informed you enough to tell me what I've got wrong. :-)

    Such an answer might be:

    * I'm wrong because carbon grew faster than the Mauna Loa data shows (perhaps another data set is a better indicator? Where can I find it?)

    * I'm wrong because the Mann model doesn't match that sketch, and thus does not predict carbon growth to accelerate until comfortably off in the (for now) unfalsifiable future (perhaps you have a better reference for Mann's model than his own famous 1998 piece in Nature introducing the "hockey stick"? Where can I find it?)

    * I'm wrong because global warming continued in the period 1998-2008 at the same (or greater) rate as in the period 1988-1998, despite the fact that the NOAA and NASA data sets don't show this (again, perhaps you could recommend another data set? Where can I find it?)

    Any of these could be easily shown by pointing to specific counterexamples (data, please!). Simply appealing to authority isn't a good way to convince anyone who doesn't already agree with you -- and if all you're interested in is preaching to the choir, well, we're back in church, aren't we? :-)
    ------------------------------- 
    Jim Wise Oct 17, 2011 (edited)
    +James Salsman Really? What dataset is that a graph of (it's not labeled)? If you fit a curve to that dataset, where and when does its slope change? Is Wikipedia user "New image uploader 929" one of +Nick Austin's 800 experts?

    I've linked NOAA page for the Mauna Loa dataset -- 643 datapoints over 53 years -- it's easy to pull into gnuplot or excel and graph for yourself. Where do you see the rate of change in that data accelerate? If you don't where is a dataset which does show acceleration?
    ------------------------------- 
    Nick Austin Oct 17, 2011
    +Jim Wise I can't tell you why you're wrong, perhaps you're right!
    The people qualified to tell you if you're wrong or not are other climate scientists. Publish your work, see what they say.

    I strongly suspect that you're wrong, since many of the snide side arguments you've posted have long since been shown to be false, yet you continue to repeat them.

    Thanks!
    ------------------------------- 
    James Salsman Oct 17, 2011 (edited)
    +Jim Wise we have already been over the reason: You were wrong because you misrepresented the data to try to support your opinion, and when called on it you said that the parts which depended on your misrepresentation were unrelated. Do you or do you not agree to tell people that is the reason if I block you? Before I answer any further questions, I want to know whether you take responsibility for lying about your mistake.
    ------------------------------- 
    Jim Wise Oct 17, 2011 (edited)
    +James Salsman Which data are you saying I misrepresented? And, again, are you claiming that the graph of carbon levels you've posted several times now matches the actual data from Mauna Loa or any other carbon dataset?

    I can't blame the graph for being wrong in 2000 -- all prediction is risky. To keep posting it in 2011 when it's prediction has been proven incorrect by all of the available data seems a bit dodgy, no?
    ------------------------------- 
    Jim Wise Oct 17, 2011
    Anyway, I have a train to catch. You'll have to start services without me.

    If you block me, remember to read Declan's post on the right way to do it.[1]

    And if you want any chance of convincing anyone who doesn't already agree with you, you might start by telling me where I'm wrong -- if this sermon is meant for the choir, I'll let +Nick Austin's hosannas speak for me. :-)

    [1] https://plus.google.com/u/0/112961607570158342254/posts/ChcTMsVgWww
    ------------------------------- 
    James Salsman Oct 17, 2011
    +Jim Wise do you remember A, B, and C above? You were wrong about A, and then you said B and C didn't depend on them when they do. Then you admitted your mistake but you have not yet agreed to explain to people that mistake is why I will have blocked you if I do. And why do you say http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:CO2_increase_rate.png is not labeled? Do you have a scrollbar?
    ------------------------------- 
    Nick Austin Oct 17, 2011
    +Jim Wise You mentioned the "climate gate" emails.
    http://www.skepticalscience.com/Climategate-CRU-emails-hacked.htm

    Mentioning them as if the matter suggests impropriety shows bad faith.
    ------------------------------- 
    James Salsman Oct 17, 2011 (edited)
    +Jim Wise you are wrong because you lied (double carbon in 2060, not 2010), lied again when you were called on the first lie (B and C depended on A) and then refused to take responsibility for the lie. Then you lied again when you said the rate of carbon increase is steady, and then tried to divert attention from your lies by saying http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:CO2_increase_rate.png is not labeled when it clearly cites its authoritative sources. Also, your practice of saying "the graph" when we are talking about multiple graphs is confusing and prevents me from answering many of your questions. Finally, for the fifth time now: If I block you will you agree to tell people it was because of these lies and give them a link to this share?
    ------------------------------- 
    Jim Wise Oct 17, 2011 (edited)
    I immediately clarified that I was referring to the change from the historical norm doubling in that graph, not the raw number -- but if I had misread the graph, that wouldn't help your case: comparing the graph to the data which has been gathered since 2000 still shows that its predictions were incorrect (and I've linked the data).

    Your response? An anonymously-uploaded graph on Wikipedia (I guess the "only recognized climate scientists may comment" rule only applies to those who disagree with you).

    If you actually disagree with me that:

    * growth of carbon concentration in the atmosphere is not acelerating (source: NOAA Mauna Loa data, linked above)

    * Mann's model has been revised accordingly from the now-falsified 1998 version (source: Mann's 1998 article in Nature, I have a hardcopy, but I'm sure you can find it)

    * global warming either slowed or stopped between 1998 and 2008, showing nowhere near the growth which occurred from 1988 to 1998 (source: NOAA and NASA global climate data, linked above)

    I'd love to see the data you're basing your conclusions on -- I've shown you mine.

    If you don't disagree with any of these points -- or don't have any basis for your disagreement that you can point to -- then I'm not sure we have much to discuss, and I won't post again. 

    Good day. :-)
    ------------------------------- 
    Nick Austin Oct 18, 2011
    +Jim Wise 
    (Original text : I created this image with help (numerical data only) from Dr. Pieter Tans (3 May 2008) "Annual CO2 mole fraction increase (ppm)" for 1959-2007," National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Earth System Research Laboratory, Global Monitoring Division (additional details; see also K.A. Masarie, P.P. Tans (1995) "Extension and integration of atmospheric carbon dioxide data into a globally consistent measurement record," J. Geopys. Research, vol. 100, 11593-11610.))

    I'll just put that here.
    ------------------------------- 
    Jim Wise Oct 18, 2011 (edited)
    (As far as I can tell, that article is using a subset of the NOAA (Mauna Loa) data, which I've linked -- and you can graph it for yourself to show that it shows no acceleration.)
    ------------------------------- 
    James Salsman Oct 18, 2011+1
    +Jim Wise how much are you willing to bet?
    ------------------------------- 
    Nick Austin Oct 18, 2011
    +Jim Wise Here is the direct answer to your specific claim:
    Currently, humans are emitting around 29 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere per year. Around 43% remains in the atmosphere - this is called the ’airborne fraction’. The rest is absorbed by vegetation and the oceans. While there are questions over how much the airborne fraction is increasing, it is clear that the total amount of CO2 in the atmosphere is increasing dramatically. Current CO2 levels are the highest in 15 million years. http://www.skepticalscience.com/co2-levels-airborne-fraction-increasing.htm
    ------------------------------- 
    Jim Wise Oct 18, 2011
    Again: is the rate of change accelerating (as the Mann model says it will be by now) or not?

    The NOAA (Mauna Loa) data says "not". Do you have another data set which suggests it is?
    ------------------------------- 
    Bob Calder Oct 18, 2011+1
    Muting this post. Wise's arguments are small potatoes.
    ------------------------------- 
    James Salsman Oct 18, 2011
    +Jim Wise that depends on the rate of wind power adoption. Do you agree with the government or the extrapolation?
    ------------------------------- 
    URL source G+ post: 
    plus.google.com/113215976889659570939/posts/dLzyWLrV83W 
    ------------------------------- 
    #globalwarming   #climatechange   #AGW   #hockeystick   #hockeystickgrowth   #co2emissions   #fossilfuels  
    ------------------------------- 
  • 0 plusses - 8 comments - 0 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-12-07 10:20:26
    nature.com - Suspend disbelief (6 comments)
    By Nature Editorial. December 5, 2012
    nature.com/news/suspend-disbelief-1.11954
    Wrangling over scientific misconduct could influence Romania’s general election.

    Excerpt:
    <<The present government of Social Democrat Victor Ponta has been in office for less than a year but it has reversed many of the positive steps taken. Should his Social Liberal Union (USL) coalition gain the absolute majority predicted by some in the general election to be held on 9 December, it is likely to dismantle even more of the institutions set up to ensure meritocracy in academic appointment and funding, and will probably strip away the remaining checks against academic corruption.

    Those checks are essential, not least to scrub clean Ponta’s government. In the past week, the watchdog website Integru.org has highlighted two cases of alleged plagiarism and one case of alleged data manipulation involving the research minister Ecaterina Andronescu, then a chemist at the Polytechnic University of Bucharest. She denies them. In accordance with Integru’s methods, each of the allegations was confirmed by several independent scientific experts from other countries in Europe and North America.

    Unlikely as it sounds given the briefness of Ponta’s tenure, Andronescu was his third appointment as research minister, and the third to be accused of misconduct. Ponta’s first choice, Corina Dumitrescu, was withdrawn before she was confirmed by parliament. She stood accused of plagiarism and falsely claiming that she attended Stanford University. Ioan Mang was appointed in her place on 7 May but was forced to resign just a week later after Nature exposed extensive plagiarism in his academic papers in computer science (see Nature 485, 289, 2012). Absurdity peaked in June, when Nature revealed that Ponta himself had plagiarized in his 2003 PhD thesis (see Nature 486, 305; 2012).

    The accused all dismiss the charges as politically motivated. Ponta promptly ditched the committees responsible for considering the allegations, replaced them with sympathizers, and insisted that the wrong committee had judged him guilty. In a televised electoral debate on 2 December, which heavily featured Integru’s evidence against her, Andronescu responded by emotionally repeating her unlikely election slogan: ‘justice all the way’. A press release from her ministry attempted to dismiss the authority of Integru.org.

    On 30 November, Andronescu announced her decision not to withdraw Ponta’s PhD, even though a report from the awarding University of Bucharest confirmed plagiarism. Only the research minister can order such revocation. Yet she claimed, absurdly, that it was not in her legislative power to do so. She similarly failed to take responsibility for plagiarism and other scientific misconduct allegedly perpetrated by leading figures in other universities. She has also announced her intention to eliminate rules that require grant applications to be sent to reviewers outside Romania, claiming that the process costs too much.

    Those who are struggling to absorb the scale on which Romania’s scientific system is failing must do as they would in the theatre — suspend their disbelief. But they might also reflect on the challenge of building a strong democratic state on the ashes of a corrupted dictatorship. Ponta’s attempt in July to impeach President Traian Băsescu, a Democratic Liberal, drew a formal rebuke from the EU as undemocratic.

    The second largest contender in the elections is a coalition led by the Democratic Liberals. The Democratic Liberals were responsible for bringing in the exemplary laws and structures for science that Ponta is now dismantling. But their governing coalition was also responsible for carrying out an austerity programme that, among other things, cut public-sector wages by 25% in 2010.>>
    _____________ 

    Further reading:

    (2 comments)
    nature.com - Plagiarism exposed in Romanian grant applications
    By Alison Abbott. November 7, 2012
    nature.com/news/plagiarism-exposed-in-romanian-grant-applications-1.11758
    More than a dozen applications suspected of plagiarism.

    nature.com - Repeat after me
    By Nature Editorial. August 15, 2012
    nature.com/nature/journal/v488/n7411/full/488253a.html 
    With plagiarism seemingly endemic in Romania, as well as rife among Europe's political class, a bid by academics to root out misconduct deserves widespread support.

    (3 comments)
    nature.com - Romanian scientists fight plagiarism
    By Alison Abbott. August 15, 2012
    nature.com/news/romanian-scientists-fight-plagiarism-1.11170 
    Researchers set up independent review panel after misconduct scandals hit government.

    (259 comments)
    nature.com - Romanian prime minister accused of plagiarism
    By Quirin Schiermeier. June 18, 2012
    nature.com/news/romanian-prime-minister-accused-of-plagiarism-1.10845 
    Allegations prompt questions about government’s ability to tackle misconduct in academia.

    (4 comments)
    nature.com - Plagiarism charge for Romanian minister
    By Alison Abbott. May 15, 2012
    nature.com/news/plagiarism-charge-for-romanian-minister-1.10646 
    Scandal adds to fears that country’s research reform is in peril.
    _______________ 
  • 2 plusses - 3 comments - 1 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-10-06 13:03:29
    RESHARE:
    plus.google.com - Omega-3 fatty acids, oxidative stress, and leukocyte telomere length: A randomized controlled trial
    By Raymund Kho K.D. October 6, 2012

    Excerpt from commments:

    Zephyr López Cervilla Oct 6, 2012 4:50 AM +1
    I have the suspicion that the reason why the telomeres of the peripheral T-cells are more prone to lengthened with omega-3 supplementation is because with the modulation of the pro-inflammatory signal induced by omega-3, the T-cell precursors proliferate less, and as it's mentioned in the same paper that presents the results of this study,

    "Inflammation triggers T-cell proliferation, one known cause of telomere shortening."

    Related questions:
    1. Why did they didn't exclude those volunteers who were taking an aspirin a day? (I only can think of a plausible explanation).
    2. Did they compare change in telomerase activity vs. change in telomere length? If so, why didn't they show those results?
    _______________ 

    Raymund Kho K.D. Oct 6, 2012 6:09 AM (edited)
    thank you +Zephyr López Cervilla for your refreshing opinion. however i might add the missing direct evidence between telomere length and pufa/omega-3 included in your suspicion. could you elaborate on this? furthermore perhaps you are in the position to point out the relation between aspirin intake and the inclusion in this study :)
    _______________ 

    Zephyr López Cervilla Oct 6, 2012 12:44 PM (edited) +2
    It can prevent heart attacks and strokes.
    I guess that they didn't exclude those people who were taking aspirin because many of their volunteers in the age range that they wanted to study (with a sedentary lifestyle and overweight or obese) were taking an aspirin a day as a preventive treatment. It's the only reason I can think about why they excluded other people who were in a treatment with other NSAID anti-inflammatories but not with aspirin.
    Perhaps they would have ended with too small sample had they excluded those taking aspirin regularly, or alternatively, they considered it as a common trait in the population under study and didn't want to skew the results.  
    Collapse this comment
    _______________ 

    Raymund Kho K.D. Oct 6, 2012 12:57 PM (edited) +1
    +Zephyr López Cervilla actually the combined use of omega-3 and aspirin reinforces against heart diseases. so it would not have been a valid design for the current study. furthermore could you elaborate on your suspicion of the modulation as the reason the telomeres lengthen as described earlier :)
    _______________ 

    Zephyr López Cervilla Oct 6, 2012 1:17 PM +1
    It's explicitly mentioned in their paper, "inflammation triggers T-cell proliferation, one known case of telomere shortening". On the other hand, the omega-3 fatty acids (basically EPA) are known to have anti-inflammatory effects.

    It has to be taken into account that what they've been studying how omega-3 intake affects telomere length exclusively on peripheral T-cells. Most of those cells are the result of previous clonal expansions caused by an immune response. A stronger pro-inflammatory signal potentiate immune response, that's why  immunologic adjuvants are commonly included in vaccines (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immunologic_adjuvant), to elicit a stronger immune response (and greater proliferation of immune cells). On the other hand, omega-3 modulate pro-inflammatory signals, making them less intense (the omega-3 derivatives are known to interfere with the signaling pathway of prostaglandins).

    With these data they can't know whether the telomere has been actually extended. The only thing that they can state is that the telomere length measured in peripheral T-cells in some cases has become longer after the 4-month period of treatment, but it could well be that the stem cells from which these cells derive hadn't lengthened their telomeres at all. To check this, they should should have induced the mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells into the blood stream (that otherwise are located in the bone marrow) or get them directly from the bone marrow to measure the length of their telomeres before and after the omega-3 treatment. 
    _____________________ 

    Raymund Kho K.D. Oct 6, 2012 2:04 PM (edited) +1
    interesting view +Zephyr López Cervilla , however i disagree  telomeres are subject to lengthening by omega-3, probably moreover by folate and nicotamine. inflammation may lead to both to oxidative stress and dna damage shortening of telomeres :)
    _____________________ 

    Zephyr López Cervilla Oct 6, 2012 2:45 PM (edited) +1
    I didn't say that the telomeres had been lengthened thanks to omega-3 supplementation, it's the authors of the paper who are suggesting such thing (or at least that omega-3 helps preserve the length of the telomeres): 

    <<The study showed that most overweight but healthy middle-aged and older adults who took omega-3 supplements for four months altered a ratio of their fatty acid consumption in a way that helped preserve tiny segments of DNA in their white blood cells.

    These segments, called telomeres, are known to shorten over time in many types of cells as a consequence of aging. In the study, lengthening of telomeres in immune system cells was more prevalent in people who substantially improved the ratio of omega-3s to other fatty acids in their diet.

    “The telomere finding is provocative in that it suggests the possibility that a nutritional supplement might actually make a difference in aging,” said Jan Kiecolt-Glaser, professor of psychiatry and psychology at Ohio State and lead author of the study.>>
    researchnews.osu.edu/archive/omega3aging.htm 
    _____________________ 

    References:

    Ohio State University press release:
    - Caldwell, Emily. Omega-3 Supplements May Slow A Biological Effect of Aging. The Ohio State University - Research and Innovation Communications. October 1, 2012
    researchnews.osu.edu/archive/omega3aging.htm 

    Reference papers:
    - Kiecolt-Glaser et al. Omega-3 fatty acids, oxidative stress, and leukocyte telomere length: A randomized controlled trial. Brain Behav Immun (2012) [uncorrected proof, article in press] 
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23010452 
    linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0889-1591(12)00431-X 
    sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088915911200431X 

    - Kiecolt-Glaser JK et al. Omega-3 supplementation lowers inflammation in healthy middle-aged and older adults: a randomized controlled trial. Brain Behav Immun (2012) vol. 26 (6) pp. 988-95
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22640930 
    linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0889-1591(12)00118-3 
    sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889159112001183 

    Related paper:
    - Kiecolt-Glaser JK et al. Omega-3 supplementation lowers inflammation and anxiety in medical students: a randomized controlled trial. Brain Behav Immun (2011) vol. 25 (8) pp. 1725-34
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21784145 
    linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0889-1591(11)00468-5 
    sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889159111004685 

    Related information available at MedLine Plus:
    nlm.nih.gov - Fish Oil
    Retrieved on October 3, 2012
    nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/druginfo/natural/993.html 

    Links to other science news outlets:
    sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/10/121001140957.htm 
    medicalxpress.com/news/2012-10-omega-supplements-biological-effect-aging.html 
    esciencenews.com/articles/2012/10/01/omega.3.supplements.may.slow.a.biological.effect.aging 
    scienceblog.com/56909/omega-3-supplements-may-slow-a-biological-effect-of-aging 
    _______________________ 

    URL related G+ post: 
    plus.google.com/114605547533973731226/posts/RYMB3JE97ob 

    URL other related G+ posts: plus.google.com/102370347732140106252/posts/C9p4AJG2xtY 
    plus.google.com/105903603302602842440/posts/fuEu9ixJx7S 
    plus.google.com/117029437254252483108/posts/7BvUQpWDxx9 
    ____________________________ 

    URL source G+ post: https://plus.google.com/104340176530762389758/posts/KH7MEQk9PjA 
    ____________________________ 

    Reshared text:
    #neuroscience #n_3_PUFAs #diet #aging #cytokines  

    Omega-3 fatty acids, oxidative stress, and leukocyte telomere length: A randomized controlled trial

    '..The triad of inflammation, oxidative stress, and immune cell aging represents important pre-disease mechanisms that may be ameliorated through nutritional interventions..'

    Shorter telomeres have been associated with poor health behaviors, age-related diseases, and early mortality. Telomere length is regulated by the enzyme telomerase, and is linked to exposure to proinflammatory cytokines and oxidative stress.

    In our recent randomized controlled trial, omega-3 (n-3) polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) supplementation lowered the concentration of serum proinflammatory cytokines.

    This study assessed whether n-3 PUFA supplementation also affected leukocyte telomere length, telomerase, and oxidative stress. In addition to testing for group differences, changes in the continuousn-6:n-3 PUFA ratio were assessed to account for individual differences in adherence, absorption, and metabolism.

    The double-blind four-month trial included 106 healthy sedentary overweight middle-aged and older adults who received (1) 2.5 g/day n-3 PUFAs, (2) l.25 g/day n-3 PUFAs, or (3) placebo capsules that mirrored the proportions of fatty acids in the typical American diet. Supplementation significantly lowered oxidative stress as measured by F2-isoprostanes (p = 0.02).

    The estimated geometric mean log-F2-isoprostanes values were 15% lower in the two supplemented groups compared to placebo. Although group differences for telomerase and telomere length were nonsignificant, changes in the n-6:n-3 PUFA plasma ratios helped clarify the intervention’s impact: telomere length increased with decreasing n-6:n-3 ratios,p = 0.02.

    The data suggest that lower n-6:n-3 PUFA ratios can impact cell aging.

    This translational research broadens our understanding of the potential impact of the n-6:n-3 PUFA balance.
    *- Janice K. Kiecolt-Glaser, Elissa S. Epel, Martha A. Belury, Rebecca Andridge, Jue Lin, Ronald Glaser, William B. Malarkey, Beom Seuk Hwang, 
    Elizabeth Blackburn*
  • 2 plusses - 3 comments - 1 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-10-20 15:38:19
    theatlantic.com - Lies, Damned Lies, and Medical Science
    By David H. Freedman. November, 2010
    theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2010/11/lies-damned-lies-and-medical-science/308269 

    Much of what medical researchers conclude in their studies is misleading, exaggerated, or flat-out wrong. So why are doctors—to a striking extent—still drawing upon misinformation in their everyday practice? Dr. John Ioannidis has spent his career challenging his peers by exposing their bad science.

    EXCERPT:
    [ Comment: believe it or not the full article is much longer, what would deter many potential readers so I've separated the wheat from the chaff. ]

    <<[John Ioannidis] is what’s known as a meta-researcher, and he’s become one of the world’s foremost experts on the credibility of medical research. He and his team have shown, again and again, and in many different ways, that much of what biomedical researchers conclude in published studies—conclusions that doctors keep in mind when they prescribe antibiotics or blood-pressure medication, or when they advise us to consume more fiber or less meat, or when they recommend surgery for heart disease or back pain—is misleading, exaggerated, and often flat-out wrong. He charges that as much as 90 percent of the published medical information that doctors rely on is flawed. His work has been widely accepted by the medical community; it has been published in the field’s top journals, where it is heavily cited; and he is a big draw at conferences. Given this exposure, and the fact that his work broadly targets everyone else’s work in medicine, as well as everything that physicians do and all the health advice we get, Ioannidis may be one of the most influential scientists alive. Yet for all his influence, he worries that the field of medical research is so pervasively flawed, and so riddled with conflicts of interest, that it might be chronically resistant to change—or even to publicly admitting that there’s a problem.>>

    John Ioannidis: “I take all the researchers who visit me here, and almost every single one of them asks the tree the same question, ‘Will my research grant be approved?’"

    <<he goes on to suggest that an obsession with winning funding has gone a long way toward weakening the reliability of medical research.>>

    <<Now he’d have a chance to combine math and medicine by applying rigorous statistical analysis to what seemed a surprisingly sloppy field.>>

    John Ioannidis: “I assumed that everything we physicians did was basically right, but now I was going to help verify it. All we’d have to do was systematically review the evidence, trust what it told us, and then everything would be perfect.”

    <<It didn’t turn out that way. In poring over medical journals, he was struck by how many findings of all types were refuted by later findings. Of course, medical-science “never minds” are hardly secret. And they sometimes make headlines, as when in recent years large studies or growing consensuses of researchers concluded that mammograms, colonoscopies, and PSA tests are far less useful cancer-detection tools than we had been told; or when widely prescribed antidepressants such as Prozac, Zoloft, and Paxil were revealed to be no more effective than a placebo for most cases of depression; or when we learned that staying out of the sun entirely can actually increase cancer risks; or when we were told that the advice to drink lots of water during intense exercise was potentially fatal; or when, last April, we were informed that taking fish oil, exercising, and doing puzzles doesn’t really help fend off Alzheimer’s disease, as long claimed. Peer-reviewed studies have come to opposite conclusions on whether using cell phones can cause brain cancer, whether sleeping more than eight hours a night is healthful or dangerous, whether taking aspirin every day is more likely to save your life or cut it short, and whether routine angioplasty works better than pills to unclog heart arteries.

    But beyond the headlines, Ioannidis was shocked at the range and reach of the reversals he was seeing in everyday medical research. “Randomized controlled trials,” which compare how one group responds to a treatment against how an identical group fares without the treatment, had long been considered nearly unshakable evidence, but they, too, ended up being wrong some of the time.>>

    John Ioannidis: “I realized even our gold-standard research had a lot of problems.”

    <<Baffled, he started looking for the specific ways in which studies were going wrong. And before long he discovered that the range of errors being committed was astonishing: from what questions researchers posed, to how they set up the studies, to which patients they recruited for the studies, to which measurements they took, to how they analyzed the data, to how they presented their results, to how particular studies came to be published in medical journals.

    This array suggested a bigger, underlying dysfunction, and Ioannidis thought he knew what it was.>>

    John Ioannidis: “The studies were biased. Sometimes they were overtly biased. Sometimes it was difficult to see the bias, but it was there.”

    <<Researchers headed into their studies wanting certain results—and, lo and behold, they were getting them. We think of the scientific process as being objective, rigorous, and even ruthless in separating out what is true from what we merely wish to be true, but in fact it’s easy to manipulate results, even unintentionally or unconsciously.>>

    John Ioannidis: “At every step in the process, there is room to distort results, a way to make a stronger claim or to select what is going to be concluded. There is an intellectual conflict of interest that pressures researchers to find whatever it is that is most likely to get them funded.”

    <<Perhaps only a minority of researchers were succumbing to this bias, but their distorted findings were having an outsize effect on published research. To get funding and tenured positions, and often merely to stay afloat, researchers have to get their work published in well-regarded journals, where rejection rates can climb above 90 percent. Not surprisingly, the studies that tend to make the grade are those with eye-catching findings. But while coming up with eye-catching theories is relatively easy, getting reality to bear them out is another matter. The great majority collapse under the weight of contradictory data when studied rigorously. Imagine, though, that five different research teams test an interesting theory that’s making the rounds, and four of the groups correctly prove the idea false, while the one less cautious group incorrectly “proves” it true through some combination of error, fluke, and clever selection of data. Guess whose findings your doctor ends up reading about in the journal, and you end up hearing about on the evening news? Researchers can sometimes win attention by refuting a prominent finding, which can help to at least raise doubts about results, but in general it is far more rewarding to add a new insight or exciting-sounding twist to existing research than to retest its basic premises—after all, simply re-proving someone else’s results is unlikely to get you published, and attempting to undermine the work of respected colleagues can have ugly professional repercussions.>>

    <<He chose to publish one paper, fittingly, in the online journal PLoS Medicine, which is committed to running any methodologically sound article without regard to how “interesting” the results may be. In the paper, Ioannidis laid out a detailed mathematical proof that, assuming modest levels of researcher bias, typically imperfect research techniques, and the well-known tendency to focus on exciting rather than highly plausible theories, researchers will come up with wrong findings most of the time. Simply put, if you’re attracted to ideas that have a good chance of being wrong, and if you’re motivated to prove them right, and if you have a little wiggle room in how you assemble the evidence, you’ll probably succeed in proving wrong theories right. His model predicted, in different fields of medical research, rates of wrongness roughly corresponding to the observed rates at which findings were later convincingly refuted: 80 percent of non-randomized studies (by far the most common type) turn out to be wrong, as do 25 percent of supposedly gold-standard randomized trials, and as much as 10 percent of the platinum-standard large randomized trials. The article spelled out his belief that researchers were frequently manipulating data analyses, chasing career-advancing findings rather than good science, and even using the peer-review process—in which journals ask researchers to help decide which studies to publish—to suppress opposing views.

    Still, Ioannidis anticipated that the community might shrug off his findings: sure, a lot of dubious research makes it into journals, but we researchers and physicians know to ignore it and focus on the good stuff, so what’s the big deal? The other paper headed off that claim. He zoomed in on 49 of the most highly regarded research findings in medicine over the previous 13 years, as judged by the science community’s two standard measures: the papers had appeared in the journals most widely cited in research articles, and the 49 articles themselves were the most widely cited articles in these journals. These were articles that helped lead to the widespread popularity of treatments such as the use of hormone-replacement therapy for menopausal women, vitamin E to reduce the risk of heart disease, coronary stents to ward off heart attacks, and daily low-dose aspirin to control blood pressure and prevent heart attacks and strokes. Ioannidis was putting his contentions to the test not against run-of-the-mill research, or even merely well-accepted research, but against the absolute tip of the research pyramid. Of the 49 articles, 45 claimed to have uncovered effective interventions. Thirty-four of these claims had been retested, and 14 of these, or 41 percent, had been convincingly shown to be wrong or significantly exaggerated. If between a third and a half of the most acclaimed research in medicine was proving untrustworthy, the scope and impact of the problem were undeniable. That article was published in the Journal of the American Medical Association. >>

    <<Ioannidis points out that obviously questionable findings cram the pages of top medical journals, not to mention the morning headlines. Consider, he says, the endless stream of results from nutritional studies in which researchers follow thousands of people for some number of years, tracking what they eat and what supplements they take, and how their health changes over the course of the study.>>

    John Ioannidis: “Then the researchers start asking, ‘What did vitamin E do? What did vitamin C or D or A do? What changed with calorie intake, or protein or fat intake? What happened to cholesterol levels? Who got what type of cancer? They run everything through the mill, one at a time, and they start finding associations, and eventually conclude that vitamin X lowers the risk of cancer Y, or this food helps with the risk of that disease.”

    <<How should we choose among these dueling, high-profile nutritional findings? Ioannidis suggests a simple approach: ignore them all.

    For starters, he explains, the odds are that in any large database of many nutritional and health factors, there will be a few apparent connections that are in fact merely flukes, not real health effects—it’s a bit like combing through long, random strings of letters and claiming there’s an important message in any words that happen to turn up. But even if a study managed to highlight a genuine health connection to some nutrient, you’re unlikely to benefit much from taking more of it, because we consume thousands of nutrients that act together as a sort of network, and changing intake of just one of them is bound to cause ripples throughout the network that are far too complex for these studies to detect, and that may be as likely to harm you as help you. Even if changing that one factor does bring on the claimed improvement, there’s still a good chance that it won’t do you much good in the long run, because these studies rarely go on long enough to track the decades-long course of disease and ultimately death. Instead, they track easily measurable health “markers” such as cholesterol levels, blood pressure, and blood-sugar levels, and meta-experts have shown that changes in these markers often don’t correlate as well with long-term health as we have been led to believe.

    On the relatively rare occasions when a study does go on long enough to track mortality, the findings frequently upend those of the shorter studies. (For example, though the vast majority of studies of overweight individuals link excess weight to ill health, the longest of them haven’t convincingly shown that overweight people are likely to die sooner, and a few of them have seemingly demonstrated that moderately overweight people are likely to live longer.) And these problems are aside from ubiquitous measurement errors (for example, people habitually misreport their diets in studies), routine misanalysis (researchers rely on complex software capable of juggling results in ways they don’t always understand), and the less common, but serious, problem of outright fraud (which has been revealed, in confidential surveys, to be much more widespread than scientists like to acknowledge).

    If a study somehow avoids every one of these problems and finds a real connection to long-term changes in health, you’re still not guaranteed to benefit, because studies report average results that typically represent a vast range of individual outcomes. Should you be among the lucky minority that stands to benefit, don’t expect a noticeable improvement in your health, because studies usually detect only modest effects that merely tend to whittle your chances of succumbing to a particular disease from small to somewhat smaller.>>

    John Ioannidis: “The odds that anything useful will survive from any of these studies are poor”

    <<dismissing in a breath a good chunk of the research into which we sink about $100 billion a year in the United States alone.

    And so it goes for all medical studies, he says. Indeed, nutritional studies aren’t the worst. Drug studies have the added corruptive force of financial conflict of interest. The exciting links between genes and various diseases and traits that are relentlessly hyped in the press for heralding miraculous around-the-corner treatments for everything from colon cancer to schizophrenia have in the past proved so vulnerable to error and distortion, Ioannidis has found, that in some cases you’d have done about as well by throwing darts at a chart of the genome. (These studies seem to have improved somewhat in recent years, but whether they will hold up or be useful in treatment are still open questions.) Vioxx, Zelnorm, and Baycol were among the widely prescribed drugs found to be safe and effective in large randomized controlled trials before the drugs were yanked from the market as unsafe or not so effective, or both.>>

     *John Ioannidis:* “Often the claims made by studies are so extravagant that you can immediately cross them out without needing to know much about the specific problems with the studies. Even when the evidence shows that a particular research idea is wrong, if you have thousands of scientists who have invested their careers in it, they’ll continue to publish papers on it. It’s like an epidemic, in the sense that they’re infected with these wrong ideas, and they’re spreading it to other researchers through journals.”

    <<Though scientists and science journalists are constantly talking up the value of the peer-review process, researchers admit among themselves that biased, erroneous, and even blatantly fraudulent studies easily slip through it.>>

    Nature (in a 2006 editorial): “scientists understand that peer review per se provides only a minimal assurance of quality, and that the public conception of peer review as a stamp of authentication is far from the truth."

    <<What’s more, the peer-review process often pressures researchers to shy away from striking out in genuinely new directions, and instead to build on the findings of their colleagues (that is, their potential reviewers) in ways that only seem like breakthroughs—as with the exciting-sounding gene linkages (autism genes identified!) and nutritional findings (olive oil lowers blood pressure!) that are really just dubious and conflicting variations on a theme.

    Most journal editors don’t even claim to protect against the problems that plague these studies. University and government research overseers rarely step in to directly enforce research quality, and when they do, the science community goes ballistic over the outside interference. The ultimate protection against research error and bias is supposed to come from the way scientists constantly retest each other’s results—except they don’t. Only the most prominent findings are likely to be put to the test, because there’s likely to be publication payoff in firming up the proof, or contradicting it.

    But even for medicine’s most influential studies, the evidence sometimes remains surprisingly narrow. Of those 45 super-cited studies that Ioannidis focused on, 11 had never been retested. Perhaps worse, Ioannidis found that even when a research error is outed, it typically persists for years or even decades. He looked at three prominent health studies from the 1980s and 1990s that were each later soundly refuted, and discovered that researchers continued to cite the original results as correct more often than as flawed—in one case for at least 12 years after the results were discredited.

    Doctors may notice that their patients don’t seem to fare as well with certain treatments as the literature would lead them to expect, but the field is appropriately conditioned to subjugate such anecdotal evidence to study findings. Yet much, perhaps even most, of what doctors do has never been formally put to the test in credible studies, given that the need to do so became obvious to the field only in the 1990s, leaving it playing catch-up with a century or more of non-evidence-based medicine, and contributing to Ioannidis’s shockingly high estimate of the degree to which medical knowledge is flawed. That we’re not routinely made seriously ill by this shortfall, he argues, is due largely to the fact that most medical interventions and advice don’t address life-and-death situations, but rather aim to leave us marginally healthier or less unhealthy, so we usually neither gain nor risk all that much.

    Medical research is not especially plagued with wrongness. Other meta-research experts have confirmed that similar issues distort research in all fields of science, from physics to economics (where the highly regarded economists J. Bradford DeLong and Kevin Lang once showed how a remarkably consistent paucity of strong evidence in published economics studies made it unlikely that any of them were right). And needless to say, things only get worse when it comes to the pop expertise that endlessly spews at us from diet, relationship, investment, and parenting gurus and pundits. But we expect more of scientists, and especially of medical scientists, given that we believe we are staking our lives on their results. The public hardly recognizes how bad a bet this is. The medical community itself might still be largely oblivious to the scope of the problem, if Ioannidis hadn’t forced a confrontation when he published his studies in 2005.>>

    <<David Gorski, a surgeon and researcher at Detroit’s Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, noted in his prominent medical blog that when he presented Ioannidis’s paper on highly cited research at a professional meeting,>>

    David Gorski: “not a single one of my surgical colleagues was the least bit surprised or disturbed by its findings.”

    John Ioannidis: “I think that people didn’t feel I was only trying to provoke them, because I showed that it was a community problem, instead of pointing fingers at individual examples of bad research” 

    <<In a sense, he gave scientists an opportunity to cluck about the wrongness without having to acknowledge that they themselves succumb to it—it was something everyone else did.>>

    <<His PLoS Medicine paper is the most downloaded in the journal’s history, and it’s not even Ioannidis’s most-cited work—that would be a paper he published in Nature Genetics on the problems with gene-link studies. Other researchers are eager to work with him: he has published papers with 1,328 different co-authors at 538 institutions in 43 countries, he says. Last year he received, by his estimate, invitations to speak at 1,000 conferences and institutions around the world, and he was accepting an average of about five invitations a month until a case last year of excessive-travel-induced vertigo led him to cut back. Even so, in the weeks before I visited him he had addressed an AIDS conference in San Francisco, the European Society for Clinical Investigation, Harvard’s School of Public Health, and the medical schools at Stanford and Tufts.>>

    John Ioannidis: “If I did a study and the results showed that in fact there wasn’t really much bias in research, would I be willing to publish it? That would create a real psychological conflict for me.” 

    <<his bigger worry, he says, is that while his fellow researchers seem to be getting the message, he hasn’t necessarily forced anyone to do a better job. He fears he won’t in the end have done much to improve anyone’s health.>>

    John Ioannidis: “There may not be fierce objections to what I’m saying. But it’s difficult to change the way that everyday doctors, patients, and healthy people think and behave.”

    Athina Tatsioni “Usually what happens is that the doctor will ask for a suite of biochemical tests—liver fat, pancreas function, and so on. The tests could turn up something, but they’re probably irrelevant. Just having a good talk with the patient and getting a close history is much more likely to tell me what’s wrong.”

    <<Of course, the doctors have all been trained to order these tests, she notes, and doing so is a lot quicker than a long bedside chat. They’re also trained to ply the patient with whatever drugs might help whack any errant test numbers back into line. What they’re not trained to do is to go back and look at the research papers that helped make these drugs the standard of care.>>

    Athina Tatsioni “When you look the papers up, you often find the drugs didn’t even work better than a placebo. And no one tested how they worked in combination with the other drugs. Just taking the patient off everything can improve their health right away.”

    <<But not only is checking out the research another time-consuming task, patients often don’t even like it when they’re taken off their drugs, she explains; they find their prescriptions reassuring.>>

    <<It’s not that he [John Ioannidis] envisions doctors making all their decisions based solely on solid evidence—there’s simply too much complexity in patient treatment to pin down every situation with a great study.>>

    John Ioannidis: “Doctors need to rely on instinct and judgment to make choices. But these choices should be as informed as possible by the evidence. And if the evidence isn’t good, doctors should know that, too. And so should patients.”

    <<In fact, the question of whether the problems with medical research should be broadcast to the public is a sticky one in the meta-research community. Already feeling that they’re fighting to keep patients from turning to alternative medical treatments such as homeopathy, or misdiagnosing themselves on the Internet, or simply neglecting medical treatment altogether, many researchers and physicians aren’t eager to provide even more reason to be skeptical of what doctors do—not to mention how public disenchantment with medicine could affect research funding. Ioannidis dismisses these concerns.>>

    John Ioannidis: “If we don’t tell the public about these problems, then we’re no better than nonscientists who falsely claim they can heal. If the drugs don’t work and we’re not sure how to treat something, why should we claim differently? Some fear that there may be less funding because we stop claiming we can prove we have miraculous treatments. But if we can’t really provide those miracles, how long will we be able to fool the public anyway? The scientific enterprise is probably the most fantastic achievement in human history, but that doesn’t mean we have a right to overstate what we’re accomplishing.”

    <<We could solve much of the wrongness problem, Ioannidis says, if the world simply stopped expecting scientists to be right. That’s because being wrong in science is fine, and even necessary—as long as scientists recognize that they blew it, report their mistake openly instead of disguising it as a success, and then move on to the next thing, until they come up with the very occasional genuine breakthrough. But as long as careers remain contingent on producing a stream of research that’s dressed up to seem more right than it is, scientists will keep delivering exactly that.>>

    John Ioannidis: “Science is a noble endeavor, but it’s also a low-yield endeavor. “I’m not sure that more than a very small percentage of medical research is ever likely to lead to major improvements in clinical outcomes and quality of life. We should be very comfortable with that fact.”

    David H. Freedman is the author of Wrong: Why Experts Keep Failing Us—And How to Know When Not to Trust Them. He has been an Atlantic contributor since 1998.
    _______________ 

    References:

    - Ioannidis JP. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med (2005) vol. 2 (8) pp. e124
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16060722 
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1182327 
    plosmedicine.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124 

    - Ioannidis JP. Contradicted and initially stronger effects in highly cited clinical research. JAMA (2005) vol. 294 (2) pp. 218-28
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16014596 
    jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?doi=10.1001/jama.294.2.218

    - Jennings CG. Quality and value: The true purpose of peer review. Nature (2006) Web focuses > Science and politics > Peer Review: Debate > nature05032. June 28, 2006 doi:10.1038/nature05032
    nature.com/nature/peerreview/debate/nature05032.html 
    blogs.nature.com/peer-to-peer/2006/06/quality_and_value_the_true_pur.html 

    - Ioannidis JP et al. Replication validity of genetic association studies. Nature Genetics (2001) vol. 29 (3) pp. 306-9
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11600885 
    nature.com/ng/journal/v29/n3/abs/ng749.html 

    - DeLong JB and Lang K (1992). Are All Economic Hypotheses False? Journal of Political Economy 100:6 (December), pp. 1257-72
    jstor.org/discover/10.2307/2138833?uid=3737952&uid=2129&uid=2&uid=70&uid=4&sid=21101173114383 
    Draft (1989):
    plan.givewell.org/files/methods/De%20Long,%20Branford%20and%20Lang%201989.pdf 
    _______________ 

    Related web pages:

    - Tatsioni A et al. Persistence of contradicted claims in the literature. JAMA (2007) vol. 298 (21) pp. 2517-26
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18056905 
    jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=209653 

    Wikipedia article on John P. A. Ioannidis:
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_P._A._Ioannidis 

    John P. A. Ioannidis' C.V.: dhe.med.uoi.gr/data/cv/CV102010D.pdf 

    PubMed search 2: 
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Ioannidis+JP%5BAuthor%5D&cmd=DetailsSearch 
    PubMed search 1: 
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Ioannidis%20JP%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=16014596

    - Freedman, David H. Wrong: Why experts† keep failing us—and how to know when not to trust them (†Scientists, finance wizards, doctors, relationship gurus, celebrity CEOs, ... consultants, health officials and more). Little, Brown and Co. June 10, 2010. ISBN-10: 0316023787
    amazon.com/Wrong-us-Scientists-relationship-consultants/dp/B005DI6QAM 

    About the title: 
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lies,_damned_lies,_and_statistics 
    en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Leonard_H._Courtney 

    URL related G+ post: 
    plus.google.com/114605547533973731226/posts/iW2cNjsmmnq 
    About
    reuters.com - In cancer science, many "discoveries" don't hold up 
    By Sharon Begley. March 27, 2012
    reuters.com/article/2012/03/28/us-science-cancer-idUSBRE82R12P20120328 
    _________________________ 

    via +Sebastian Pölsterl 
    URL source G+ post: plus.google.com/109729446928613352924/posts/KgmnNpqys2Z 
    _________________________ 
  • 5 plusses - 1 comments - 0 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-09-16 11:28:06
    RESHARE:
    plus.google.com - The Brits in the Tube
    Uploaded by Peter Bailey. September 16, 2012

    Excerpt from comments:

    Ivan Arabadzhiev Sep 16, 2012 12:18 PM +4
    You mean something is wrong with this picture?:)

    Zephyr López Cervilla Sep 16, 2012 1:22 PM
    Yep, everybody is sitting down in the tube, as it should be always for safety reasons.

    URL source G+ post: plus.google.com/102648429021828386272/posts/hkdfzqZoiHR 
    __________________________ 

    Reshared text:
    The Brits are pro at pretending everything is absolutely normal :P
  • 5 plusses - 1 comments - 0 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-11-03 23:52:44
    RESHARE:
    plus.google.com - Cat Hair Spread-O-Tron
    Uploaded by Bilal Ibrar. November 3, 2012

    Homesteader: "I fucking knew it!"
    Cat Hair Spread-O-Tron

    URL source G+ post: plus.google.com/109320436322820889899/posts/5tNVRCE7Q6b 
    ________________ 

    Reshared text:
    Cat Hair Spread-O-Tron

    That explains it!
  • 4 plusses - 0 comments - 1 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-07-20 00:48:37
    LearnLiberty.org - Does Capitalism Exploit Workers? .
    By Matt Zwolinski (Univ. of San Diego). Jul 19, 2012
    via +John Richardson 

    Excerpt from comments:

    Sheila Hibbard July 19, 2012 11:24 PM
    Great illustration of those who worry "capitalism" will somehow disappear simply because many of us believe demonstrating "citizenship" has more importance. 
    ------------------------ 
    Zephyr López Cervilla* Yesterday 11:28 PM
    Capitalism has nothing to do with citizenship but with private ownership and free trade of goods and services.
    ------------------------ 
    James Bruni Yesterday 11:33 PM
    Yeah, but the problem is that capitalism concentrates all those "good and services" and private ownership into the hands of a very small part of our population...
    ______________ 

    Zephyr López Cervilla Yesterday 11:35 PM
    In fact, even the Universal Declaration of Human Rights protects private ownership:
    Article 17
    (1) Everyone has the right to own property alone as well as in association with others.
    (2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property.
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Declaration_of_Human_Rights#Article_17 
    ______________ 

    Kenneth Trent July 19, 2012 11:36 PM +1
    +James Bruni does that mean we should do away with privatization of goods and services? I'm not sure what you're implying the alternative is here.
    ------------------------ 
    John Richardson Yesterday 11:37 PM
    No, +James Bruni Corporatism is what does that.
    ------------------------ 
    Zephyr López Cervilla July 19, 2012 11:53 PM (edited)
    But corporatism only can exist when there are barriers that prevent free trade and free competition. It isn't a fault of capitalism but of the barriers imposed to capitalism. I'm thinking of the privileges granted to some such and protectionist policies: public subsidies, custom duties, patent rights and copyright, public contracts, bailouts. All of this undermines free competition. Corporatism needs of the intervention of the government and the existence of specific legislation to protect their interests.
    ------------------------ 
    John Richardson July 19, 2012 11:55 PM +1
    +Zephyr López Cervilla That's exactly what I mean.
    ------------------------ 
    stacie monahan July 20, 2012 12:05 AM
    Yeah, what he just said!  Seriously, capitalism is another business term for GREED!!
    ______________ 

    Kenneth Trent July 20, 2012 12:54 AM (edited) +4
    +stacie monahan I'm not sure I follow your logic. Capitalism is a social and economic system that guaruntees legal protection for private property. By your assessment that Capitalism is another term for greed, you are trying to equate a social system with a pejorative word which implies lack of concern or compassion for others. If you don't agree with Capitalism, I sure hope you have taken the liberty of donating whatever has come to your possession in excess of your basic needs to survive to others less fortunate than yourself - or your government in the form of taxes.
    Personally, I prefer to enjoy the fruits of my labors. If I work harder than others, should I not be allowed to keep more?
    ______________ 

    Zephyr López Cervilla July 20, 2012 1:50 AM (edited)
    +stacie monahan: "Yeah, what he just said!  Seriously, capitalism is another business term for GREED!!"
    - According to Friedrich Hayek, "profit is the signal which tells us what we must do in order to serve to people who we do not know" (11:02 - 11:10): 
    Friedrich von Hayek: His Life and Thought 
    In a small group in which everyone knows everyone else, there's no need to pursue economic profit. Everyone would know the others needs, and people would work to serve others needs in a mutualist relationship. This is more or less what used to happen within families. 
    "Production for use is only possible in societies in which we know all the facts." (10:43 - 10:48)
    But extended society "where we all work for people who we do not know and we are supported by the work of people who we do not know is made posible because we work for economic profit" (10:51 - 11:02).
    ______________ 

    John Richardson July 20, 2012 1:48 AM +1
    Those of you who think capitalism is somehow evil might want to watch this:
    http://youtu.be/4Ttbj6LAu0A
    ______________ 

    Rigo Rodriguez July 20, 2012 1:36 AM +1
    +Kenneth Trent Anything can be good or bad, it is not the concept in it self. As they say fire can burn you or fire can cook your meals. Capitalism the way it started out in this country was great. What is questionable, is the way is being applied now day. It has become an excuse to become a criminal. On the other hand, everything has cicles, and things come to an end, the way capitalism is now, can not survive for long. Just look at the french revolution, royalty did not want to understand until they were cutting their heads off. If you think is great, I don't think there is nothing that can be said to you to convince you otherwise.
    Another system needs to be found...does anybody has the answer of what that is...nobody knows. But the fact is, we need to start looking, and fast
    ______________ 

    URL source G+ post comments: plus.google.com/112374836634096795698/posts/JZqfN2Wogjn

    Guy Kawasaki July 19, 2012 11:00 PM (edited)  -  Public
    (Thu06) Words as images.
    toxel.com/inspiration/2012/07/17/words-as-images
    More on design: design.alltop.com
    ___________________  

    Blurb of the video:
    The idea that capitalism exploits workers stems from Karl Marx's work in the late 1800s. Although the definition of "exploitation" has changed since then, many still believe capitalist systems take advantage of vulnerable workers. Prof. Matt Zwolinski explains why capitalism actually tends to protect workers' interests. And Zwolinski contends that even if it were exploitative, increasing political regulation and control would actually make the problem worse. Increases in government make citizens more vulnerable to the state. Political officials are tempted to exploit this vulnerability for the benefit of the politically well connected. Unlike free market transactions, which are mutually beneficial, when politics is involved one party's gain usually comes at someone else's expense. 
    learnliberty.org
    A project of the Institute for Humane Studies
    ___________________  
  • 4 plusses - 0 comments - 1 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-05-14 21:32:43
    RESHARE:
    plus.google.com - On Marriage
    c. May, 2012

    Script:
    ---------------------------------
    Boy: "What's new, Mr. President?"
    Mr. President: "How about this? I think that same sex couples should be able to get married..."
    Boy: "Oh... well what's stopping them from getting married now, Mr. President?"
    Mr. President: "Well, in many places it's still illegal for them to get a marriage license"
    Boy: "Really? Well what's a marriage license for, Mr. President?"
    Mr. President: "They started issuing marriage licenses in the United States back in the 1920's in an attempt to eliminate interracial marriage. But times have changed and now they are just the government's way of giving permission for people to marry each other..."
    Boy: "Oh I think I get it. Seems like soon we won't need marriage licenses anymore, so they'll prolly [ sic ] just get rid of them, right Mr. President?"
    Mr. President: "No, no, no, we can't do that. Then anybody could just be free to marry anyone at anytime and we would have no way to control it..."
    Boy: "But isn't that what you want?"
    Mr. President: "Of course not, the Government never gets rid of any kind of power it has. It seems that you still have a lot to learn about democracy..."
    ---------------------------------

    prolly: probably probably?

    via +Jo Sparkles
    URL via post: plus.google.com/110219327643577705724/posts/eVWy2wydawo

    Reshared text:
    Fantastic explanation.
  • 4 plusses - 0 comments - 1 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-09-28 17:47:33
    RESHARE:
    theatlantic.com - The Case for Abolishing Patents (Yes, All of Them)
    By Jordan Weissmann. September 27, 2012

    Excerpt:
    <<patent protections never stay small and tidy. Instead, entrenched players like intellectual property lawyers who make their living filing lawsuits and old, established corporations that want to keep new players out of their markets lobby to expand the breadth of patent rights. And as patent rights get stronger, they take a serious toll on the economy, including our ability to innovate. We can see that cost today as tech companies like Google spend billions on "defensive patents," which are essentially useless other than as a protection against lawsuits. We see it whenever a cool startup firm is forced to license a bogus patent from a litigious troll. And we see it in the untold dollars spent on legal fees and unnecessary patent filings for ludicrously broad or impractical ideas. The authors' extreme case in point: Somebody out there actually patented a method for moving information through the fifth dimension. As in the Bruce Willis movie.>>

    <<What do we get from all this? Precious little, the paper argues. They find virtually no statistical evidence that rising patent applications actually make our economy more productive.

    Eliminating patents altogether, Boldrin and Levine say, would also have fewer negative consequences than most of us assume. Most industries, they argue, only resort to patent litigation once their pace of innovation has slowed. As long as they still cranked out out new, popular products, companies like Apple would continue to profit by being the first to market, which often confers a long-term advantage.>>

    <<Because ending all patent protections immediately would be impractical, Boldrin and Levine advocate several transitional steps, such as shortening patent terms. "The aim of policy, in general, should be that of slowly but surely decreasing the strength of intellectual property interventions," they write, "but the final goal cannot be anything short of abolition.">>
    _________________

    Further reading:

    - Boldrin M and Levine DK. The Case Against Patents. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Working Paper Series (2012) 2012-035A
    http://research.stlouisfed.org/wp/2012/2012-035.pdf

    - Boldrin, Michele and Levine, David K. Against Intellectual Monopoly. Cambridge University Press, 2008 (print version) 
    PDF final online version (January 2, 2008): 
    http://levine.sscnet.ucla.edu/papers/imbookfinalall.pdf 
    Excerpt: plus.google.com/114605547533973731226/posts/aPA3xZEQpHF

    - Kinsella, N Stephan. Against Intellectual Property. Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2008 (print version) 
    Source: http://mises.org/resources/3582/Against-Intellectual-Property
    PDF: http://mises.org/books/against.pdf
    ePub: http://mises.org/books/AgainstIP.epub

    Post with a list of references and links of different studies on the subject:
    plus.google.com/114605547533973731226/posts/DhEwwFH3jq7
    ______________________

    Excerpt from G+ post comments:

    Tomáš Hluska Sep 28, 2012 11:14 PM +1
    Interesting, how "everyone" wants to quit all patents because of software-patent-suits. What sense will have say five-year patent in biotech?
    -------------------------- 
    mary Zeman Sep 28, 2012 11:15 PM +1
    +Tomáš Hluska  excellent point.  Esp with FDA processes not changing any time soon...
    -------------------------- 
    Tomáš Hluska Sep 28, 2012 11:25 PM +1
    Greenpeace wants at least ten-year-long testing of #GMO . Basically the same is true for pharma industry. And yet people are complaining against them all the time.
    -------------------------- 
    Zephyr López Cervilla Sep 29, 2012 12:35 AM (edited)
    Simply shortening the patent period negates most of the major purposes of abolishing patent rights.

    1. to avoid devoting resources on legal costs and litigation:

    <<It's a fount of expensive litigation>> 
    <<we see it in the untold dollars spent on legal fees>>
    <<protection against lawsuits>>
    <<intellectual property lawyers who make their living filing lawsuits>>

    (quotes from the article published in the Atlantic)
    ________________ 

    2. to avoid investment of resources in developing useless patents and the bureaucracy needed to register patents:

    <<companies like Google spend billions on "defensive patents," which are essentially useless other than as a protection against lawsuits>>
    <<unnecessary patent filings for ludicrously broad or impractical ideas>>
    ________________ 

    3a. to prevent patents being used as a barrier for competition and innovation:

    <<bullying their more innovative competitors in court>>
    <<as patent rights get stronger, they take a serious toll on the economy, including our ability to innovate>>
    <<Most industries, they argue, only resort to patent litigation once their pace of innovation has slowed>>
    <<whenever a cool startup firm is forced to license a bogus patent from a litigious troll>>
    ________________ 

    3b. to prevent the use of patents by large corporations as barriers against their new smaller competitors:

    <<established corporations that want to keep new players out of their markets>>
    _____________________
     

    - None of these issues can be redressed simply by shortening the period of exclusive profit granted to patentees.
    Additionally, the existence of patents is also cause of other dysfunctions on the economy, scientific research and innovation that haven't been tackled in this article. There's a mention of one of these dysfunctions in this other article: 

    4. to avoid the skewing effect in the allocation of limited resources for research and innovation towards those fields in which patent grants are easier to get, thus reducing the resources allocated on basic research:

    <<innovation and research lost when companies concentrate on patentable innovations and allocate fewer resources to more basic scientific research, or when an entire field is avoided for fear of patent-infringement lawsuits>>
    ________________ 

    I consider that this latest effect is especially undesirable. +Stephan Kinsella also mentions some of the previous effects, 

    3b. to prevent the use of patents by large corporations as barriers against their new smaller competitors:

    <<Large companies rattle their sabers or sue each other, then make a deal, say, to cross-license their patents to each other. That’s fine for them because they have protection from each other’s competition. But what does it do to smaller companies? They don’t have big patent arsenals or a credible countersuit threat. So patents amount to a barrier to entry, the modern version of mercantilist protectionism>>
    ________________ 

    1+2+3a+3b. to avoid all the patent-related economic costs, including the cost of suppressed innovation:

    <<No doubt the patent system imposes costs on American society. I’ve estimated the net cost at $38–48 billion a year, and this is probably conservative. The costs include patent attorney salaries, fees, litigation, increased insurance premiums, and higher-priced products>>

    <<Anyone who argues that patents yield a net gain is obliged to estimate the total cost (including suppressed innovation) as well as the value of any innovation thereby stimulated. But IP proponents never provide these estimates>>

    <<IP advocates make the empirical claim that we are richer because of the patent system. They say we have more innovation at a low price. Yet virtually every empirical study I’ve seen on this matter is either inconclusive or finds a net cost and/or a suppression of innovation>>

    Reference:
    - Kinsella,  N. Stephan. How Intellectual Property Hampers the Free Market. The Free Man (thefreemanonline.org), Foundation for Economic Education. June, 2011
    thefreemanonline.org/features/how-intellectual-property-hampers-the-free-market 
    ________________ 

    As for biotech patents, I'd like to cite the following patent:

    European patent that covers conventional seeds and conventional breeding methods, 

    a. rmiglobal.org/2011/10/27/ep-1069819-stands-euro-veg-zombie-broccoli-patent-tested 
    b. www.alt.no-patents-on-seeds.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=20&Itemid=20 

    The original patent granted on the exclusive use of the GFP gene outside the original organism, 

    1. boliven.com/patent/US5491084 / google.com/patents/US5491084 
    2. boliven.com/patent/US6146826 / google.com/patents/US6146826 
    Further information: 
    kitchanlaw.com/Seminars-2010_CUHK_Seminar.pdf 

    and the identification of an individual's BRCA1 allele sequences and related identification tests, 

    a. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brca1#Patent 
    b. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_for_Molecular_Pathology,_et_al._v._United_States_Patent_and_Trademark_Office,_et_al

    are also nice examples of how these kind of patents contribute to the welfare of the general population.
    __________________________________ 

    URL G+ source post: plus.google.com/116127033078839124702/posts/dRe7cZavEGF 
    __________________________________ 

    Reshared text:
    All of them? (Gulp!!)

    um.... yeah, can you wait until I retire for that? thanks.  LOL  A radical point of view here.....
  • 3 plusses - 1 comments - 1 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-07-09 08:17:17
    RESHARE:
    cultofmac.com - Why the ‘Boycott Apple’ Movement is Dumb
    By Mike Elgan. July 7, 2012

    Boycott Apple advocates pretend to believe what they do not (or should not) believe, which that companies that don’t sue over patents don’t sue because they’re nice, or virtuous or believe in the free exchange of ideas.
    The reality is that they don’t sue because they don’t have a case.
    When companies have a patent case they think they can win, they sue.
    ______________________ 

    Excerpt from comments:

    +John O'Connor: "For the record Nokia is not actually suing anybody, his article even links to The Inquirer which is a font of intelligent and well researched truths."

    - Wrong:

    bbc.co.uk - Nokia suing Apple over the iPhone
    22 October 2009
    Nokia, the world's biggest mobile phone maker, has said that it is suing its US rival Apple for infringing patents on mobile phone technology for the iPhone.
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/8321058.stm 

    wsj.com - Nokia Accuses Apple of Patent Infringement Over iPhone
    By Ian Edmondson And Yuraki Iwatani Kane. October 23, 2009
    STOCKHOLM—Nokia Corp., NOK -4.95% the world's biggest cellphone maker, leveled patent-infringement charges against Apple Inc., AAPL -0.67% whose iPhone is the hottest product in the smart-phone category.
    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704224004574489221111114540.html 

    bbc.co.uk - Nokia sues Apple for 'patent infringement'
    8 May 2010
    The world's biggest mobile phone maker, Nokia, has filed a lawsuit against Apple claiming the iPad 3G and iPhone infringe five of its patents.
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8669529.stm 
    ______________________ 


    Google fan boys are being used by Google like a stick (as a drive belt) to campaign against Apple while Google is already suing others via Motorola (regardless of what their fan boys may believe), helping HTC with their patents sue Apple, and buying patents to do the same in the future. Why is Apple doing so?
    As Mike Elgan points out,

    Boycott Apple advocates pretend to believe what they do not (or should not) believe, which that companies that don’t sue over patents don’t sue because they’re nice, or virtuous or believe in the free exchange of ideas.
    The reality is that they don’t sue because they don’t have a case.
    When companies have a patent case they think they can win, they sue.
    _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 

    As soon as Google has a case they will sue as they  are already doing:


    Examples of patent litigations in which Google is involved directly or indirectly in the complainant party in all but one: 

    en.wikipedia.org - Smartphone wars
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smartphone_wars 

    2010, Aug 12: Oracle sues Google over 7 patents relating to the use of Java in Android.

    2010, Oct 06: Motorola sues Apple over 18 patents, and files an ITC complaint against Apple over 6 of them.

    2010, Oct 08: Motorola files a request for declaratory judgement that they do not infringe 12 Apple patents, and that those patents be declared invalid.

    2010, Nov 09: Microsoft alleges Motorola has failed to comply with RAND (reasonable and non-discriminatory) licensing obligations.

    2010, Nov 10: Motorola sues Microsoft over 7 patents in one court and 9 patents in another.

    2010, Nov 22: Motorola files an ITC complaint against Microsoft over 5 patents.

    2010, Dec 23: Motorola files a third lawsuit against Microsoft over 3 patents.

    2011, Feb 14: Motorola adds 2 patents to their lawsuits against Microsoft.

    2011, Jun 30: A consortium of companies made up of Apple, EMC Corporation, Ericsson, Microsoft, Research In Motion and Sony win against Google in an auction of over 6,000 Nortel mobile-related telecommunications patents for $4.5 billion USD.

    2011, Jul 11-12: Google acquires 1,029 Patents from IBM for an undisclosed amount.

    2011, Aug 15: Google announces its intention to buy Motorola Mobility for $12.5 billion USD. Eighteen of Motorola's patents could potentially be used for defense or countersuits against Apple and Microsoft, and may influence the smartphone war. These patents may change the balance of power, and force the various players to settle their lawsuits.

    2011, Aug 17: Google acquires 1,023 more patents from IBM for an undisclosed amount (not revealed until 13 Sep 2011).

    2011, Aug 23: Microsoft files a complaint with the ITC requesting a ban on several key Motorola smartphones and devices in the USA based on infringements of 7 patents.

    2011, Sep 07: HTC countersues Apple using nine patents from Google. The move is seen as a possible first step for Google giving direct support in lawsuits involving manufacturers using Android.

    2011, Sep 13: Google's August 17 acquisition of 1,023 patents from IBM is revealed by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

    2012, Jun 23: Federal Judge Posner throws out Apple-Motorola case with prejudice.
    ______________________ 

    Comment:
    As I have said in previous occasions, if you don't like the patent system can hinder free market and free competition, don't blame the corporations that can get some profit of it be courageous and dare to criticize the law and demand the abolishment of the patent system.
    ______________________ 

    URL source G+ post: plus.google.com/112997561829078041002/posts/hBUCK1Sjzf2 

    Related post:
    andromancer.com - Why Mike Elgan’s post was wrong…
    By Jonas M Luster. July 8, 2012
    andromancer.com/2012/07/08/why-mike-elgans-post-was-wrong/ ______________________ 
    #boycottapple  
    ______________________ 

    Reshared text:
    I agree.
  • 3 plusses - 1 comments - 1 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-04-22 15:51:19
    RESHARE:
    minimumble.com - The Real Me The Real Cone of My Life
    by Chris Hallbeck. 2012

    The Real Me
    "Video chat is a chance for my Internet friends to get to know the real me."

    Reshared text:
    The Real Me

    This is how I hang out on Google+ :) How about you?
  • 2 plusses - 0 comments - 2 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-03-25 05:29:07
    RESHARE:
    Hurry Up Bro! The Google Car Is Coming

    Comment:
    The worst thing about this is that the pic is genuine.

    URL source post: https://plus.google.com/u/0/116143340835822342380/posts/K3nK3ow5Rah

    Reshared text:
  • 2 plusses - 0 comments - 2 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-02-12 13:09:09
    RESHARE:
    Huffington Post (Books) - 'Til the End of Eternity?
    By Jennifer Jenkins. February 12, 2012

    (Jennifer Jenkins. Director, Center for the Study of Public Domain at Duke Law School)

    Excerpt:
    <<It matters for price. As studies have shown, not only are public domain books cheaper, they are available in more editions and in more formats. (Importantly, there is another benefit: when books are in the public domain, anyone can make Braille or audio versions for visually impaired readers. No permission required. And if you think no one would object to such uses, sadly you would be wrong.)

    It matters for creativity and free speech. The public domain feeds creativity. Authors build on the cultural artifacts around them. The Waste Land is anything but: it's a fertile bed of references to dozens of earlier works (from Homer, Virgil, Shakespeare, Kyd, Chaucer, and Milton, to name a few). Michael Chabon -- one of my favorite authors -- describes how his novel Summerland builds on public domain sources such as American folktales, and stories from Greek, Norse, and American Indian mythology. Some claim that Lolita was borrowed from an earlier story of the same name; pointing in the other direction, Nabokov's heirs sued the publishers of Lo's Diary (a retelling of Lolita from the girl's perspective) for copyright infringement. Examples could (and do) fill volumes. In a brilliant article on the subject, author Jonathan Lethem calls it "the ecstasy of influence."

    What happens if these underlying sources are copyrighted? As Judge Richard Posner pointed out, "Romeo and Juliet itself would have infringed Arthur Brooke's The Tragicall Historye of Romeo and Juliet... which in turn would have infringed several earlier Romeo and Juliets, all of which probably would have infringed Ovid's story of Pyramus and Thisbe." You get the point -- without a rich public domain, much of literature would be illegal.

    Alice Randall discovered this when she wrote The Wind Done Gone. Randall is an African-American writer who wanted to retell Gone With the Wind from the slaves' point of view, in order to criticize its romanticized depiction of slaveholding society. Gone With the Wind -- published in 1936 -- would have been in the public domain by now had copyright terms not been extended. Anyone could have done what Randall did without fear of interference. Now it is copyrighted until 2031. (Yes, that's right. Gone With the Wind is still under copyright.) Margaret Mitchell's estate sued Randall's publisher for copyright infringement. And at first they succeeded - the book was banned by a Georgia court. Only on appeal did a higher court overturn that decision and vindicate Randall's First Amendment right to parody Gone With the Wind. But to get that right, Randall had to go to court -- no small barrier for a would-be parodist. (I know how hard that struggle was because I was part of the legal team defending her book.)>>

    Comment:

    Ether Wojcicki - "Copyright law keep being extended. Is that in the public interest?"


    Zephyr López Cervilla - Nope. There's no reasonable period of time.
    There're other alternatives to fund intellectual work that are commonly used in other fields: laboral and service contracts. Philosophers, Economists, Anthropologists, Psychologists, Sociologists, Historians, Archaeologists, Mathematicians, Astronomers, Theoretical Physicists and other Scientists devoted to basic research aren't granted the privilege of the monopoly for their discoveries and findings and they still manage for a living.
    This discrimination of certain kind of intellectual work over the rest only encourages a drainage of talent and resources from the more fruitful task of research and discovery toward the more frivolous world of the media, show business, art and entertainment, or trying to shield with patents the marketing of a new gadget at the best scenario.
    We need a level playground to ensure free competition.


    brettrobbins - Why should creative works lapse into public domain status EVER? They are intellectual property. Should other kinds of property do so? The author cites the fact that "public domain books [are] cheaper" as a benefit of the practice. Yes, if a house someone from the Kringle family purchased 150 years ago were suddenly to be taken away from Charles Kringle III due to an analogous practice established for real estate, it would not only be cheaper for those who wish to squat on what used to be his legal property but actually FREE! Just think of it.

    The author also states that Public Domain "feeds creativity." This would also be true if squatters were to claim Mr. Kringle's inherited land and occupy it and bring their art supplies and paint pictures in it and sell them and use the proceeds to put food on the table and subsidize a new "creative" subculture. There's only one problem though: IT'S NOT THEIR PROPERTY.

    Either we believe in property rights--real property, intellectual property, any kind of property--or we don't. To choose an arbitrary number (oh, I don't know, 70 years after an artist's death) after which his or her rights (via his or her descendents) to said property are suddenly and completely relinquished is nothing but legally sanctioned thievery.


    Zephyr López Cervilla - Intellectual property is not a genuine property but the grant of a monopoly "artificially" by the coercion of a strong government eroding the genuine property rights of all the rest.
    Nobody has any right to impose what others can think, write or say. The only legitimate property is the property on scarce resources, and ideas aren't scarce.
    The first person who painted a bison on a cave didn't have any right to prevent others from doing the same. The first who managed to produce fire at will didn't deserve any special privilege for being the first.

    The only reason for assigning ownership to the first to homestead a scarce resource is because of its scarcity. In contrast, the air of the atmosphere or the water of the sea don't have any legitimate owner because so far it is not scarce resource. Following the same principle, ideas, inventions, the different combinations of words shouldn't have any owner because they aren't scarce. Any person with a lucid mind could be capable to reproduce them again. There's no impediment for humans can't invent the wheel over and over again. The materialization of a certain idea doesn't exhaust its source, the human creativity.
    Mankind developed property rights for a purpose, the concept of intellectual property distorts such a purpose and abuses the legitimate rights of the rest, the use of your property as fits you best.


    Christina Benson - >>>Our constitution and laws have to seek a balance on fiercely competing ideals. One bedrock ideal is the freedom of speech and free expression of ideas; another is to incentivize and reward innovation and the "useful arts".
    >>>Every great artist, musician, poet, writer, inventor, stands on the shoulders of giants. Can anyone point me to any ideas and expression left in the world that can be proven to be 100% original? By extending copyright too far, we actually inhibit the creative process and collective construction of ideas by preventing folks from building within their discipline upon the foundation of ideas that came before them. This not only limits free speech expression, but ultimately inhibits innovation and ingenuity over the long run.

    >>>If we are to extend copyrights for such long periods, then we need to have some mechanism for expanding limited public licenses to access these works. While there is the concept of "Fair Use" (eg, limited use of a work for purposes such as commentary, parody, teaching), the courts and regulators have been shrinking their interpretations of what uses fall within "fair use".

    >>>Indefinite copyright terms may actually help us lose our last remaining competitive advantage on the world stage: our "creative/knowledge economy." We may not manufacture much here anymore, but we sure do create, design, write, sing, film, and perform. Through long copyrights, we deny ourselves inspiration from millions of muses that have come before who could spur our creativity and innovation to new heights....


    Zephyr López Cervilla - "Science and useful Arts"
    This "Science" includes art and literary work, whereas "useful arts" mean inventions.
    There aren't any competing ideals. If you want to incentivize and reward innovation and art then you can give those innovators and artists a prize at your own risk or hire them instead of damaging the rights and freedom of the rest.


    BlackJAC - _I've noticed that the only people who complain about copyright duration are usually incapable of creating anything of their own that people would gladly pay cash money for a licensed copy. KW Jeter posited in his novel Noir that it's not about having a licensed copy of a given work but rather to punish the work's creator for undeserved
    ly getting the talent and skill and consequently the signed deal and praise._


    Zephyr López Cervilla - You've noticed wrong. For instance, Friedrich Hayek and Benjamin Tucker were clearly against the existence of intellectual property and this didn't prevent their books from being sold well. In fact, of some of Hayek's works have been sold even millions of copies:
    1. Hayek on Patents and Copyrights http://blog.mises.org/9247/hayek-on-patents-and-copyrights/
    2. Hayek Contra Copyright Laws http://blog.mises.org/17228/hayek-contra-copyright-laws/
    3. Copyright and Patent in Benjamin Tucker's Periodical http://mises.org/daily/4575


    Zephyr López Cervilla - BTW, your remark is as idiotic as the statement that there were no aristocrats or from good breed against the privileges of the aristocracy during the French Revolution but only commoners, what actually wouldn't be a correct statement.


    JHBH - Be creative. Write your own stuff. Don't plagiarize from others, whether alive or dead, in the public domain or not. Let those who have been creative reap the rewards for their work.
    The point of copyright law is to encourage artists to create by letting them profit from their labor. Ultimately we all benefit from that creative incentive.


    Zephyr López Cervilla - Nope. You've been brainwashed by the media, the intellectual gang (curiously, the only ones who get some benefit), and the educational intitutions to believe so, but you're wrong. Plato wouldn't have been able to write about Socrates' philosophy, and Aristotle about Plato's work.
    We'd be better off without any kind of restriction.


    Val Wilson - ? not - the ability to profit from these IP works extends far beyond the lifetime of the creator. Why should a stranger be more entitled to benefit from someone else's work than an estate left for their own family? or a charity? IP is now being used in new ways, not considered before and so why the rush to declare it without value. Vintage movies are finding new life on streaming sites, digital media means that even a simple sketch can be used to create coloring pages or virtual stamp art or other creative media in the blink of an eye. If you don't create IP, why should you profit from another's work and creativity, let alone get it for free.


    Zephyr López Cervilla - Interestingly, abstract intellectual work (theories of Physics, Mathematical theorems, Economic models) isn't protected by IP rights and still you are benefiting from it. Should we charge all those so creative authors every time they mention any thing related to the Theory of Relativity, Quantum Physics or the Genetic Code in any of their magnificent movies?


    Zephyr López Cervilla - Miguel de Cervantes made a living writing novels and fictional short stories in the 17th century, and at that time there weren't copyright laws. In fact, another writer under the pseudonym Alonso Fernández de Avellaneda wrote a sequel of the first part of "El Quixote". Even Cervantes mentioned that sequel in his second part.
    BTW, Kafka couldn't make a living writing books, and despite so he wrote them anyway even though he had also to pay the bills. A similar case to van Gogh. In any of both cases the lack of protection by copyright is to blame.
    There are many other people who do intellectual work and don't have the exclusiveness of their work. Einstein devoted a lot of time to develop his Theory of Relativity, to discover the law of the photoelectric effect, Brownian motion etc., and yet he wasn't rewarded with any monopoly to explode that intellectual work. Could he made a living while he was at it? Nope, he had to work in a patent office. And later? Only indirectly, he was hired as a professor to give lectures and could work in theoretic physics, yet, without any exclusive right on his ideas.
    Frankly, I'm more concerned about all people losing their right to communicate and share information and knowledge, the kind of things that people have done since they people are people (and use their property as they see fit), than a bunch of people can make a living writing, taking pictures or filming. A natural universal right is always more important than the privilege of a minority.

    URL source post: https://plus.google.com/u/0/102774783758711593873/posts/4DRY51aJTiV

    Reshared text:
  • 2 plusses - 0 comments - 2 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-03-18 04:19:27
    RESHARE:
    choicematters.org - I Oppose Pelvic Politics And I Vote

    Excerpt from comments:

    Stephanie L Davis - I think my Libertarian leanings emerged from my Pro-Choice stance.

    Stephen Davis - +Stephanie L Davis I too have strong Libertarian leanings but happen to be on the Pro-Life side.

    Stephanie L Davis - We can agree to disagree. I can handle that +Stephen Davis :)

    Adam Wyson - I'm pro anything that doesn't force me to pay for other's mistakes. Abort babies all you want, don't make my tax dollars pay for it. Government needs to stay out of it.

    Stephen Davis - +Stephanie L Davis I can also agree to disagree at this point as nothing either of us says will change the other one. +Panah Rad as I have studied Libertarianism I have found good arguments on both sides of this one, it is not as clear as most issues, as some of us define the unborn as people. +Jacqueline Arsenault some of us live in countries that have government funded health care.

    Jacqueline Arsenault - Which countries' governments are currently and actively legislating away womens' rights over their own bodies?
    ---------------------------
    Zephyr López Cervilla - +Jacqueline Arsenault, Spain's government.
    ---------------------------
    Zephyr López Cervilla - +Stephanie L Davis +Stephen Davis, even in the case that conceptuses were people (in my opinion they're not), why should we force another person to feed them, take care of them for several months, and put her life, her health or her reproductive capacity at risk? The patients who are waiting for an organ transplant are certainly people and yet we don't force suitable donors to donate their organs so we can keep those patients alive. We don't even force people to become blood donors.
    ---------------------------
    Stephen Davis - +Zephyr López Cervilla it was me not +Stephanie L Davis (almost the same name I know) that said I consider the unborn to be people. Check your statistics it is abortion not natural childbirth that puts future reproductive capacity at risk. Like I said earlier I have heard good arguments on both sides. But to me the big difference is that we do not (at least yet) actively do something to end the life of the people waiting for organs or even blood. So in your opinion when does one become a person and why? My answer is at conception because everything required is there in the fertilized egg.
    ---------------------------
    Zephyr López Cervilla - +Stephen Davis:
    1. "to me the big difference is that we do not (at least yet) actively do something to end the life of the people waiting for organs or even blood."
    - The definition of "actively" is quite slippery. For instance, if you don't give food to a patient in coma, are you actively killing him?
    An abortion could perfectly consist in something like that. In fact, if a pregnant woman was fasting for enough time during the first months of her pregnancy, that would probably end up in miscarriage. Curiously, other mammals have adopted a similar strategy,
    a) female elks can reabsorb conceptuses under harsh living conditions,
    b) female bears carry fertilized eggs in their uterus for months but the zygotes won't be implanted if the female is underweight, or malnourished,
    c) gelada monkeys will abort their pregnancy spontaneously when new males take over a harem with pregnant females.

    2. "So in your opinion when does one become a person and why?"
    - There isn't a precise moment when an individual becomes a person. The formation of a person is more or less a continual process. A good analogy could be a large city. A house or a few houses aren't a big city, however the boundaries between hamlet, village, town and city are hard to establish and arbitrary. Yet, there's a clear difference between a hamlet with 5 buildings and New York City. Would you say that a hamlet is already a city?

    3. "My answer is at conception because everything required is there in the fertilized egg."
    - A fertilized egg doesn't contain everything required (I guess to become a person?). It requires of a big amount of matter that isn't present in the zygote, specificaly water, organic and inorganic matter, and a lot of energy to develop into a... much bigger and complex organism. And those elements that are missing are as essential as the other ones. But anyway, the potentiality of a thing isn't the thing itself, the future doesn't exist, only the present.

    Instead of trying to determine whether a conceptus is a person or not, I think that it's more productive to determine whether it requires rights or not, and for that it's necessary to focus on what is the purpose of rights, and where they come from.
    Some Christians like Ron Paul believe that God gave rights to people, but this was an unsatisfactory answer for me since I don't believe in the existence of God. I tried to figure that it could be an element of our instinctive social behavior, just like the concept of fairness, which has been demosntrated in babies of very young age.
    I asked about it to Stephan Kinsella and he gave me a much simpler explanation that doesn't rely on its origin but on its purpose:

    <<Even if there is a God he cannot create right and wrong. He cannot "give" rights.That does not solve the issue. Rights have no source. They do not "come from" anywhere. that is a positivist way of looking at it. Rights simply are a way of describing the fact that it is impossible for a person to argumentatively justify aggression, since argumentation is a peaceful activity that participants in already necessarily recognize as valuable.>>
    <<see blog.mises.org/18608/the-relation-between-the-non-aggression-principle-and-property-rights-a-response-to-division-by-zer0 Rights just describe what property borders are. Aggression is just an invasion of those borders>>
    Ref.: plus.google.com/u/0/107839603122535455846/posts/HgcguuQBG4P

    An excerpt from the page of that link:
    “So long as men desire to live together, no man may initiate — do you hear me? No man may start — the use of physical force against others.” ((Ayn Rand (Galt’s Speech, Atlas Shrugged, 1957).))

    So the ultimate purpose of rights is to prevent aggression so we can live together. Now the question is, can we live still together if some women decide to abort? Obviously not together with the aborted conceptuses but aborting women have no intention either. And with everybody else? In which way the existence of some women who abort makes our coexistence impossible? Who should be concerned for their loss other than their direct family. All the bonds that a conceptus has are with its mother.
    Likewise there's consensus to accept that the parents are entitled to decide how they raise and educate their children, perhaps we should accept that one of the parents, in this case its mother, is entitled to terminate her pregnancy at any point. She is just using her reproductive capacity as she sees fit, and reproductive capacity isn't only conception, it's mainly nurturing. As a matter of fact reproduction in many organisms doesn't involve conception (e.g., drones develop from non-fertilized eggs) but there's always a transfer of nutrients and energy from the progenitor to its offspring.

    Finally, I'll illustrate with another analogy how the conceptus' life shouldn't prevail over the mother's rights,

    Imagine a shipwreck in the 17th century. The only five survivors end up on the beach of a desert island, among them, a pregnant woman. They have no idea where they are other than on an island in the south of of the Pacific Ocean. During their stay she gives birth to a baby. After a couple of months they decide to build a raft. Two months later the raft is finished and ready to sail. However, as they expect that the journey will take many days they decide that the baby can't come with them, the baby could survive so many days at sea. She has only two options, to remain on the island for an indefinite period of time, but probably no less than several years, or otherwise leave the island without the baby. She decides to leave. Is she doing wrong? Must she give priority to her baby's life over her right to leave the island?
    ---------------------------

    URL source post: https://plus.google.com/u/0/115655034901162574758/posts/F8DAZfBCFEU

    Reshared text:
    Best one I've seen so far.
  • 3 plusses - 3 comments - 0 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-05-22 02:18:31
    RESHARE:
    phys.org - Research team claims to have found evidence Lake Cheko is impact crater for Tunguska Event
    By Bob Yirka. May 21, 2012

    phys.org/news/2012-05-team-evidence-lake-cheko-impact.html

    Comment:
    When I was child I became fascinated by this event after the first time I heard of it. I remember that one of the first computer programs I ever "wrote" was the copy of a short one that came in a newspaper to calculate the expected frequency and energy released by the impact of meteoroid ans comets of different sizes.

    Research article:
    - Gasperini L et al. Magnetic and seismic reflection study of Lake Cheko, a possible impact crater for the 1908 Tunguska Event. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, Vol. 13, Q05008, 12 pp., 2012. doi:10.1029/2012GC004054 (May 12, 2012)
    agu.org/pubs/crossref/2012/2012GC004054.shtml

    Abstract
    A major explosion occurred on 30 June 1908 in the Tunguska region of Siberia, causing the destruction of over 2,000 km2 of taiga; pressure and seismic waves detected as far as 1,000 km away; bright luminescence in the night skies of Northern Europe and Central Asia; and other unusual phenomena. This “Tunguska Event” is probably related to the impact with the Earth of a cosmic body that exploded about 5–10 km above ground, releasing in the atmosphere 10–15 Mton of energy. Fragments of the impacting body have never been found, and its nature (comet or asteroid) is still a matter of debate. We report here results from a magnetic and seismic reflection study of a small (∼500 m diameter) lake, Lake Cheko, located about 8 km NW of the inferred explosion epicenter, that was proposed to be an impact crater left by a fragment of the Tunguska Cosmic Body. Seismic reflection and magnetic data revealed a P wave velocity/magnetic anomaly close to the lake center, about 10 m below the lake floor; this anomaly is compatible with the presence of a buried stony object and supports the impact crater origin for Lake Cheko.
    -----------------------

    Note:
    The following aren't real pictures, probably a representation of the orography without the water of the lake and the surrounded trees by Luca Gasperini (University of Bologna):

    1. thunderbolts.info/tpod/2007/image07/070705lakecheko.jpg
    2. www.geotimes.org/feb08/article.html?id=nn_crater.html
    -----------------------

    Related informative articles:

    scientificamerican.com - The Tunguska Mystery (5 pages)
    By Luca Gasperini, Enrico Bonatti and Giuseppe Longo. May 19, 2008
    scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=the-tunguska-mystery

    geotimes.org - Long-lost Siberian crater found? (1 page)
    By Sadie MacMillan. February, 2008
    www.geotimes.org/feb08/article.html?id=nn_crater.html
    -----------------------

    URL source post: plus.google.com/102953679072375185491/posts/6wSgjvzqYSa

    Reshared text:
    Is Lake Cheko the impact crater for Tunguska Event?

    The cause of the Tunguska event is still unclear, yet most scientists seem to agree it was either a comet or meteoroid.

    An Italian research team now claims to have found evidence Lake Cheko is impact crater for Tunguska Event, which would make the cause a meteoroid. More here: http://phys.org/news/2012-05-team-evidence-lake-cheko-impact.html

    Lake Cheko on Google maps: http://goo.gl/SGpOV and in Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake_Cheko

    More info here: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-3121.2008.00792.x/pdf and here http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-3121.2009.00906.x/pdf

    #science #tunguska #ScienceEveryday
  • 2 plusses - 2 comments - 1 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-04-22 20:09:00
    RESHARE:
    2-minute Interview to Kimi Räikkönen after F1 2012 Bahrain GP
    April 22, 2012

    Comment:
    Lotus F1 must be the most effective F1 team at present. Despite of only a few secondary sponsors (the contract with Lotus Cars already ended last month) and without any official maker support (unlike Ferrari or Mercedes) they have managed to have 2 competitive cars consistently for the first 4 GP.

    Reshared text:
    Kimi Raikkonen: "I should have won..."

    #f1 #formula1 #formulaone #raikkonen #bahraingp
  • 2 plusses - 2 comments - 1 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-09-10 05:31:59
    newscientist.com - Why Haven't Bald Men Gone Extinct?
    By Rob Dunn. June 21, 2012

    URL original article:
    newscientist.com/article/mg21428692.100-why-havent-bald-men-gone-extinct.html 
    URL copy of the manuscript: 
    http://stirling-westrup-tt.blogspot.com.es/2012/06/tt-ns-2869-why-havent-bald-men-gone.html 

    Related papers published in specialized journals:

    Action mechanism: 

    - Garza LA et al. Prostaglandin D2 inhibits hair growth and is elevated in bald scalp of men with androgenetic alopecia. Science Translational Medicine (2012) vol. 4 (126) pp. 126ra34

    Free PDF original paper: 
    hopkinsmedicine.org/dermatology/news/2012_stm_garza.pdf 
    Author manuscript in PubMed Central: ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3319975 
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22440736 

    George Cotsarelis' webpage: 
    uphs.upenn.edu/dermatol/faculty/cotsarelis.html
    _________________ 

    - Garza LA et al. Bald scalp in men with androgenetic alopecia retains hair follicle stem cells but lacks CD200-rich and CD34-positive hair follicle progenitor cells. J Clin Invest (2011) vol. 121 (2) pp. 613-22
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1172/JCI44478 
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3026732 
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21206086 

    - Festa E et al. Adipocyte lineage cells contribute to the skin stem cell niche to drive hair cycling. Cell (2011) vol. 146 (5) pp. 761-71
    Free PDF:
    yale.edu/horsley/Publications_files/Cell%202011%20Festa.pdf 
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3298746 
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21884937 

    - Yip L et al. Role of genetics and sex steroid hormones in male androgenetic alopecia and female pattern hair loss: an update of what we now know. Australas J Dermatol (2011) vol. 52 (2) pp. 81-8
    http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1440-0960.2011.00745.x/full 
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21605090 

    - Hillmer AM et al. Genetic variation in the human androgen receptor gene is the major determinant of common early-onset androgenetic alopecia. The American Journal of Human Genetics (2005) vol. 77 (1) pp. 140-8
    cell.com/AJHG/retrieve/pii/S0002929707609100 
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1226186 
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15902657 

    - Hillmer AM et al. Genome-wide scan and fine-mapping linkage study of androgenetic alopecia reveals a locus on chromosome 3q26. American Journal of Human Genetics (2008) vol. 82 (3) pp. 737-43
    cell.com/AJHG/retrieve/pii/S0002929708001419 
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2427264 
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18304493 

    Function:

    - Kabai P. Androgenic alopecia may have evolved to protect men from prostate cancer by increasing skin exposure to ultraviolet radiation. Med Hypotheses (2008) vol. 70 (5) pp. 1038-40
    Free PDF: behav.org/kabai/abstracts/kabai_alopecia_prostate_cancer.pdf 
    www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306987707005427 
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17910907 

    - Li R et al. Six novel susceptibility Loci for early-onset androgenetic alopecia and their unexpected association with common diseases. PLoS Genet (2012) vol. 8 (5) pp. e1002746
    plosgenetics.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pgen.1002746 
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22693459 

    Papers with restricted access:

    - Sigelman L et al. Hair loss and electability: The bald truth. J Nonverbal Behav (1990) vol. 14 (4) pp. 269-283
    www.springerlink.com/content/tw306tl825061558 

    - Muscarella F and Cunningham MR. The Evolutionary Significance and Social Perception of Male Pattern Baldness and Facial Hair. Ethology and Sociobiology (1996) vol. 17 (2) pp. 99–117
    www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0162309595001301 

    Hair growth in vitro:

    - Lindner G et al. De novo formation and ultra-structural characterization of a fiber-producing human hair follicle equivalent in vitro. J Biotechnol (2011) vol. 152 (3) pp. 108-12
    www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168165611000630 
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21277344 
    _________________ 

    Related articles in newspapers and popular journals:

    nytimes.com - A War on Baldness, Fought in the Follicle
    By Anne Eisenberg._ July 28, 2012 
    nytimes.com/2012/07/29/business/baldness-battle-fought-in-the-follicle.html 
    Lipid compound that suppresses hair growth in mice and men suggests treatment target.

    nature.com - Clues to the cause of male pattern baldness
    By Melissa Lee Phillips.  March, 21 2012
    nature.com/news/clues-to-the-cause-of-male-pattern-baldness-1.10277 
    Lipid compound that suppresses hair growth in mice and men suggests treatment target.

    medicinenet.com - The Sweet Hair After
    By Daniel DeNoon (WebMD Feature) September 29, 2003 
    Reviewed By Brunilda Nazario_
    www.medicinenet.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=52272 
    Future Hair-Loss Treatments Promise What's not Hair Today will Be Hair Tomorrow

    stemcellbaldnesscures.com - Will New Prostaglandin Creams Be New Hair Loss Products
    By Julian Phillips
    http://stemcellbaldnesscures.com/hair-loss-products/will-new-prostaglandin-creams-be-new-hair-loss-products 

    straightdope.com - Is male pattern baldness inherited? Who's to blame?
    By Cecil Adams. August 19, 2005
    straightdope.com/columns/read/2610/is-male-pattern-baldness-inherited-whos-to-blame 

    23andme.com - 23andMe’s Latest Publication Shines Light on Male Pattern Baldness and Unexpected Associations with Disease
    By DaveH. June 18, 2012
    http://spittoon.23andme.com/23andme-research/23andmes-latest-publication-shines-light-on-male-pattern-baldness-and-unexpected-associations-with-disease 

    hairsite.com - Cotsarelis - "Cure in two years." (Hair Loss Research & Clinical Trials)
    By dastardly. August 19, 2012
    hairsite.com/hair-loss/forum_entry-id-108299-page-0-category-1-order-last_answer.html 

    sciencedaily.com - Tendency To Hair Loss Inherited From The Mother
    May 20, 2005
    sciencedaily.com/releases/2005/05/050520172151.htm 

    [poorly written]
    australianscience.com.au - The Evolutionary Significance and Social Perception of Male Pattern Baldness and Facial Hair
    By Josip Ivanovic. October 27, 2011
    australianscience.com.au/health/the-evolutionary-significance-and-social-perception-of-male-pattern-baldness-and-facial-hair 

    Layman's forums: 

    http://immortalhair.forumandco.com/t7262-prostaglandin-d2-inhibits-hair-growth-and-is-elevated-in-bald-scalp-of-men-with-androgenetic-alopecia 

    hairlosshelp.com/forums/messageview.cfm?catid=10&threadid=100735 

    guardian.co.uk/notesandqueries/query/0,,-192228,00.html 

    http://gizmodo.com/5920166/why-havent-bald-men-gone-extinct 
    ________________________ 
  • 1 plusses - 3 comments - 1 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-03-23 09:28:50
    RESHARE:
    Why Does a Salad Cost More Than a Big Mac?

    Federal Subsidies for Food Production, 1995-2005* Vs.
    Federal Nutrition Recommendations

    Comment:
    Who took this image should have left the reference to the sources.
    Anyway, it' well known that the grain used to feed farm animals is subsidized, that's one of the reasons meet production is so cheap, here it is the other one, the meat production is also directly subsidized. Another good reason to take the money of the Government out of the markets. Besides any subsidy represents an unfair competition to those who aren't subsidized, in this case, farmers who produce vegetables and fruits and farmers from countries that can afford subsidize their national production, that is, developing countries.
    It's funny that salt is recommended when salt is almost everywhere and most people always take too much rather than too people. I have never heard of a documented case of someone suffering from chronic hyponatremia. I guess they included it because in the US most of the land is poor in iodide and to prevent goitre they decided to add it to the common salt (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iodized_salt), but there are many other alternative ways to supplement iodide, and if you eat marine fish, seafood, or algae from time to time, say a couple of times a week you'll have more than enough.

    URL source post: https://plus.google.com/u/0/114496611785749155087/posts/6pNaCwrJY34

    Reshared text:
  • 1 plusses - 3 comments - 1 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-11-04 17:13:30
    RESHARE:
    plus.google.com - UTC Now!
    Uploaded by Kai Saffron. November 4, 2012
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coordinated_Universal_Time 

    Further reading/watching:

    - Grey, C.G.P. Daylight Saving Time Explained . YouTube, CGPGrey Channel. Oct 24, 2011
    Source: 
    - Grey, C.G.P. Daylight Saving Time Explained. Grey's Blog (Colin Gregory Palmer Grey). Oct 24, 2011
    blog.cgpgrey.com/daylight-saving-time-explained 

    References:

    - Rasmussen Reports Staff. 47% Don’t Think Daylight Saving Time Worth the Hassle. Rasmussen Reports. March 13, 2010
    rasmussenreports.com/public_content/lifestyle/general_lifestyle/march_2010/47_don_t_think_daylight_saving_time_worth_the_hassle 

    - Wright, Tony. Daylight Savings Time costs the United States $480,000,000. RescueTime. March 11, 2009
    blog.rescuetime.com/2009/03/11/daylight-savings-time-costs-the-united-states-480000000 

    - Hudson, George V. On Seasonal Time. Transactions and Proceedings of the Royal Society of New Zealand (1898) vol. 31 (Art. 63) pp. 578-583
    rsnz.natlib.govt.nz/volume/rsnz_31/rsnz_31_00_008570.html 
    PDF: rsnz.natlib.govt.nz/volume/rsnz_31/rsnz_31_00_008570.pdf 
    ________________ 

    URL related G+ posts: 
    plus.google.com/110240143550654748022/posts/1jcEJBcWGCg 
    plus.google.com/114605547533973731226/posts/2wi5S3UF7gc 
    plus.google.com/u/0/+TreyRatcliff/posts/g3aU4CmsK1z 

    huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/03/daylight-saving-time-2012-sleep-mood_n_2058154.html 

    URL source G+ post: plus.google.com/103673601952617127321/posts/ddEMVCSMvtV 
    ______________________ 

    Reshared text:
    #DaylightSavingsTime   #DrWho  
  • 4 plusses - 1 comments - 0 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-04-30 01:41:27
    RESHARE:
    Night in the Consulting Room

    Night in the Consulting Room
    Chaise longue: "Ugh! What an awful day."
    Chair: "Was it?"
    Chaise longue: "You've got it easy. I'm the one with people weeping and moaning all over me."
    Chair: "I see..."
    Chaise longue: "You're doing it again!"
    Chair: "No I'm not."
    Chaise longue: "You are! You're talking just like him. You're not a therapist! You're a chair!"
    Chair: "I'm sensing a lot of hostility here."

    URL via post (limited): plus.google.com/116930595742991881922/posts/aZZMbfTgCJk

    Reshared text:
  • 4 plusses - 1 comments - 0 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-10-08 17:09:21
    RESHARE:
    cleantechnica.com - “ebuggy” EV Battery Trailer Blazes a Shortcut to Affordable Electric Vehicles
    By Tina Casey. September 19, 2012

    Comment:
    This seems a outsourced derivative of the hot swappable battery concept, since a trailer could be easily replaced by another one with charged batteries to extend the range of the vehicle without having to wait to recharge them. 
    Better than renting the trailer would be the development of a chain of relay stations to supply trailers with their batteries recharged as soon as you run out of battery.
    Alternatively, a rental plan of swappable batteries that included the replacement of damaged batteries and to phase out obsolescent technology.
    The integration of swappable battery modules in the same automobile seems a more efficient alternative but battery trailers may be still the only option when there're no battery replacements available during long trips.

    I wonder what is the weight of this trailer and how much it can extend the range of your EV.
    ____________________ 

    Excerpt:
    <<The trailer arrangement enables car buyers to go for a relatively low-cost EV with a small, lightweight battery for local driving (where range is not an issue). To go on a long trip, all they have to do is stop by the local ebuggy station, hitch up a trailer with a much larger battery>>

    <<For even longer trips, ebuggy envisions a network of relay stations where EV drivers can drop off a spent trailer and hitch up a fresh one, also within just a couple of minutes.

    That makes things a bit more complicated, but it wouldn’t necessarily put a crimp on the market. In fact, the EV battery relay/exchange concept is already starting to take hold as an alternative to charging stations. The EV battery company Better Place, for example, has been ramping up the introduction of a fully automated drive-through “experience,” where EV owners can switch out their spent batteries in a matter of minutes rather than waiting around for a recharge.

    For even longer trips, ebuggy envisions a network of relay stations where EV drivers can drop off a spent trailer and hitch up a fresh one, also within just a couple of minutes.

    That makes things a bit more complicated, but it wouldn’t necessarily put a crimp on the market. In fact, the EV battery relay/exchange concept is already starting to take hold as an alternative to charging stations. The EV battery company Better Place (cleantechnica.com/2011/12/14/better-place-electric-vehicle-battery-switchout-is-easy-in-china), for example, has been ramping up the introduction of a fully automated drive-through “experience,” where EV owners can switch out their spent batteries in a matter of minutes rather than waiting around for a recharge.>>

    <<In terms of EV design, the ebuggy concept offers a higher degree of leeway to EV manufacturers, which would be freed up to devote more talent on developing super lightweight, inexpensive EVs for local driving rather than having to accommodate larger, heavier batteries.

    The folks at ebuggy also point out that the trailer concept provides a two-for-one deal, by providing EV owners with both a short-range and a long-range option in one car.>>
    ____________________ 

    via +Seppo Alaruikka 
    URL via G+ post: plus.google.com/105879309798956721686/posts/8Jm5sRa7VB7 
    URL source G+ post: plus.google.com/102291313118764969093/posts/EXFc3Gnqyfo 
    ________________________ 

    Reshared text:
  • 1 plusses - 5 comments - 0 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-06-19 04:57:41
    RESHARE:
    uk.ign.com - Microsoft Unveils Microsoft Surface Tablet
    By Nic Vargus. June 18, 2012

    uk.ign.com/articles/2012/06/18/microsoft-unveils-microsoft-surface-tablet

    Comment:
    This kind of keyboard is not the way to go. In 5 year's time nobody will use on tablets neither physical keyboards like this nor on-screen keyboards as we know them. 
    The answer are Kinect alternatives like the Leap (Introducing the Leap) and some patents filed by Apple (appleinsider.com/articles/11/12/08/apple_exploring_kinect_like_3d_input_for_controlling_macs.html from mobiledia.com/news/120854.html) which will be able to detect the movement of your fingers in any position. Then the device will interpret almost instantaneously what you're pretending to type on the air, on improvised surfaces, or even on an edge of your tablet. 
    First, each user will calibrate the device by type a certain text so that the device can learn each individual's characteristic movements. This means you'll have the option to replace the standard typing movements with new ones optimized to this new platform.

    URL source post: plus.google.com/100801061924982065053/posts/FGvUyPt86Uq

    Reshared text:
    Microsoft unveils the Surface Tablet! Whaddya think? http://go.ign.com/KgyTWX
  • 1 plusses - 5 comments - 0 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2011-12-04 20:43:42
    I've embedded this video because I found it funny. It's supposed to be critical against Ron Paul's candidature for the presidency, but for some odd reason it seems to cause the opposite effect. Perhaps the performer ( The Amazing Atheist ) of this video professes an unconfessable devotion for Ron Paul like those of whom he mocks.
    In any case, under AA's point of view Ron Paul isn't a good alternative because:

    1) He is anti-abortion (although he's committed not to get involved and give each State its constitutional right to legislate on the subject).

    2) He doesn't believe in Evolution (again, he's committed to close the US Department of Education, so what is tought in the public schools will exclusively depend on the education policy of each state).

    3) He's commited to deregulate the market and shrink significantly the Federal Government expenses by supressing several departments and reducing Federal responsibilities to balance the national budget.

    I don't agree with RP's opinion on 1) and 2). I'm pro-choice and I think that the Theory of Evolution has been widely backed up with experimental evidence. In fact, it's the central paradigm that gives sense and helps explain at a molecular level the way that the different structures and enzymes of living organisms are generated, as well as many of the processes and other phenomena of life. In spite of that, I respect the right of RP to privately keep religious beliefs that have been contradicted by scientific evidence. I'm an atheist. By the time I was born my parents, of Catholic origin, had been non-believers in the previous 20 years. I wasn't baptized so technically I'm not even a Christian. To me having religious beliefs is hard to understand. Still, if I had to distrust every person who keeps irrational beliefs I couldn't trust in hardly anyone, including myself.

    As for his anti-abortion stance, even though I don't agree with him I understand his rejection to determine a point in which a human embryo should be considered already a person. The fact is that there's no clear boundary, the development of a human being is a gradual process and there's no clear definition of what it should be considered as a person or what it shouldn't other than the requirement of being a human being at some phase of its development.

    In my opinion, the development of the mind is the essential trait to decide whether a human being is a person. If we accept brain death as the end of a person even if other parts of its body can be kept alive, why shouldn't we apply the same criterion to decide when a conglomerate of human cells attains person status? Without any nerve system and any brain activity, a human embryo is intellectually at the same level to a human being whose brain is already dead.
    A matter for another debate is whether we should impose a person a temporary servitude to keep another person alive. On that basis we should also force everyone to donate blood and their non-essential organs to save other people's lives.

    Unlike AA, I strongly agree with Ron Paul on 3). In fact, this is the main reason I support his candidacy.
    I support the moral superiority and I believe in the effectiveness of the basic ideals of Classic Liberalism and the Austrian School of Economic Thought: limited government, constitutionalism, rule of law, due process, and liberty of individuals.
    The interventionism of the State in the market other than ensuring free competition has repeatedly demonstrated to be inefficient due to malinvestment. Likewise, monetarist policies can cause a distortion in the real value of goods and services.

    Thanks to +Owen McNamara for the link to the video.
    URL source post: https://plus.google.com/u/0/101355972096514481661/posts/1pr5sytLiRn
    CULT of Ron Paul
  • 1 plusses - 5 comments - 0 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2013-01-27 04:58:37
    RESHARE:
    theatlantic.com - The Never-Before-Told Story of the World's First Computer Art (It's a Sexy Dame)
    By Benj Edwards. January 24, 2013
    theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2013/01/the-never-before-told-story-of-the-worlds-first-computer-art-its-a-sexy-dame/267439 

    Comment:
    For some reason when I read this article it reminded me of Stanley Kubrick's "Dr. Strangelove" (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dr._Strangelove)

    Pic (IBM 7090 console): 
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Dr._Strangelove_-_Group_Captain_Lionel_Mandrake.png 

    IBM - SAGE Computer Ad (1960)
    IBM Sage Computer Ad, 1960 

    Further reading:

    UNCLE, SAGE, SABRE, Strangelove & Tulsa: Connections
    tulsatvmemories.com/sabre.html 

    SAGE A/N FSQ-7   NORAD Computer
    smecc.org/sage_a_n_fsq-7.htm 
    ______________ 

    URL source G+ post: 
    plus.google.com/104765717987042844598/posts/AooDZdcHkQg 
    ______________ 

    Reshared text:
    Computer Art History

    Let's see - what would one of the first uses of a computer display be back in the 1950s when a computer cost nearly a quarter of a billion dollars?

    But even if the images weren't totally above board, they encountered little to no resistance among the ranks. "It was an all male enterprise at that time," recalls Tipton, speaking of the late 1950s. "There were a few women in the Air Force upstairs in the control center, but at that time of life, you know, there wasn't as much controversy."
  • 3 plusses - 0 comments - 1 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2013-01-27 02:51:49
    dilbert.com - Accurate Numbers
    by Scott Adams. May 8, 2008
    dilbert.com/strips/comic/2008-05-08 

    Dilbert: "I didn't have any accurate numbers so I just made up this one."
    $4,629,873
    Dilbert: "Studies have shown that accurate numbers aren't any more useful than the ones you make up."
    Attendant: "How many studies showed that?"
    Dilbert: "Eighty-seven."

    Related G+ post: 
    plus.google.com/110969448173982102496/posts/6QD25hBzZLW 
    ___________
  • 3 plusses - 0 comments - 1 shares | Read in G+
  • Zephyr López Cervilla2012-10-12 19:21:56
    youtube.com - Memorable Monologues: George Carlin - Saving the Planet

    "Save the trees, save the bees, save the whales, save those snails." (1:22
     — George Carlin - Saving the Planet 

    Script excerpt: 
    goodreads.com/quotes/251836-we-re-so-self-important-everybody-s-going-to-save-something-now-save 
    ____________
  • 3 plusses - 0 comments - 1 shares | Read in G+